Review
The long-term uncertainty of biodegradable mulch film residues and associated microplastics pollution on plant-soil health

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130055Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Bioplastics (Bio-MPs) are unlikely to be important in promoting soil C storage.

  • Bio-MPs act as labile C sources to stimulate microbial growth and soil N and P cycling.

  • Bio-MPs are much easier to form nanoplastics and cause stronger toxic to plants.

  • Uncertainty of bio-MPs pollution remains on plant-soil health.

Abstract

Biodegradable mulch film potentially offers an encouraging alternative to conventional (petroleum-based) plastic films. Since biodegradable films are more susceptible to rapid degradation, more microplastics (MPs) are likely to be generated than conventional films within the same time frame, probably leading to more severe MPs pollution and associated effects. However, the effect of biodegradable mulch film residues and associated MPs pollution on plant-soil health remains uncertainty. Here, we evaluated the potential effect of bio-MPs pollution on soil carbon (C) and nutrient (i.e., N and P) cycling, soil biology (microorganisms and mesofauna), and plant health, as these are crucial to agroecosystem functioning and the delivery of key ecosystem services. Unlike the inert (and therefore recalcitrant) C contained within petroleum-based MPs, at least 80% of the C from bio-MPs is converted to CO2, with up to 20% immobilized in living microbial biomass (i.e., < 0.05 t C ha−1). Although biodegradable films are unlikely to be important in promoting soil C storage, they may accelerate microbial biomass turnover in the short term, as well as CO2 production. Compared to conventional MPs, bio-MPs degradation is more pronounced, thereby inducing greater alterations in microbial diversity and community composition. This may further alter N2O and CH4 emissions, and ultimately resulting in unpredictable consequences for global climate warming. The extent to which this may occur, however, has yet to be shown in either laboratory or field studies. In addition, bio-MPs have a large chance of forming nanoplastics, potentially causing a stronger toxic effect on plants relative to conventional MPs. Consequently, this would influence plant health, crop productivity, and food safety, leading to potential health risks. It is unclear, however, if these are direct effects on key plant processes (e.g. signaling, cell expansion) or indirect effects (e.g. nutrient deficiency or acidification). Overall, the question as to whether biodegradable mulch films offer a promising alternative to solve the conventional plastic legacy in soil over the long term remains unclear.

Introduction

Plastics provide a vital role within almost all agronomic management regimes, however, their use is receiving increased attention and scrutiny due to their potential to contaminate and pollute land, and migrate to freshwater and marine habitats (Maraveas, 2020a). Plastic mulch films are one of the most important plastic products used in agriculture and are widely used to suppress weeds and reduce water usage in crop production (Kasirajan and Ngouajio, 2012). The global mulch films market is currently valued at US$ 5 × 109 and is expected to have a compound annual growth rate of 5.9% over the next 5 years (TMR, 2022). Although values vary widely, it is currently estimated that 2.5 × 106 tonnes (t) of plastic film are used annually within greenhouses and for mulching (ca. 0.5% of global plastic production) and that this covers an area of land ca. 25 × 106 ha (Qadeer et al., 2021, OECD, 2022). These films, however, have a limited lifespan (<1 y for mulches and ca. 5 y for greenhouses) due to progressive chemical, physical and biological degradation. Removing the plastic mulch films from soil in the agroecosystem is time-consuming (estimated ∼42 h per ha; Velandia et al., 2019), and expensive (estimated to be €176.5, €186 and €192 per ha for removal, landfill and recycling, respectively) (Marí et al., 2019). At the end of their working lifetime, complete removal from fields is often therefore unviable economically, if not impossible, leading to a substantial accumulated legacy of both macro- and microplastics (MPs, diameter < 5 mm) in agroecosystems (Rillig et al., 2012). The detection of MPs in edible vegetables (e.g. carrots, lettuce, broccoli, potatoes) and fruits (e.g. apples and pears) suggests that MPs also transfer into the food chain and may pose a threat to human health (Li et al., 2020, Conti et al., 2020, Wang et al., 2022a). This is supported by recent evidence showing that human exposure to MPs can lead to intestinal inflammation, as well as accumulation in organs (including the kidney, liver, gut and placenta) resulting in metabolic changes (Kannan and Vimalkumar, 2021, Schwarzfischer and Rogler, 2022, Shi et al., 2022a), although a causal link to more serious medical conditions has yet to be established. It is therefore clear that strategies are needed to minimize the formation, persistence, movement, and toxicity of MPs within agriculture.

One way to lessen plastic pollution in agroecosystems is by the substitution of petroleum-based plastic with biobased plastics (examples include polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), polybutylene succinate (PBS) and polylactic acid (PLA)). Biodegradable film are progressively replacing conventional polyethylene (PE)-, polypropylene (PP)- and polyvinyl chloride (PVC)-based films, and their use is predicted to increase from 1.5 × 106 t in 2021 to 5.3 × 106 t by 2026 (Plastics Europe, 2020). Although biobased films are typically more expensive than their petroleum-derived counterparts (Jogi and Bhat, 2020), the cost is often offset by the absence of removal and disposal costs (Malinconico et al., 2008). Biodegradable plastic mulch films have also shown equivalent agronomic performance compared with conventional polyethylene mulches in many cases (Fig. 1). A meta-analysis conducted in China by Liu et al. (2021) found that the performance of biodegradable mulch film differed little from that of conventional mulch films, increasing the water use efficiency of crops by 19–25% and soil temperature by 0.9 °C, consequently leading to an enhancement in crop yields (i.e., maize, wheat, cotton, and potato) by 18–26%. However, it is still too early to promote the use of biodegradable films on a large scale, due to the questions about in situ degradation particularly in different (natural) climates and over longer temporal periods, as well as the uncertainties about the long-term impacts on plant-soil health and ecosystem multifunctionality in agroecosystems (Fig. 1, Fig. 2). It has been widely accepted that biodegradable plastic mulch films are designed to break down into carbon dioxide (CO2) and water (usually by hydrolysis) with some carbon (C) incorporated into the soil microbial biomass within less than one year, according to the standard laboratory analysis at temperatures from 20 °C to 28 °C (Liwarska-Bizukojc, 2021). However, it cannot be guaranteed that biodegradable mulch films will indeed degrade in the field within a 24-month time frame as environmental conditions, such as the microbial community present, temperature, and moisture content, vary from soil to soil, and are also dependent on climatic conditions (Sintim et al., 2020). Therefore, biodegradation is most likely much slower as average soil temperatures and moisture contents seldom reach those used in laboratory test conditions (Tabasi and Ajji, 2015). For example, Liao and Chen (2021) found that the weight loss was only 1.1–8.0% for PLA, and 0.8–6.8% for poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT) after a 180 day incubation in soil. Of note, numerous MPs were formed after poly(p-dioxanone) degradation, leading to the presence of 2103 plastic items/g in the soil (Liao and Chen, 2021). Thus, the question as to whether biodegradable mulch films offer a promising alternative to solve the conventional plastic accumulation/legacy problem in soil over the long term, remains unclear. Therefore, investigation and assessment of the degradation processes, as well as the timescale of biodegradable mulch films degradation in the natural environment are required. This is of particular importance given biodegradable mulch films are designed to be tilled into the soil and not removed after use.

Equally, while the main plastic biopolymer in the film may be classified as environmentally benign (Maraveas, 2020a, Maraveas, 2020b), mulch films also contain a multitude of undeclared additives (e.g. metals, volatile organic chemicals) that are used to provide additional functionality (e.g. UV resistance, flexibility, improved tensile strength) (Marra et al., 2016, Arza et al., 2018). While some of these are added to accelerate degradation, the short- and long-term impact of these on plant and soil health remains virtually unknown (Fig. 2). Since biodegradable mulch films are designed to degrade within a few years, it is highly likely that more MPs will be generated over short periods in comparison to conventional plastics (Liao and Chen, 2021). Consequently, this may lead to even more serious bio-MPs pollution in soils with implications for nutrient (i.e., N and P) cycling processes, with consequences for soil quality, ecosystem functions and multifunctionality (Ma et al., 2022), and therefore on the food security (Beltrán-Sanahuja et al., 2021). In this perspective piece, we therefore discuss the potential effect of bio-MPs from the decomposition of biodegradable mulch films with a focus on: C storage, nutrient (i.e., N and P) cycling, greenhouse gas emission, soil biology (microorganisms and mesofauna), and plant health, as these are crucial to agroecosystem functions and the delivery of key ecosystem services.

Section snippets

Soil carbon storage

Biodegradable mulch films are C-rich (typically around 60–80%), and may influence soil organic matter (SOM), and biogeochemical cycling. Assuming an average film thickness of 25 µm and an average density of 1.2 g cm-³ , we calculate that biodegradable mulch films will typically contribute 0.30 t C ha−1 y−1. For context, annual inputs from cereal root systems and crop residues (e.g. maize or wheat) can exceed 5 t ha−1 y−1, even excluding C inputs from root exudation (Zhang et al., 2013, Komainda

Influence of bio-MPs on nutrient cycling and GHG emissions

Since bioavailable C is the dominant element in bio-MPs, their degradation could supply C for microbial communities, which potentially induces the cycling of other macro and micro nutrients (Sun et al., 2022a). N turnover was significantly altered by bio-MPs addition, documented by the changes in NH4+, and reduction in NO3- (Table 1). The accumulation of NH4+ is dependent on its balance between production (e.g. ammonia oxidization and mineralization) and depletion (e.g. nitrification and

Influence of bio-MPs on the microbial community

The zone of soil surrounding bio-MPs is likely to induce a shift in the microbial community leading to the formation of microbial hotspots (so termed the microplastisphere; Zhou et al., 2021b). As soil contains numerous spatial niches (i.e., rhizosphere, fertisphere, detritusphere, drillosphere), a key question is whether this shift in soil community has any major influence on soil biodiversity and function. Compared to conventional MPs, bio-MPs disintegration is more rapid and formation of

Influence of bio-MPs on mesofauna

Agroecosystem sustainability is supported by an ecological network comprised of a diversity of organisms. Therefore, understanding the impact of bio-MPs on a range of trophic levels is required to gain a holistic view of soil biology change. Bio-MPs share some common features with MPs, from which some parallels may be drawn. That is, bio-MPs can cause weight loss, reduce growth rates and casting yield, increase mortality, decrease reproduction rate, as well as induce DNA damage and oxidative

Influence of bio-MPs on plant health

Plants are fundamental to terrestrial ecosystem functioning as well as agroecosystem service provision, and therefore a fuller understanding of MPs-plant interaction is needed. Like conventional MPs, toxic effects of bio-MPs on plants have also been recorded (as reviewed by Zhou et al., 2021a). It is unclear, however, if these are direct effects on key plant processes (e.g. signaling, cell expansion) or indirect effects (e.g. nutrient deficiency due to microbial immobilization of N and P, or

Uncertainty 1

Although biodegradable mulch films are designed to break down into CO2 and water in the field, a paucity of information exists about their physical disintegration and subsequent degradation under realistic field conditions. If the biodegradation is much slower under cooler, drier conditions, then more bio-MPs (and nanoplastics) may accumulate in the soil in comparison to conventional plastics. Hence, it is still unclear whether current biodegradable plastic mulches will solve the problem of

Environmental Implications

Bioplastics potentially offer an encouraging alternative to conventional (petroleum-based) plastics. Although bioplastics are designed to degrade within a few years, it is highly likely that more MPs will be generated over short periods in comparison to conventional plastics. Consequently, this may lead to even more serious bio-MPs pollution in soils with implications for soil and plant health. However, the short- and long-term impact of bio-MPs on plant-soil health remains virtually unknown.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the Fellowship of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2022M713397) and the Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program funded by China Association for Science and Technology (2020QNRC001). D.L.J. acknowledges the support of the UK Natural Environment Research Council Global Challenges Research Fund programme on Reducing the Impacts of Plastic Waste in Developing Countries (NE/V005871/1), and the Centre for Environmental Biotechnology Project, part-funded by the

References (99)

  • L.M. Greenfield et al.

    Field response of N2O emissions, microbial communities, soil biochemical processes and winter barley growth to the addition of conventional and biodegradable microplastics

    Agric., Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2022)
  • R. Jia et al.

    Insights into the associations between soil quality and ecosystem multifunctionality driven by fertilization management: a case study from the North China Plain

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2022)
  • K. Jogi et al.

    Valorization of food processing wastes and by-products for bioplastic production

    Sustain. Chem. Pharm.

    (2020)
  • S.W. Kim et al.

    Edible size of polyethylene microplastics and their effects on springtail behavior

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2020)
  • M. Komainda et al.

    The effects of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrid and harvest date on above- and belowground biomass dynamics, forage yield and quality - A trade-off for carbon inputs?

    Eur. J. Agron.

    (2018)
  • Y. Kuzyakov et al.

    Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2000)
  • C. Li et al.

    Effect of LDPE and biodegradable PBAT primary microplastics on bacterial community after four months of soil incubation

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2022)
  • J. Liao et al.

    Biodegradable plastics in the air and soil environment: Low degradation rate and high microplastics formation

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2021)
  • X.H. Liao et al.

    Soil nematode communities on five oceanic islands across a latitudinal gradient in the north of the South China Sea: Influence of biotic and abiotic factors

    Ecol. Indic.

    (2021)
  • E. Liwarska-Bizukojc

    Effect of (bio)plastics on soil environment: a review

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2021)
  • A. Marra et al.

    Polylactic acid/zinc oxide biocomposite films for food packaging application

    Int. J. Biol. Macromol.

    (2016)
  • M. Mazzon et al.

    Biodegradable plastics: Effects on functionality and fertility of two different soils

    Appl. Soil Ecol.

    (2022)
  • M.T. Mueller et al.

    Species-specific effects of long-term microplastic exposure on the population growth of nematodes, with a focus on microplastic ingestion

    Ecol. Indic.

    (2020)
  • G. Nayab et al.

    Climate warming masks the negative effect of microplastics on plant-soil health in a silt loam soil

    Geoderma

    (2022)
  • A. Qadeer et al.

    Agricultural plastic mulching as a potential key source of microplastic pollution in the terrestrial ecosystem and consequences

    Resour., Conserv. Recycl.

    (2021)
  • Y. Qi et al.

    Effects of plastic mulch film residues on wheat rhizosphere and soil properties

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2020)
  • C. Sanz-Lázaro et al.

    Biodegradable plastics can alter carbon and nitrogen cycles to a greater extent than conventional plastics in marine sediment

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2021)
  • J. Sasse et al.

    Feed your friends: Do plant exudates shape the root microbiome?

    Trends Plant Sci.

    (2018)
  • C. Shi et al.

    Disturbed gut-liver axis indicating oral exposure to polystyrene microplastic potentially increases the risk of insulin resistance

    Environ. Int.

    (2022)
  • J. Shi et al.

    Microplastic additions alter soil organic matter stability and bacterial community under varying temperature in two contrasting soils

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2022)
  • H.Y. Sintim et al.

    In situ degradation of biodegradable plastic mulch films in compost and agricultural soils

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2020)
  • T. Sun et al.

    Microbial growth rates, carbon use efficiency and enzyme activities during post-agricultural soil restoration

    Catena

    (2022)
  • X. Sun et al.

    Simulation of the effects of microplastics on the microbial community structure and nitrogen cycle of paddy soil

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2022)
  • Y. Sun et al.

    Biodegradable microplastics enhance soil microbial network complexity and ecological stochasticity

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2022)
  • R.Y. Tabasi et al.

    Selective degradation of biodegradable blends in simulated laboratory composting

    Polym. Degrad. Stab.

    (2015)
  • F. Wang et al.

    Interactions of microplastics and cadmium on plant growth and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in an agricultural soil

    Chemosphere

    (2020)
  • F. Wang et al.

    Micro (nano) plastics and terrestrial plants: Up-to-date knowledge on uptake, translocation, and phytotoxicity

    Resour., Conserv. Recycl.

    (2022)
  • F. Wang et al.

    Effects of microplastics on soil properties: current knowledge and future perspectives

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2022)
  • Q. Wang et al.

    Effects of microplastics and carbon nanotubes on soil geochemical properties and bacterial communities

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2022)
  • W. Yang et al.

    Effects of microplastics on plant growth and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in a soil spiked with ZnO nanoparticles

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2021)
  • Y. Yu et al.

    Polystyrene microplastics (PS-MPs) toxicity induced oxidative stress and intestinal injury in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2020)
  • H. Zang et al.

    Microplastics in the agroecosystem: are they an emerging threat to the plant-soil system?

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2020)
  • F.L. Zhang et al.

    Studies on the root characteristics of maize varieties of different eras

    J. Integr. Agric.

    (2013)
  • L. Zhang et al.

    Interaction of Lumbricus terrestris with macroscopic polyethylene and biodegradable plastic mulch

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2018)
  • S. Zhang et al.

    Ecotoxicological effects of polyethylene microplastics and ZnO nanoparticles on earthworm Eisenia fetida

    Appl. Soil Ecol.

    (2022)
  • J. Zhou et al.

    Arbuscular mycorrhiza enhances rhizodeposition and reduces the rhizosphere priming effect on the decomposition of soil organic matter

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2020)
  • J. Zhou et al.

    Microplastics as an emerging threat to plant and soil health in agroecosystems

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2021)
  • J. Zhou et al.

    The microplastisphere: biodegradable microplastics addition alters soil microbial community structure and function

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2021)
  • J. Zhou et al.

    Strong priming of soil organic matter induced by frequent input of labile carbon

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2021)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text