Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integrated isotope and microbiome analysis indicates dominance of denitrification in N2O production after rewetting of drained fen peat

  • Published:
Biogeochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peatlands are an important source of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, which is a potent greenhouse gas and is also involved in the depletion of stratospheric ozone. Due to the large number of N2O production and consumption processes, it is challenging to trace N2O emissions to an individual process. We investigated the effect of different water regimes (dry, intermediate and flooded) on N2O emissions via 15N tracing in a microcosm study with well-decomposed nitrogen-rich alluvial fen peat. The isotopic composition of the peat and emitted N2O gas was analysed in combination with qPCR analysis of abundances and diversity of N-cycle functional genes. Bacterial denitrification was the predominant source of N2O emission, followed by nitrification (ammonia oxidation). This was identified by a close relationship between 15N-N2O and 15N-NO3 under flooded (anoxic) and intermediate (sub-oxic) treatments and concomitant increases in nirK, nirS and nosZ after the flooding. The site preference and δ18O values fell within the previously observed range indicating multiple overlapping processes and bacterial denitrification as the dominant process. Although the combination of isotopic and microbial analyses indicates that bacterial denitrification is the primary process under intermediate and flooded treatments, the high abundance of amoA indicates that nitrification via comammox was present. High archaeal amoA and bacterial amoA gene copy numbers and second highest N2O emissions under the intermediate and flooded peats indicated that ammonia oxidation was, secondary to denitrification, also a source for N2O. The increase in emissions with nrfA gene copies also showed that dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) potentially contributed to N2O emission under flooded treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Enquiries about data availability should be directed to the authors.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by the Ministry of Education and Research of Estonia (PRG‐352 and MOBERC20 grants), the EU through European Regional Development Fund (ENVIRON and EcolChange Centres of Excellence, and the MOBTP101 returning researcher grant by Mobilitas +), and the Estonian Centre of Analytical Chemistry (AKKI). The methodological groundwork for the study was laid by IAEA’s Coordinated Research Project (CRP) on “Strategic placement and area‐wide evaluation of water conservation zones in agricultural catchments for biomass production, water quality and food security”. Dr. Reinhald Well’s laboratory at Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Braunschweig, Germany provided gas samples for calibration of IRM-MS. We also thank Margarita Oja for the assistance in gas sampling. The datasets generated during the current study are not publicly available due to lack of agreement with participating outside labs but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Funding

Eesti Teadusagentuur,PRG-352,Ülo Mander,MOBERC-20,Ülo Mander,European Regional Development Fund,TK-131 (EcolChange Centre of Excellence),Ülo Mander

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ülo Mander.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Kate Lajtha.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 25 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 15 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Masta, M., Espenberg, M., Gadegaonkar, S.S. et al. Integrated isotope and microbiome analysis indicates dominance of denitrification in N2O production after rewetting of drained fen peat. Biogeochemistry 161, 119–136 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-022-00971-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-022-00971-3

Keywords

Navigation