Abstract
Background
In-toeing is one of the main reasons children are applying to the orthopedics clinic. In the clinical settings, during in-toeing gait assessment parents often define that their child does not walk same at the clinic as at home, linked possibly to Hawthorne effect.
Research Question
How does the in-toeing angle differ when children are aware, versus when they are not aware of their gait inspection?
Methods
This single center, clinical, cross-sectional, observational study looked into the variation in gait pattern of twelve children with in-toeing, with and without their awareness. Two videos for each child was recorded with a smart phone, once at the clinic while aware and once by the family without awareness, and uploaded into Kinovea software for gait analysis. The angle of foot in-toeing was measured and analyzed using SPSS comparison of means and correlations.
Results
The gait pattern evaluated with the angle of in-toeing showed a significant difference between the two videos of the same child. The angle difference returned a p value of 0.000 using paired sample t test and a Cohen’s d value of 1.4, representing the large significance between clinic and family recorded videos. The initial foot in-toeing angle showed a moderate positive Pearson’s correlation of 0.031 when compared with the angle difference in both settings.
Significance
These results highlight the importance of including family recorded videos in gait pattern analysis without the patient’s awareness. The study not only shows the significant difference found which can be explained by Hawthorne Effect but also suggests a clearer path of understanding the child’s condition with the family.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fabry, G., Macewen, G. D., & Shands, A. (1973). torsion of the femur: A follow-up study in normal and abnormal c0nditi0ns. JBJS, 55(8), 1726–1738.
Bruderer-Hofstetter, M., Fenner, V., Payne, E., Zdenek, K., Klima, H., & Wegener, R. (2015). Gait deviations and compensations in pediatric patients with increased femoral torsion. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 33(2), 155–162.
Knittel, G., & Staheli, L. T. (1976). The effectiveness of shoe modifications for intoeing. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 7(4), 1019–1025.
Bruce, W. D., & Stevens, P. M. (2004). Surgical correction of miserable malalignment syndrome. Journal of pediatric orthopaedics, 24(4), 392–396.
Westberry, D. E., Wack, L. I., Davis, R. B., & Hardin, J. W. (2018). Femoral anteversion assessment: Comparison of physical examination, gait analysis, and EOS biplanar radiography. Gait & Posture, 62, 285–290.
Wickström, G., & Bendix, T. (2000). The" Hawthorne effect"—what did the original Hawthorne studies actually show? Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 2, 363–367.
Rashid, U., et al. (2021). Validity and reliability of a smartphone app for gait and balance assessment. Sensors, 22(1), 124.
Puig-Diví, A., Padullés-Riu, J. M., Busquets-Faciaben, A., Padullés-Chando, X., Escalona-Marfil, C., & Marcos-Ruiz, D. (2017). Validity and reliability of the kinovea program in obtaining angular and distance dimensions. PLoS Medicine, 14, e0216448.
Geil, M. D., Rahnama, L., Sergeant, E., Soulis, K., Jarrells, J., & Poisal, M. (2021). Influence of non-immersive avatar-based gamification on the Hawthorne Effect in pediatric gait. Gait & Posture, 88, 122–125.
Ardestani, M. M., & Hornby, T. G. (2020). Effect of investigator observation on gait parameters in individuals with stroke. Journal of Biomechanics, 100, 109602.
Robles-García, V., et al. (2015). Spatiotemporal gait patterns during overt and covert evaluation in patients with Parkinson’s disease and healthy subjects: Is there a Hawthorne effect? Journal of applied biomechanics, 31(3), 189–194.
Vickers, J., Reed, A., Decker, R., Conrad, B. P., Olegario-Nebel, M., & Vincent, H. K. (2017). Effect of investigator observation on gait parameters in individuals with and without chronic low back pain. Gait & Posture, 53, 35–40.
Leblebici, G., et al. (2019). Increased femoral anteversion-related biomechanical abnormalities: Lower extremity function, falling frequencies, and fatigue. Gait & Posture, 70, 336–340.
Radler, C., Kranzl, A., Manner, H. M., Höglinger, M., Ganger, R., & Grill, F. (2010). Torsional profile versus gait analysis: Consistency between the anatomic torsion and the resulting gait pattern in patients with rotational malalignment of the lower extremity. Gait & posture, 32(3), 405–410.
Uota, S., Morikita, I., & Shimokochi, Y. (2019). Validity and clinical significance of a clinical method to measure femoral anteversion. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 59(11), 1908–1914.
Gaumétou, E., Mallet, C., Souchet, P., Mazda, K., & Ilharreborde, B. (2016). Poor efficiency of eight-plates in the treatment of lower limb discrepancy. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 36(7), 715–719.
Besier, T. F., Sturnieks, D. L., Alderson, J. A., & Lloyd, D. G. (2003). Repeatability of gait data using a functional hip joint centre and a mean helical knee axis. Journal of biomechanics, 36(8), 1159–1168.
Westberry, D. E., Davids, J. R., Davis, R. B., & de Morais Filho, M. C. (2008). Idiopathic toe walking: a kinematic and kinetic profile. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 28(3), 352–358.
Aktas, S., Aiona, M. D., & Orendurff, M. (2000). Evaluation of rotational gait abnormality in the patients cerebral palsy. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 20(2), 217–220.
Funding
This research did not receive any kind of funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MH: The conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the article and revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be submitted. DKB: The conception and design of the study, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the article and revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be submitted. MG: Acquisition of data, drafting the article, final approval of the version to be submitted. ÖKC: Analysis and interpretation of data, revising the article critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be submitted.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article. The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.
Ethical review committee statement
This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee (Marmara University Medical School, Ethic Committee for Clinical Research: 09.2020.223).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Akgülle, A.H., Haidar, M., Baştürk, D.K. et al. Hawthorne Effect in Gait Analysis of Children with In-Toeing Caused by Increased Femoral Anteversion. JOIO 56, 1789–1794 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-022-00729-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-022-00729-x