Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter April 28, 2023

Towards chiral acoustoplasmonics

  • Beatriz Castillo López de Larrinzar , Chushuang Xiang , Edson Rafael Cardozo de Oliveira , Norberto Daniel Lanzillotti-Kimura ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Antonio García-Martín ORCID logo EMAIL logo
From the journal Nanophotonics

Abstract

The possibility of creating and manipulating nanostructured materials encouraged the exploration of new strategies to control electromagnetic properties. Among the most intriguing nanostructures are those that respond differently to helical polarization, i.e., exhibit chirality. Here, we present a simple structure based on crossed elongated bars where light-handedness defines the dominating cross-section absorption or scattering, with a 200 % difference from its counterpart (scattering or absorption). The proposed chiral system opens the way to enhanced coherent phonon excitation and detection. We theoretically propose a simple coherent phonon generation (time-resolved Brillouin scattering) experiment using circularly polarized light. In the reported structures, the generation of acoustic phonons is optimized by maximizing the absorption, while the detection is enhanced at the same wavelength and different helicity by engineering the scattering properties. The presented results constitute one of the first steps towards harvesting chirality effects in the design and optimization of efficient and versatile acoustoplasmonic transducers.

1 Introduction

Objects are considered chiral when their mirror images cannot be superimposed, even after spatial rotations in three dimensions. Their relevance is such that they are critical in life systems since biologically relevant molecules are predominantly chiral (proteins, amino acids, etc.) [1]. Handedness (right vs. left, dextro vs. levo) identifies the two different enantiomers in a chiral structure, and it is the crucial element determining how systems interact with their environment [2].

Electromagnetic fields can be made to exhibit chirality, handedness, or helicity, as in the simplest case of circularly polarized light. Circularly polarized light can be used to probe and determine the chiral nature of molecules or other human-made structures. Normally, the chiral nature of the structure is reflected as quantitative differences in the values of the absorption or scattering cross-sections. Only recently, it has been put forward that it is possible to find helicity-dependent absorption resonances while the scattering remains essentially helicity-independent [3]. Our work demonstrates that, through the interactions between different elements, it is possible to make the absorption and scattering cross-sections radically and qualitatively different for the two circular polarizations. Even more, we show that the dominating cross-section can be switched from absorption to scattering by simply changing the polarization of the impinging beam.

The possibility of using plasmonic structures has recently appeared as a suitable tool in nanophononics [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. For instance, the use of plasmonic metasurfaces to generate tunable acoustic phonons, the use of Swiss cross antennae to spatially probe strain distributions at the nanoscale, or the control of transmission of acoustic waves using tailored antennae are just examples of applications where plasmonics meets nanomechanics.

The main limitation in developing photonic applications based on plasmonic resonances is optical losses (a.k.a. absorption). Interestingly, the generation of coherent acoustic phonons is strongly dependent on the coupling of the incident light and, generally, how much it is absorbed [4, 5, 7, 8, 13]. Likewise, the capacity to detect coherent acoustic vibrations in plasmonic structures relies on the scattering cross-section. To maximize the performance it is necessary to comply with two conditions: maximum absorption and minimum scattering for excitation, and the reverse for detection [14]. These conditions are not usually found to occur simultaneously at the same wavelength.

Therefore, having handedness-dependent absorption and scattering cross-sections unlocks an invaluable tool to decouple the generation and detection of coherent acoustic phonons in nanostructures. The use of chiral acousto-plasmonic structures appears as a potential game-changer in developing a novel generation of phononic transducers. This is precisely the core of the present work, where we examine a simple chiral structure composed of two resonant interacting elements stacked vertically [15], so that the chiral characteristics can be tuned via their mutual interactions. The system is yet maintained simple enough to understand the actual nature of the response observed, be open to future developments, and warrant fabrication for future experimental verification. We will show that this chiral plasmonic structure exhibits critical characteristics to be used as the basis of future ultrafast acousto-plasmonic devices, where light-handedness can be employed to discriminate generation and detection processes of coherent acoustic phonons. In short, we seek to develop structures with the dominance of absorption or scattering in the cross-sections depending on the handedness of the incident radiation.

The paper is organized as follows: in Section 2 we introduce the rotated bars platform as a fundamental yet simple chiral plasmonic structure and the chiral characteristics from the handedness-dependent optical response; in Section 3 we propose the use of these structures to generate and detect acoustic phonons, where circular polarization plays a key role in enhancing the signals; and finally, in Section 4, we present the conclusions and perspectives.

2 The chiral optical platform

The key idea is to have a system composed of as few elements as possible, with the constraint imposed by the fact that the mirror image cannot be superimposed with itself (i.e., geometrically chiral). Likely, the simplest version [16] of such a system is composed of two dissimilar metallic nanoplates with the long axis parallel to the polarization plane forming a given angle between them (45° throughout this work) and vertically aligned perpendicular to the propagation direction of the impinging wave. As it is most usual in plasmonics, the metal to be employed is gold, and the dimensions of the plates are chosen so that each one of them separately has resonances in the Vis-NIR range of the electromagnetic spectrum, (see Figure 1). The bottom bar, always in contact with a SiO2 (n = 1.456) substrate, has a thickness H = 10 nm, a length L = 260 nm, and a width of W1 = 130 nm. The top bar has the same H and L, but the width is W2 = 65 nm. This asymmetry in the width is introduced to mimic the profiles obtained from actual lithographic procedures [17], [18], [19]. In addition, it would allow fine-tuning over the spectral positions of the two resonances.

Figure 1: 
Composition of the chiral geometry. (a) Sketch of the geometrical layout of the chiral structure depicting the dimensions of the bars (H, L, W1, W2) and the separation distance (D), the angle is set to 45°. Scattering and absorption cross-sections for circularly polarized waves of the (isolated) top (b) and bottom (c) bars, showing that each bar leads to two different resonances per helicity.
Figure 1:

Composition of the chiral geometry. (a) Sketch of the geometrical layout of the chiral structure depicting the dimensions of the bars (H, L, W1, W2) and the separation distance (D), the angle is set to 45°. Scattering and absorption cross-sections for circularly polarized waves of the (isolated) top (b) and bottom (c) bars, showing that each bar leads to two different resonances per helicity.

The numerical simulations have been performed using a commercial Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) solver for Maxwell’s equations (Lumerical). The material Au properties are taken from the Lumerical’s embedded database [20], thus explicitly taking into account intrinsic losses and complex electromagnetic fields. We use an impinging plane wave with the proper polarization along the z-axis (perpendicular to the bars interaction axis) of unit amplitude in the whole simulation cell. The geometry of the cell (2.1 μm × 2.1 μm × 5 μm) ensures that perfectly absorbing boundary conditions do have a negligible effect on the electromagnetic fields obtained. We use a refined mesh in the nanostructures and in near field region (0.3 μm × 0.3 μm × 0.17 μm) of 1 nm × 1 nm × 0.75 nm, dx-dy-dz, respectively, growing uniformly up to a maximum of 15 nm out of the nearfield close to the simulation boundaries, so that convergence (to the best of our numerical capabilities) is attained. The refined mesh in the near field region equals a minimum of 500 points per wavelength in each direction. The total and scattered fields are then collected to give rise to the intensity color maps and the cross-sections. All fields are normalized to the amplitude of the impinging plane wave.

Figure 1(a) and (b) present the scattering cross sections of each of the nanoplates in the absence of the other one, but in presence of the substrate, as a function of the wavelength under the incidence of a circularly polarized wave. As in the isolated case, none of the plates has any helicity dependence the two circular polarizations report the same results. The observed peaks represent the wavelengths for which a resonance of the individual nanoplate is excited, which are essentially four, corresponding to the long- and short-axis resonances in the pure helicity basis of circular polarization. Therefore, when the separating distance makes the two elements interact, the resulting scenario would be the complex mixing of four resonant modes, as pointed out in ref. [21] where a similar, somehow less anisotropic system, is decomposed in Mie multipoles.

When the two bars are superimposed, i.e., D = 0 forming a planar system, the system is essentially a single anisotropic unit. Both absorption and scattering cross-sections (CS) for incoming Left Circular Polarized (LCP) or Right Circular Polarized (RCP) waves are expected to present two peaks, and the differences between the two polarizations are negligible. When the two bars are vertically displaced, D > 0, the interaction between the near-field of each bar at resonance gives rise to hybrid states whose spectral position depends on the interaction (i.e., on D), thus allowing control over the overall response of the system in terms of CS. This effect is nicely depicted in Figure 2, where we can observe two different resonant regions. The resonance located at ca. 875 nm presents a clear dominance of absorption versus scattering for the two helicities, and no significant differences for LCP or RCP can be found. For the resonances located ca. 1.4 μm there is a rich phenomenology due to interactions (see below). When the separation increases the field overlap decreases rapidly [22, 23], reaching a value from which the interaction can be regarded as negligible, and therefore the observed peaks closely represent the linear addition of the resonances of the two individual bars (see Figure 1).

Figure 2: 
Effect of the separation D of the bars (interaction) for the absorption (bottom) and scattering cross-sections (top) for the two helicities, left- and right-circular polarization, of the impinging plane wave.
Figure 2:

Effect of the separation D of the bars (interaction) for the absorption (bottom) and scattering cross-sections (top) for the two helicities, left- and right-circular polarization, of the impinging plane wave.

In Figure 3 we present selected curves extracted from Figure 2 for vertical separations of (a) 10 nm, and (b) 60 nm. In (a) the separation is too short to appreciate significant differences between the two impinging helicities and we can see that scattering dominates clearly over absorption. However, in (b) the situation is radically different: for RCP there is a clear dominance of the scattering over absorption CS (close to a factor of 2), while for LCP the situation is reversed, absorption CS is predominant. Especially interesting is the point at ca. 1.36 μm, where a sweet point can be observed in which the scattering CS for RCP is dominant and equivalent to the absorption CS for LCP, which is dominant for that polarization.

Figure 3: 
Absorption and scattering cross-sections (structures over a substrate, but separated by air as in Figure 2), for an edge-to-edge distance (a) 10 nm and (b) 60 nm. The grey shadow area is to reflect the frequency region where the effects take place.
Figure 3:

Absorption and scattering cross-sections (structures over a substrate, but separated by air as in Figure 2), for an edge-to-edge distance (a) 10 nm and (b) 60 nm. The grey shadow area is to reflect the frequency region where the effects take place.

So far we have presented the phenomenon we were looking for, but with air between the bars. This configuration allowed us to keep the geometry and environment as simple as possible. However, the experimental situation would require the top plate to be fabricated over a solid layer. As the effect of a different dielectric environment (n > 1) would be to modify the evanescent fields and the resonance, a similar effect would require different bar-to-bar distances. In Figure 4 we present a similar geometry as before but with the bottom bar embedded in SiO2, n = 1.5, and when the distance between the bars is D = 80 nm. It is apparent that the overall physical picture previously discussed remains valid, but there is a red-shift in the location of the resonances due to the higher refractive index of the environment. Naturally, the sweet point also experiments a red-shift, from 1.36 μm to 1.43 μm.

Figure 4: 
Absorption and scattering cross-sections when the bottom bar is fully embedded in SiO2 and the top bar sits on the surface of SiO2, and the separation distance is D = 80 nm. As can be seen the same qualitative phenomenology as in Figure 3 is obtained.
Figure 4:

Absorption and scattering cross-sections when the bottom bar is fully embedded in SiO2 and the top bar sits on the surface of SiO2, and the separation distance is D = 80 nm. As can be seen the same qualitative phenomenology as in Figure 3 is obtained.

3 Time-resolved Brillouin scattering enabled by chirality

When considering high-frequency acoustic phonons, that is, with frequencies higher than a few gigahertz, the use of Brillouin scattering [24] and coherent phonon generation [25, 26] techniques become the standard experimental characterization tools [27], [28], [29]. Let us consider the particular case of an impulsive excitation of coherent acoustic phonons in a metallic bar nanoantenna [9]. In this case, an ultrafast -femtosecond or picosecond- pulsed laser impinges the plasmonic structure. If the incident polarization matches the main axis and the wavelength matches the resonant wavelength of the antenna, then a longitudinal plasmon is excited. This process takes place in the femtosecond timescale. The excited longitudinal plasmon will eventually decay – lose its coherence, thus inducing a rise in temperature with a spatial profile quite similar to that of the plasmon. The decay of the plasmon takes place in the picosecond timescale. The temperature rise has an associated thermal expansion of the antenna that evolves in time as a combination of the time evolutions of the vibrational eigenmodes. Note that the excitation process is intimately related to the initially excited plasmon. If the incident laser pulse has the wrong polarization or wavelength, the plasmon is not excited, and consequently, the coherent phonons are not efficiently generated [7].

In a bar with a length of approximately 100 nm, the longitudinal acoustic mode frequency will be around 15 GHz, but several other modes can be excited in the system. This frequency range has an associated period of tens of ps. The acoustic phonons induce two effects in the nanoantenna: (i) they modulate its shape, and size and (ii) they modulate the electronic density and thus the dielectric constant. Both effects result in the modulation of the optical response of the system. By sending a second, delayed in time, ultrafast laser pulse (probe) it is possible to measure the instantaneous optical state of the system. And by tuning the delay between pump and probe pulses and performing multiple experiments, it is possible to reproduce the time evolution of the reflectivity. As with the generation of phonons, the sensitivity of this measurement is also determined by the plasmonic properties of the system. It is a necessary condition that the probe laser couples to a plasmonic mode, and that the spatial profile of this plasmonic mode overlaps with the spatial profile of the considered acoustic phonons. In other words, the probe reflectivity senses only variations of the plasmonic modes to which it is coupled. The only condition imposed on the excitation pulse is that its duration should be shorter than a half period of the studied acoustic modes, to allow an impulsive excitation. Considering fs/ps laser pulses largely complies with this condition. In such a coherent phonon generation-detection experiment, the maximum generation is usually associated with the maximum absorption, while the best condition for detection is at the flank of an optical mode. In trivial optical resonators, such as micropillar microcavities or nanobar antennas, these two conditions -associated with the same optical resonance- cannot be achieved at the same wavelength. In this work, we report on a structure in that absorption and scattering channels can be well separated at the same wavelength by using the appropriate helicity.

As it was explained before, to enhance the signals in this kind of time-resolved Brillouin scattering experiments, two conditions have to be simultaneously fulfilled: (i) have an enhanced absorption and minimum scattering for the generation, and (ii) present an enhanced scattering cross-section and minimal absorption for the detection of phonons. Two strategies are usually used to reach these conditions, the chromatic separation of pump-probe laser beams with the drawback of using two different ultrafast lasers or to use cross-polarized beams preventing the simultaneous optimization in simple systems.

We propose using the impinging radiation helicity to perform coherent phonon generation experiments in chiral plasmonic structures. We have shown that the structure of the twisted bar structure presents a strong chiral behavior. In the considered system, for a wavelength of 1360 nm, LCP light presents a strong absorption cross-section and attenuated scattering, while for RCP light the opposite is true. It results that by using LCP it is possible to have an efficient coherent generation of the acoustic phonons of the structure. In Figure 5 we show the electromagnetic field intensity (|E|2/|E 0 |2, being |E 0 |2 the intensity of the impinging beam) corresponding to LCP incidence at a wavelength of 1360 nm. The field is localized in the central part of both bars, and the kinetic energy of the fast electrons will be released uniformly 100 nm around the hot spots. For the sake of simplicity, we can further assume that these phonons will correspond mainly to the breathing modes of the bars, with similar spatial profiles as those previously studied in other works [7, 8].

Figure 5: 
Normalized spatial field intensity at the bottom surface of the top bar (a), and at the top surface of the bottom bar (b). As it can be seen the field intensity closely resembles that of a dipole, but located at the interaction region only.
Figure 5:

Normalized spatial field intensity at the bottom surface of the top bar (a), and at the top surface of the bottom bar (b). As it can be seen the field intensity closely resembles that of a dipole, but located at the interaction region only.

The fundamental acoustic mode of the bars (see the Supplementary Information) is a longitudinal mode along the long axis of the bars. In a simplified model, the relevant parameter to characterize the structure sensitivity is the derivative of the scattering cross-section with the size of the bar. In Figure 6 we show the difference of the scattering CS (and absorption, for completeness) for RCP light corresponding to expanded-contracted bars (±2 % in the long axis). We can observe that an optimal condition for scattering is achieved at ca. 1360 nm. Therefore, at that sweet point, the system presents (i) for LCP light there is strong absorption and weak scattering; and (ii) for RCP light, the absorption is smaller than for the LCP light, and the scattering cross-section and its variation under expansion or contraction bigger than for the LCP light. A simple cross-polarized setup with a synchronous detection system can be easily adapted to work with the helicity, taking full advantage of the chirality of the proposed systems.

Figure 6: 
Differential absorption and scattering cross-sections for RCP incidence light assuming an expansion/contraction of 2 % over the long axis for both nanoplates nominal geometrical parameters. It can be seen that for scattering the maximum signal appears at the sweet point 1360 nm. At the same point, the differential cross-section for absorption is close to zero.
Figure 6:

Differential absorption and scattering cross-sections for RCP incidence light assuming an expansion/contraction of 2 % over the long axis for both nanoplates nominal geometrical parameters. It can be seen that for scattering the maximum signal appears at the sweet point 1360 nm. At the same point, the differential cross-section for absorption is close to zero.

4 Discussion and conclusions

We presented a simple structure, feasible to fabricate, based on crossed elongated bars where light-handedness defines the dominating cross-section absorption or scattering, with a 200 % difference from its counterpart (scattering or absorption). The fine-tuning of the interacting distance of the element of the structure allows us to optimize the response of the system to, at a given wavelength, present maximal (minimal) absorption (scattering) cross-section for LCP light, and exactly the opposite for RCP light. The simplicity of the structure leads to ample room for optimization, which can be made via multiparametric variations of the geometry of both interacting nanoplates, the incorporation of an “active substrate” [22, 30, 31], or modifying the material composition of the nanoplates to include effects such as magneto-optics [32] or hyperbolicity [33].

In nanophononics [28, 34], [35], [36], [37], the lack of standard transducers to generate and detect acoustic phonons forced researchers to develop novel experimental schemes based on all-optical techniques. In the most used protocol [25, 26], for a given wavelength, an ideal optoacoustic transducer presents three characteristics: high pump absorption to warrant the impulsive generation of acoustic phonons, and high scattering cross-section of the probe to detect the modification of the optical properties due to the phonons. The use of structures sustaining chiral optical modes appears as a natural, yet unexplored strategy to address these conditions. The proposed chiral system opens the way to enhanced and selective coherent phonon excitation and detection.

Finally, the use of chiral structures like the ones reported in this work could be extended to the domain of quantum applications, such as quantum dot-based single-photon emitters where helicity could become a new design parameter [38, 39].


Corresponding authors: Norberto Daniel Lanzillotti-Kimura, CNRS, Centre de Nanosciences et de Nanotechnologies, Université Paris-Saclay, 10 Boulevard Thomas Gobert, Palaiseau 91120, France, E-mail: ; and Antonio García-Martín, Instituto de Micro y Nanotecnología IMN-CNM, CSIC, CEI UAM + CSIC, Isaac Newton 8, Tres Cantos, Madrid 28760, Spain, E-mail: .

Award Identifier / Grant number: 715939

Award Identifier / Grant number: PDC2021-121833-I00

Award Identifier / Grant number: PID2019-109905 GA-C22

Funding source: Comunidad de Madrid

Award Identifier / Grant number: Program “Yo Investigo”

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: B. C. LdL and A.G.-M. acknowledge support from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación through Grants Nos. TED2021-131417B-I00 (Bigplan-6G), PDC2021-121833-I00 (Raindrops) and PID2019-109905GA-C22 (Symped). B. C. LdL is also grateful to the “Yo Investigo” program of the Comunidad de Madrid. N.D.L.-K. acknowledges funding from the European Research Council Starting Grant No.715939, Nanophennec.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

[1] A. G. Hutt and J. O’Grady, “Drug chirality: a consideration of the significance of the stereochemistry of antimicrobial agents,” J. Antimicrob. Chemother., vol. 37, p. 7, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/37.1.7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] L. D. Barron, Molecular Light Scattering and Optical Activity, Cambridge, Cambridge Univeristy Press, 2004.10.1017/CBO9780511535468Search in Google Scholar

[3] J. Rodríguez-Álvarez, A. García-Martín, A. Fraile Rodríguez, X. Batlle, and A. Labarta, “Tunable circular dichroism through absorption in coupled optical modes of twisted triskelia nanostructures,” Sci. Rep., vol. 12, p. 1, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03908-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[4] R. Berte, F. D. Picca, M. Poblet, et al.., “Acoustic far-field hypersonic surface wave detection with single plasmonic nanoantennas,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 121, p. 253902, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.121.253902.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] F. D. Picca, R. Berte, M. Rahmani, et al.., “Tailored hypersound generation in single plasmonic nanoantennas,” Nano Lett., vol. 16, p. 1428, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04991.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Y. Imade, R. Ulbricht, M. Tomoda, et al.., “Gigahertz optomechanical modulation by split-ring-resonator nanophotonic meta-atom arrays,” Nano Lett., vol. 17, p. 6684, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b02663.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] N. D. Lanzillotti-Kimura, K. P. O’Brien, J. Rho, H. Suchowski, X. Yin, and X. Zhang, “Polarization-controlled coherent phonon generation in acoustoplasmonic metasurfaces,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 97, p. 235403, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.97.235403.Search in Google Scholar

[8] K. O’Brien, N. D. Lanzillotti-Kimura, J. Rho, H. Suchowski, X. Yin, and X. Zhang, “Ultrafast acousto-plasmonic control and sensing in complex nanostructures,” Nat. Commun., vol. 5, p. 4042, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5042.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Y. Guillet, B. Audoin, M. Ferrié, and S. Ravaine, “All-optical ultrafast spectroscopy of a single nanoparticle-substrate contact,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 86, p. 035456, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.86.035456.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Y. Guillet, C. Rossignol, B. Audoin, G. Calbris, and S. Ravaine, “Optoacoustic response of a single submicronic gold particle revealed by the picosecond ultrasonics technique,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 95, p. 061909, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3205472.Search in Google Scholar

[11] A. Crut, P. Maioli, N. Del Fatti, and F. Vallée, “Time-domain investigation of the acoustic vibrations of metal nanoparticles: size and encapsulation effects,” Ultrasonics, vol. 56, p. 98, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2014.02.013.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] D. Mongin, V. Juvé, P. Maioli, et al.., “Acoustic vibrations of metal-dielectric core–shell nanoparticles,” Nano Lett., vol. 11, p. 3016, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl201672k.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] P. Ruello and V. E. Gusev, “Physical mechanisms of coherent acoustic phonons generation by ultrafast laser action,” Ultrasonics, vol. 56, p. 21, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2014.06.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] N. D. Lanzillotti-Kimura, A. Fainstein, B. Perrin, et al.., “Enhanced optical generation and detection of acoustic nanowaves in microcavities,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 83, p. 201103, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.83.201103.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Z. Han, F. Wang, J. Sun, X. Wang, and Z. Tang, “Recent advances in ultrathin chiral metasurfaces by twisted stacking,” Adv. Mater., vol. 35, p. 2206141, 2023.10.1002/adma.202206141Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] B. Auguié, J. L. Alonso-Gómez, A. Guerrero-Martínez, and L. M. Liz-Marzán, “Fingers crossed: optical activity of a chiral dimer of plasmonic nanorods,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett., vol. 2, p. 846, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz200279x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] H. Fredriksson, Y. Alaverdyan, A. Dmitriev, et al.., “Hole–mask colloidal lithography,” Adv. Mater., vol. 19, p. 4297, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200700680.Search in Google Scholar

[18] G. Armelles, A. Cebollada, F. García, A. García-Martín, and N. de Sousa, “Far- and near-field broad-band magneto-optical functionalities using magnetoplasmonic nanorods,” ACS Photonics, vol. 3, p. 2427, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00670.Search in Google Scholar

[19] C. de Dios, A. Jiménez, F. García, A. García-Martín, A. Cebollada, and G. Armelles, “Mueller matrix study of the dichroism in nanorods dimers: rod separation effects,” Opt. Express, vol. 27, p. 21142, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.27.021142.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy, “Optical constants of the noble metals,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 6, p. 4370, 1972. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.6.4370.Search in Google Scholar

[21] R. Alaee, C. Rockstuhl, and I. Fernandez-Corbaton, “Exact multipolar decompositions with applications in nanophotonics,” Adv. Opt. Mater., vol. 7, p. 1800783, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201800783.Search in Google Scholar

[22] G. Armelles, A. Cebollada, H. Y. Feng, et al.., “Interaction effects between magnetic and chiral building blocks: a new route for tunable magneto-chiral plasmonic structures,” ACS Photonics, vol. 2, p. 1272, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.5b00158.Search in Google Scholar

[23] A. Dmitriev, T. Pakizeh, M. Käll, and D. S. Sutherland, “Gold–silica–gold nanosandwiches: tunable bimodal plasmonic resonators,” Small, vol. 3, p. 294, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200600409.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] P. Yu and M. Cardona, Fundamentals of Semiconductors: Physics and Materials Properties, 4th ed., Berlin Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 2010.10.1007/978-3-642-00710-1Search in Google Scholar

[25] C. Thomsen, J. Strait, Z. Vardeny, H. J. Maris, J. Tauc, and J. J. Hauser, “Coherent phonon generation and detection by picosecond light pulses,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 53, p. 989, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.53.989.Search in Google Scholar

[26] C. Thomsen, H. T. Grahn, H. J. Maris, and J. Tauc, “Surface generation and detection of phonons by picosecond light pulses,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 34, p. 4129, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.34.4129.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] O. Ortiz, F. Pastier, A. Rodriguez, et al.., “Fiber-integrated microcavities for efficient generation of coherent acoustic phonons,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 117, p. 183102, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0026959.Search in Google Scholar

[28] R. P. Beardsley, A. V. Akimov, M. Henini, and A. J. Kent, “Coherent terahertz sound amplification and spectral line narrowing in a Stark ladder superlattice,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 104, p. 085501, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.104.085501.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Ia. A. Mogunov, F. Fernández, S. Lysenko, et al.., “Ultrafast insulator-metal transition in ${\mathrm{VO}}_{2}$ nanostructures assisted by picosecond strain pulses,” Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 11, p. 014054, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.11.014054.Search in Google Scholar

[30] J. B. Lassiter, F. McGuire, J. J. Mock, et al.., “Plasmonic waveguide modes of film-coupled metallic nanocubes,” Nano Lett., vol. 13, p. 5866, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl402660s.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] A. Carrara, N. Maccaferri, A. Cerea, et al.., “Plasmon hybridization in compressible metal–insulator–metal nanocavities: an optical approach for sensing deep sub-wavelength deformation,” Adv. Opt. Mater., vol. 8, p. 2000609, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202000609.Search in Google Scholar

[32] D. Meneses-Rodríguez, E. Ferreiro-Vila, P. Prieto, et al.., “Probing the electromagnetic field distribution within a metallic nanodisk,” Small, vol. 7, p. 3317, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201101060.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] N. Maccaferri, Y. Zhao, T. Isoniemi, et al.., “Hyperbolic meta-antennas enable full control of scattering and absorption of light,” Nano Lett., vol. 19, p. 1851, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04841.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[34] G. Arregui, O. Ortíz, M. Esmann, et al.., “Coherent generation and detection of acoustic phonons in topological nanocavities,” APL Photonics, vol. 4, p. 030805, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5082728.Search in Google Scholar

[35] S. Anguiano, A. Bruchhausen, B. Jusserand, et al.., “Micropillar resonators for optomechanics in the extremely high 19–95-GHz frequency range,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 118, p. 263901, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.118.263901.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[36] A. A. Balandin, “Nanophononics: phonon engineering in nanostructures and nanodevices,” J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., vol. 5, p. 1015, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2005.175.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[37] A. E. Bruchhausen, N. D. Lanzillotti-Kimura, B. Jusserand, et al.., “Acoustic confinement phenomena in oxide multifunctional nanophononic devices,” Phys. Rev. Mater., vol. 2, p. 106002, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevmaterials.2.106002.Search in Google Scholar

[38] O. Gazzano, S. M. de Vasconcellos, K. Gauthron, et al.., “Evidence for confined tamm plasmon modes under metallic microdisks and application to the control of spontaneous optical emission,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 107, p. 247402, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.107.247402.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[39] C. Belacel, B. Habert, F. Bigourdan, et al.., “Controlling spontaneous emission with plasmonic optical patch antennas,” Nano Lett., vol. 13, p. 1516, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl3046602.Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2022-0780).


Received: 2022-12-15
Accepted: 2023-04-14
Published Online: 2023-04-28

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/nanoph-2022-0780/html
Scroll to top button