Elsevier

Automatica

Volume 149, March 2023, 110828
Automatica

Brief paper
On the relation between ω-limit set and boundaries of mass-action chemical reaction networks

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2022.110828Get rights and content

Abstract

ω-limit set can be used to understand the long term behavior of a dynamical system. In this paper, we use the Lyapunov Function PDEs method, developed in our previous work, to study the relation between ω-limit points and boundaries for chemical reaction networks equipped with mass-action kinetics. Using the solution of the PDEs, some new checkable criteria are proposed to diagnose non ω-limit points of the network system. These criteria are successfully applied to verify that non-semilocking boundary points and some semilocking boundary points are not ω-limit points. Further, we derive the ω-limit theorem that precludes the limit cycle of some biochemical network systems. The validity of the results are demonstrated through some abstract and practical examples of chemical reaction networks.

Introduction

Chemical reaction networks (CRNs) are widely existing in the fields of chemistry, biology, and medicine, etc. The related studies have been applied to many fields, besides the above mentioned ones, even including those not seemly related to chemical reactions, such as electricity (Samardzija et al., 1989). Mass-action kinetics is one of the most commonly used kinetics to describe the reaction rate of chemical reactions, and the induced systems, termed as mass-action systems (MASs), often give rise to a family of nonequilibrium ordinary differential equations (ODEs). The ODEs are generally highly nonlinear, and also contain many parameters, such as the rate constants of all reactions. Due to difficult/inaccurate measurement problem to these parameters, it often requires to study the dynamical behaviors of MASs only depending on the topological structure of networks, but independent of the system parameters. Here, the dynamical behaviors mainly relate to stability, persistence, etc. The pioneering work on this topic was made by Feinberg (1979), and Horn and Jackson (1972). They defined a class of complex balanced MASs with weakly reversible network structure, and addressed well the issues on number of equilibria, locally asymptotic stability, etc. However, the globally asymptotic stability is still far from being solved. In practice, it is unnecessary to directly tackle this issue itself, but may address another issue of persistence instead. A complex balanced MAS will be globally asymptotically stable if it has persistence. Hence, the persistence study has become quite active in recent decades (Anderson, 2008, Angeli et al., 2007), but the related issues are still open problems in the field of CRNs. Certainly, persistence, as a kind of dynamical behavior, is often used to model the reaction phenomenon that no species will be used up in the course of reaction if it is present at the reaction start. The study on this topic is also interesting from the viewpoint of dynamic analysis.

In this work, we will not follow the line of studying persistence of complex balanced MASs, but launch some preparatory work about persistence of CRNs with any structure. As one might know, ω-limit set is a positively invariable set of the trajectory, and may be used to reflect the dynamical property of system. A MAS is persistence if the intersection of its ω-limit set and boundaries is empty. The studies on the relation between ω-limit set and boundaries of MASs are thus rather significant from the viewpoint of control theory as well as of dynamic analysis. As early as 1970s, Vasil’ev et al. (1974) proved the ω-limit set of each trajectory of a detailed balanced system to be only a single positive equilibrium or a set of boundary equilibria. Siegel and MacLean (2000) generalized this result to complex balanced MASs and use this property to derive the global asymptotic stability of a subclass of complex balanced MASs. In characterizing dynamical behaviors, Lyapunov function is a powerful tool (Blanchini & Giordano, 2014). When the networks are complex balanced, there is a canonical choice, i.e., the well-known pseudo-Helmholtz free energy function as the Lyapunov function (Horn & Jackson, 1972). However, in other cases, there is no general method to obtain a Lyapunov function, and no understanding of the space of possible Lyapunov functions for a given reaction network. Although Anderson et al. (2015) showed that the pseudo-Helmholtz free energy function can be derived from an appropriate limit of the stationary distributions for the stochastic mass-action systems, this is not a practical construction method since for almost all reaction network systems, the stationary distributions are prohibitively hard to obtain. Our early work (Fang & Gao, 2019) followed up this issue, and by connecting the microscopic and the macroscopic levels, thermodynamics and potential theory, proposed a PDE and a boundary condition for a mass-action system, referred to as the Lyapunov Function PDEs. When the PDEs are solved, the solutions are conjectured as Lyapunov functions for the network attached. This conjecture has been proved true when the network is complex balanced, of 1-dimensional stoichiometric subspace, and a combination of the other cases, respectively. Some special networks with dimension of the stoichiometric subspace more than 2 also support the conjecture.

In this paper, we continue to utilize the Lyapunov Function PDEs, but to study the relation between ω-limit set and boundaries of each trajectory of MAS. The main contributions are listed below:

  • For a MAS, based on the solution of its Lyapunov Function PDEs, two sufficient conditions are proposed to say any boundary point of system to be not ω-limit point.

  • Any non-semilocking boundary point and some semilocking boundary non-equilibrium points are proved not ω-limit point.

  • The ω-limit set of some MASs, especially of complex balanced MASs, is proved a set of positive equilibria or a set of boundary equilibria.

  • Some practical biochemical systems are proved to have no limit cycles.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 introduces some preliminaries about CRN theory and Lyapunov Function PDEs. Section 3 presents the checkable technical criteria for the ω-limit set under the framework of the Lyapunov Function PDEs, and some concrete examples are also illustrated. In Section 4, we apply our results to some kinds of real biochemical networks. Finally, Section 5 concludes the paper.

Notations: Rn,R0n,R>0n denote n-dimensional real space, non -negative real space, positive real space, respectively; Ci denotes the function set whose elements are ith continuously differentiable; sux denotes the support set of a vector x defined as sux={Sj|xj0},xR0n; Ln(x) is defined as a vector whose jth element is ln(xj).

Section snippets

Preliminaries

In this section we will introduce some backgrounds on CRN (Feinberg, 1979, Horn and Jackson, 1972) and the Lyapunov Function PDEs (Fang & Gao, 2019).

Main results

In this section, we present our main results on the relation between ω-limit set and boundaries of MASs. The Lyapunov Function PDEs (3), (4) might serve for analyzing any boundary point to be an ω-limit point or not. From the solution of dynamical Eq. (2), R>0n is the positive invariant (Siegel & MacLean, 2000), wich means it impossible for arbitrary trajectory with positive initial point to enter into a boundary of Rn in a finite amount of time. So we consider the situation when the starting

Applications

In this section, we apply our results to some real biochemical networks which are obviously not complex balanced even not weakly reversible.

Example 4 PAK-1 network

p21-activated kinase 1(PAK-1) is involved in a variety of biological processes such as tumor cell proliferation, apoptosis and invasion (Hong et al., 2021). The following network can be seen as a simplified model of PAK-1: Let x1,x2,x3 denote the concentration of species E,P1,P2. Then, the function f(x)=i=2,3(xilnxixixilnxi+xi)+2(x1lnx1x1x1lnx1+x1

Conclusion

This article has made a systematic study on the relation between ω-limit points and boundary points of MASs through the Lyapunov Function PDEs method. Based on the solution of the PDEs, we develop some criteria (sufficient conditions) to say the boundary point of the MAS to be not ω-limit point. Furthermore, we prove the sufficient conditions are valid in ruling out two types of boundary points, i.e., any non-semilocking boundary point and some semilocking boundary non-equilibrium points, to

Xiaoyu Zhang received the B.Sc. degree in mathematics from Anhui University, China, in 2017, and the Ph.D. degree from Zhejiang University, China, in 2022. She is currently a postdoctor in the Department of Control Science and Engineering at Zhejiang University. Her research interests are in the areas of control theory and chemical reaction networks theory.

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Xiaoyu Zhang received the B.Sc. degree in mathematics from Anhui University, China, in 2017, and the Ph.D. degree from Zhejiang University, China, in 2022. She is currently a postdoctor in the Department of Control Science and Engineering at Zhejiang University. Her research interests are in the areas of control theory and chemical reaction networks theory.

Zhou Fang received the B.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees in mathematics from Zhejiang University, China, in 2014 and 2019 respectively. He is currently a postdoctor in Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich. His research interests are in the areas of control theory, systems and synthetic biology, and non-equilibrium thermodynamics.

Chuanhou Gao received the B.Sc. degrees in Chemical Engineering from Zhejiang University of Technology, China, in 1998, and the Ph.D. degrees in Operational Research and Cybernetics from Zhejiang University, China, in 2004. From June 2004 until May 2006, he was a Postdoctor in the Department of Control Science and Engineering at Zhejiang University. Since June 2006, he has joined the Department of Mathematics at Zhejiang University, where he is currently a Professor. He was a visiting scholar at Carnegie Mellon University from Oct. 2011 to Oct. 2012. His research interests are in the areas of data-driven modeling, control and optimization, chemical reaction network theory and thermodynamic process control. He is an associate editor of IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control and of International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing.

Denis Dochain received his degree in Electrical engineering in 1982 from the Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium. He completed his Ph.D. thesis and a “thèse d’agrégation de l’enseignement supérieur” in 1986 and 1994, respectively, also at the Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium. He has been CNRS associate researcher at the LAAS (Toulouse, France) in 1989, and Professor at the Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal, Canada in 1987–88 and 1990–92. He has been with the FNRS (Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique, National Fund for Scientific Research), Belgium since 1990. Since September 1999, he is Professor at the ICTEAM (Institute), Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium, and Honorary Research Director of the FNRS. He has been invited professor at Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada between 2002 and 2004. He is full professor at the UCL since 2005. He is the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Process Control, senior editor of the IEEE Transactions of Automatic Control and associate editor of Automatica. He is active in IFAC since 1999 (Council member, Technical Board member, Publication Committee member and chair, TC and CC chair). He received the IFAC outstanding service award in 2008 and is an IFAC fellow since 2010. He received the title of Doctor Honoris Causa from the INP Grenoble on December 13, 2020. His main research interests are in the field of nonlinear systems, thermodynamics based control, parameter and state estimation, adaptive extremum seeking control and distributed parameter systems, with application to microbial ecology, environmental, biological and chemical systems, and electrical and mechanical systems. He is the (co-)author of 5 books, more than 160 papers in refereed journals and 260 international conference papers.

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 12071428 and 62111530247, and the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. LZ20A010002. The material in this paper was not presented at any conference. This paper was recommended for publication in revised form by Associate Editor Thomas Meurer under the direction of Editor Miroslav Krstic.

View full text