1 Introduction

The development and application of microelectronics have brought us to the era of digital and information age. Nowadays, thin-film transistors (TFTs) with the active channel layer of IGZO [1, 2], In2O3-ZnO, ZnO, and SnO2 are the most basic and important component in modern electronic devices and equipments [3, 4], which have been widely used in sensors [5, 6], switching memories [7], logical circuits, and especially in flat-panel displays [8, 9]. The highly integrated portable electronic devices need high-performance TFTs, for example, in active matrix display for touch panels, flexible circuitries in smartphone, smartwatch, and laptop consumers products with features such as high brightness, high screen resolution and refresh rate, foldable, and low energy consumption. Thus, the great demand for flexible, high-performance, and high energy efficiency TFTs has emerged [10]. Recently, flexible electronics attracted great interest in the field of wearable health management devices and flexible displays for their intrinsic properties including bendable, deformable, and portable [11, 12]. Especially, as essential components of the pixel-drive circuits, TFTs work as the driving switches playing a significant role in organic light-emitting displays and liquid–crystal displays [9]. Accordingly, great efforts (such as the deep subthreshold regime operatable schottky-barrier IGZO thin-film transistor) are being conducted to develop low power, high current sensitivity, and flexible TFTs [13]. These high-performance flexible TFTs could be used as the key units for future displays, artificial skin, and soft robotics [14,15,16,17].

To date, combinations of advanced materials to fabricate flexible TFTs with enhanced intrinsic electrical properties and ingenious device structures with optimized configurations have been studied and explored. Despite many great progresses such as 1D carbon nanotubes (CNTs) or nanowire flexible TFTs [18,19,20,21,22], 2D nanomaterials flexible TFTs [23, 24], flexible organic TFTs [25,26,27,28], and metal-oxide flexible TFTs [29,30,31] have reported to obtain flexible TFTs. The developed flexible TFTs are still difficult to meet the practical application demands. This is due to the considerably the high standard and stringent requirements of electronic products ranging from superior electrical output performance, continuous/scale-up fabrication, reliability, and environmental stability. For CNTs flexible TFTs, although the single CNTs TFTs have been demonstrated with superior performance [32], but these is not suitable for assembling large-scale integrated circuits due to limiting factors such as cost, uniformity, and purity of network-type CNTs [19]. Regarding 2D materials TFTs, a wide variety of 2D nanosheets including boron nitride dielectric, graphene, MoS2, and WS2 channels can be used to prepare flexible TFTs with high mobilities [33], yet optimizing the flake sizes and continuous reliable operability are still needed to be explored. The organic semiconductors with intrinsic mechanical properties provide a promising way towards fabricating flexible TFTs. However, challenges such as environment robustness, shelf-life, and device performance are still needed to be circumvented. Comparing with the organic TFTs, metal-oxide flexible TFTs are compatible with conventional complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor processes and offer higher performance and stability [1, 34, 35], but typically need a relatively high-temperature annealing process [13, 36]. Usually, the polymeric substrates with relatively low glass transition temperature (Tg) such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene naphthalate (PEN), and polyimide (PI) for flexible TFTs are easily degraded during high-temperature processing [9, 31, 37]. Besides, the thermal explosion coefficient difference between layer for flexible TFTs will result in the internal stresses, decreasing the device performance and stability. Therefore, exploring flexible TFTs at low temperature (200 °C or lower) with ideal device performance is of considerable importance for flexible electronics.

In this work, high-performance flexible TFTs with bottom-gate top-contacted configuration were successfully fabricated on a polyimide substrate without any post-annealing process. The amorphous indium-gallium-zinc oxide (a-IGZO, with the stoichiometry of In0.37Ga0.20Zn0.18O0.25), was deposited by radio frequency (RF) sputtering and used as the active channel. The Al2O3/HfO2 laminated insulator was prepared by atomic layer deposition (ALD) at a relatively lower temperature of 150 °C. Benefited from the nanolaminates of Al2O3/HfO2 dielectric consisting of amorphous Al2O3 and crystallize HfO2, and the interface aluminate Al–Hf–O phase, the as-prepared TFTs exhibited the carrier mobility of 9.7 cm2 V−1 s−1, ON/OFF ratio ~ 1.3 × 106, subthreshold voltage of 0.1 V, saturated current up to 0.70 mA, and subthreshold swing of 0.256 V dec−1, as well as withstanding the bending radius of 40 mm. Furthermore, the TFTs with nanolaminate insulator possess satisfactory humidity stability and hysteresis behavior in a relative humidity of 60–70%, a temperature of 25–30 °C environment. The yield of IGZO-based TFTs with the nanolaminate insulator reaches 95%.

2 Experimental

2.1 Device Fabrication

Two types of substrates including the rigid Si wafers and flexible polyimide films were used for the TFTs fabrication. The detailed fabrication procedure for polyimide (PI) substrate-based flexible TFTs will be introduced below. First, the poly(pyromellitic dianhydride-co-4,4’-oxydianiline), amic acid (PAA) solution precursor (purchased from Sigma Aldrich) was spun coated onto the SiO2/Si wafer at the spin rate of 1000 rpm for 1 min. Then, the PAA-coated wafer was moving into a tube furnace for annealing at 300 °C for 1 h with Ar flow for complete curing and imidization. The as-obtained PI film on the wafer was about 15 μm thick. Subsequently, the Ti/Au gate electrode with the thickness of 10/100 nm was deposited through an e-beam evaporator. A series of the thicker dielectric layers containing more layers of Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminate dielectric was used to fabricate the flexible TFTs. After a series of qualifications, the thickness of the nanolaminate dielectric was finally set at 20 nm. The nanolaminate Al2O3/HfO2 (five layers composing of three layers of Al2O3 and two layers of HfO2, the thickness of each layer is 4 nm) insulator was deposited using the Cambridge Nanotech ALD equipment using H2O as the oxygen source, applying trimethylaluminum (TMA) and tetrakis(dimethylamido) hafnium (TDMAH) as their metal sources. Prior to deposition processing, the TDMAH was heated to 75 °C, while TMA and H2O were kept at room temperature. The pulses sequence of one deposition cycle to obtain 0.1 nm Al2O3 was as follows: TMA exposure (0.25 s), N2 purging (5 s), H2O exposure (0.25 s), N2 purging (5 s). The pulses sequence for obtaining 0.1 nm HfO2 was as follows: TDMAH exposure (0.5 s), N2 purging (5 s), H2O exposure (0.1 s), N2 purging (5 s). Afterward, a 50-nm-thick patterned IGZO channel layer was deposited at room temperature using the Denton Sputtering System. The process conditions applied for IGZO deposition include the pre-vacuum of 10−6 Torr, O2 and Ar rate of 5 and 50 sccm, respectively, the RF sputtering power of 100 W. We have identified the structure and stoichiometry of the active layer (IGZO) with FIB-TEM and EDX. The red wireframe part in Fig. S1a shows that the IGZO active layer was in an amorphous state. The In/Ga/Zn/O atomic content percentage in IGZO was demonstrated as In0.37Ga0.20Zn0.18O0.25 (Fig. S1 and S2). Lastly, the patterned Ti/Au source and drain electrodes with the thickness of 10/100 nm were further deposited by E-beam evaporation, followed by lift-off to obtain the flexible TFTs for measurements. The channel length and width of TFT devices are 20 and 100 μm, respectively.

2.2 Film and Device Characterization

The microscope images were taken by the Olympus SZX16 optical microscope. All TFTs characterizations were performed using a Keithley 4200 semiconductor analyzer in ambient environment. The capacitances of the as-prepared insulators in metal–insulator–metal structures were measured by the Keysight (Agilent) LCR meter. The cross-sectional sample for transmission electron microscope (TEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) measurements were prepared by a dual-beam FIB-SEM system (Zeiss Crossbeam 540). The TEM/EDS characterizations were carried out via the JEOL transmission electron microscope system at (JEM-2100 UHR at 200 kV and JED 2300 T EDS). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of the as-prepared insulators was characterized with the PHI Quantera II surface analysis equipment. All the obtained XPS spectra were calibrated by the adsorbed C 1s (284.6 eV).

3 Results and Discussion

In this study, all the as-prepared TFTs with the bottom-gate top-contact configurations were fabricated by the typical photolithographic processes. The acceptable processing temperatures for obtaining an ideal insulator were discussed firstly. To study the area capacitance and leakage current density, the Al2O3 and HfO2 insulators prepared at different temperatures were measured from the Au/insulator/Au structure (Fig. S3). As shown in Fig. S4–S6, the Al2O3 and HfO2 insulators fabricated at a relatively lower temperature at 150 °C exhibited promising insulating properties and capacitance. Inspired by the utilization of nanolaminate structure to achieve the highly dense, humidity/oxygen-resistant, and flexible thin films such as Al2O3/MgO [31], Al2O3/TiO2 [38], and Al2O3/ZrO2 [39], the laminated Al2O3/HfO2 insulator with different layered numbers (Fig. S7) was fabricated here by controlling the ALD processing steps. The area capacitance and leakage current density of the different laminated Al2O3/HfO2 insulators were further investigated (Fig. S8) The five layers laminated Al2O3/HfO2 insulators showed the optimized insulating performance and reliability, which were labeled as Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates and used for the TFTs preparation. As shown in Fig. 1a, the typical photolithographic processes were applied for preparing the PI-based flexible TFTs with the Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates. The detailed procedures and parameters for each layer fabrication were depicted in the experimental section. The optical microscopic image of the as-prepared TFT device is given in Fig. 1b depicting the device with an effective channel length and width of 20 and 100 μm, respectively. After peeling off the PI substrate from the wafer, the as-fabricated PI-based flexible TFTs on a bending surface with a bending radius of 40 mm is displayed in Fig. 1c.

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Schematic diagram of the fabrication flow of the IGZO-based TFT with laminated Al2O3/HfO2 insulator including the respective thicknesses information. b The microscopic image of an as-prepared TFT device. c Photograph of the obtained TFTs with Al2O3/HfO2 insulator on the flexible substrate

Full size image

To demonstrate IGZO-based TFTs performances, comparisons were made with the 150 °C ALD-deposited insulators including Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates, HfO2, and Al2O3, and the electrical performance of the as-fabricated TFTs is measured and compared in Fig. 2, in which the IDS (drain-to-source current), IGS (gate leakage, drain-to-source current), and square-root-IDS were plotted against the VGS (gate-to-source voltage), and the IDS was plotted against the VDS (drain-to-source voltage). The thicknesses of the single layer HfO2 and Al2O3 were 4 nm. Figure 2a, d, and g shows the transfer characteristics of the TFTs with Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates, HfO2, and Al2O3 insulators, respectively, in which the VDS was fixed at 10 V. The leakage current was displayed in the range of about 10−9 A for these three samples. The maximum on-current (Ion) for the Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates based TFTs was as high as 0.70 mA, which was 350% and 260% higher than those with Al2O3 (0.20 mA) HfO2 (0.27 mA) insulators, respectively. As shown in Fig. 2b, e and h, the threshold voltage (Vth) of 0.1, 2.1, and 1.7 V for Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates, HfO2, and Al2O3-based TFTs was obtained from the intersection points of the linear fitted square-root-IDS against VGS respectively. Figure 2c, f and I shows the output characteristics of Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates, HfO2, and Al2O3-based TFTs with the applied VGS from 2 to 10 V with the increasing steps of 2 V. The saturation current and pinch-off ranges of these three samples were clearly observed, indicating that the channel current could be well controlled by the VGS. In addition, no current crowding behaviors for these three TFTs indicated good contact at the source/drain electrodes and channel interface. The IDS of the TFTs with Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates (0.42 mA) at the VGS of 10 V was at least twice larger than that with HfO2 (0.18 mA) and Al2O3 (0.13 mA) insulators, which could be attributed to the thermodynamical stability, high density, and good corrosion-resistance of Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates and higher saturation carriers mobility [40]. The effective mobility (μ), subthreshold swing (SS), transconductance (gm), and field-effect mobility (μFE) can be calculated by the following equations [40,41,42]:

$$ I_{{\text{D}}} = \left( {\frac{W}{2L}C_{i} \mu } \right)\left( {V_{{{\text{GS}}}} - V_{{{\text{th}}}} } \right)^{2} $$
(1)
$$ SS = \frac{{dV_{{{\text{GS}}}} }}{{d\left( {\log I_{D} } \right)}} $$
(2)
$$ g_{m} = \frac{W}{L}\mu C_{i} V_{{{\text{DS}}}} $$
(3)
$$ \mu_{{{\text{FE}}}} = \frac{{Lg_{m} }}{{WC_{i} V_{{{\text{DS}}}} \left( {1 + \frac{{V_{E} - V_{{{\text{th}}}} }}{\mu }\frac{{{\text{d}}\mu }}{{{\text{d}}V_{{{\text{GS}}}} }}} \right) }} $$
(4)

where L and W are the length and width of the channel, Ci is the measured capacitance density (extracted from Fig.S2, S3, and S6 at the frequency of 100 kHz) of the insulator, ID, VGS, and Vth are the drain-to-source current, gate-to-source voltage, and threshold voltage, respectively. The calculated effective mobility μ for the TFTs with Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates, HfO2, and Al2O3 insulators was 9.7, 4.6, and 3.8 cm2 V−1 s−1, respectively. The calculated field-effect mobility for the TFTs with Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates was 8.2 cm2 V−1 s−1. Figure S9 shows the VGS against log-scale IDS plots of the Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates, HfO2, and Al2O3 insulators based TFTs. The SS for the TFTs with the Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates, HfO2, and Al2O3 insulators was 256, 482, and 389 mV dec−1. The performance parameters including μ, ION/IOFF ratio, Vth, and SS at VDS = 10 V of the TFTs are summarized in Table S1. In addition, the saturation currents per unit channel width of IGZO-based TFTs with different insulators are compared in Table 1. These results clearly indicated that the Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates deposited using the low-temperature ALD have delivered a superior performance of the TFTs. Compared with other nanolaminates such as ZrO2/Al2O3 (250 °C ALD) and Al2O3/MgO (70 °C ALD) [31, 43], the TFTs with Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates exhibited promising saturation current which could be applied for driving the high-power electronic components.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Transfer characteristics, Sqrt (IDS) curves, and output performances of the IGZO TFTs on the Si wafer with different insulators of a–c laminated Al2O3/HfO2, d–f HfO2, and g–i Al2O3 prepared by ALD at 150 °C

Full size image
Table 1 Comparison of the saturation current per unit channel width of IGZO-based TFTs with different insulators
Full size table

To characterize the morphology and microstructure of the Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates deposited via ALD at 150 °C, the cross-sectional TEM-EDS analysis was carried out on the IGZO/Al2O3/HfO2 layers of an actual TFTs device. As shown in Fig. S10, the TEM specimen was firstly prepared by a dual-beam FIB system. The SEM image of the obtained FIB specimen was given in Fig. 3a. Figure 3b shows the cross-sectional TEM image of the Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates. Five layers of the light (Al2O3) and dark (HfO2) stacking structure with the total thickness of ~ 20 nm were well observed with minimal interfacial roughness and good thickness uniformity. As exhibited from the HRTEM image in Fig. 3c, the Al2O3 layers were found to be amorphous, whereas the lattice fringe of HfO2 can be clearly observed indicating its crystalline state. In addition, a fuzzy interface between the crystallized HfO2 and amorphous Al2O3 was formed, which might be attributed to the formation of the aluminate phase at the laminated interface (similar to Al–Mg-O aluminate phase) [31]. The FFT diffraction pattern in Fig. 3d evidently showed the single-crystalline nature of HfO2 layers. The cross-sectional EDS mapping taken from part of the IGZO/Al2O3/HfO2 actual TFTs displayed the distribution of Zn, In, Ga, Al, Hf, C, and O elements (Fig. 3e). Figure 3f–i exhibited the EDS maps of the Hf, Al, In, and O elements, respectively. The sublayer structure of the Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates and sharper interface between the IGZO channel and insulator are found in Fig. 3f, h.

Fig. 3
figure 3

a SEM image of the TEM specimen prepared by FIB. b Cross-sectional TEM and c HRTEM images of the laminated Al2O3/HfO2 insulator prepared via ALD at 150 °C. d The fast fourier transform (FFT) diffraction pattern image obtained from the dotted area in panel c. e Cross-sectional TEM-EDS elemental mapping of elements Zn, In, Ga, Al, Hf, C, and O. EDS mapping of elements f Hf, g Al, h In, and i O

Full size image

XPS spectra were also measured to investigate the elemental composition and chemical states of the Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates, HfO2, and Al2O3 insulators. As shown in Fig. 4a, the peaks corresponding to C, O, Al, and Hf elements were found in the Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates XPS spectrum. The peaks belonging to C, O, and Hf elements and peaks corresponding to C, O, and Al elements were observed in the HfO2 and Al2O3 XPS spectra, respectively. The O 1 s XPS spectra of the Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates and Al2O3 are shown in Fig. 4b and fitted by two peak components through Gaussian fitting. The peaks centered at high binding energy of 532.1 eV correspond to oxygen vacancy, whereas the peaks at 530.9 eV are related to oxide lattices (metal-oxide bonds here) [40]. The relative content of oxygen vacancy for Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates was found to be 23.2%, which was smaller than that of 40.6% for Al2O3. The Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates with low oxygen vacancy were beneficial for enhancing the TFTs performance [40, 44]. Figure 4c, d presents the Al 2p and Hf 4f core-level XPS spectra for the Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates, Al2O3, and HfO2. The core-level peaks of Al 2p and Hf 4f in Al2O3 and HfO2 were found at 74.5 eV (Al 2p), 18.4 eV (Hf 4f5/2), and 16.7 eV (Hf 4f7/2), in agreement with the binding energy in previous reports [45]. As for the Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates comparing with Al2O3 and HfO2, the Al 2p core-level peak was shifted toward lower binding energy of 74.5 eV, and Hf 4f core-level peaks were shifted toward higher binding energy of 18.8 eV (Hf 4f 5/2) and 17.1 eV (Hf 4f7/2). These binding energy shifts of Al 2p and Hf 4f in Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates are resulted from the difference in electronegativities of Al (1.61) and Hf (1.32) [31, 46]. Therefore, as schematically shown in Fig. 4e, the aluminate phase of Al–Hf–O was formed between the sublayers of Al2O3 and HfO2 in Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates. These aluminate phases with enhanced thermodynamical stability, high density, and good corrosion-resistance have been reported in similar laminated structures such as Al2O3/ZrO2, Al2O3/TiO2, and Al2O3/MgO [31, 38, 39]. As a result, this Al–Hf–O chemical bonding improved the reliability of the laminated Al2O3/HfO2 insulator. Therefore, the Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates with the layered structure of amorphous Al2O3, the aluminate phase in sublayers, and crystallized HfO2 could be applied as an ideal dielectric for the high-performance TFTs.

Fig. 4
figure 4

a X-ray photoelectron spectra of the Al2O3/HfO2, HfO2, and Al2O3 insulators prepared by ALD at 150 °C. High-resolution b O 1s and c Al 2p spectra of the Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates and Al2O3. d High-resolution Hf 4f spectra of the Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates and HfO2. e Schematic of the Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates with amorphous Al2O3, crystallized HfO2, and the aluminate (Al–Mg–O) phase at the interface

Full size image

The flexible TFTs on the PI substrate were fabricated with 150 °C ALD-deposited Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates. As shown in Fig. 5a, the PI-based flexible TFTs with Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates could be tested on a bending surface with a bending radius of 40 mm. Figure 5b presents the transfer characteristics of the PI-based flexible TFTs with the fixed VDS of 3 V. The leakage current was in the range of ~ 10−9 A. The maximum Ion for PI-based flexible TFTs was up to as 0.83 mA. The obtained ION/IOFF ratio was higher than 106. The Vth of − 2.8 V was extracted from the intersection point of the linear fitted square-root-IDS against VGS (Fig. 5c). Figure 5d shows the output characteristics of Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates-based flexible TFTs with the applied VGS from 2 to 10 V with the increasing steps of 2 V. The saturation IDS could be observed from the output curves. The IDS of this flexible TFTs was up to 0.72 mA at the VGS of 10 V. In addition, the VGS against log-scale IDS curves of the flexible TFTs are also plotted in Fig. S11. Based on Eq. (2), the SS of this flexible TFTs with the Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates was calculated as 319 mV dec−1. Compared with other PI-based organic or inorganic flexible TFTs [30, 37], the flexible TFTs with Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates showed promising performance including the carriers mobility and output current. Transfer characteristics of the fabricated flexible IGZO thin-film transistors after repeated bending for 100 times at the bending radius of 40 mm are shown in Fig. 5e. Furthermore, the stable maximum IDS and average gate leakage of the as-prepared TFTs are also summarized in Fig. 5f. These satisfactory electrical performances of the flexible IGZO-based TFTs exhibited their promising flexibility and endurability.

Fig. 5
figure 5

a, g Photograph of the PI-based flexible TFTs with lAl2O3/HfO2 nanolaminates tested on a bending surface with a bending radius of 40 mm. b Transfer characteristics, c Sqrt (IDS) curve, and d output performances of the flexible TFTs tested at a bending radius of 40 mm. e Transfer characteristics and f the maximum IDS and average IGS of the flexible IGZO-based TFTs after repeated bending for 100 times at the bending radius of 40 mm

Full size image

The humidity stability and hysteresis behavior of the as-prepared IGZO-based TFTs with nanolaminate Al2O3/HfO2 insulator were conducted by storing the devices in a laboratory environment (relative humidity of 60–70%, temperature of 25–30 °C) at different times. As shown in Fig. 6a, the gate leakage of IGZO-based TFTs with nanolaminate Al2O3/HfO2 insulator is kept stable and at a relatively low value of about 10–10 A. Meanwhile, the TFTs exhibited ideal transfer behaviors with small hysteresis after exposure to a relative humidity of 60–70%, and a temperature of 25–30 °C environment for 48 h. The reliability of the set of IGZO-based TFTs with nanolaminate Al2O3/HfO2 insulator was also processed (Fig. 6b). Seven batches (each batch has seven cells) total of 49 IGZO-based TFT cells were tested. As shown in Fig. 6b, two cells in batch 3 and batch 4 were damaged. The other 47 cells worked well with an average maximum IDS of 0.79 mV. The yield of IGZO-based TFTs with nanolaminate Al2O3/HfO2 insulator reaches 95%.

Fig. 6
figure 6

a Transfer characteristics and hysteresis behavior of the IGZO-based TFTs with nanolaminate Al2O3/HfO2 insulator in a pristine state and after being stored in a laboratory environment (relative humidity of 60– 70%, temperature of 25–30 °C) for 6, 24, and 48 h. b 3D bars map showing maximum IDS for 7 batch (each batch has seven cells) IGZO-based TFTs

Full size image

4 Conclusions

Flexible TFTs on PI substrates were successfully fabricated using the Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminate which was deposited by ALD at 150 °C. The Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminate was demonstrated with the layered structure of amorphous Al2O3, crystallized HfO2, and the aluminate Al–Hf–O phase at sublayers interface. The as-prepared TFTs without any post-annealing presented the carrier mobility of 9.7 cm2 V−1 s−1, ON/OFF ratio ~ 1.3 × 106, subthreshold voltage of 0.1 V, saturated current up to 0.83 mA, and subthreshold swing of 0.256 V dec−1, as well as withstand the bending radius of 40 mm. The as-prepared TFTs possess satisfactory humidity stability in a relative humidity of 60–70%, a temperature of 25–30 °C environment. The yield of IGZO-based TFTs with the nanolaminate insulator reaches 95%. We believe this Al2O3/HfO2 nanolaminate could be one of the ideal candidates for high-performance electronics.