Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T12:27:54.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An ex-Gaussian analysis of eye movements in L2 reading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2022

Steven G. Luke*
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University Provo, UT, USA
Rachel Yu Liu
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University Provo, UT, USA
Kyle Nelson
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University Provo, UT, USA
Jared Denton
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University Provo, UT, USA
Michael W. Child
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University Provo, UT, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Steven G. Luke, Department of Psychology Brigham Young University 1062 SWKT Provo, UT 84602-5543 E-mail: steven_luke@byu.edu

Abstract

Second language learners’ reading is less efficient and more effortful than native reading. However, the source of their difficulty is unclear; L2 readers might struggle with reading in a different orthography, or they might have difficulty with later stages of linguistic interpretation of the input, or both. The present study explored the source of L2 reading difficulty by analyzing the distribution of fixation durations in reading. In three studies, we observed that L2 readers experience an increase in Mu, which we interpret as indicating early orthographic processing difficulty, when the L2 has a significantly different writing system than the L1 (e.g., Chinese and English) but not when the writing systems were similar (e.g., Portuguese and English). L2 readers also experienced an increase in Tau, indicating later-arising processing difficulty which likely reflects later-stage linguistic processes, when they read for comprehension. L2 readers of Chinese also experienced an additional increase in Tau.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashby, J, Rayner, K and Clifton, C (2005) Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: differential effects of frequency and predictability. Q J Exp Psychol A 58, 10651086. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000476CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bai, X, Yan, G, Liversedge, SP, Zang, C and Rayner, K (2008) Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 34, 1277.Google ScholarPubMed
Bates, D, Mächler, M, Bolker, B and Walker, S (2015) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. In http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4Google Scholar
Ben-Yehudah, G, Hirshorn, EA, Simcox, T, Perfetti, CA and Fiez, JA (2019) Chinese–English bilinguals transfer L1 lexical reading procedures and holistic orthographic coding to L2 English. Journal of Neurolinguistics 50, 136148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, BT and Luke, SG (2018) Individuals’ eye movements in reading are highly consistent across time and trial. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 44, 482.Google ScholarPubMed
Carter, BT and Luke, SG (2020) Best practices in eye tracking research. International Journal of Psychophysiology 155, 4962.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, P.-C, Galley, M and Manning, CD (2008) Optimizing Chinese word segmentation for machine translation performance. Proceedings of the third workshop on statistical machine translation.Google Scholar
Chen, T, Ke, S and Koda, K (2021) The Predictive Role of Grapho-Morphological Knowledge in Reading Comprehension for Beginning-Level L2 Chinese Learners, Frontiers of Psychology 12: 757934, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.757934.Google ScholarPubMed
Christianson, K and Luke, SG (2011) Context strengthens initial misinterpretations of text. Scientific Studies of Reading 15, 136166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, SC, Chen, X and Geva, E (2019) Deconstructing and reconstructing cross-language transfer in bilingual reading development: An interactive framework. Journal of Neurolinguistics 50, 149161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, R and Cox, TL (2013) Empirical validation of reading proficiency guidelines. Foreign Language Annals 46, 4561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cop, U, Drieghe, D and Duyck, W (2015a) Eye movement patterns in natural reading: A comparison of monolingual and bilingual reading of a novel. PLoS One 10, e0134008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cop, U, Keuleers, E, Drieghe, D and Duyck, W (2015b) Frequency effects in monolingual and bilingual natural reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 22, 12161234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitousi, D (2020) Linking the ex-gaussian parameters to cognitive stages: Insights from the linear ballistic accumulator (lba) model. Quant. Methods Psychol 16, 91106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaholt, MG, Rayner, K and Reingold, EM (2013) Spatial frequency filtering and the direct control of fixation durations during scene viewing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 75, 17611773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guy, N, Lancry-Dayan, OC and Pertzov, Y (2020) Not all fixations are created equal: The benefits of using ex-Gaussian modeling of fixation durations. Journal of vision 20, 99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henderson, JM, Choi, W and Luke, SG (2014) Morphology of Primary Visual Cortex Predicts Individual Differences in Fixation Duration during Text Reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 26, 28802888. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00668CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henderson, JM, Choi, W, Luke, SG and Schmidt, J (2018) Neural correlates of individual differences in fixation duration during natural reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71, 314323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, JM and Luke, SG (2014) Stable individual differences in saccadic eye movements during reading, pseudoreading, scene viewing, and scene search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 40, 1390.Google ScholarPubMed
Jeon, EH and Yamashita, J (2014) L2 reading comprehension and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Language learning 64, 160212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kliegl, R, Grabner, E, Rolfs, M and Engbert, R (2004) Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 16, 262284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, A, Brockhoff, PB and Christensen, RH (2017) lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of statistical software 82, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leal, S.E., Lukasova, K., Carthery-Goulart, M.T. & Aluísio, S.M. (2022) RastrOS Project: Natural Language Processing contributions to the development of an eye-tracking corpus with predictability norms for Brazilian Portuguese. Language Resources and Evaluation, 140.Google Scholar
Lemhöfer, K and Broersma, M (2012) Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behavior research methods 44, 325343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, H, Zhang, J and Ding, G (2021) Reading across writing systems: a meta-analysis of the neural correlates for first and second language reading. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 24, 537548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liversedge, SP, Drieghe, D, Li, X, Yan, G, Bai, X and Hyönä, J (2016) Universality in eye movements and reading: A trilingual investigation. Cognition 147, 120.Google Scholar
Liversedge, SP, Hyönä, J and Rayner, K (2013) Eye movements during Chinese reading. In: Wiley Online Library.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luke, SG (2017) Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R. Behavior research methods 49, 14941502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luke, SG and Christianson, K (2016) Limits on lexical prediction during reading. Cognitive psychology 88, 2260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luke, SG, Darowski, ES and Gale, SD (2018) Predicting Eye Movement Characteristics across Multiple Tasks from Working Memory and Executive Control. Mem Cognit 46, 826839.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luke, SG and Henderson, JM (2013) Oculomotor and cognitive control of eye movements in reading: evidence from mindless reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 75, 12301242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luke, SG and Henderson, JM (2016) The influence of content meaningfulness on eye movements across tasks: evidence from scene viewing and reading. Frontiers in Psychology 7, 257.Google ScholarPubMed
Luke, SG, Henderson, JM and Ferreira, F (2015) Children's eye-movements during reading reflect the quality of lexical representations: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 41, 1675.Google ScholarPubMed
Luke, SG, Nuthmann, A and Henderson, JM (2013) Eye movement control in scene viewing and reading: Evidence from the stimulus onset delay paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 39, 10.Google ScholarPubMed
Luke, SG, Smith, TJ, Schmidt, J and Henderson, JM (2014) Dissociating temporal inhibition of return and saccadic momentum across multiple eye-movement tasks. Journal of Vision 14, 99. https://doi.org/10.1167/14.14.9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, G (2017) Does interword spacing influence lexical processing in Chinese reading? Visual Cognition 25, 815824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, G, Li, X and Rayner, K (2015) Readers extract character frequency information from nonfixated-target word at long pretarget fixations during Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 41, 1409.Google ScholarPubMed
Ma, G and Zhuang, X (2018) Distributional analyses of word frequency effects in Chinese sentence reading and lexical decision tasks. Journal of Research in Reading 41, S183-S196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marian, V, Blumenfeld, HK and Kaushanskaya, M (2007) The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Massidda, D and Massidda, MD (2013) Package ‘retimes’.Google Scholar
Matin, E (1974) Saccadic suppression: a review and an analysis. Psychological bulletin 81, 899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matzke, D and Wagenmakers, E.-J (2009) Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: A diffusion model analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16, 798817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McVay, JC and Kane, MJ (2012) Drifting from Slow to “D'oh!” Working Memory Capacity and Mind Wandering Predict Extreme Reaction Times and Executive-Control Errors. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 38, 525549. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025896CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nuthmann, A and Engbert, R (2009) Mindless reading revisited: an analysis based on the SWIFT model of eye-movement control. Vision Res 49, 322336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2008.10.022CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, B.R., & Stine-Morrow, E.A. (2014) Adult age differences in wrap-up during sentence comprehension: Evidence from ex-Gaussian distributional analyses of reading time. Psychology and Aging 29(2), 213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perfetti, CA, Goldman, SR and Hogaboam, TW (1979) Reading skill and the identification of words in discourse context. Memory & cognition 7, 273282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rayner, K (1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological bulletin 124, 372.Google ScholarPubMed
Rayner, K (2009) Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62, 14571506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rayner, K and Fischer, M (1996) Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different. Perception & Psychophysics 58, 734747. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213106CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rayner, K, Kambe, G and Duffy, SA (2000) The effect of clause wrap-up on eye movements during reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 53, 10611080.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Core Team. (2020) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. In R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/Google Scholar
Reingold, EM, Reichle, ED, Glaholt, MG and Sheridan, H (2012) Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations. Cognitive Psychology 65, 177206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rieger, T and Miller, J (2020) Are model parameters linked to processing stages? An empirical investigation for the ex-Gaussian, ex-Wald, and EZ diffusion models. Psychological Research 84, 16831699.Google ScholarPubMed
Schmiedek, F, Oberauer, K, Wilhelm, O, Süß, H.-M and Wittmann, WW (2007) Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136, 414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shen, HH and Jiang, X (2013) Character reading fluency, word segmentation accuracy, and reading comprehension in L2 Chinese.Google Scholar
Sheridan, H, Rayner, K and Reingold, EM (2013) Unsegmented text delays word identification: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations. Visual Cognition 21, 3860.Google Scholar
Sheridan, H and Reingold, EM (2012) The time course of contextual influences during lexical ambiguity resolution: Evidence from distributional analyses of fixation durations. Memory & Cognition 40, 11221131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Staub, A (2015) The effect of lexical predictability on eye movements in reading: Critical review and theoretical interpretation. Language and Linguistics Compass 9, 311327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staub, A and Benatar, A (2013) Individual differences in fixation duration distributions in reading. Psychon Bull Rev 20, 13041311. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0444-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Staub, A, White, SJ, Drieghe, D, Hollway, EC and Rayner, K (2010) Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 36, 12801293. https://www.lib.byu.edu/cgi-bin/remoteauth.pl?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdhref&AN=JEPHPP.CF.ABHJ.STAUB.DEWFEF&site=ehost-live&scope=siteGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, X, Zhang, K, Marks, RA, Nickerson, N, Eggleston, RL, Yu, CL, Chou, TL, Tardif, T and Kovelman, I (2022) What's in a word? Cross-linguistic influences on Spanish–English and Chinese–English bilingual children's word reading development. Child development 93, 84100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tse, C.-S, Balota, DA, Yap, MJ, Duchek, JM and McCabe, DP (2010) Effects of healthy aging and early stage dementia of the Alzheimer's type on components of response time distributions in three attention tasks. Neuropsychology 24, 300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unsworth, N, Redick, TS, Lakey, CE and Young, DL (2010) Lapses in sustained attention and their relation to executive control and fluid abilities: An individual differences investigation. Intelligence 38, 111122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Berkum, JJ, Brown, CM, Zwitserlood, P, Kooijman, V and Hagoort, P (2005) Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31, 443.Google ScholarPubMed
Vieira, JMM (2020) The Brazilian Portuguese eye tracking corpus with a predictability study focusing on lexical and partial prediction.Google Scholar
Vitu, F, O'Regan, JK, Inhoff, AW and Topolski, R (1995) Mindless reading: Eye-movement characteristics are similar in scanning letter strings and reading texts. Perception & Psychophysics 57, 352364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walshe, RC and Nuthmann, A (2014) Asymmetrical control of fixation durations in scene viewing. Vision Res 100, 3846. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2014.03.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, M, Koda, K and Perfetti, CA (2003) Alphabetic and nonalphabetic L1 effects in English word identification: A comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2 learners. Cognition 87, 129149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, SJ and Staub, A (2012) The distribution of fixation durations during reading: effects of stimulus quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 38, 603.Google ScholarPubMed
Whitford, V and Titone, D (2012) Second-language experience modulates first-and second-language word frequency effects: Evidence from eye movement measures of natural paragraph reading. Psychonomic bulletin & review 19, 7380.Google ScholarPubMed
Whitford, V and Titone, D (2015) Second-language experience modulates eye movements during first-and second-language sentence reading: Evidence from a gaze-contingent moving window paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 41, 1118.Google ScholarPubMed
Yang, H.-M and McConkie, GW (1999) Reading Chinese: Some basic eye-movement characteristics. Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis, 207222.Google Scholar
Zang, C, Liang, F, Bai, X, Yan, G and Liversedge, SP (2013) Interword spacing and landing position effects during Chinese reading in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 39, 720.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhang, D (2017) Word reading in L1 and L2 learners of Chinese: Similarities and differences in the functioning of component processes. The Modern Language Journal 101, 391411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H, Zhang, X, Li, M and Zhang, Y (2021) Morphological Awareness in L2 Chinese Reading Comprehension: Testing of Mediating Routes. Frontiers in Psychology 12.Google ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Luke et al. supplementary material

Luke et al. supplementary material

Download Luke et al. supplementary material(File)
File 317.2 KB