Mindfulness and green purchase intention: A mediated moderation model uncovering the role of ethical self-identity

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107810Get rights and content

Abstract

Ecological economists seek alternatives to capitalism that might establish societies that prioritize respect for the planet. Building on recent conceptual works, the current research adopts a self-determination perspective on human motivation to propose a mediated moderation model in which mindfulness affects green purchase intentions (GPI). Specifically, a self-ethical identity might mediate the relationship between dispositional mindfulness and GPI, and mindfulness training should enhance this effect. The test of the proposed model, with 778 members of the general population in France, affirms the hypothesized relationships, including a positive relation between trait mindfulness and GPI that is significantly mediated by self-ethical identity. Attending mindfulness training also has a moderating effect on this mediated relationship. The current study accordingly contributes to ongoing research designed to understand the potential benefits of mindfulness for resolving sustainability challenges.

Introduction

Humankind faces vast and global environmental challenges, including climate change, depleted natural resources, and threats to biodiversity (Harris, 2004). Both international and interdisciplinary efforts are required to revise consumption patterns, such that they are no longer a threat to the planet. In the past decade, consumers' sensitivity to environmental issues has prompted significant research attention (e.g., Menger and Hamm, 2021; Sama et al., 2018). To transition toward a sustainable society, change strategies must be implemented in three different spheres: personal, political, and practical (O'Brien, 2018). The potential effects of the personal sphere on societal transformation have gained particular momentum among ecological economists, who recognize the powerful influence of worldviews, values, and ethical principles for facilitating agent-driven cultural change (Bina and Vaz, 2011). In line with self-determination theory that highlights the key role of intrinsic motivation in human behavior (Deci and Ryan, 2013), ecological economists also argue that human beings represent transitioning forces, rather than passive recipients, of environmental policies, such that intrinsically motivated pro-environmental behaviors (PEB) are more effective and long lasting than extrinsically motivated ones (Thiermann and Sheate, 2020).

Acknowledging the need for a fundamental shift in consciousness to ensure ecological sustainability (Dhiman and Marques, 2016; Parodi and Tamm, 2018), we require a better understanding of innate, individual motivations to be able to promote change at the personal level, which has prompted wider consideration of mindfulness among sustainable consumption researchers. Mindfulness, defined as receptive attention to and awareness of present events and experience (Brown et al., 2007), offers a promising counterpoint to consumerism (Burch, 2000; Rosenberg, 2004). The quality of conscious awareness that is signaled by mindfulness may prompt consideration of the environmental consequences of consumption decisions and encourage resistance to consumerist messages that promote materialistic goals (Brown and Kasser, 2005). Mindfulness is associated with value clarification, empathy, and compassion, such that it may influence beliefs and actions conducive to the transition toward sustainability (Carroll, 2016; Scharmer, 2009; Wamsler et al., 2018). Despite growing evidence of mindfulness's contributions to overcoming environmental challenges, to attain both sustainable consumption and personal well-being (Dhandra, 2019; Ericson et al., 2014; Hüttel et al., 2020), the mechanisms linking mindfulness to sustainable consumption remain largely unknown (Wamsler, 2018; Wamsler and Brink, 2018).

We seek to explore such mechanisms in the context of green consumption. Consumers' perceptions of themselves as “green” influences their intentions to engage in green consumption behaviors, and an ethical self-identity (i.e., extent to which people perceive themselves as worried about ethical issues; Singh, 2016) is among the strongest predictors of green purchase intentions (GPI) (Arli et al., 2018). Therefore, finding ways to reinforce ethical self-identities represents a relevant effort. We propose a mediated moderation model, which highlights how mindfulness can enhance GPI, both directly and indirectly through increased ethical self-identity. We use structural equation modeling among a sample of 778 French individuals. In addition, in response to calls to explore effective therapies at individual level aiming at building a sustainable future (Costanza, 2020) and methods for reinforcing the benefits of ethical self-identity for GPI (Arli et al., 2018), we investigate the extent to which mindfulness training might augment the effects of trait mindfulness.

Section snippets

Mindfulness and GPI

Mindfulness emanates from Buddhism, a philosophy based on the principles of wisdom, virtue, and meditation. Buddhism and related worldviews offer relevant responses to the impending challenges of sustainability, due to their non-anthropocentric conceptualization of humanity's place in the ecosphere and their prioritization of developing mindful capabilities (Daniels, 2010; Mabsout, 2015). The quality of consciousness that characterizes mindfulness encourages reflection on the ecological impact

Research design

In order to test our proposed conceptual model, we conducted an empirical study in the Lille Metropolitan area, the fourth-largest urban area in France with >1.1 million inhabitants North Paris. The data was collected using purposive sampling via an online questionnaire for completion through a Qualtrics platform. Participants anonymously completed the survey questionnaire, participated voluntarily, and did not receive any incentives or compensation. The data collection took place over five

Descriptive statistics

Mindfulness relates positively to GPI (r = 0.19) and ethical self-identity (r = 0.21), and ethical self-identity relates positively to GPI (r = 0.66). We present composite reliability coefficients (Jöreskog's rhô > 0.70), confirm internal convergent validity (rhôvc > 0.50), and check for discriminant validity (Fornell and Larcker, 1981). Table 3 summarizes the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) results for the three scales across the whole sample.

Measurement models

Our study includes 21 items and three factors:

Discussion

Our study makes three main contributions in nascent literature at the nexus of mindfulness and sustainable consumption research. First, it responds to calls for research into how inner dimensions and mindfulness may be linked to sustainability (Wamsler and Brink, 2018). Adding to the four previously proposed mechanisms for linking mindfulness to consumerism (i.e., disruption of routines, closure of the attitude–behavior gap, primacy of nonmaterialistic values and well-being, and pro-social

Conclusion

Evolving beyond capitalism while flourishing as a society respectful of the planet requires a shift in our value system. Recently, ecological economists have proposed to move away from mainstream normative assumptions for PEB and suggested experiential strategies to trigger individual motivation for social transition. Grounded in self-determination theory, mindfulness has documented transformative effects on the inner dimensions of individuals. Mindfulness contributes to building a clearer

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References (107)

  • P.L. Daniels

    Climate change, economics and Buddhism—part I: an integrated environmental analysis framework

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2010)
  • T.K. Dhandra

    Achieving triple dividend through mindfulness: more sustainable consumption, less unsustainable consumption and more life satisfaction

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2019)
  • T. Ericson et al.

    Mindfulness and sustainability

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2014)
  • D. Fischer et al.

    Mindfulness and sustainable consumption: a systematic literature review of research approaches and findings

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2017)
  • S.M. Geiger et al.

    Mindfulness and sustainability: Correlation or causation?

    Curr. Opin Psychol.

    (2019)
  • A.W. Hanley et al.

    Clarity of mind: structural equation modeling of associations between dispositional mindfulness, self-concept clarity and psychological well-being

    Pers. Individ. Differ.

    (2017)
  • J.M. Harris

    Global environmental challenges of the twenty-first century: resources, consumption, and sustainable solutions

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2004)
  • A. Hüttel et al.

    Welfare beyond consumption: the benefits of having less

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2020)
  • M.H. Johe et al.

    To buy or not to buy: the roles of self-identity, attitudes, perceived behavioral control and norms in organic consumerism

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2016)
  • J. Kabat-Zinn

    An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: theoretical considerations and preliminary results

    Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry

    (1982)
  • W. Li et al.

    Unlocking employees’ green creativity: the effects of green transformational leadership, green intrinsic, and extrinsic motivation

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2020)
  • S. Lorek et al.

    Sustainable consumption within a sustainable economy–beyond green growth and green economies

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2014)
  • R. Mabsout

    Mindful capability

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2015)
  • K. Mathiyazhagan et al.

    Integrating lean and agile practices for achieving global sustainability goals in Indian manufacturing industries

    Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change.

    (2021)
  • P.C. Melo et al.

    Does work-life balance affect pro-environmental behaviour? Evidence for the UK using longitudinal microdata

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2018)
  • K. O’Brien

    Is the 1.5°C target possible? Exploring the three spheres of transformation

    Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain.

    (2018)
  • T. Ramayah et al.

    Green product purchase intention: some insights from a developing country

    Resour. Conserv. Recycl.

    (2010)
  • C. Sama et al.

    Consumer preferences for foodstuffs produced in a socio-environmentally responsible manner: a threat to fair trade producers?

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2018)
  • L. Steg et al.

    Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda

    J. Environ. Psychol.

    (2009)
  • U.B. Thiermann et al.

    Motivating individuals for social transition: the 2-pathway model and experiential strategies for pro-environmental behaviour

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2020)
  • E. Van der Werff et al.

    The value of environmental self-identity: the relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour

    J. Environ. Psychol.

    (2013)
  • G.A. Akerlof et al.

    Economics and identity

    Q. J. Econ.

    (2000)
  • E.L. Amel et al.

    Mindfulness and sustainable behavior: pondering attention and awareness as means for increasing green behavior

    Ecopsychology

    (2009)
  • J.L. Arbuckle

    IBM SPSS Amos 20 user’s Guide

    (2011)
  • D. Arli et al.

    Exploring consumers’ purchase intention towards green products in an emerging market: the role of consumers’ perceived readiness

    Int. J. Consum. Stud.

    (2018)
  • A. Armstrong

    Mindfulness and Consumerism: A Social Psychological Investigation

    (2012)
  • S. Bahl et al.

    Mindfulness. The transformative potential for consumer, societal, and environmental well-being

    J. Public Policy Mark.

    (2016)
  • N.A. Barber et al.

    Tapping mindfulness to shape hotel guests’ sustainable behavior

    Cornell Hosp. Q.

    (2014)
  • J.A. Bargh et al.

    The unbearable automaticity of being

    Am. Psychol.

    (1999)
  • A. Berkovich-Ohana et al.

    Studying the default mode and its mindfulness-induced changes using EEG functional connectivity

    Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci.

    (2014)
  • S.R. Bishop et al.

    Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition

    Clin. Psychol.

    (2004)
  • R. Booth

    EU Officials Being Trained to Meditate to Help Fight Climate Crisis

  • K.W. Brown et al.

    Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle

    Soc. Indic. Res.

    (2005)
  • K.W. Brown et al.

    The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being

    J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.

    (2003)
  • K.W. Brown et al.

    Mindfulness: theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects

    Psychol. Inq.

    (2007)
  • M.A. Burch

    Stepping Lightly: Simplicity for People and the Planet

    (2000)
  • J. Burroughs et al.

    Materialism and well-being: a conflicting values perspective

    J. Consum. Res.

    (2002)
  • E.N. Carlson

    Overcoming the barriers to self-knowledge: mindfulness as a path to seeing yourself as you really are

    Perspect. Psychol. Sci.

    (2013)
  • J. Carroll

    Formless meditation and sustainability

  • R.Y. Chan

    Determinants of Chinese consumers’ green purchase behavior

    Psychol. Mark.

    (2001)
  • Cited by (4)

    View full text