Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Internetworking framework in underwater wireless sensor network protocol to a certain connectivity using probabilistic approaches

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Microsystem Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ocean acidification is one of the parameters that affect underwater wireless sensor network routing protocols. The underlying network-level metrics of sensor nodes correspond to depth-dependent interactions. The spatial relevancy of sensor nodes varies drastically due to the mobility of the ocean column. In this work, complexity of the underwater environment and its characteristics are fed along with the sensor node capabilities of internetworking and its communication void. The wireless sensor node embeds medium access control layer timing of sensor packet transmission associated with its communication range and underwater characteristics of transmission and absorption losses. Underwater routing protocol for void avoidance transmission probability (UWRPVA-TP) is proposed, and sensors are deployed across diverse depths. Multi-hop communications as a function of depth-dependent attenuation across the ocean columns and their transmission probabilities have been calculated under mobility scenarios. The simulation result of UWRPVA-TP has been validated for the protocol using different attenuation models for energy consumption and number of alive nodes. Finally, the packet reliability ratio and deadline miss ratio has been calculated to understand the application of the time complexity associated with packet transfer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainslie MA, McColm JG (1998) A simplified formula for viscous and chemical absorption in seawater. J Acoust Soc Am 103(3):1671–1672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand JV, Sivanesan P (2021) Certain investigations of underwater wireless sensors synchronization and funneling effect. Int J Comput Appl 43(5):423–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand JV, Titus S (2017) Energy efficiency analysis of effective hydrocast for underwater communication. Int J Acoust Vib 22(1):44–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Aranda-Escolástico E, Colombo LJ, Guinaldo M (2021) Periodic event-triggered targeted shape control of Lagrangian systems with discrete-time delays. ISA Trans 117:139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2021.01.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basagni S, Di Valerio V, Gjanci P, Petrioli C (2018) Harnessing HyDRO: harvesting-aware data routing for underwater wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the eighteenth ACM international symposium on mobile ad hoc networking and computing. ACM, pp 271–279

  • Brown E, Colling A, Park D, Phillips J, Rothery D, Wright J (1995) Seawater: its composition, properties, and behavior, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (chapter 2, ISBN 0080425186)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown NR, Leighton TG, Richards SD, Heathershaw AD (1998) Measurement of viscous sound absorption at 50–150 kHz in a model turbid environment. J Acoust Soc Am 104(4):2114–2120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JL, Gilbert RP, Wirgin A, Xu Y (2004) Marine acoustics: direct and inverse problems. SIAM, Philadelphia (ISBN 0-89871-547-4)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cen Y, Liu M, Li D, Meng K, Xu H (2021) Double-scale adaptive transmission in time-varying channel for underwater acoustic sensor networks. Sensors 21(6):2252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doonan IJ, Coombs RF, McClatchie S (2003) The absorption of sound in seawater concerning the estimation of deep-water fish biomass. ICES J Mar Sci 60(5):1047–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etter PC (2018) Underwater acoustic modeling and simulation, 5th edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 43–54 (chapter 2)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher FH, Simmons VP (1977) Sound absorption in seawater. J Acoust Soc Am 62(3):558–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fofonoff NP (1977) Computation of the potential temperature of seawater for an arbitrary reference pressure. Deep Sea Res 24(5):489–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fofonoff NP, Millard RC (1983) Algorithms for computation of fundamental properties of seawater. UNESCO technical papers in marine sciences, pp 44–53

  • Francois RE, Garrison GR (1982a) Sound absorption is based on ocean measurements. Part II: boric acid contribution and equation for total absorption. J Acoust Soc Am 72(6):1879–1890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francois RE, Garrison GR (1982b) Sound absorption based on ocean measurements: part I: pure water and magnesium sulfate contributions. J Acoust Soc Am 72(3):896–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou R, He L, Hu S, Luo J (2018) Energy-balanced unequal layering clustering in underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Access 6(2):39685–39691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • http://www.tsuchiya2.org/absorption/absorp_e.html 16/05/2020.

  • https://did.nio.org/oceanographic_utilities/potential_temperature 1/7/2022

  • Jiang S (2018) On reliable data transfer in underwater acoustic networks: a survey from a networking perspective. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 20(2):1036–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai X, Ji X, Zhou X, Chen L (2017) Energy efficient link-delay aware routing in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sens J 18(2):837–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Bhattacharjee B, Banerjee S (2005) Efficient geographic routing in multihop wireless networks. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM international symposium on mobile ad hoc networking and computing. ACM, pp 230–241

  • Llor J, Malumbres MP (2012) Underwater wireless sensor networks: how do acoustic propagation models impact the performance of higher-level protocols. Sensors 12(2):1312–1335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noh Y, Lee U, Wang P, Choi BSC, Gerla M (2012) VAPR: void-aware pressure routing for underwater sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 12(5):895–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petroccia R, Petrioli C, Potter J (2018) Performance evaluation of underwater medium access control protocols: at-sea experiments. IEEE J Ocean Eng 43(2):547–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilson ME (2012) An introduction to the chemistry of the sea, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press (ISBN 9781139603034)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pompili D, Melodia T, Akyildiz IF (2006) Routing algorithms for delay-insensitive and delay-sensitive applications in underwater sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 12th annual international conference on mobile computing and networking. ACM, pp 298–309

  • Richards SD, Heathershaw AD, Thorne PD (1996) The effect of suspended particulate matter on sound attenuation in seawater. J Acoust Soc Am 100(3):1447–1450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sehgal A, Tumar I, Schonwalder J (2009) Variability of available capacity due to the effects of depth and temperature in the underwater acoustic communication channel. In: OCEANS 2009-EUROPE. IEEE, pp 1–6

  • Thorp WH (1967) Analytic description of the low-frequency attenuation coefficient. J Acoust Soc Am 42(1):270–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie P, Zhou Z, Peng Z, Yan H, Hu T, Cui JH, Zhou S (2009) Aqua-Sim: an NS-2 based simulator for underwater sensor networks. In: OCEANS 2009, MTS/IEEE Biloxi-marine technology for our future: global and local challenges. IEEE, pp 1–7

  • Yan H, Shi ZJ, Cui JH (2008) DBR: depth-based routing for underwater sensor networks. In: International conference on research in networking. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 72–86

  • Zhang W, Wang X, Han G, Peng Y, Guizani M, Sun J (2021) A load-adaptive fair access protocol for MAC in underwater acoustic sensor networks. J Netw Comput Appl 173:102867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Cao T, Xiang W (2020) Anypath routing protocol design via Q-learning for underwater sensor networks. IEEE Internet Things J 8(10):8173–8190

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Communication Technology, School of Computing, SASTRA University, Thanjavur, Tamilnadu, 613401, India

    Sivanesan Perumal

  2. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Siddartha Institute of Science and Technology, Puttur, Andhra Pradesh, 517583, India

    Anand Jeganathan Vivek

  3. School of Computing, SASTRA University, Thanjavur, Tamilnadu, 613401, India

    Karunanithi Praveen Kumar

  4. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Rajiv Gandhi University of Knowledge and Technology, Ongole Campus, Ongole, Andhra Pradesh, 523225, India

    Balanagireddy Gujjula

Authors
  1. Sivanesan Perumal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anand Jeganathan Vivek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Karunanithi Praveen Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Balanagireddy Gujjula
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sivanesan Perumal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perumal, S., Jeganathan Vivek, A., Praveen Kumar, K. et al. Internetworking framework in underwater wireless sensor network protocol to a certain connectivity using probabilistic approaches. Microsyst Technol 28, 2403–2413 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-022-05368-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-022-05368-8

Search

Navigation