Full length article
Valorization of deep soil mixing residue in cement-based materials

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106597Get rights and content

Abstract

This study examined the potential of recycling deep soil mixing residue (DSMR), a cement-soil waste, as a partial Portland cement substitute. The chemical and mineral compositions of DSMR before and after calcination were determined. For the calcined DSMR blended cement pastes, the compressive strength and phase assemblage (characterized using TGA and XRD) were evaluated. Results revealed pozzolanic and hydraulic properties of the calcined DSMR, due to the formation of reactive calcium-rich glassy phases and hydraulic C2S. The calcined DSMR can contribute to the strength development of cement because of the pozzolanic reactions and the formation of additional hydrates. With up to 20% calcined DSMR, negligible side-effect on the strength of the blended cement paste was noticed. The compressive strength development of the blended cement pastes was linearly correlated to the reactive phase content in the calcined DSMR. This work demonstrated the potential of using DSMR to develop greener composite cement.

Introduction

Deep soil mixing (DSM), a ground improvement technique, has been widely utilized to treat problematic or soft soil ground over the last decades (De Silva et al., 2001; Güllü et al., 2017; Hasheminezhad and Bahadori, 2019; Jin-Jian et al., 2013; Madhyannapu and Puppala, 2014). DSM is carried out usinga machine equipped with mixing blades, as shown in Fig. 1(a), to break up in-situ soils and mechanically mix them with a cementitious binder, resulting in the formation of a cement-soil column beneath the ground surface. Cement is the most commonly used binder in DSM, often with a binder to soil ratio of up to 0.3 (Arulrajah et al., 2018; Ni and Cheng, 2014). The chemical reaction between the cement and the soil significantly enhances the characteristics of the weak soils, especially in terms of the load-bearing capacity, shear strength and modulus, to meet engineering requirements.

A major environmental challenge of the DSM technique is the generation of a large quantity of solid wastes. During the construction process, the cementitious binder is mixed with the in-situ soil to create a soil-cement mixture beneath the ground. During this procedure, a large quantity of excessive soil-cement mixtures tends to return to the ground surface and become the deep soil mixing residue (DSMR), as shown in Fig. 1(b). It is estimated that the amount of DSMR accounts for around 30% by the volume of the produced DSM column (Denies et al., 2012). The total quantity of DSMR generated in Flanders, Belgium, for instance, is more than 460,000 tons per year (Joseph et al., 2016). Currently, the generated DSMR is usually stacked next to the construction sites (see Fig. 1(c)) and later dumped in suburban landfills. The current dumping of DSMR results in a high economic cost and causes significant environmental issues, such as occupying valuable land resources and polluting surrounding soils. Therefore, exploring more efficient methods for the disposal of DSMR is of great importance to a circular construction economy.

The partial replacement of Portland cement by certain volumes of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), exhibiting hydraulic and/or pozzolanic or filler properties, has been commonly utilized to reduce the demand for cement clinker and thereby to decrease CO2 emissions from cement production. Moreover, SCMs are frequently employed in concrete to improve its long-term mechanical performance and durability. However, in recent years, conventional SCMs, such as ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) and coal fly ash, are subjected to a significant shortage in many countries and regions (Poowancum and Horpibulsuk, 2015). Moreover, the supply of those materials has kept decreasing in recent years and is expected to be reduced considerably in 2025 due to the rapid decrease of blast furnaces and coal-fired power plants (Alberici et al., 2017). As a result, it is necessary to explore novel and sustainable SCMs.

Calcined DSMR could be a promising candidate as an alternative SCM. This is because DSMR mainly consists of clay minerals, quartz, and hydrated cement. Several research works have documented the utilization of hydrated cement wastes (Bogas et al., 2020; Serpell and Lopez, 2013; Serpell and Zunino, 2017; Yu et al., 2013) and excavated soils (or clays) (Dang et al., 2013; Du and Pang, 2018; Hollanders et al., 2016; Yanguatin et al., 2019; Zhao and Khoshnazar, 2020; Zhou et al., 2017) as SCMs, where calcination was used to enhance their reactivity. For hydrated cement, thermal treatment at a high temperature (600–800 °C) for several hours confers its rehydration capacity, due to the formation of calcium oxide (CaO) and recovered clinkers (i.e., C2S) (Bogas et al., 2020; Serpell and Zunino, 2017; Yu et al., 2013). For clay minerals, the dehydroxylation by thermal treatment at 500–900 °C transforms the crystal minerals into an amorphous phase, making the treated materials exhibit pozzolanic reactivity (Zhao and Khoshnazar, 2020). The reactivity of calcined clays is mainly governed by the types of clay minerals (Zhao and Khoshnazar, 2020). Kaolinitic clays, which are often regarded as high-quality clays, exhibit high pozzolanic reactivity after thermal treatment, while some other clay minerals (e.g., montmorillonites and illite) show low reactivity or even remain inert after being heated; hence, they have been classified as low-quality clays for the use as SCMs (Hollanders et al., 2016).

A major concern of using calcined DSMR as a possible SCM is that its mineral composition tends to be dominated by the low-quality clays in it, due to the limited availability of kaolin-rich clays in the local natural soils, which thus limits its reactivity (Hollanders et al., 2016). Nevertheless, the co-calcination of low-quality clays and cement hydrates, which are the main minerals in the DSMR, might be able to form some highly reactive phases, favoring the reactivity of the calcined DSMR. This is because recent research demonstrated that the reactivity of low-quality clays could be significantly increased when they are co-calcined with Ca-rich minerals (e.g., calcite or dolomite) (Bullerjahn et al., 2020; Cultrone et al., 2001). This is due to the reaction between the clays and the free CaO released from the decomposed calcite or dolomite during calcination, leading to the formation of Ca-rich amorphous phases with highly pozzolanic activity (Bullerjahn et al., 2020; Cultrone et al., 2001). Similar reactive phases are expected to be generated in calcined DSMR with low-quality clays, as the hydrated cement present in DSMR could work as a Ca-rich source, considering that free CaO is one of the main products of the thermally dehydrated cement (Carriço et al., 2020).

The research significance and novelty of the present study are that, for the first time, the potential of using DSMR after calcination as an SCM is investigated. For this purpose, three DSMR samples from different construction sites located in Flanders, Belgium, were collected. They were then ground into fine powders and thermally activated (calcined). The chemical and mineral compositions of the DSMR powders before and after the calcination were characterized using X-ray fluorescence (XRF), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). The hydration of cement pastes blended with the DSMR powders at different curing ages (1, 7, 14, and 28 days) was quantitatively monitored with XRD and TGA. Finally, the compressive strength development of the DSMR powder blended pastes was evaluated, and the results were compared with that of cement pastes blended with GGBS, which is a conventional highly reactive SCM (Yousefi Oderji et al., 2019).

Section snippets

Raw materials

The chemical and mineral compositions of Portland cement CEM I 52.5 R and GGBS used in this study are given in Table 1.

Three DSMR samples (named as A, B and C, respectively) generated from cutter soil mixing technique (Rabbani et al., 2019) - a subtype of the deep soil mixing method - were collected from different construction sites located in Flanders, Belgium. The different DSMR samples were employed to preliminarily check the variation of the chemical and mineral compositions of the DSMR

Chemical composition

The chemical compositions of the DSMR powders before and after the calcination are given in Table 3.

As shown in Table 3, all the DSMR powders were rich in Si, Ca and Al. The amount of Ca (expressed as CaO content) in the DSMR powders was relatively high, accounting for 25.7, 41.5 and 21.4% in DSMR sample A, B and C, respectively. The CaO existed mainly in the hydrated cement phases as well as in the calcareous minerals from soils, such as calcite and vaterite.

Mineral compositions

Fig. 2 shows the XRD patterns for

Conclusion

This paper presents a feasibility study on the valorization of DSMR in cement-based materials after proper processing. Within the scope of this study, the following conclusions can be drawn based on the test results:

  • (1)

    Calcination can activate the DSMR owing to the formation of reactive Ca-rich silica-alumina amorphous phase and hydraulic C2S.

  • (2)

    Replacing 20% Portland cement with the calcined DSMR has negligible side effects on the strength of the cement pastes. The calcined DSMR shows satisfactory

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Yuelin Li: Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. Samuel Eyley: Writing – review & editing. Wim Thielemans: Writing – review & editing. Qiang Yuan: Writing – review & editing. Jiabin Li: Supervision, Project administration, Writing – review & editing.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The financial support from the Lvnong Chair in Construction Waste Recycling of KU Leuven, Belgium, to this research work is greatly appreciated. The first author thanks the China Scholarship Council (CSC) for granting the scholarship (No. 201907650010). W.T. and S.E. want to thank the European Fund for Regional Development (EFRD) for its financial support (project P1316 – Ongelimiteerde Recyclage).

References (65)

  • K.A. Clavier et al.

    Opportunities and challenges associated with using municipal waste incineration ash as a raw ingredient in cement production – a review

    Resour. Conserv. Recycl.

    (2020)
  • T.A. Dang et al.

    Design of new blended cement based on marine dredged sediment

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2013)
  • M.S. De Silva et al.

    Trials for the construction of a cement solidified retaining structure in a domestic landfill site using deep soil mixing

    Eng. Geol.

    (2001)
  • H. Du et al.

    Value-added utilization of marine clay as cement replacement for sustainable concrete production

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2018)
  • V.C. Farmer et al.

    The infra-red spectra of layer silicates

    Spectrochim. Acta

    (1964)
  • R. Fernandez et al.

    The origin of the pozzolanic activity of calcined clay minerals: a comparison between kaolinite, illite and montmorillonite

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (2011)
  • Y. Gao et al.

    Investigation on microstructure and microstructural elastic properties of mortar incorporating fly ash

    Cem. Concr. Compos.

    (2018)
  • I. Garcia-Lodeiro et al.

    Mineralogical and microstructural alterations in a portland cement paste after an accelerated decalcification process

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (2021)
  • H. Güllü et al.

    Use of cement based grout with glass powder for deep mixing

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2017)
  • V. Hallet et al.

    Hydration of blended cement with high volume iron-rich slag from non-ferrous metallurgy

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (2022)
  • A. Hasheminezhad et al.

    Seismic response of shallow foundations over liquefiable soils improved by deep soil mixing columns

    Comput. Geotech.

    (2019)
  • S. Hollanders et al.

    Pozzolanic reactivity of pure calcined clays

    Appl. Clay Sci.

    (2016)
  • C. Hosten et al.

    An industrial comparative study of cement clinker grinding systems regarding the specific energy consumption and cement properties

    Powder Technol

    (2012)
  • S. Joseph et al.

    Activation of Portland cement blended with high volume of fly ash using Na2SO4

    Cem. Concr. Compos.

    (2019)
  • M.C.G. Juenger et al.

    Supplementary cementitious materials: new sources, characterization, and performance insights

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (2019)
  • V. Morin et al.

    Impact of quantity of anhydrite, water to binder ratio, fineness on kinetics and phase assemblage of belite-ye'elimite-ferrite cement

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (2017)
  • J.C. Ni et al.

    Quality control of double fluid jet grouting below groundwater table: case history

    Soils Found.

    (2014)
  • P. Rabbani et al.

    Effect of Cutter Soil Mixing (CSM) method and curing pressures on the tensile strength of a treated soft clay

    Heliyon

    (2019)
  • S. Ramanathan et al.

    Linking reactivity test outputs to properties of cementitious pastes made with supplementary cementitious materials

    Cem. Concr. Compos.

    (2020)
  • S.E. Schulze et al.

    Suitability of natural calcined clays as supplementary cementitious material

    Cem. Concr. Compos.

    (2019)
  • R. Serpell et al.

    Reactivated cementitious materials from hydrated cement paste wastes

    Cem. Concr. Compos.

    (2013)
  • R. Serpell et al.

    Recycling of hydrated cement pastes by synthesis of α′H-C2S

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (2017)
  • Cited by (6)

    • Fresh and hardened properties of cement paste and mortar incorporating calcined cutter soil mixing residue

      2022, Construction and Building Materials
      Citation Excerpt :

      These findings suggest that it could be possible to use calcined CSMR as an alternative to traditional SCMs, such as fly ash and GGBS in cement-based materials. The feasibility of using calcined CSMR as an alternative SCM has been preliminarily explored in a recent study by the authors in [22]. In that work, the chemical and mineral compositions of CSMR before and after calcination were comprehensively characterized.

    View full text