Abstract
The current research strives for examining the power of utilizing computer-based simulations on students’ academic performance and their perceptions of organic chemistry after using computer-based simulations during their learning of organic chemistry. The study adopted mixed-method research. A total of 72 students whose ages range from 16 to 18 years old were included in this study and they were chosen from two secondary schools that have a combination where chemistry is taught in Gicumbi District in Rwanda. Two classes at every school were selected. One class functioned as the control group, and the other functioned as the experimental group. Their regular chemistry instructors that functioned as a facilitator in the research taught the units of organic Chemistry. Each experimental group and control group comprised 36 students, making a total of 72 students in both groups. Pre- and post-tests were given to all 72 students in both groups. The dependability coefficient for the quantitative data, which was 0.791, was determined using an organic chemistry test. However, qualitative data were collected from only 20 students from the experimental group of 36 students after using computer-based simulation. The analysis of quantitative data was done by using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS software) where the mean of marks, standard deviation and the t-test were computed to report the research questions and to test the hypothesis. The findings revealed that the mean marks of students taught the units of organic chemistry by using computer-based simulations were extensively greater than those taught without using computer-based simulations. The findings also indicated that the students had a positive reflection, and motivation, and their understanding was increased after using computer-based simulations. Therefore, it was recommended that computer-based simulations should be used to improve students’ learning of organic chemistry.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The corresponding author can be reached for reasonable requests for the datasets created during and/or examined during this investigation.
References
Adams, W. K. (2010). Student engagement and learning with PhET interactive simulations. Nuovo Cimento Della Societa Italiana Di Fisica C, 33(3), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1393/ncc/i2010-10623-0
Agu, P. A., & Samuel, I. R. (2020). Effect of simulation instructional package on basic science and technology students ’ achievement and retention in federal capital territory, Abuja, Nigeria. International Journal of Innovative Education Research, 6(3), 1–7
Alase, A. (2017). The Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA): A Guide to a Good Qualitative Research Approach. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 5(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.5n.2p.9
Almasri, F. (2022). Simulations to teach science subjects: connections among students’ engagement, self-confidence, satisfaction, and learning styles. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 7161–7181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10940-w
Anderson, T. L., & Bodner, G. M. (2008). What can we do about “parker”? a case study of a good student who didn’t “get” organic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(2), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1039/b806223b
Aytekin. (2007). How Technology Is Integrated Into Science Education in a Developing Country: North Cyprus Case. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 6(3), 1303–6521
Barakabitze, A. A., William-Andey Lazaro, A., Ainea, N., Mkwizu, M. H., Maziku, H., Matofali, A. X., Iddi, A., & Sanga, C. (2019). Transforming African Education Systems in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Using ICTs: Challenges and Opportunities. Education Research International, 2019, 29. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6946809
Beichumila, F., Bahati, B., & Kafanabo, E. (2022). Students ’ acquisition of science process skills in chemistry through computer simulations and animations in secondary schools in Tanzania. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 21(3), 166–195
Buabeng-Andoh, C., & Issifu, Y. (2015). Implementation of ICT in Learning: A Study of Students in Ghanaian Secondary Schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191(1), 1282–1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.555
Carpenter, Y., & Sullivan, E. R. (2017). The role of interactive digital simulations in student conversations about visualizing molecules. Proceedings of the University of Calgary Conference on Learning and Teaching, 2, 16–23
Celik, B. (2022). The Effects of Computer Simulations on Students’ Science Process Skills: Literature Review. Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v2i1.17
Charles Kwesi Koomson, Godfred Safo-Adu, and S. A. (2020). Utilising Computer Simulation and Computerised Molecular Modeling Software to Enhance the Teaching and Learning of Hybridisation in Senior High Schools. International Journal of Chemistry Education, 4(1), 44–55.
de Mushimiyimana, J. D (2021). School Management and Effective Use of smart Classroom in Teaching and Learning Process. Teaching and Learning Process, 9(4), 4–13
Dunn, J. (2020). education sciences The E ff ect of Simulation-Supported Inquiry on South African Natural Sciences Learners ’ Understanding of Atomic and Molecular Structures
Egara, F. O., Eseadi, C., & Nzeadibe, A. C. (2022). Effect of computer simulation on secondary school students’ interest in algebra. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 5457–5469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10821-8
Eticha, A. T., & Ochonogor, C. (2020). Assessment of undergraduate chemistry students’ difficulties in organic chemistry. International conference on mathematics, science and technology education 2015, (september), 1–12. retrieved from http://uir.unisa.ac.za/handle/10500/19962
Ferguson, R., & Bodner, G. M. (2008). Making sense of the arrow-pushing formalism among chemistry majors enrolled in organic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(2), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1039/b806225k
Frenz, C. M. (2007). Possibilities and limitations of computer simulation. Ieee Potentials, 26(2), 30–33. https://doi.org/10.1109/MP.2007.343025
Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.23596
Ibrahim. M, (2011). Implications of Designing Instructional Video Using Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. Critical Questions in Education, 3(2), 83–104.
Jabeen, F., & Afzal, M. T. (2020). Effect of simulated chemistry practicals on students’ performance at secondary school level. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 7(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v7i1.2600
Jhenly, A., Maria, T., & Qu (2019). Computer-based-Simulation-and-its-Effects-on-Student’s-Knowledge-in-Chemistry.pdf (pp. 8–9). pp. 8–9.
Johan, R., & Harlan, J. (2014). Education Nowadays. International Journal of Educational, 4(5), 6.
Johnstone, A. H. (2006). Chemical education research in Glasgow in perspective. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(2), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1039/B5RP90021B
Kabigting, L. D. C. (2021). Computer simulation on teaching and learning of selected topics in physics. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 2(2), e02108. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/10909
Kanyaru, P., & Maina, E. (2019). Enhancing exploratory learning using computer simulation in an e-learning environment: a literature review. Open Journal for Information Technology, 2(2), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojit.0202.02035k
Khaleel Younis, B. (2017). The effects of scientific inquiry simulations on students’ higher order thinking skills of chemical reaction and attitude towards chemistry. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(11), 1158–1161. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-5-11-7
Kim, J. H., & Robinson, A. P. (2019). Interval-based hypothesis testing and its applications to economics and finance. Econometrics, 7(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics7020021
Krüger, J. T., Höffler, T. N., Wahl, M., Knickmeier, K., & Parchmann, I. (2022). Two comparative studies of computer simulations and experiments as learning tools in school and out-of-school education. Instructional Science, 50(2), 169–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09566-1
Lasisi, A. R., Oti, E., & Arowolo, J. G., P. A. and A. N. O (2021). The effect of innovative computer simulation instruction on students’ academic performance in abstract concepts in science. British Journal of Education, 9(3), 1–8
Laxmi Narwal, P. S. (2017). Role of computer simulation in Chemistry. International Research Journal of Management Science & Technology, 8(6), 81–85. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/36208435/Role_of_computer_simulation_in_Chemistry
Liu, H. C. (2005). Examining the use of computer simulations to promote learning of electrochemistry among college students Recommended Citation
Lorenzo, M. G., Reverdito, A. M., Blanco, M., & Salerno, A. (2012). Difficulties of undergraduate students in the organic chemistry. 42(1973), 74–81
Mandela, N. (2003). " Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world “. 1–11
Mihindo, W., Jane, O., & A., W. S. W. Z (2017). Effects of computer-based simulations teaching approach on students ’ achievement in the learning of chemistry among secondary school students in nakuru sub county, Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(5), 65–75
Mohsen, M. A. (2011). The use of computer-based simulation to aid comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning. Journal of educational computing research, 54(6), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe756113
Moore, E. B., Chamberlain, J. M., Parson, R., & Perkins, K. K. (2014). PhET interactive simulations: transformative tools for teaching chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(8), 1191–1197. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed4005084
Nkemakolam, O. E., Chinelo, O. F., & Jane, M. C. (2018). Effect of computer simulations on secondary school students’ academic achievement in chemistry in anambra state. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 4(4), 284–289. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2018.44.284.289
Oladejo, A. I., Akinola;, V. O., & Nwaboku, N. C. (2021). Teaching Chemistry With Computer Simulation: Would Senior. Crawford Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(2), 16–32
Oladejo, A. I., & Victoria, A. V. (2021). Teaching chemistry with computer simulation : would senior. Crawford journal of multidisciplinary research, 2(2), 16–32.
Olakanmi, E. E. (2015). the Effects of a web-based computer simulation on students’ conceptual unde. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(5), 627–641
Ouahi, M. Ben, Lamri, D., Hassouni, T., & Al Ibrahmi, E. M. (2022). Science teachers’ views on the use and effectiveness of interactive simulations in science teaching and learning. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15116a
Pinto, M., & Leite, C. (2020). Digital technologies in support of students learning in higher education: Literature review. Digital Education Review, 6(37), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1344/DER.2020.37.343-360
Rushton, G. T., Hardy, R. C., Gwaltney, K. P., & Lewis, S. E. (2008). Alternative conceptions of organic chemistry topics among fourth year chemistry students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(2), 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1039/b806228p
Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0
Sener, N., & Tas, E. (2017). Developing achievement test: a research for assessment of 5th grade biology subject. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(2), 254. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n2p254
Sentongo, J. (2013). The effect of using computer simulations in teaching chemical bonding: experiences with Ugandan Learners. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 05(04), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.31901/24566322.2013/05.04.10
Soma, A., Nantomah, I., & Adusei, R. (2021). Didactics of Natural Sciences in Higher Secondary Education. International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, 8(10). https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.0810002
Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. SSRN Electronic Journal, 5(3), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040
Vásquez, A., Nussbaum, M., Sciarresi, E., Martínez, T., Barahona, C., & Strasser, K. (2017). The Impact of the Technology Used in Formative Assessment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(8), 1142–1167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116650971
Wakil, K., Qaisar, N., & Mohammed, C. (2017). Enriching Classrooms With Technology. European Journal of Open Education and E-Learning Studies, September, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.841925
Widiyatmoko, A. (2018). The effectiveness of simulation in science learning on conceptual understanding: A literature review. Journal of international development and cooperation, 24(1), 35–43
Zhaoyan Li, Y. C. (2021). and J. L. Application of virtual simulation technology in chemistry teaching. E3S Web of Conferences, 267, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126702067
Acknowledgements
The authors recognize Assoc. Prof. Evode Mukama, lecturer at the University of Rwanda, College of Education (UR-CE), for his advice and assistance through this study. The authors also acknowledge the African Centre of Excellence for Innovative in Teaching and Learning Mathematics and Sciences (ACEITLMS), University of Rwanda-College of Education (UR-CE), Rukara Campus, Kayonza, Rwanda, for its encouragement to conduct this study.
Funding
The current research has not received any specific financial funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix:Achievement Test/ 20 Marks
Appendix:Achievement Test/ 20 Marks
-
1.
a) What do you understand by the term hydrocarbon? /0.5 marks.
-
a.
b) What is the relationship between the number of carbon atoms in a hydrocarbon and its boiling point? / 0.5 marks.
-
2.
Explain the different steps of the chlorination reaction of methane/ 1 Mark.
-
3.
Explain how ethene can be differentiated from carbon dioxide using a chemical test / 1 Mark.
-
4.
State the necessary condition for the existence of cis-trans isomerism in alkenes?/ 1 Mark.
-
5.
State the necessary condition for the existence of cis-trans isomerism in alkenes?/ 1 Mark.
-
6.
What are the products of the dehydrohalogenation of the following compound? Show the major product in 1-Bromo-2-methylpropane / 1 Mark.
-
7.
What are the products of the dehydrohalogenation of the following compound? Show the major product 3-chloro-3-ethyl pentane / 1 Mark.
-
8.
With reference to alcohols, define intermolecular dehydration reaction./ 1 Mark.
-
9.
Compare and contrast the preparation of ethanol by hydration of ethanol and by fermentation by putting an emphasis on the advantages and disadvantages of each process./ 1 Mark.
-
10.
If you react ethanal with acidified potassium dichromate (VI) solution, what organic product would you get? ii. Write a half-equation for the formation of that product from ethanal./ 1 Mark.
-
11.
Draw the structure of the alcohol you would oxidize in order to obtain each of the following compounds. (i) pentan-2-one (ii) Butanal/ 1 Mark.
-
12.
The carbon-oxygen double bond present in aldehydes and ketones is very polar. What does this mean and how does it arise? / 1 Mark.
-
13.
Find the structures that correspond to the systematic names below a) 2,2-dimethylpropanoic acid. /1 Mark.
-
14.
Fatty acids are some of the raw materials used in the manufacture of soaps. How is this possible, to convert fatty acid into these important cleansing agents? /1 Mark.
-
15.
Explain if tertiary amines can react with acid chloride. If it is possible what would be the expected product./ 1 Mark.
-
16.
Draw the isomer that is; the most acidic of dichlorobutanoic acid. /1Mark.
-
17.
Draw the isomer that is; the least acidic of fluoropentanoic acid/ 1 Mark.
-
18.
Describe the chemical test that can be used to distinguish the following pairs of compounds: a)Ethanoic acid and 2-methylpropan-2-ol / 1 Mark.
-
19.
Draw the structures of all amines of molecular formula C4H11N. Classify them as primary, secondary and tertiary amines. /1 Mark.
-
20.
If protein molecules are made essentially of Carbon, Hydrogen, Oxygen, Nitrogen and amino acid side chains (a) What kind of bonds do you expect to see in those structures? (b) What kind of reactions do expect in those molecules?/ 1 Mark.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Nsabayezu, E., Iyamuremye, A., Mukiza, J. et al. Impact of computer-based simulations on students’ learning of organic chemistry in the selected secondary schools of Gicumbi District in Rwanda. Educ Inf Technol 28, 3537–3555 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11344-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11344-6