Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using Primary Knowledge in Unpopular Statistics Exercises

  • Continuing Education
  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human cognitive architecture has evolved throughout history, thus facilitating the processing of certain types of knowledge that emerged early on in evolution and that have an adaptive benefit (e.g., recognizing faces or food). Despite its complexity, primary knowledge is processed almost effortlessly, as opposed to secondary knowledge which developed later during the course of evolution and which requires extra cognitive resources and motivation for processing (e.g., “academic” knowledge, such as mathematics or grammar). Primary knowledge also constitutes the basis for secondary knowledge. Using primary knowledge to encourage individuals to invest in a task that is not motivating has therefore been used in recent studies as a promising avenue of research. This study presents 3 experiments in which university students had to complete statistics exercises — statistics being renowned as a difficult discipline typically disliked by students. The task presented problem-solving exercises which were identical in structure but which differed in content, by referring to either primary or secondary types of knowledge. Primary knowledge content, particularly when presented first, enhanced performance and efficiency while maintaining motivation during problem solving. Participants appeared to be unaware of this positive effect. By contrast, secondary knowledge content had a negative effect on performance and seemed to reduce motivation when presented first. These findings suggest that the use of easy-to-process primary knowledge can enhance learning — simply by manipulating task content and presentation order.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Notes

  1. Formal description of the structure of language.

  2. These are examples of subjunctive mood use in French. It corresponds to “that they should/ would/ might go” in English.

References

  • Acee, T. W., & Weinstein, C. E. (2010). Effects of a value-reappraisal intervention on statistics students’ motivation and performance. The Journal of Experimental Education, 78(4), 487–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2017). Fast logic?: Examining the time course assumption of dual process theory. Cognition, 158, 90–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, T. J. (2016). Effects of guided project-based learning activities on students’ attitudes toward statistics in an introductory statistics course. PhD Thesis, Old Dominion University.

  • Beck, F., & Richard, J.-B. (2010). Les comportements de santé des jeunes. Inpes. http://inpes.santepubliquefrance.fr/Barometres/barometre-sante-2010/comportement-sante-jeunes/pdf/Alimentation-12-30-ans.pdf. Accessed Jan 2018

  • Cashin, S. E., & Elmore, P. B. (2005). The survey of attitudes toward statistics scale: A construct validity study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(3), 509–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Neys, W., Schaeken, W., & d’Ydewalle, G. (2005). Working memory and everyday conditional reasoning: Retrieval and inhibition of stored counterexamples. Thinking & Reasoning, 11(4), 349–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbulok-Charcape, M., Grandoit, E., Berman, L., Fogel, J., Fink, L., & Rabin, L. (2019). Improving exam performance in an undergraduate statistics course for at-risk students through peer tutoring. Psychology Teaching Review, 25(2), 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. S. B. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. S. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2007). How students learn statistics revisited: A current review of research on teaching and learning statistics. International Statistical Review, 75(3), 372–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C. (2007). Educating the evolved mind: Conceptual foundations for an evolutionary educational psychology. In J. S. Carlson, & J. R. Levin (Eds.),  (pp. 1–99). Greenwich: Information Age.

  • Geary, D. C. (2008). An evolutionarily informed education science. Educational Psychologist, 43(4), 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C. (2012). Application of evolutionary psychology to academic learning. In S. C. Roberts (Ed.), Applied evolutionary psychology (pp. 78–92). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C., & Berch, D. (2015). Evolutionary approaches to understanding children’s academic achievement. In R. A. Scott & S. M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 1–10). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C., & Berch, D. (2016). Evolution and children’s cognitive and academic development. In D. C. Geary, & D. Berch (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on child development and education (pp. 217–249). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International

  • Ginns, P., & King, V. (2021). Pointing and tracing enhance computer-based learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 69, 1387–1403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M., Goldberg, A. B., & Zhu, X. (2011). Improving early reading comprehension using embodied CAI. Instructional Science, 39(1), 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gros, H., Thibaut, J. P., & Sander, E. (2020). Semantic congruence in arithmetic: A new conceptual model for word problem solving. Educational Psychologist, 55(2), 69–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gros, H., Thibaut, J. P., & Sander, E. (2021). What we count dictates how we count: A tale of two encodings. Cognition, 212, 104665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guichemerre, C. (2011). Enquête vie de campus. Université de Bordeaux. http://www.cue-aquitaine.fr/docs/poleetudes/conditions_vie/tdb1.pdf

  • Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2011). Task complexity as a driver for collaborative learning efficiency: The collective working-memory effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(4), 615–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lespiau, F. & Tricot, A. (2022). Primary vs. secondary knowledge contents in reasoning: motivated and efficient vs. overburdened. Acta Psyhologica. pp. 277

  • Lespiau, F., & Tricot, A. (2018). Primary knowledge enhances performance and motivation in reasoning. Learning and Instruction, 56, 10–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lespiau, F., & Tricot, A. (2019). Using primary knowledge: An efficient way to motivate students and promote the learning of formal reasoning. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 915–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lespiau, F. (2017). Logique sans peine? Comment nous sommes plus performants et motivés pour raisonner logiquement à propos des connaissances primaires. Effortless logic? How we are better able and motivated to reason logically about primary knowledge. [Doctoral dissertation, Toulouse 2 Jean-Jaurès University]. DANTE.

  • Paas, F., & Ayres, P. (2014). Cognitive load theory: A broader view on the role of memory in learning and education. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 191–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2012). An evolutionary upgrade of cognitive load theory: Using the human motor system and collaboration to support the learning of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 24(1), 27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, G., Fugelsang, J. A., & Koehler, D. J. (2015). What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement. Cognitive Psychology, 80, 34–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ping, R., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). Gesturing saves cognitive resources when talking about nonpresent objects. Cognitive Science, 34(4), 602–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1974). Intellectual autobiography. In P. A. Schillp (Ed.), The philosophy of Karl Popper (pp. 3–181). Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1978). Natural selection and the emergence of mind. Dialectica, 32, 339–355.

  • Sweller, J. (2015). In academe, what is learned, and how is it learned? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(3), 190–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (2016). Cognitive load theory, evolutionary educational psychology, and instructional design. In D. C. Geary & D. Berch (Eds.), Evolution and children’s cognitive and academic development (pp. 291–306). Springer International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (2021). The Role of Evolutionary Psychology in our understanding of human cognition: Consequences for cognitive load theory and instructional procedures. Educational Psychology Review, 1–13.

  • Tricot, A., & Sweller, J. (2014). Domain-specific knowledge and why teaching generic skills does not work. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gog, T., Paas, F., Marcus, N., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2009). The mirror neuron system and observational learning: Implications for the effectiveness of dynamic visualizations. Educational Psychology Review, 21(1), 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, B., Ginns, P., & Mockler, N. (2021). Sequencing tracing with imagination. Educational Psychology Review, 1–29.

  • Whittlesea, B. W., Jacoby, L. L., & Girard, K. (1990). Illusions of immediate memory: Evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(6), 716–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youssef, A., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2012). Using general problem-solving strategies to generate ideas in order to solve geography problems. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(6), 872–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youssef-Shalala, A., Ayres, P., Schubert, C., & Sweller, J. (2014). Using a general problem-solving strategy to promote transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20(3), 215–231.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UNIV. NIMES, APSY-V, F-30021, Nîmes Cedex 1, France

    Florence Lespiau

  2. Université Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, EPSYLON EA 4556, F34000, Montpellier, France

    André Tricot

Authors
  1. Florence Lespiau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. André Tricot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florence Lespiau.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This study was conducted in accordance with institutional and national ethical standards and with the Declaration of Helsinki (2008). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lespiau, F., Tricot, A. Using Primary Knowledge in Unpopular Statistics Exercises. Educ Psychol Rev 34, 2297–2322 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09699-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09699-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation