Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:42:07.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Demystifying Reviewing: The Whys and Hows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2023

Celeste Montoya Open the ORCID record for Celeste Montoya [Opens in a new window]
Celeste Montoya*
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Boulder, USA
*
Email: celeste.montoya@colorado.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Peer review is a key component of academic publishing, meant to maintain the integrity of the process. Peer reviewers help editors evaluate research—assessing the quality, validity, and original contribution of manuscripts submitted for publication. At its best, peer review can also help raise the quality of published research by providing authors with constructive expert feedback that helps them further develop and polish their project and its presentation.

Type
Critical Perspectives Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 2023 , pp. 625 - 629
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Women, Gender, and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sundström, Aksel. 2023. “Responding to Reviewers: Guidelines and Advice.” Politics & Gender. DOI: 10.1017/S1743923X23000168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar