Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:03:08.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Should linguistics be applied and, if so, how?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2022

Lydia White
Lydia White*
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montreal, Canada
*
Email: lydia.white@mcgill.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research on second language (L2) acquisition in the generative tradition (GenSLA) addresses the nature of interlanguage competence, examining the roles of Universal Grammar, the mother tongue and the input in shaping the acquisition, representation and use of second languages. This field is sometimes dismissed by applied linguists as irrelevant because it does not provide direct applications for language teaching. However, the assumption that theories must have applications involves a fundamental misconception: linguistic theories explore the nature of grammar; GenSLA theories explore the nature of language learning. No such theory entails that language must be taught in a particular way. Nevertheless, potential applications can be identified: examples are presented that describe aspects of language that do not need to be taught, properties that might benefit from instruction, and cases where textbooks provide inadequate information. I argue that linguistic theory and GenSLA theory have more to offer in terms of considering what aspects of language might or might not be taught rather than how languages should be taught.

Type
Plenary Speech
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , July 2023 , pp. 349 - 361
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Earlier versions of this talk were presented at Seton Hall University, NJ, USA, in November 2019 and (virtually) at the Japan Second Language Association (J-SLA) conference, Japan, March 2021.

References

Bruhn de Garavito, J. (2013). What research can tell us about teaching: The case of pronouns and clitics. In Whong, M., Gil, K.-H., & Marsden, H. (Eds.), Universal grammar and the second language classroom (pp. 17–34). Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J, . (1995). L2 acquisition of verb complementation and binding principle B. In Eckman, F., Highland, D., Lee, P., Mileham, J., & Rutkowski Weber, R. (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 79–99). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Burzio, L. (1986). Italian syntax: A government and binding approach. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabrelli, J., Flynn, S., & Rothman, J. (Eds.). (2012). Third language acquisition in adulthood. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Foris.Google Scholar
de Bot, K. (2015). A history of applied linguistics: From 1980 to the present. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(4), 431–470. doi:10.1017/S0272263100010287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckman, F., Bell, L., & Nelson, D. (1988). On the generalization of relative clause instruction in the acquisition of English as a second language. Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 1–20. doi:10.1093/applin/9.1.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. (1982). From theory to practice. In Hines, M. & Rutherford, W. (Eds.), On TESOL (pp. 129–139). TESOL.Google Scholar
Gil, K.-H., Marsden, H., & Whong, M. (2019). The meaning of negation in the second language classroom: Evidence from ‘any’. Language Teaching Research, 23(2), 218–236. doi:10.1177/1362168817740144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirakawa, M. (1990). A study of the L2 acquisition of English reflexives. Second Language Research, 6(1), 60–85. doi:10.1177/026765839000600103.Google Scholar
Hirakawa, M. (2013). Alternations and argument structure in second language English: Knowledge of two types of intransitive verbs. In Whong, M., Gil, K.-H., & Marsden, H. (Eds.), Universal grammar and the second language classroom (pp. 117–137). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanno, K. (1997). The acquisition of null and overt pronominals in Japanese by English speakers. Second Language Research, 13(3), 265–287. doi:10.1191/026765897673070746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, E., & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1), 63–99.Google Scholar
Marsden, H., Whong, M., & Gil, K.-H. (2018). What's in the textbook and what's in the mind: Polarity item ‘any’ in learner English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(1), 91–118. doi:10.1017/S0272263117000018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montalbetti, M. (1984). After binding: On the interpretation of pronouns (Unpublished PhD dissertation). M.I.T.Google Scholar
Okuma, T. (2015). The interpretation of Japanese pronouns by L1 English and L1 spanish speakers. BUCLD 39 Online Proceedings Supplement. https://www.bu.edu/bucld/supplementvol39/.Google Scholar
Oshita, H. (1997). The unaccusative trap: L2 acquisition of English intransitive verbs (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and ‘linguistic behavior’. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 147–163. doi:10.1017/S0272263100011931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12(1), 40–72. doi: 10.1177/026765839601200103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2008). Meaning in the second language. Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2013). What is easy and what is hard in second language acquisition: A generative perspective. In del Pilar García Mayo, M., Gutiérrez-Mangado, J., & Martínez Adrían, M. (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 5–28). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R., Leal, T., & Liskin-Gasparro, J. (2015). Rumors of UG's demise have been greatly exaggerated. Applied Linguistics, 36(2), 265–269. doi: 10.1093/applin/amv007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trotzke, A., & Kupisch, T. (Eds.) (2020). Formal linguistics and language education. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trotzke, A., & Rankin, T. (2020). Introduction to pedagogical linguistics. Pedagogical Linguistics, 1(1), 1–7. doi:10.1075/pl.19015.tro.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umeda, M., Snape, N., Yusa, N., & Wiltshier, J. (2019). The long-term effect of explicit instruction on learners’ knowledge on English articles. Language Teaching Research, 23(2), 179–199. doi:10.1177/1362168817739648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7(2), 133–161. doi:10.1177/026765839100700205.Google Scholar
White, L. (2000). Second language acquisition: From initial to final state. In Archibald, J. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 130–155). Blackwell.Google Scholar
White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L., Hirakawa, M., & Kawasaki, T. (1996). Effects of instruction on second language acquisition of the Japanese long distance reflexive zibun. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 41(3), 235–254. doi:10.1017/S0008413100016418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whong, M., Gil, K.-H., & Marsden, H. (Eds.). (2013). Universal grammar and the second language classroom. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H. (2000). Object language and the language subject: On the mediating role of applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 21–33. doi:10.1017/S0267190500200020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (2020). Linguistics, language teaching objectives and the language learning process. Pedagogical Linguistics, 1(1), 34–43. doi:10.1075/pl.19014.wid.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zobl, H. (1989). Canonical typological structures and ergativity in English L2 acquisition. In Gass, S. & Schachter, J. (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 203–221). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar