From the tourist gaze to a shared gaze: Exploring motivations for online photo-sharing in present-day tourism experience

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2023.101099Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The shared gaze guides present-day tourist experience through online photo-sharing.

  • Five internally-driven and four externally-driven motives for sharing were found.

  • The shared gaze occurs with physical others, online others, and the future-self.

Abstract

Online photo-sharing is commonplace in present-day tourism, yet previous studies revealed contrasting implications of mobile connectivity and holiday photo-sharing on the tourist experience. To address this, the present study explores tourists' online photo-sharing behaviour and motivation, and the subsequent gaze that is pursued. An inductive and qualitative approach was applied through 17 in-depth interviews with tourists from 11 countries. The findings reveal nine motives for sharing, classified into internally and externally-driven motives. Online photo-sharing was found to offer value targeted towards the tourist-self and others through viewership of the intended audience. The study then introduces a shift from the tourist gaze to a shared gaze and extends the literature on the communal nature and boundaries of this gaze, shaped by motives for sharing holiday photos online. It offers insights that will assist tourism providers with leveraging the shared gaze to enhance value, transform tourists into co-marketers, and improve destination performances.

Introduction

The intertwined relationship between photography and vacationing has been widely discussed in tourism literature. As such, photo-taking is recognised as an important part of being a tourist (Albers & James, 1988; Gillet, Schmitz, & Mitas, 2016) and “a tool for consuming and constructing the tourist experience” (Scarles, 2013, p. 898). The simultaneous development of digital photography, mobile technology, and social networking sites (SNS) has heightened tourists' engagement in photography and enabled holiday photos to be shared as experiences unfold. This has opened opportunities for tourists to not only gaze but share such gazes through instant broadcasts of holiday photos (Coghlan & Prideaux, 2008).

Tourism has long been regarded as one's visual consumption of place (Haldrup & Larsen, 2003; Scarles, 2014; Urry, 1990, Urry, 2002), and online photo-sharing allows such consumption to be extended to those who are not physically present. Yet, Barasch, Zauberman, and Diehl (2017) found people who take photos for the anticipated purpose of sharing enjoyed their experience less than those who photograph for memory-making and safekeeping. This was attributed to self-presentational concerns and the desire to display oneself in a positive light, leading to indirect deviation from one's enjoyment. According to the authors, “seeking future utility from sharing photos can diminish hedonic utility in the present” (Barasch et al., 2017, p. 1233). Similarly, Neuhofer (2016) argued engagement with mobile devices can lead to value co-destruction as it hinders tourists from experiencing the ‘now’. Tourists often find themselves focused on taking photos as well as posting and sharing their experiences online, which hampers the real-time experience (Neuhofer, 2016). In the same vein, Ayeh (2018) found mobile engagement to distract tourists and steal time away from the ‘real’ experience, limiting their ability to achieve travel-related goals. From a safety viewpoint, increasing accidents and injuries have been reported in the pursuit of selfies, with many resulting in deaths. Weiler, Gstaettner, and Scherrer (2021) attributed this to the distractive nature of selfie-taking and found such risk-taking behaviours to be motivated by the desire to share photos and display an intended image online.

Contrasting views were presented by other authors, claiming tourists receive instant responses and comments from virtual networks when experiences are shared online (Kim, Fesenmaier, & Johnson, 2013; Tan, 2017; Tanti & Buhalis, 2016). Such feedback offers gratification, resulting in positive feelings that enhance the tourist experience and satisfaction (Tan, 2017). Furthermore, positive emotional support received during the trip creates a more enjoyable and memorable experience (Kim et al., 2013; Tanti & Buhalis, 2016). Experience-sharing through social media also enhances value as it generates positive feelings of inspiring, influencing, and contributing to others through recommendations offered (Neuhofer, 2016). A paradox is hence identified, as photo-sharing was found to be important yet detrimental to the tourist experience. As experience-sharing on social media becomes an integral part of travel (Magasic, 2016), it is imperative to explore tourists' behaviours and motivations for online photo-sharing.

Samarathunga and Cheng (2021, p. 345) argued that tourists with differing motivations “including the desire for pleasure, excitement, recreation, spirituality or education construct alternate gazes”. Thus, to understand the gaze pursued by tourists partaking in this paradoxical activity, an understanding of their underlying motivations is first required. To explore this, the following research questions were formulated: What are tourists' online photo-sharing behaviours and motivations? How does motivation for online photo-sharing shape or alter the gaze pursued by present-day tourists?

The tourist gaze, through its iterations, has conceptualised the tourist experience as a visual consumption of place (see tourist gaze in Urry, 1990) to one that involves an intersection of senses and people in visual encounters (see tourist gaze 3.0 in Urry & Larsen, 2011). The tourist gaze 3.0 posits that when gazing upon places, tourists do so in the presence of others, such as travel companions, other tourists, and locals, transforming it into a relational and communal activity (Urry & Larsen, 2011). As such, the effect of the physical others on the quality of tourism experiences is acknowledged. Yet, in this “era of constant connectedness” (Neuhofer, 2016, p. 780), how the gaze and experience of tourists are shaped by the presence of, and interactions with, virtual others have yet to be understood.

From a theoretical perspective, this study rethinks the tourist gaze in the context of connected tourism experiences through photos that are shared, and therefore gazes that are extended, to those not physically present. It contributes to advancing knowledge on the gaze pursued by tourists when sharing visual encounters online. From a practical standpoint, this study assists tourism providers with curating experiences that cater to the pursuit of such gaze. As Barasch et al. (2017) stated, understanding factors affecting the enjoyment of experiences is important to companies providing and marketing experiences, as well as to consumers seeking happiness from such experiences.

Section snippets

Tourist experience and the evolution of the gaze

The tourist experience has been described as an outcome of interactions between the tourist and destination elements such as its people, products, environment, and providers (Cutler & Carmichael, 2010; Larsen, 2007; Mossberg, 2007). Munar and Gyimóthy (2013) later distinguished the two forms of parallel travel undertaken by contemporary tourists: the physical journey of travelling, and the online journey represented through the recording and sharing of experiences on social media. Lee,

Methodology

The present study seeks to explore tourists' online photo-sharing behaviour and motivation while travelling, and the gaze pursued by tourists in such endeavours. Past research on the motivation for sharing content online has been largely quantitative which, from an ontological perspective, pursues objective truth that is generalised to the overall population. However, the tourist experience is a subjective and personal construct (Tung & Ritchie, 2011; Urry, 1990), and such a method downplays

Findings

The findings of this study revealed nine motives for sharing holiday photos online as tourists gaze and extend their gazes to those who are physically present, those who are virtually present, and the tourist's future-self. The extended utility of holiday photos was also uncovered as new meanings and functions were ascribed to photos shared during the trip. These findings are encapsulated in Fig. 3, Fig. 2, respectively.

Conclusion and implications

This study explored the online photo-sharing behaviour and motivation of present-day tourists while on holiday, and the gaze pursued in such endeavours. It investigated the paradox identified in existing literature as photo-sharing was depicted to be a significant (Kim et al., 2013; Magasic, 2016; Neuhofer, 2016; Tan, 2017; Tanti & Buhalis, 2016), yet detrimental (Ayeh, 2018; Barasch et al., 2017; Neuhofer, 2016) part of the tourist experience. The findings of this study revealed most

Authorship statement

  • The first author, Cindy Lee, contributed to the conceptualisation and investigation of the study, including data collection, data analysis and interpretation, and the reporting of findings. Cindy also contributed to writing the initial manuscript.

  • The co-authors, Scott Richardson, Edmund Goh and Rajka Presbury, contributed to the conceptualisation and investigation of the study, including methods related to data collection, data analysis and interpretation, and the reporting of findings. The

Cindy Lee is a Senior Lecturer at the Blue Mountains International Hotel Management School at Torrens University Australia. Her research focuses on exploring the evolving tourist experience with particular interest in tourists’ photo-taking and online photo-sharing behaviours and motivation. She has also previously published in the area of hospitality career perceptions. Having been in tourism and hospitality education for over a decade, she has recently taken interest in exploring hospitality

References (84)

  • I.S. Lo et al.

    Tourism and online photography

    Tour. Manag.

    (2011)
  • R.C. Mannell et al.

    Psychological nature of leisure and tourism experience

    Ann. Tour. Res.

    (1987)
  • K.W. Markwell

    Dimensions of photography in a nature-based tour

    Ann. Tour. Res.

    (1997)
  • A.M. Munar et al.

    Motivations for sharing tourism experiences through social media

    Tour. Manag.

    (2014)
  • T. Oliveira et al.

    Why do people share their travel experiences on social media?

    Tour. Manag.

    (2020)
  • S. Pan et al.

    Travel photos: Motivations, image dimensions, and affective qualities of places

    Tour. Manag.

    (2014)
  • W.K. Tan

    The relationship between smartphone usage, tourist experience and trip satisfaction in the context of a nature-based destination

    Telematics Inform.

    (2017)
  • V.W.S. Tung et al.

    Exploring the essence of memorable tourism experiences

    Ann. Tour. Res.

    (2011)
  • B. Weiler et al.

    Selfies to die for: A review of research on self-photography associated with injury/death in tourism and recreation

    Tour. Manag. Perspect.

    (2021)
  • N.R. White et al.

    Home and away: Tourists in a connected world

    Ann. Tour. Res.

    (2007)
  • K.H. Yoo et al.

    Influence of personality on travel-related consumer-generated media creation

    Comput. Hum. Behav.

    (2011)
  • A. Barasch et al.

    How the intention to share can undermine enjoyment: Photo-taking goals and evaluation of experiences

    J. Consum. Res.

    (2017)
  • M. Bastiaansen et al.

    Emotions as core building blocks of an experience

    Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag.

    (2019)
  • N.K. Baym

    Personal connections in the digital age

    (2010)
  • R. Belk et al.

    Tourist photographs: Signs of self

    Int. J. Cult., Tour. Hospit. Res.

    (2011)
  • G. Bruno

    Collection and recollection on film itineraries and museum walks

  • K. Chalkiti et al.

    Information sharing and idea generation in peer to peer online communities: The case of ‘DIALOGOI’

    J. Vacat. Mark.

    (2008)
  • H.J. Cheong et al.

    Consumers’ reliance on product information and recommendations found in UGC

    J. Interact. Advert.

    (2008)
  • A. Coghlan et al.

    No pictures, no memory: Capturing image-taking behaviour on the Great Barrier Reef

  • M. Crang

    Knowing, tourism and practices of vision

  • J.W. Creswell et al.

    Designing and conducting mixed methods research

    (2017)
  • S.Q. Cutler et al.

    The dimensions of the tourist experience

  • G.M.S. Dann et al.

    From travelogue to travelblog: (Re)-negotiating tourist identity

    Acta Turisti.

    (2007)
  • N.W. Davis et al.

    Qualitative data analysis: A procedural comparison

    J. Appl. Sport Psychol.

    (2009)
  • J. Daxböck et al.

    The implicit and explicit motivations of tourist behaviour in sharing travel photographs on Instagram: A path and cluster analysis

  • S. Garlick

    Revealing the unseen: Tourism, art and photography

    Cult. Stud.

    (2002)
  • S. Gillet et al.

    The snap-happy tourist: The effects of photographing behavior on tourists’ happiness

    J. Hosp. Tour. Res.

    (2016)
  • E. Goh et al.

    Showcasing Leximancer in tourism and hospitality research: A review of Leximancer-based research published in tourism and hospitality journals during 2014-2020

    Tour. Recreat. Res.

    (2022)
  • M. Haldrup et al.

    The family gaze

    Tour. Stud.

    (2003)
  • M. Hammersley et al.

    Ethnography: Principles in practice

    (1995)
  • A. Hatchuel

    Towards an epistemology of collective action: Management research as a responsive and actionable discipline

    Eur. Manag. Rev.

    (2005)
  • G. Jennings

    Tourism research

    (2001)
  • Cited by (6)

    • An extended view of tourist gaze theory: Proactive gaze in picnics

      2024, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management

    Cindy Lee is a Senior Lecturer at the Blue Mountains International Hotel Management School at Torrens University Australia. Her research focuses on exploring the evolving tourist experience with particular interest in tourists’ photo-taking and online photo-sharing behaviours and motivation. She has also previously published in the area of hospitality career perceptions. Having been in tourism and hospitality education for over a decade, she has recently taken interest in exploring hospitality education in the shifting landscape, from an on-site to an online environment, as well as how educators can teach and train empathy.

    Scott Richardson, currently Associate Dean for Business at Torrens University Australia, has over 15 years of experience in higher education and more than 10 years’ experience in the tourism and hospitality industry. He is a member of editorial boards for various journals and is a Fellow of The International Centre of Excellence in Tourism and Hospitality Education (THE-ICE).

    Edmund Goh is an Associate Professor in Tourism and Hotel Management at Bond Business School, Bond University, Australia. He has published in leading journals such as Tourism Management, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, International Journal of Hospitality Management, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Journal of Vacation Marketing, Journal of Tourism and Travel Marketing, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Tourism Recreation Research, Tourism Management Perspectives, British Food Journal, Journal of Cleaner Production and Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. Edmund sees his research as the nexus to address education and industry gaps.

    Rajka Presbury is an Adjunct Associate Professor at Torrens University Australia. Her PhD is on the topic of service quality in hotels, and her research interest remains in and around the issue of service experience, exploring perceptions of customers, managers, and employees in hotels. She is a member of editorial boards for various journals and is on the Auditor Panel of The International Centre of Excellence in Tourism and Hospitality Education (THE-ICE).

    View full text