Skip to main content
Log in

Component Games on Random Graphs

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Combinatorica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the (1:b) component game played on a graph G, two players, Maker and Breaker, alternately claim 1 and b previously unclaimed edges of G, respectively. Maker’s aim is to maximise the size of a largest connected component in her graph, while Breaker is trying to minimise it. We show that the outcome of the game on the binomial random graph is strongly correlated with the appearance of a nonempty (b +2)-core in the graph.

For any integer k, the k-core of a graph is its largest subgraph of minimum degree at least k. Pittel, Spencer and Wormald showed in 1996 that for any k ≥ 3 there exists a constant ck, which they determine, such that p = ck/n is the threshold function for the appearance of the k-core in \(G \sim {\cal G}\left( {n,p} \right)\). More precisely, \(G \sim {\cal G}\left( {n,c/n} \right)\) has WHP a linear-size k-core for constant c>ck, and an empty k-core when c<ck.

We show that for any positive constant integer b, when playing the (1:b) component game on \(G \sim {\cal G}\left( {n,c/n} \right)\), Maker can WHP build a linear-size component if c > cb+2, while Breaker can WHP prevent Maker from building larger than polylogarithmic-size components if c< cb+2.

For the strategy of Maker when c> cb+2, we utilise known results on the k-core. For Breaker when c< cb+2, we make use of a result of Achlioptas and Molloy (sketching its proof) that states that after deleting all vertices of degree less than k, and repeating this step a constant number of times, G is WHP shattered into pieces of polylogarithmic size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Achlioptas and M. Molloy: The solution space geometry of random linear equations, Random Structures and Algorithms 46 (2015), 197–231.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Bednarska and Tomasz Łuczak: Biased positional games and the phase transition, Random Structures and Algorithms 18 (2001), 141–152.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Beck: Combinatorial Games: Tic-Tac-Toe Theory, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2008.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. B. Bollobás: A probabilistic proof of an asymptotic formula for the number of labelled regular graphs, European J. Combinatorics 1 (1980), 311–316.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. V. Chvátal and P. Erdős: Biased positional games, Ann. Discrete Math. 2 (1978), 221–228.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. F. Chung and L. Lu: The diameter of sparse random graphs, Advances in Applied Math 26 (2001), 257–279.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Cain and N. Wormald: Encores on cores, Electronic J. Combinatorics 13 (2006), P81.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Ferber, R. Glebov, M. Krivelevich and A. Naor: Biased games on random boards, Random Structures and Algorithms 46 (2015), 651–676.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Frieze and M. Karoński: Introduction to random graphs, Cambridge University Press, 2015.

  10. P. Gao: Analysis of the parallel peeling algorithm: a short proof, arXiv:1402.7326

  11. H. Gebauer and T. Szabó: Asymptotic random graph intuition for the biased connectivity game, Random Structures and Algorithms 35 (2009), 431–443.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Hefetz, M. Krivelevich, M. Stojaković and T. Szabó: Global Maker-Breaker games on sparse graphs, European J. Combinatorics 32 (2011), 162–177.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Hefetz, M. Krivelevich, M. Stojaković and T. Szabó: Positional Games, Oberwolfach Seminars, vol. 44, Birkhäuser Basel (Springer), 2014.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Hefetz, M. Mikalački and M. Stojaković: Doubly biased Maker-Breaker Connectivity game, Electronic J. Combinatorics 19 (2012), P61.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Hod and A. Naor: Component games on regular graphs, Combinatorics, Probability and Computing 23 (2014), 75–89.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Janson and M. J. Luczak: A simple solution to the k-core problem, Random Structures and Algorithms 30 (2007), 50–62.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Jiang, M. Mitzenmacher and J. Thaler: Parallel peeling algorithms, ACM Trans. Parallel Comput. 3 (2016), #7, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Lehman: A solution of the Shannon switching game, J. Soc. Indust. Appl. Math. 12 (1964), 687–725.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. T. Łuczak: Size and connectivity of the k-core of a random graph, Discrete Math. 91 (1991), 61–68.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. T. Łuczak: Sparse random graphs with a given degree sequence, in: Random Graphs: Volume 2 (A. Frieze and T. Łuczak, eds.), 165–182, John Wiley & Sons, 1992.

  21. M. Molloy and B. Reed: A critical point for random graphs with a given degree sequence, Random Structures and Algorithms 6 (1995), 161–180.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. C. St. J. A. Nash Williams: Edge-disjoint spanning trees of finite graphs, J. London Math. Soc. 36 (1961), 445–450.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. B. Pittel, J. Spencer and N. Wormald: Sudden emergence of a giant k-core in a random graph, J. Combinatorial Theory Series B 67 (1996), 111–151.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. P. Prałat, J. Verstraëte and N. Wormald: On the threshold for k-regular subgraphs of random graphs, Combinatorica 31 (2011), 565–581.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. O. Riordan: The k-core and branching processes, Combinatorics, Probability and Computing 17 (2008), 111–138.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. M. Stojaković and T. Szabó: Positional games on random graphs, Random Structures and Algorithms 26 (2005), 204–223.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. W. T. Tutte: On the problem of decomposing a graph into n connected factors, J. London Math. Soc. 36 (1961), 221–230.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to the anonymous referee who pointed out that Theorem 1.4 was already proved in [1], and for their careful reading and many helpful remarks.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rani Hod.

Additional information

Research supported by Len Blavatnik and the Blavatnik Family foundation.

Research supported in part by USA-Israel BSF grant 2018267, and by ISF grant 1261/17.

Research partially supported by NWO grants 639.031.829, 639.032.529 and 612.001.409.

Research supported by the Australian Laureate Fellowships grant FL120100125.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hod, R., Krivelevich, M., Müller, T. et al. Component Games on Random Graphs. Combinatorica 42 (Suppl 1), 1189–1229 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00493-022-5036-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00493-022-5036-9

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

Navigation