Elsevier

Field Crops Research

Volume 296, 15 May 2023, 108924
Field Crops Research

Effective Striga control and yield intensification on maize farms in western Kenya with N fertilizer and herbicide-resistant variety

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108924Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Highlights

  • IR maize is more effective than N fertilizer in reducing Striga emergence.

  • N fertilizer is more effective than IR maize toward increasing maize grain production.

  • Striga emergence alone does not predict the yield gain by use of IR maize and/or N fertilizer.

  • Yield benefits of combining N fertilizer and IR maize is linked to yield effects of individual practices under some conditions.

Abstract

Context

Maize production in western Kenya is limited by the spread of parasitic weed Striga hermonthica and depletion of soil nutrient stocks. Nitrogen (N) fertilizer and imidazolinone resistant (IR) maize are key elements in the agronomic toolbox to control infestations and enhance yields

Research question

The circumstances under which their use, individually or combined, is most effective on farmer fields have not been well documented. Inappropriate management decisions and low returns on investments arise from this knowledge gap, causing hunger and poverty in smallholder communities to persist.

Methods

Experiments were carried out on 60 fields in three different agroecosystems of western Kenya using full-factorial treatments with non-herbicide treated maize (DH) and herbicide treated maize (IR), and N fertilizer omission and application. Trials were stratified on a field with low and high soil fertility within individual farms and repeated over two seasons.

Results

Cultivating IR maize instead of DH maize decreased the emergence of Striga with 13 shoots m−2 on average while applying N fertilizer on DH maize led to a reduction of 5 shoots m−2 on average. Decreases of Striga by use of IR maize and N fertilizer were between 6 and 23 shoots m−2 larger at the site with high levels of infestation than at the sites with medium or low emergence. Input of N fertilizer increased grain harvests by 0.59 ton ha−1 on average while use of IR maize enhanced the productivity with 0.33 ton ha−1 on average. Use of N fertilizer had similar yield effects in all three sites, whereas use of IR maize at the site with high Striga emergence increased maize production by 0.26–0.39 ton ha−1 more than at the sites with medium or low emergence.

Conclusions

The greater Striga responses to IR maize and the greater yield responses to N fertilizer demonstrate their use could be optimized according to field conditions and management goals. Combining IR maize and N fertilizer has larger added yield benefits where their individual effects on grain productivity are smaller.

Significance

Findings from this study indicate that farmers in western Kenya require guidance on how to align the use of herbicide resistant maize and inorganic N inputs with the level of Striga infestation and maize yield on their fields for effectively controlling the pernicious weed and enhancing food production.

Keywords

Weed control
Soil nutrient management
Imidazolinone resistant maize
Sustainable intensification

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.

Cited by (0)