Skip to main content
Log in

Manipulating the Resistance Training Volume in Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of the Effects on Muscle Strength and Size, Muscle Quality, and Functional Capacity

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Effective manipulation of the acute variables of resistance training is critical to optimizing muscle and functional adaptations in middle-aged and older adults. However, the ideal volume prescription (e.g., number of sets performed per exercise) in middle-aged and older adults remains inconclusive in the literature.

Objective

The effects of single versus multiple sets per exercise on muscle strength and size, muscle quality, and functional capacity in middle-aged and older adults were compared. Moreover, the effects of single versus multiple sets per exercise on muscular and functional gains were also examined, considering the influence of training duration.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials comparing single versus multiple sets per exercise on muscle strength, muscle size, muscle quality, or functional capacity in middle-aged and older adults (aged ≥ 50 years) in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases (01/09/2021, updated on 15/05/2022) were identified. A random-effects meta-analysis was used.

Results

Fifteen studies were included (430 participants; 93% women; age 57.9–70.1 years). Multiple sets per exercise produced a greater effect than single sets on lower-limb strength (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07–0.51; mean difference [MD] = 1.91 kg; 95% CI 0.50–3.33) and muscle quality (SMD = 0.40; 95% CI 0.05–0.75) gains. There were no differences between single versus multiple sets per exercise for upper-limb strength (SMD = 0.13; 95% CI − 0.14 to 0.40; MD = 0.11 kg; 95% CI − 0.52 to 0.75), muscle size (SMD = 0.15; 95% CI − 0.07 to 0.37), and functional capacity (SMD = 0.01; 95% CI − 0.47 to 0.50) gains. In addition, there were no differences between single versus multiple sets on muscle strength and size gains for training durations ≤ 12 weeks or > 12 weeks.

Conclusions

Multiple sets per exercise produced greater lower-limb strength and muscle quality gains than single sets in middle-aged and older adults, although the magnitude of the difference was small. In contrast, single sets per exercise were sufficient to improve upper-limb strength, muscle size, and functional capacity in these populations. Despite these findings, researchers should conduct future high-quality, pre-registered, and blinded randomized controlled trials to strengthen the scientific evidence on this topic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mitchell WK, Williams J, Atherton P, et al. Sarcopenia, dynapenia, and the impact of advancing age on human skeletal muscle size and strength; a quantitative review. Front Physiol. 2012;3:260. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2012.00260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shur NF, Creedon L, Skirrow S, et al. Age-related changes in muscle architecture and metabolism in humans: the likely contribution of physical inactivity to age-related functional decline. Ageing Res Rev. 2021;68: 101344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2021.101344.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Doherty TJ. Invited review: aging and sarcopenia. J Appl Physiol. 2003;95(4):1717–27. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00347.2003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen N, He X, Feng Y, et al. Effects of resistance training in healthy older people with sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2021;18(1):23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-021-00277-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rodrigues F, Domingos C, Monteiro D, et al. A review on aging, sarcopenia, falls, and resistance training in community-dwelling older adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(2):874. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brahms CM, Hortobágyi T, Kressig RW, et al. The interaction between mobility status and exercise specificity in older adults. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2021;49(1):15–22. https://doi.org/10.1249/JES.0000000000000237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nagai K, Miyamato T, Okamae A, et al. Physical activity combined with resistance training reduces symptoms of frailty in older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018;76:41–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2018.02.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kekäläinen T, Kokko K, Sipilä S, et al. Effects of a 9-month resistance training intervention on quality of life, sense of coherence, and depressive symptoms in older adults: randomized controlled trial. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(2):455–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1733-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baker BS, Weitzel KJ, Royse LA, et al. Efficacy of an 8-week resistance training program in older adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Aging Phys Act. 2021;29(1):121–9. https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2020-0078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vikberg S, Sörlén N, Brandén L, et al. Effects of resistance training on functional strength and muscle mass in 70-year-old individuals with pre-sarcopenia: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019;20(1):28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2018.09.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Persch LN, Ugrinowitsch C, Pereira G, et al. Strength training improves fall-related gait kinematics in the elderly: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Biomech. 2009;24(10):819–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.07.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Otsuka Y, Yamada Y, Maeda A, et al. Effects of resistance training intensity on muscle quantity/quality in middle-aged and older people: a randomized controlled trial. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022;13(2):894–908. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bird SP, Tarpenning KM, Marino FE. Designing resistance training programmes to enhance muscular fitness. Sport Med. 2005;35(10):841–51. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200535100-00002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA. Fundamentals of resistance training: progression and exercise prescription. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2004;36(4):674–88. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000121945.36635.61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Spiering BA, Kraemer WJ, Anderson JM, et al. Resistance exercise biology. Sport Med. 2008;38(7):527–40. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200838070-00001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fragala MS, Cadore EL, Dorgo S, et al. Resistance training for older adults: position statement from the National Strength and Conditioning Association. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33(8):2019–52. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000003230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Marques MC, Izquierdo M, Pereira A. High-speed resistance training in elderly people: a new approach toward counteracting age-related functional capacity loss. Strength Cond J. 2013;35(2):23–9. https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0b013e31828ba884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Talar K, Hernández-Belmonte A, Vetrovsky T, et al. Benefits of resistance training in early and late stages of frailty and sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. J Clin Med. 2021;10(8):1630. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Csapo R, Alegre LM. Effects of resistance training with moderate vs heavy loads on muscle mass and strength in the elderly: a meta-analysis. Scand J Med Sci Sport. 2016;26(9):995–1006. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12536.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Peterson MD, Rhea MR, Sen A, et al. Resistance exercise for muscular strength in older adults: a meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2010;9(3):226–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2010.03.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Latham NK, Bennett DA, Stretton CM, et al. Systematic review of progressive resistance strength training in older adults. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59(1):M48-61. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/59.1.M48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Steib S, Schoene D, Pfeifer K. Dose-response relationship of resistance training in older adults: a meta-analysis. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2010;42(5):902–14. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181c34465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Raymond MJ, Bramley-Tzerefos RE, Jeffs KJ, et al. Systematic review of high-intensity progressive resistance strength training of the lower limb compared with other intensities of strength training in older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(8):1458–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.02.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Borde R, Hortobágyi T, Granacher U. Dose-response relationships of resistance training in healthy old adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Access J Sport Med. 2015;45(12):1693–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0385-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. de Santana DA, Castro A, Cavaglieri CR. Strength training volume to increase muscle mass responsiveness in older individuals: weekly sets based approach. Front Physiol. 2021;12: 759677. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.759677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Polito MD, Papst RR, Farinatti P. Moderators of strength gains and hypertrophy in resistance training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Sci. 2021;39(19):2189–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2021.1924978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Peterson MD, Sen A, Gordon PM. Influence of resistance exercise on lean body mass in aging adults: a meta-analysis. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2011;43(2):249–58. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181eb6265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gonzalez AM, Hoffman JR, Townsend JR, et al. Intramuscular anabolic signaling and endocrine response following high volume and high intensity resistance exercise protocols in trained men. Physiol Rep. 2015;3(7): e12466. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12466.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Burd NA, West DWD, Staples AW, et al. Low-load high volume resistance exercise stimulates muscle protein synthesis more than high-load low volume resistance exercise in young men. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(8): e12033. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012033.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Terzis G, Spengos K, Mascher H, et al. The degree of p70S6k and S6 phosphorylation in human skeletal muscle in response to resistance exercise depends on the training volume. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;110(4):835–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-010-1527-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Arantes VHF, da Silva DP, de Alvarenga RL, et al. Skeletal muscle hypertrophy: molecular and applied aspects of exercise physiology. Ger J Exerc Sport Res. 2020;50(2):195–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-020-00652-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Endo Y, Nourmahnad A, Sinha I. Optimizing skeletal muscle anabolic response to resistance training in aging. Front Physiol. 2020;11:874. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Drummond MJ, Marcus RL, LaStayo PC. Targeting anabolic impairment in response to resistance exercise in older adults with mobility impairments: potential mechanisms and rehabilitation approaches. J Aging Res. 2012;2012:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/486930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Burd NA, Gorissen SH, van Loon LJC. Anabolic resistance of muscle protein synthesis with aging. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2013;41(3):169–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/JES.0b013e318292f3d5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Paulussen KJM, McKenna CF, Beals JW, et al. Anabolic resistance of muscle protein turnover comes in various shapes and sizes. Front Nutr. 2021;8: 615849. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.615849.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Radaelli R, Botton CE, Wilhelm EN, et al. Time course of low- and high-volume strength training on neuromuscular adaptations and muscle quality in older women. Age. 2014;36(2):881–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-013-9611-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ribeiro AS, Schoenfeld BJ, Pina FLC, et al. Resistance training in older women: comparison of single vs. multiple sets on muscle strength and body composition. Isokinet Exerc Sci. 2015;23(1):53–60. https://doi.org/10.3233/IES-140564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Galvão DA, Taaffe DR. Resistance exercise dosage in older adults: single-versus multiset effects on physical performance and body composition. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(12):2090–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00494.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Radaelli R, Botton CE, Wilhelm EN, et al. Low- and high-volume strength training induces similar neuromuscular improvements in muscle quality in elderly women. Exp Gerontol. 2013;48(8):710–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2013.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Abrahin O, Rodrigues RP, Nascimento VC, et al. Single- and multiple-set resistance training improves skeletal and respiratory muscle strength in elderly women. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:1775–82. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S68529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Correa CS, Teixeira BC, Bittencourt A, et al. Effects of high and low volume of strength training on muscle strength, muscle volume and lipid profile in postmenopausal women. J Exerc Sci Fit. 2014;12(2):62–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesf.2014.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Antunes M, Kassiano W, Silva AM, et al. Volume reduction: which dose is sufficient to retain resistance training adaptations in older women? Int J Sports Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1502-6361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Cunha PM, Nunes JP, Tomeleri CM, et al. Resistance training performed with single and multiple sets induces similar improvements in muscular strength, muscle mass, muscle quality, and IGF-1 in older women: a randomized controlled trial. J Strength Cond Res. 2020;34(4):1008–16. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Radaelli R, Wilhelm EN, Botton CE, et al. Effects of single vs. multiple-set short-term strength training in elderly women. Age. 2014;36(6):9720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-014-9720-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Radaelli R, Brusco CM, Lopez P, et al. Higher muscle power training volume is not determinant for the magnitude of neuromuscular improvements in elderly women. Exp Gerontol. 2018;110:15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2018.04.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Correa CS, Teixeira BC, Cobos RCR, et al. High-volume resistance training reduces postprandial lipaemia in postmenopausal women. J Sports Sci. 2015;33(18):1890–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2015.1017732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Polito MD, Papst R, Goessler K. Twelve weeks of resistance training performed with different number of sets: effects on maximal strength and resting blood pressure of individuals with hypertension. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2021;43(2):164–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641963.2020.1833024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Cunha PM, Ribeiro AS, Tomeleri CM, et al. The effects of resistance training volume on osteosarcopenic obesity in older women. J Sports Sci. 2017;36(14):1564–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2017.1403413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Radaelli R, Brusco CM, Lopez P, et al. Muscle quality and functionality in older women improve similarly with muscle power training using one or three sets. Exp Gerontol. 2019;128: 110745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2019.110745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Cunha PM, Tomeleri CM, Nascimento MAD, et al. Improvement of cellular health indicators and muscle quality in older women with different resistance training volumes. J Sport Sci. 2018;36(24):2843–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2018.1479103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372: n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Methley AM, Campbell S, Chew-Graham C, et al. PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):579. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366: l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355: i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Schumann M, Feuerbacher JF, Sünkeler M, et al. Compatibility of concurrent aerobic and strength training for skeletal muscle size and function: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Sport Med. 2022;52(3):601–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01587-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Orssatto LB, Freitas CR, Shield AJ, et al. Effects of resistance training concentric velocity on older adults’ functional capacity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Exp Gerontol. 2019;127: 110731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2019.110731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis in the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 1988. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  58. Higgins JPT. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2019.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  60. Sousa N, Mendes R, Abrantes C, et al. Differences in maximum upper and lower limb strength in older adults after a 12 week intense resistance training program. J Hum Kinet. 2011;2011(30):183–8. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10078-011-0086-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Tracy BL, Ivey FM, Hurlbut D, et al. Muscle quality. II. Effects of strength training in 65- to 75-yr-old men and women. J Appl Physiol. 1999;86(1):195–201. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1999.86.1.195.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Lynch NA, Metter EJ, Lindle RS, et al. Muscle quality. I. Age-associated differences between arm and leg muscle groups. J Appl Physiol. 1999;86(1):188–94. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1999.86.1.188.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Fragala MS, Fukuda DH, Stout JR, et al. Muscle quality index improves with resistance exercise training in older adults. Exp Gerontol. 2014;53:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2014.01.027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Fragala MS, Kenny AM, Kuchel GA. Muscle quality in aging: a multi-dimensional approach to muscle functioning with applications for treatment. Sport Med. 2015;45(5):641–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0305-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Russ DW, Gregg-Cornell K, Conaway MJ, et al. Evolving concepts on the age-related changes in “muscle quality.” J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2012;3(2):95–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13539-011-0054-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Pinto RS, Correa CS, Radaelli R, et al. Short-term strength training improves muscle quality and functional capacity of elderly women. Age. 2014;36(1):365–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-013-9567-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Radaelli R, Taaffe DR, Newton RU, et al. Exercise effects on muscle quality in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):21085. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00600-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Cadore EL, Izquierdo M, Conceição M, et al. Echo intensity is associated with skeletal muscle power and cardiovascular performance in elderly men. Exp Gerontol. 2012;47(6):473–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2012.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Lopez P, Izquierdo M, Radaelli R, et al. Effectiveness of multimodal training on functional capacity in frail older people: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Aging Phys Act. 2018;26(3):407–18. https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2017-0188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Takeshima N, Sozu T, Tajika A, et al. Which is more generalizable, powerful and interpretable in meta-analyses, mean difference or standardized mean difference? BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(1):30. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. La Scala Teixeira CV, Motoyama Y, de Azevedo PHSM, et al. Effect of resistance training set volume on upper body muscle hypertrophy: are more sets really better than less? Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2018;38(5):727–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Iversen VM, Norum M, Schoenfeld BJ, et al. No time to lift? Designing time-efficient training programs for strength and hypertrophy: a narrative review. Sport Med. 2021;51(10):2079–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01490-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Fröhlich M, Emrich E, Schmidtbleicher D. Outcome effects of single-set versus multiple-set training: an advanced replication study. Res Sport Med. 2010;18(3):157–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/15438620903321045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Fyfe JJ, Hamilton DL, Daly RM. Minimal-dose resistance training for improving muscle mass, strength, and function: a narrative review of current evidence and practical considerations. Sport Med. 2022;52(3):463–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01605-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Marston KJ, Peiffer JJ, Newton MJ, et al. A comparison of traditional and novel metrics to quantify resistance training. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):5606. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05953-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Marques DL, Neiva HP, Faíl LB, et al. Acute effects of low and high-volume resistance training on hemodynamic, metabolic and neuromuscular parameters in older adults. Exp Gerontol. 2019;125: 110685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2019.110685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Tajra V, Vieira DC, Tibana RA, et al. Different acute cardiovascular stress in response to resistance exercise leading to failure versus not to failure in elderly women with and without hypertension: a pilot study. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2015;35(2):127–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Vale AF, Carneiro JA, Jardim PCV, et al. Acute effects of different resistance training loads on cardiac autonomic modulation in hypertensive postmenopausal women. J Transl Med. 2018;16(1):240. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-018-1615-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Faulkner JA, Larkin LM, Claflin DR, et al. Age-related changes in the structure and function of skeletal muscles. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2007;34(11):1091–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1681.2007.04752.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Deschenes MR. Effects of aging on muscle fibre type and size. Sport Med. 2004;34(12):809–24. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200434120-00002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Suetta C, Haddock B, Alcazar J, et al. The Copenhagen Sarcopenia Study: lean mass, strength, power, and physical function in a Danish cohort aged 20–93 years. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019;10(6):1316–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Wang Z, et al. Skeletal muscle mass and distribution in 468 men and women aged 18–88 yr. J Appl Physiol. 2000;89(1):81–8. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.2000.89.1.81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Kennis E, Verschueren S, Van Roie E, et al. Longitudinal impact of aging on muscle quality in middle-aged men. Age (Omaha). 2014;36(4):9689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-014-9689-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Abe T, Thiebaud RS, Loenneke JP. Age-related change in handgrip strength in men and women: is muscle quality a contributing factor? Age (Omaha). 2016;38(1):28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-016-9891-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diogo Luís Marques.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This research was supported by national funding through the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P., under the grant number SFRH/BD/147608/2019 (DLM) and project number UIDB/04045/2020.

Conflicts of Interest

Diogo Luís Marques, Henrique Pereira Neiva, Daniel Almeida Marinho, and Mário Cardoso Marques have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review.

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Availability of Data and Material

The data analyzed in this study are included in the Electronic Supplementary Material.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

Design of the study: DLM, HPN, MCM. Literature search: DLM, HPN. Data screening and extraction: DLM, HPN. Statistical analyses: DLM, HPN. Manuscript preparation and editing: DLM, HPN DAM, MCM. All authors have read and agreed to the submitted version.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1213 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marques, D.L., Neiva, H.P., Marinho, D.A. et al. Manipulating the Resistance Training Volume in Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of the Effects on Muscle Strength and Size, Muscle Quality, and Functional Capacity. Sports Med 53, 503–518 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01769-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01769-x

Navigation