Elsevier

Ecological Economics

Volume 210, August 2023, 107860
Ecological Economics

The effects of environmental performance and green innovation on corporate venture capital

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107860Get rights and content

Abstract

The aim of this study is to provide investors, policymakers and others with information on how greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and green innovation affect corporate financial performance. Although reporting by corporate venture capital (CVC) firms on GHG emissions as well as their green innovation has increased significantly, especially in the last two decades, little is known about how these two factors affect financial performance. To fill this gap, this article investigates the relationships between environmental performance, green innovation, and financial performance in CVC investments in the US over an 18-year period between 2002 and 2019. The results show the effects of GHG-emission reduction and green innovation, both separately and combined, on the financial performance of CVC firms. These findings contribute to the ongoing debate on the role of corporations in the efforts to reach net-zero emissions. The results indicate that emission reductions give firms a financial advantage over time and that there is a financial interest for corporate investors to drive green innovation. These results have important implications for research and practice and illustrate the importance for corporate investors of including ecological considerations in their overall business strategies to create competitive advantage.

Introduction

The worsening climate crisis has come to dominate political discussions in recent years (IPCC, 2022). Researchers are increasingly sounding the alarm and urging governments and policymakers to take immediate action to limit the devastating effects of rising global surface temperatures (O'Garra and Fouquet, 2022; Sun et al., 2022). The main driver of global warming is the accumulation of GHG emissions in the atmosphere (Su and Ang, 2017). To counteract this crisis, 196 parties, including the world's leading governments, have signed on to the legally binding Paris Agreement at COP21, on 12 December 2015 (UNFCC, 2015). One of the major outcomes of this agreement is a commitment to reduce GHG emissions so as to limit global warming “to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels” (UNFCC, 2015). In order to reach this goal, enormous efforts by governments, corporations, and individuals are essential. Accordingly, in recent years, sustainable business practices that support the reduction of GHG emissions have become of vital importance as the world faces this existential crisis. Therefore, many scholars have begun to conduct research on measures and effects in order to shed light on corporate environmental performance.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper that considers the relationship between GHG emissions, green innovation, and financial performance to apply them to corporate venture capital (CVC) investments. CVC refers to venture capital investments made by established corporations in privately held entrepreneurial ventures, in other words, direct minority equity investments (Wadhwa et al., 2016). While many corporate investors face strong societal pressure from their stakeholders to reduce their ecological footprint, they can use CVC investments as a means of acquiring knowledge and technologies, allowing them to significantly improve their environmental performance and reduce their GHG emissions (Battisti et al., 2022). Typically, the aim of CVC investment is to acquire technological innovations (Da Gbadji et al., 2015). A common reason for firms to invest in CVC is to gain knowledge and ideas to support their innovation efforts (Chemmanur et al., 2014; Shuwaikh and Dubocage, 2022) and improve their competitive position by developing those capabilities that enhance organizational performance (Dushnitsky and Lenox, 2006).

Faced with continuous and extreme changes in the environment (Antonioli and Mazzanti, 2017; Appolloni et al., 2022; Sun et al., 2022), CVC investments build linkages to improve environmental performance and pursue green innovation as part of their corporate performance strategies. CVC programs play a role in power building that could improve the performance of the firm (Dushnitsky and Lenox, 2005). Although reporting by CVC firms on their GHG emissions and green innovation efforts, especially over the last two decades, has greatly increased, little is known about the effect of these two factors on the firm's financial performance. To fill this gap, this article investigates the relationships between environmental performance, green innovation and financial performance in CVC investments with a view to helping the parent (investor) company improve strategic performance and generate higher financial returns. In developing hypotheses below, we build on these ideas to contribute to the substantive theory of CVC investments, environmental performance, green innovation and firm value. From our analysis of the relevant literature on the topic, we have identified two main shortcomings which our study aims to address. First, neither the effect of green innovation on financial performance nor the relationship between environmental performance and green innovation has been researched in the specific context of CVC investments. Second, the literature has not yet specifically addressed the combined effect of GHG emissions and green innovation on the financial performance of CVC firms.

This paper presents the first detailed analysis of the impact of GHG-emission reduction and green innovation on CVC investments in the US. The sample comprises 133 CVC firms analyzed over an 18-year period between 2002 and 2019. CVC investment is a suitable context for our research for the following reasons. First, CVCs play a role in funding digital technologies after examination of the financial plans of new, pioneering, and groundbreaking firms (Rossi et al., 2020a, Rossi et al., 2020b). CVC is embraced across many sectors and allows incumbent firms to achieve balance in their corporate strategy (Rossi et al., 2020a). Battisti et al. (2022) demonstrate that corporate investors have exceptional access, compared to other firms, to social and ecological aspects through their investments. Second, CVC investment is a mechanism often used by firms to obtain a window into new technology and a channel through which it can gain knowledge (Maula et al., 2013). CVC develops unique strategies to lead innovation (Shuwaikh and Dubocage, 2022). Battisti et al. (2022) and Wadhwa et al. (2016) demonstrate that CVC investments are seen as an important source of knowledge and innovation by investors. Rossi et al. (2020b) show that CVCs tend to invest in sectors related to their core business with strategic intent, applying knowledge management methods for the accumulation of intellectual capital. Third, scholars have explained the strong positive impact of CVC funding on corporate performance (Dushnitsky and Lenox, 2005). For example, Dushnitsky and Lenox (2006) with Wadhwa and Kotha (2006) find that CVC investment improves valuation performance through citations in addition to patent production and drives a higher market valuation. Research on CVC investments as tools for knowledge acquisition makes a positive contribution to innovation and financial performance in firms (Kang et al., 2022; Keil et al., 2008; Shuwaikh and Dubocage, 2022; van de Vrande et al., 2011; Wadhwa and Kotha, 2006).

Our results make significant contributions to the literature. First, we contribute to the NRBV theory of the firm that is used as the theoretical lens to examine and analyze decarbonization actions (Hart and Dowell, 2011). Our paper provides a practical application of NRBV to CVC investing, focusing on green innovation and the effects on GHG emissions. The NRBV framework is suitable for our context because its central assumption is that environmentally sustainable actions contribute to competitive success (Cristina De Stefano et al., 2016; Menguc and Ozanne, 2005). This study provides empirical evidence on the positive relationships between GHG emissions as a measure of environmental performance and green innovation as an environmental practice. According to our results, green innovation provides an effective strategic environmental approach to GHG emissions reduction, which is consistent with NRBV. We deliver a useful application of NRBV in the CVC context, focusing on green innovation strategies and their impacts on GHG emissions.

Second, our paper contributes to the literature on corporate venture capital by examining CVC investments from the perspective of the investee firm. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper that considers the relationship between GHG emissions, green innovation, and the financial performance of CVC firms. Although the impact of environmental performance on financial performance has been covered by previous research, no study has specifically targeted CVC. This paper demonstrates the contribution of CVC investment to firm value which is achieved when firms explicitly pursue environmental performance by harnessing green innovation. Therefore, the results are based on research on a combination of corporate investors' financial performance (e.g. Baierl et al., 2016; Battisti et al., 2022), its relationship with GHG-emission reduction and, more generally, between environmental performance and corporate financial performance (e.g. Busch and Hoffmann, 2011; Russo et al., 2021), as well as the impact of green innovation on financial performance (e.g. Przychodzen and Przychodzen, 2015; Scarpellini et al., 2019) and with the creation of firm value (Dushnitsky and Lenox, 2006). Firms are more likely to pursue CVC activities as a part of their innovation strategy (Wadhwa et al., 2016). In contrast to previous literature which focused on the impact of CVC on innovation, we study the effect of green innovation. This exploration not only enriches the research on the green innovation effects of CVC but also further explores the driving force of green innovation.

Third, our work aims to assist firms in making the green transition. This study analyzes how green innovation works to reduce GHG emissions (Chen et al., 2022, Chen et al., 2021; Du et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2021). Green innovation requires large investment in cleaner technologies to reduce a firm's GHG emissions. We evaluate how green innovation helps firms to cut their GHG emissions. Environmental performance and green innovation should be integral parts of the investment strategies of investors. Analyzing the combined effect of GHG emissions and green innovation on the financial performance of corporate investors suggests that a simultaneous reduction in GHG emissions and increase in sustainability-based innovation has a positive influence on financial performance. This paper elaborates on the relationship between reduced carbon emissions and green innovation and demonstrates their effect on corporate financial performance (Lee and Min, 2015; Ma et al., 2021).

The remainder of this paper is structured as follows. The literature review is presented in Section 2. Data selection and methodology are described in Section 3. Empirical results as well as a discussion about them are outlined in Section 4. Conclusion and policy implications are drawn in Section 5, along with limitations and avenues for future research.

Section snippets

Resource based view (RBV) theory and environmental performance

As one of the most relevant questions in business research, scholars aim to understand the factors influencing the financial performance of firms. To define these factors, researchers continuously analyze the different resources and capabilities available to companies and how they impact on performance at the firm level. The notion of the RBV of firms was first described by Wernerfelt (1984) and Barney (1991). In its original form, it analyzes the impact of the heterogeneous resources used by

Sample selection

The selected sample is made up of U.S. firms as the US is the most active VC market and serves as a successful model for other countries. Hege et al. (2008, p. 1) specify that “Venture capital is an American invention, and the United States is home to the largest venture capital industry by far”. Regarding the study sample, the period choice of 2002–2019 was made as GHG emissions data are only available on Eikon for firms from 2002 onwards. We extracted from the Thomson VentureXpert database,

Descriptive statistics and correlations

Table 1 summarizes the statistics of the underlying research sample. The 133 firms included in the sample have an average (median) ROA of 0.06 (0.05). The values of the additional financial performance measures, ROE and Tobin's Q, are 0.12 (0.05) and 2.20 (1.76), respectively. The observed kurtosis of 710.78 for ROE implies a high likelihood of extreme results. Prior to inverting the values of the environmental performance measures, the average (median) natural logarithm of GHG emissions and

Conclusion and implications

The research findings demonstrate that better environmental performance and more green innovation positively affect CVC firms' financial performance. The empirical results highlight three key points: first, environmental performance contributes significantly to financial performance. Second, green innovation has a positive impact on financial performance. Third, the combined effect of environmental performance and green innovation on the financial performance of U.S. CVC firms is strongly

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (126)

  • M. Cristina De Stefano et al.

    A natural resource-based view of climate change: innovation challenges in the automobile industry

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2016)
  • K. Du et al.

    Do green technology innovations contribute to carbon dioxide emission reduction? Empirical evidence from patent data

    Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change

    (2019)
  • G. Dushnitsky et al.

    When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures?: corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates

    Res. Policy

    (2005)
  • G. Dushnitsky et al.

    When does corporate venture capital investment create firm value?

    J. Bus. Ventur.

    (2006)
  • H. Gonenc et al.

    Environmental and financial performance of fossil fuel firms: a closer inspection of their interaction

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2017)
  • T. Hassan et al.

    Environmental regulations, political risk and consumption-based carbon emissions: evidence from OECD economies

    J. Environ. Manag.

    (2022)
  • J. Horbach et al.

    Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact — the role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2012)
  • E. Horváthová

    The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: short-term costs and long-term benefits?

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2012)
  • H. Iwata et al.

    How does environmental performance affect financial performance? Evidence from Japanese manufacturing firms

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2011)
  • R. Konadu et al.

    Board gender diversity, environmental innovation and corporate carbon emissions

    Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change

    (2022)
  • S. Kraus et al.

    Corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: the mediating role of environmental strategy and green innovation

    Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change

    (2020)
  • K.-H. Lee et al.

    Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2015)
  • K.-H. Lee et al.

    The impacts of carbon (CO2) emissions and environmental research and development (R&D) investment on firm performance

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2015)
  • K. Lindeneg

    Instruments in environmental policy —different approaches

    Waste Manag. Res.

    (1992)
  • A. Lioui et al.

    Environmental corporate social responsibility and financial performance: disentangling direct and indirect effects

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2012)
  • W. Liu et al.

    Will China’s household coal replacement policies pay off: a cost-benefit analysis from an environmental and health perspective

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2022)
  • X. Long et al.

    Environmental innovation and its impact on economic and environmental performance: evidence from Korean-owned firms in China

    Energy Policy

    (2017)
  • J.-R. Lu et al.

    Identifying the fair value of Sharpe ratio by an option valuation approach

    Q. Rev. Econ. Finc.

    (2021)
  • Q. Ma et al.

    The nexuses between energy investments, technological innovations, emission taxes, and carbon emissions in China

    Energy Policy

    (2021)
  • B. Menguc et al.

    Challenges of the “green imperative”: a natural resource-based approach to the environmental orientation-business performance relationship

    J. Bus. Res.

    (2005)
  • N. Misani et al.

    Unraveling the effects of environmental outcomes and processes on financial performance: a non-linear approach

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2015)
  • T. O’Garra et al.

    Willingness to reduce travel consumption to support a low-carbon transition beyond COVID-19

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2022)
  • M.H. Pesaran et al.

    Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels

    J. Econ.

    (1995)
  • J. Przychodzen et al.

    Relationships between eco-innovation and financial performance – evidence from publicly traded companies in Poland and Hungary

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2015)
  • A. Rokhmawati et al.

    The effect of GHG emission, environmental performance, and social performance on financial performance of listed manufacturing firms in Indonesia

    Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci.

    (2015)
  • M. Rossi et al.

    When corporations get disruptive, the disruptive get corporate: financing disruptive technologies through corporate venture capital

    J. Bus. Res.

    (2020)
  • M. Rossi et al.

    Corporate venture capitalists as entrepreneurial knowledge accelerators in global innovation ecosystems

    J. Bus. Res.

    (2022)
  • F.F. Adedoyin et al.

    Environmental consequences of economic complexities in the EU amidst a booming tourism industry: accounting for the role of brexit and other crisis events

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2021)
  • R. Aggarwal et al.

    Greenhouse gas emissions mitigation and firm value: a study of Large North-American and European Firms

  • J. Aguilera-Caracuel et al.

    Green innovation and financial performance: an institutional approach

    Organ. Environ.

    (2013)
  • E. Alvarez-Garrido et al.

    Are entrepreneurial venture’s innovation rates sensitive to investor complementary assets? Comparing biotech ventures backed by corporate and independent VCs

    Strateg. Manag. J.

    (2016)
  • A. Appolloni et al.

    Green recovery in the mature manufacturing industry: the role of the green-circular premium and sustainability certification in innovative efforts

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2022)
  • K. Asiaei et al.

    How does green intellectual capital boost performance? The mediating role of environmental performance measurement systems

    Bus. Strateg. Environ.

    (2022)
  • B.J. Avolio et al.

    Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance

    J. Organ. Behav.

    (2004)
  • R. Baierl et al.

    Coopetition in corporate venture capital: the relationship between network attributes, corporate innovativeness, and financial performance

    Int. J. Technol. Manag.

    (2016)
  • J. Barney

    Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage

    J. Manag.

    (1991)
  • F.V. Bekun et al.

    Exploring the tourism-CO2 emissions-real income nexus in E7 countries: accounting for the role of institutional quality

    J. Policy Res. Tour. Leis. Events

    (2022)
  • M.F. Bellemare et al.

    Lagged explanatory variables and the estimation of causal effect

    J. Polit.

    (2017)
  • R. Benkraiem et al.

    Boardroom attributes and trade credit under different ownership structures

    Strateg. Chang.

    (2020)
  • T. Busch et al.

    How hot is your bottom line? Linking carbon and financial performance

    Bus. Soc.

    (2011)
  • Cited by (10)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text