Cell
Volume 186, Issue 7, 30 March 2023, Pages 1352-1368.e18
Journal home page for Cell

Article
A thalamic-primary auditory cortex circuit mediates resilience to stress

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2023.02.036Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Primary auditory cortex (A1) parvalbumin interneurons activate in response to stress

  • Short-term hyperpolarization of A1-projecting thalamic neurons promotes resilience

  • Temporal neural plasticity initiates thalamic synaptogenesis via BDNF-TrkB signaling

  • Mimicking short-term hyperpolarization achieves sustained antidepressant-like effects

Summary

Resilience enables mental elasticity in individuals when rebounding from adversity. In this study, we identified a microcircuit and relevant molecular adaptations that play a role in natural resilience. We found that activation of parvalbumin (PV) interneurons in the primary auditory cortex (A1) by thalamic inputs from the ipsilateral medial geniculate body (MG) is essential for resilience in mice exposed to chronic social defeat stress. Early attacks during chronic social defeat stress induced short-term hyperpolarizations of MG neurons projecting to the A1 (MGA1 neurons) in resilient mice. In addition, this temporal neural plasticity of MGA1 neurons initiated synaptogenesis onto thalamic PV neurons via presynaptic BDNF–TrkB signaling in subsequent stress responses. Moreover, optogenetic mimicking of the short-term hyperpolarization of MGA1 neurons, rather than merely activating MGA1 neurons, elicited innate resilience mechanisms in response to stress and achieved sustained antidepressant-like effects in multiple animal models, representing a new strategy for targeted neuromodulation.

Introduction

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability and affects approximately 322 million individuals worldwide.1 Although significant progress has been made in the research and development of treatments for depression in the past few decades, poor understanding of the neural basis of depression has resulted in more than half of patients not receiving adequate treatment.2 Depression results from interactions between multiple risk and protective factors that are unique for each individual.3,4 In the face of stress and trauma, only a small percentage of individuals show rapid progression to severe depression, with most people exhibiting resilience. Even a substantial proportion of patients with depression show spontaneous recovery,5 suggesting resilience in these people. Revealing the neurobiological mechanisms promoting such resilience will hopefully lead to more effective prevention strategies and treatments for depression.6,7,8

Resilience in chronic stress is the ability to rebound from adversity in a healthy manner and is mediated by adaptive changes in the function of multiple brain circuits.9 Tremendous efforts have been made to investigate the genetic, molecular, developmental, and psychosocial factors associated with resilience.4,6,7,10,11 On the neural circuit level, clinical observations have shown that the frontal gyri, right insula, and anterior cingulate cortex participated in regulating different manifestations of resilience.12,13 Preclinical evidence has demonstrated that several brain regions, including the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), hippocampus, ventral tegmental area (VTA), locus coeruleus and nucleus accumbens (NAc), and their related neural circuits are involved in resilience in response to stress.6,14,15,16 At the molecular level, unique upregulation of distinct potassium channel subunits in dopaminergic VTA neurons in resilient mice following chronic social defeat stress (CSDS) is essential for resilience.17 In addition, β-catenin is highly regulated, whereas claudin-5 is repressed, in the NAc of resilient mice,11,18 and Zfp189 in the mPFC is a key hub gene in a resilient-specific gene module.10 Further, the immune system and gut microbiota are involved in resilience.16,19 However, the neural underpinnings of innate resilience have not been rigorously established.

Abnormal perceptual processing has been proposed in the pathophysiology of MDD.20 Studies have shown visual cortex malfunction in patients with MDD,21 and bright light treatment can alleviate depressive symptoms in patients with MDD22 and reverse depressive phenotypes in rodents.23 Clinical observations have indicated that auditory perceptibility is also impaired in patients with MDD, while many studies described the effects of music therapy on MDD.24,25,26,27,28 An auditory cortex–entorhinal cortex–hippocampus circuit may be an interface for perceptual processing,29 and evidence has shown that the entorhinal network is crucial for regulating depressive-like behaviors.30,31 Moreover, clinical studies have consistently identified abnormalities in thalamic structure and function in MDD, and a positive correlation was found between thalamo-temporal cortex connectivity and severity of MDD symptoms.32 However, how the sensory neocortex processes stress features, encoding resilience by way of brain-wide afferents, remains poorly understood.

CSDS is a well-established mouse model of depression in which adult male C57BL/6J mice (intruders) can be typically classified into susceptible (SUS) or resilient (RES) populations following 10 defeats over 10 days by larger, highly aggressive resident CD1 mice.17,33 Using the CSDS paradigm, we identified a microcircuit and relevant molecular adaptations that play a role in natural resilience. Early attacks during CSDS induced a short-term hyperpolarization of glutamatergic neurons in the medial geniculate body (MG) that project to the ipsilateral primary auditory cortex (A1) (referred to as MGA1 neurons) in RES mice. This temporary neural plasticity of MGA1 neurons ignited the synaptogenesis of thalamic inputs onto parvalbumin interneurons (PV-INs) receiving thalamic inputs from the MG in the A1 (referred to as MGPV neurons) via presynaptic brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)–tropomyosin receptor kinase B (TrkB) signaling in the subsequent stress responses and thus activated MGPV neurons, mediating resilience.

Section snippets

The activation of PV-INs in the A1 of RES mice was increased following CSDS

To investigate the CSDS-related dynamics of the neural circuits underlying depression, we employed transgenic Fos-tTA; Fos-EGFP mice, which allowed for the quantification of c-Fos expression by measuring EGFP fluorescence following exposure to environmental stimuli.34 CSDS-responsive neurons were examined on the first (initial stress stage), third (initial social avoidance), and 10th (stable social avoidance) days of the CSDS paradigm by analyzing the whole brain (Figures S1A and S1B). On the

Discussion

In this study, we identified a microcircuit involving primary auditory areas that mediates natural resilience and a molecular mechanism within this circuit. We found that early attack during CSDS induced short-term hyperpolarization of MGA1 neurons in RES mice, and this adaptive plasticity in the MG led to activation of MGPV neurons in the subsequent stress responses (e.g., repeated CD1 mouse approaching) in two ways: by a mechanism of homeostatic scaling of postsynaptic GluA2-type AMPA

Key resources table

REAGENT or RESOURCESOURCEIDENTIFIER
Antibodies
Rabbit monoclonal anti-c-FosCell Signaling TechnologyCat#2250S; RRID: AB_2247211
Rabbit monoclonal anti-FosBCell Signaling TechnologyCat#2251S; RRID: AB_2106903
Mouse monoclonal anti-PVSwantCat#235; RRID: AB_10000343
Mouse monoclonal anti-CaMKII alpha (6G9)Thermo Fisher ScientificCat#MA1-048; RRID: AB_325403
Rabbit polyclonal anti-PSD95Thermo Fisher ScientificCat#51–6900; RRID: AB_2533914
Guinea pig monoclonal anti-gephyrinSynaptic SystemsCat#147318;

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Naguib Mechawar, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Canada, for his help on manuscript preparation; Prof. Fei-Xue Liang, Southern Medical University, and Hao Liu, Pazhou Lab, for their technical support; and Prof. Sheng-Li An, Department of Biostatistics, Southern Medical University, for his help on data analysis. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, China (81930034 to X.-H.Z.) and the STI 2030 – Major projects (2022ZD0211700 to

References (76)

  • B. Zingg et al.

    AAV-mediated anterograde transsynaptic tagging: mapping corticocollicular input-defined neural pathways for defense behaviors

    Neuron

    (2017)
  • P. Chen et al.

    Prefrontal cortex corticotropin-releasing factor neurons control behavioral style selection under challenging situations

    Neuron

    (2020)
  • R. Tremblay et al.

    GABAergic Interneurons in the Neocortex: From Cellular Properties to Circuits

    Neuron

    (2016)
  • S. Pfennig et al.

    GRIP1 binds to ApoER2 and EphrinB2 to induce activity-dependent AMPA receptor insertion at the synapse

    Cell Rep.

    (2017)
  • E.D. Vickers et al.

    Parvalbumin-interneuron output synapses show spike-timing-dependent plasticity that contributes to auditory map remodeling

    Neuron

    (2018)
  • C.S. Wang et al.

    BDNF signaling in context: from synaptic regulation to psychiatric disorders

    Cell

    (2022)
  • E.T. Kavalali et al.

    Targeting homeostatic synaptic plasticity for treatment of mood disorders

    Neuron

    (2020)
  • Q. Yuan et al.

    Regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor exocytosis and gamma-aminobutyric acidergic interneuron synapse by the schizophrenia susceptibility gene dysbindin-1

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2016)
  • T.E. Schlaepfer et al.

    Rapid effects of deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant major depression

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2013)
  • J. Downar et al.

    New targets for rTMS in depression: a review of convergent evidence

    Brain Stimul.

    (2013)
  • X.H. Qin et al.

    Liver soluble epoxide hydrolase regulates behavioral and cellular effects of chronic stress

    Cell Rep.

    (2019)
  • L.A. Ibrahim et al.

    Cross-modality sharpening of visual cortical processing through layer-1-mediated inhibition and disinhibition

    Neuron

    (2016)
  • X.H. Hou et al.

    Central control circuit for context-dependent micturition

    Cell

    (2016)
  • Z. Liu et al.

    IGF1-dependent synaptic plasticity of mitral cells in olfactory memory during social learning

    Neuron

    (2017)
  • M.A. Muniak et al.

    Hidden hearing loss and endbulbs of Held: Evidence for central pathology before detection of ABR threshold increases

    Hear. Res.

    (2018)
  • T. Stuart et al.

    Comprehensive integration of single-cell data

    Cell

    (2019)
  • I.V. Vahia et al.

    Older adults and the mental health effects of COVID-19

    JAMA, J. Am. Med. Assoc.

    (2020)
  • S.M. Southwick et al.

    The science of resilience: implications for the prevention and treatment of depression

    Science

    (2012)
  • P. Cuijpers

    The challenges of improving treatments for depression

    J. Am. Med. Assoc.

    (2018)
  • A.K. Friedman et al.

    Enhancing depression mechanisms in midbrain dopamine neurons achieves homeostatic resilience

    Science

    (2014)
  • S.J. Russo et al.

    Neurobiology of resilience

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (2012)
  • L. Kola

    COVID-19: boost mental-health resilience

    Nature

    (2022)
  • Z.S. Lorsch et al.

    Stress resilience is promoted by a Zfp189-driven transcriptional network in prefrontal cortex

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (2019)
  • C. Dias et al.

    beta-catenin mediates stress resilience through Dicer1/microRNA regulation

    Nature

    (2014)
  • K.B. Burt et al.

    Structural brain correlates of adolescent resilience

    J. Child Psychol. Psych.

    (2016)
  • D.C. Johnson et al.

    Modifying resilience mechanisms in at-risk individuals: a controlled study of mindfulness training in Marines preparing for deployment

    Am. J. Psych.

    (2014)
  • N.D. Alves et al.

    Adult hippocampal neuroplasticity triggers susceptibility to recurrent depression

    Transl. Psychiatry

    (2017)
  • A. Feder et al.

    Psychobiology and molecular genetics of resilience

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (11)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    6

    These authors contributed equally

    7

    Lead contact

    View full text