Abstract
Purpose
Implant leakage is the most common complication of vertebral augmentation. Alternative injectable materials must demonstrate intravascular safety comparable to or better than polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). This study assessed the systemic effects of a triphasic calcium-based implant or PMMA injected directly into the femoral vein in a large animal model designed to mimic severe intravascular implant leakage.
Methods
Six skeletally mature female sheep were randomly assigned (n = 3) to either the PMMA or the triphasic implant (AGN1, composition: calcium sulfate, β-tricalcium phosphate, brushite) treatment group. Femoral veins of each sheep were directly injected with 0.5 mL of implant material to mimic leakage volumes reported during PMMA vertebroplasty. To compare acute systemic effects of the materials, cardiovascular parameters, laboratory coagulation markers, and calcium and sulfate serum levels were monitored for 60 min after implant injection. Thrombotic and embolic events were evaluated by radiologic imaging, necropsy, and histopathology.
Results
Heart rate, systemic arterial blood pressure, arterial oxygenation, arterial carbon dioxide content, and coagulation markers remained within physiological range after either AGN1 or PMMA injection. No blood flow interruption in the larger pulmonary vessels was observed in either group. Lung histopathology revealed that the severity of thrombotic changes after AGN1 injection was minimal to slight, while changes after PMMA injection were minimal to massive.
Conclusion
Acute systemic effects of intravascular AGN1 appeared to be comparable to or less than that of intravascular PMMA. Furthermore, in this preliminary study, the severity and incidence of pulmonary histological changes were lower for AGN1 compared to PMMA.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Painful compression fractures of vertebral bodies occur in spines weakened by osteoporosis, hemangioma, or metastases. These fractures can cause persistent pain, impairing patient mobility, and reducing quality of life [1]. In selected patients, minimally invasive vertebral augmentation provides lasting pain relief, increases patient quality of life and decreases health deterioration, hospitalization time, costs, and mortality risk compared to conservative therapy [2,3,4,5,6].
Vertebral augmentation is routinely performed with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) bone cement. PMMA has significant limitations including high stiffness that can alter spine biomechanics, increasing the likelihood of additional surgical interventions [7,8,9]. Also, PMMA is non-resorbable, lacking the potential to remodel or integrate with existing bone, potentially complicating future procedures. Due to these limitations, there is interest in finding a resorbable implant material that immediately increases the strength of treated bone and maintains strength as it is resorbed and replaced by new bone [10]. The implant material should optimally have compressive strength and stiffness similar to normal bone, providing long-term functional benefit without negatively altering the long-term biomechanics of the fractured vertebral body being treated [10]. One such possible alternative implant material is an injectable in situ setting triphasic calcium-based implant, previously shown to strengthen cadaveric vertebral bodies [11].
A concern for all injectable materials used in vertebral augmentation is the possible adverse effect of extraosseous implant leakage which can cause severe complications including neurologic injury and pulmonary emboli [12,13,14,15]. The incidence of PMMA leakage is between 8–37% (18% average) during kyphoplasty and 34–80% (60% average) during vertebroplasty [12]. A particular concern for previously evaluated injectable resorbable calcium phosphate or calcium composite bone implant materials was stimulation of coagulation, as leakage with one formulation was reported to be associated with severe pulmonary vascular obstruction and formation of blood clots in the heart [16]. Studies demonstrated that other calcium composite implants lacked cohesion and disintegrated within the vasculature [17, 18], resulting in cardiovascular changes that were more severe when directly compared to PMMA [17].
The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the acute systemic effects of the triphasic calcium-based implant material, AGN1, to PMMA following direct injection into the femoral vein in a large animal sheep model.
Methods
Animals, preclinical model, and study design
Six skeletally mature, female, White Swiss Alpine sheep (mean age 4.6 years, range 3–7 years; mean weight 78.3 kg, range 66.5–91.5 kg) were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to one of two groups (n = 3 sheep per group): PMMA or triphasic calcium implant material (AGN1). Each sheep underwent direct injection of 0.5 mL of implant material into the femoral vein to mimic cement volume leakage reported during PMMA vertebroplasty [19, 20]. Cardiopulmonary parameters and occurrence of sequela were monitored for 60 min after the injection procedure, as previously described (Fig. 1) [17, 18]. Afterward, the sheep were euthanized and underwent a systematic, complete postmortem inspection.
Prior to the start of the study, the sheep were acclimatized for at least 2 weeks and were in good health based on a complete physical assessment performed by a veterinarian and a complete blood cell count. To standardize the protocol, anesthesia monitoring was performed by the same anesthetist, catheter placement and implant injection were performed by the same surgeon, and the same support staff were present for each surgery. Experiments were carried out at an AAALAC International-approved facility and received ethical consent from the Veterinary Commission of the Canton of Grisons, Switzerland, in accordance with the Swiss laws of animal protection and welfare and were conducted under good laboratory practices (GLP). To minimize the risk of bias, the surgery staff and CT analysis personnel were blinded to the study group. The veterinary pathologist was also blinded to the study group during necropsy, histopathology and histomorphometry. The veterinary surgeon performed implant mixing and injection and thus was unblinded to the study groups.
Implant materials
PMMA bone cement was prepared (mixing and waiting phase) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BonOs, Osartis GmbH, Dieburg, Germany) and then transferred to 1 mL syringes. The triphasic calcium implant material (AGN1, AgNovos Healthcare LLC, Rockville, MD), composed of calcium sulfate, β-tricalcium phosphate, and brushite, was mixed for 30 s using the supplied mixer and then transferred to 1 mL syringes. PMMA or AGN1 were injected into the femoral veins via catheter following mixing and transfer at the earliest time possible (range 4 m:5 s to 4 m:20 s and 5 m:4 s to 5 m:20 s for PMMA and AGN1, respectively).
Preparation of animals
Sheep were sedated with xylazine 20 min before general anesthesia induction using intravenous midazolam and propofol, and endotracheally intubated for maintenance using sevoflurane in oxygen and air (targeted alveolar concentration of 1.5–2.0% sevoflurane in approximately 75% oxygen). Mechanical ventilation was instituted to maintain normocapnia with predefined settings (Table 1). Further modification to maintain all vital parameters in a physiological range was performed according to individual needs when deemed necessary by the anesthesiologist blinded to the study groups. Ventilator settings were not altered after implant injection.
Sheep were placed in dorsal recumbency, the inner thigh was aseptically prepared, and a 14G × 80-mm catheter was inserted into the femoral vein using the Seldinger technique under ultrasound guidance. Prior to injection, the catheter was flushed with saline. The catheter was then filled with the implant material, and immediately, thereafter, a single injection using a 1 mL syringe over a period of less than one minute resulted in systemic intravenous administration of 0.5 mL of implant material.
Cardiovascular monitoring
Systemic arterial blood pressure (mean (MABP), systolic, diastolic arterial blood pressure) was continuously recorded from a single lumen 20G catheter placed in the right auricular artery. Heart rate and blood oxygen saturation were also continuously recorded using an anesthesia monitor at 1 Hz (Datex Ohmeda S/5 Monitor; Anandic Medical Systems, Switzerland).
Blood sampling and analysis
Arterial and venous blood samples were taken prior to femoral catheter placement, prior to implant injection, and 3, 10, 30, and 60 min after implant injection (Fig. 1). A blood gas panel (pH, PCO2, PO2, tCO2, HCO3, sO2, base excess, ionized calcium, Na, K, glucose, hematocrit, and hemoglobin) was performed at each timepoint using arterial heparinized whole blood and a handheld analyzer (i-STAT® 1 Handheld Analyzer, Abbott, Princeton, NJ). Venous blood sampling was performed at each timepoint for total calcium, sulfate, D-dimer, and thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) complex analysis (see Appendix 1 for methodology details).
Computer tomography (CT) imaging and analysis
A clinical CT scan (Revolution EVO, GE Medical Systems (Schweiz) AG) examination of the thorax, abdomen and femoral catheter site was conducted prior to each injection procedure and after the 60-min observation (120 kV, 400 mAs, 0.625 mm slice thickness). A CT pulmonary angiography examination was also performed prior to euthanasia using a bolus tracking technique. Briefly, sequential axial slices were obtained at a set region of interest at the truncus pulmonalis during the contrast injection until a threshold enhancement (+ 60 HU) was met, triggering the diagnostic scan. Image reconstruction was done for the lungs with the standard kernel. Data were analyzed using Amira software (Amira 6.3, FEI SAS a part of Thermo Fisher Scientific).
The lungs were inspected slice by slice (2.5 mm slice thickness) in the native post-injection scan from cranial to caudal in the pulmonary window for hyperdense objects compared to the native pre-injection scan. The inferior vena cava and the femoral vein down to the injection site were also inspected slice by slice for hyperdense objects compared to the native pre-injection scan.
Euthanasia and tissue harvest
All animals were euthanized under general anesthesia by means of an intravenous overdose of barbiturate (Pentobarbital, Esconarkon) following final CT imaging. Comprehensive, systematic postmortem inspection with special attention to vital organs including brain, heart, and lungs was performed by a certified veterinary pathologist blinded to study groups. Lungs were fixed using instillation with 5% buffered formaldehyde solution then sampled (10 sites). Heart (3 sites), brain (7 sites), and all macroscopically changed tissue were sampled then immersed in fixative.
Histopathology and histomorphology analysis
Histopathological analysis and grading were performed by a certified veterinary pathologist blinded to study groups. Analyses focused on, but were not limited to, changes in vasculo-occlusive/thromboembolic events including thrombi, foreign material emboli, and hemorrhages. Changes present in tissue samples of the lungs, heart, brain, and representative macroscopically altered tissues were analyzed semi-quantitatively using a 6-point grading system (grade 0 to 5; grade 0: change absent, grade 5: massive severity).
A 1 × 1 cm2 image of each lung slide (10 per sheep) was digitized using a 20 × objective and quantitatively analyzed for thromboembolic changes. Before starting to count, the image was divided into a total of 228 tiles (12 × 19w × h) using the digital reticle, resulting in individually numbered fields. The total number of thrombi, microthrombi, and capillary microthrombi were manually identified and automatically counted.
Statistics
A sample size of three per group only allowed for a qualitative analysis of the systemic effects of AGN1 leakage compared to PMMA. Descriptive statistics for measured parameters including mean, median, standard deviation, minimum, and maximum were reported, as appropriate, for each parameter.
Results
Cardiovascular monitoring and blood measurements
All sheep survived the 0.5 mL material injection and 60-min observation period. No difference was observed in cardiovascular parameters between the PMMA and AGN1 groups pre- and post-injection. After injection, changes in MABP, arterial oxygen content (SaO2, PaO2), and arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2) remained within physiological ranges in all sheep at all time points (Table 2). No difference was observed in calcium and sulfate between the PMMA and AGN1 groups pre- and post-injection (Table 3). Two sheep in the PMMA group had post-injection increases in thrombin-antithrombin (TAT), whereas no AGN1 animals had increases over pre-injection values (Fig. 2). D-dimer measurements were stable pre- and post-injection for both groups (D-dimer ≤ 0.6 ng/mL; data not shown).
CT analysis
CT imaging detected implant material in the lungs of one of three sheep in the PMMA group (Fig. 3A) and none of the AGN1 sheep (Fig. 3B). All six sheep had implant material in the abdominal vena cava and femoral vein (Fig. 3). Pulmonary angiography indicated that there was no interruption of blood flow in the larger pulmonary vessels for either group.
Histopathology and histomorphology
Thrombotic changes at the lungs appeared less severe and less frequent for AGN1 compared to PMMA. The severity of thrombotic changes ranged from minimal (grade 1) to slight (grade 2) severity for the AGN1 group compared to minimal (grade 1) to massive severity (grade 5) for the PMMA group. The group medians were for thrombi: 0.0 versus 2.5; for microthrombi: 1.0 versus 3.5; and for capillary microthrombi: 0.0 versus 1.0 for AGN1 versus PMMA, respectively (Fig. 4). Thrombotic changes at the heart and brain were recorded at very low incidence and severity and not different between groups.
Quantification of thrombotic changes within the lungs demonstrated that the mean number of blood clots was fewer for AGN1 sections compared to PMMA sections (Fig. 5A−C; mean number per group: thrombi 0.7 versus 41.3; microthrombi 30.3 versus 191.0; and capillary microthrombi 30.3 versus 163.0, respectively). Neither PMMA nor AGN1 implant material were observed in any lung sections.
Additionally, a capillary obstruction complex was observed in the lungs of all three PMMA animals, but not in any of the AGN1 animals. This finding was characterized by increased capillary filling, increased number of neutrophils, and hemorrhage (Fig. 6). For the PMMA group, lung capillary obstruction complex severity ranged from grade 1 to grade 4, and the overall incidence across the 10 locations analyzed ranged from 20 to 90% for each animal.
Discussion
This is the first study to assess the acute and short-term physiologic and thromboembolic effects of intravascular injection of a resorbable, triphasic, calcium-based, osteoconductive implant material, AGN1, compared to PMMA. PMMA has a long history of use in vertebral augmentation despite frequent systemic leakage during the procedure and other complications [12]. In this study, the systemic effects of intravascular AGN1 appeared to be comparable to or less than that of intravascular PMMA. Similar cardiovascular and blood gas changes between both implant materials were observed. Although no blockage of the vasculature was observed via pulmonary angiography for either group, histopathological assessment revealed that the severity of thrombotic changes in the lungs was lower in the AGN1 group than in the PMMA group. No findings of capillary obstruction were observed in the AGN1 group, whereas the PMMA group had capillary obstruction to varying severity.
Direct implant material injection into the femoral vein of sheep was chosen to model severe clinical intravascular implant leakage that can occur during vertebral augmentation [12] or other orthopedic procedures [21] in which material injection has the potential for vascular leakage. The femoral vein drains to the inferior vena cava, where implant leakage is often detected clinically following vertebral augmentation [13] and where implant material was detected in all sheep included in this study. Implant material leakage into the inferior vena cava is significantly correlated with the development of pulmonary cement embolism [13]. An injection volume of 0.5 mL was chosen based on the volume of cement leakage reported during PMMA vertebroplasty averaging between 2.8% and 5.7% of the injected volume [19, 20]. An assumed injection volume of 8 mL and a worst-case assumption that all the material reaches the venous system translates to 0.46 mL of implant leakage. The 60-min follow-up to evaluate cardiopulmonary sequelae was based on the published literature in preclinical models as sufficient to evaluate those effects [17, 18].
Intravascular safety studies in large animals have been critical to the assessment of the potential clinical impact of leakage of alternative resorbable calcium-based implant materials. Bernard et al. demonstrated that a direct injection of a calcium phosphate implant resulted in a severe hypercoagulation reaction resulting in occlusion of the entire right ventricle and up to 86% mortality [16]. Krebs et al. found that a direct injection of a calcium phosphate implant resulted in increased pulmonary arterial pressure and decreased mean arterial blood pressure [17]. No similar changes were observed in this study following AGN1 injection. Qin et al. reported that a direct injection of a biphasic calcium sulfate/calcium phosphate resulted in smaller changes in pulmonary arterial pressure, mean arterial blood pressure, and blood gas when compared to PMMA [18].
The less frequent and less severe lung thrombotic changes in the AGN1 group were correlated with the reduced plasma levels of thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) which are known to be elevated during coagulation and in the procoagulant state [22]. TAT complex for all sheep remained below the reported physiological range (TAT ≤ 15 ng/mL) [23]; however, two PMMA sheep had TAT increases of 3 ng/mL after intravenous injection. Similar TAT increases following intravenous PMMA injection have been reported previously [18].
The lack of systemic activation of blood clotting by the triphasic AGN1 implant material used in this study has been reported for other, but not all, calcium phosphate formulations. Severe clot activation observed with one calcium phosphate formulation was hypothesized to be due to the implant material’s surface morphology activating the coagulation pathway by providing a surface for clot formation combined with calcium released into the vasculature providing a cofactor for coagulation activation [16]. One suggestion for the relative lack of reactivity of the triphasic implant material in the present study is that the crystalline structure of the calcium sulfate, brushite and tricalcium phosphate in the implant material is less reactive and there is no increase in circulating levels of calcium after injection. An additional factor may be the lack of fragmentation or disintegration of the triphasic implant material following intravascular injection as reported with other injectable calcium phosphate materials [17, 18]. It has been hypothesized that cement disintegration could result in an increased number of emboli due to fragmentation and calcium ions released [17].
Strengths of this study are the clinically relevant sheep large animal model, the precise control of timing and implant material injection volumes directly into the venous circulation, the range of analyses performed, and the blinded nature of the study. The main limitation is the small sample size allowing only for qualitative comparisons. The short observation period and the differences between the animal model and actual clinical use are further limitations. Although inducing leakage in a vertebral body model would more closely mimic clinical usage, it would not allow control of the volume or location of the implant leakage into the vasculature system. Additionally, inducing leakage into a vertebral body as the result of implant injection would produce fat emboli, potentially masking the effect of implant material leakage [24, 25].
Conclusion
This study demonstrated that the acute systemic and thromboembolic effects of a direct injection of a triphasic calcium-based implant material into the femoral vein appear to be comparable to or less than the effects of an injection of PMMA bone cement. Specifically, the severity and incidence of pulmonary histological changes may be lower for AGN1 compared to PMMA; however, a larger study would be required to determine whether these data are statistically significant. These preliminary safety data are supportive of further clinical evaluation of the implant material for vertebral augmentation.
References
McCarthy J, Davis A (2016) Diagnosis and management of vertebral compression fractures. Am Fam Physician 94:44–50
Edidin AA, Ong KL, Lau E, Kurtz SM (2011) Mortality risk for operated and nonoperated vertebral fracture patients in the medicare population. J Bone Miner Res 26:1617–1626. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.353
Lange A, Kasperk C, Alvares L et al (2014) Survival and cost comparison of kyphoplasty and percutaneous vertebroplasty using german claims data. Spine 39:318–326. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000135
Tsoumakidou G, Too CW, Koch G et al (2017) CIRSE guidelines on percutaneous vertebral augmentation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 40:331–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1574-8
Hirsch JA, Beall DP, Chambers MR et al (2018) Management of vertebral fragility fractures: a clinical care pathway developed by a multispecialty panel using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. Spine J 18:2152–2161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.07.025
Hirsch JA, Chandra RV, Carter NS et al (2019) Number needed to treat with vertebral augmentation to save a life. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6367
Lewis G (1997) Properties of acrylic bone cement: state of the art review. J Biomed Mater Res 38:155–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199722)38:2%3c155::AID-JBM10%3e3.0.CO;2-C
Nagaraja S, Awada HK, Dreher ML et al (2013) Vertebroplasty increases compression of adjacent IVDs and vertebrae in osteoporotic spines. Spine J 13:1872–1880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.007
Cho A-R, Cho S-B, Lee J-H, Kim K-H (2015) Effect of augmentation material stiffness on adjacent vertebrae after osteoporotic vertebroplasty using finite element analysis with different loading methods. Pain Physician 18:E1101–E1110
Lewis G (2006) Injectable bone cements for use in vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: state-of-the-art review. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 76:456–468. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30398
Trost M, Schmoelz W, Wimmer D et al (2020) Local osteo-enhancement of osteoporotic vertebra with a triphasic bone implant material increases strength—a biomechanical study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 140:1395–1401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03382-x
Zhan Y, Jiang J, Liao H et al (2017) Risk factors for cement leakage after vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty: a meta-analysis of published evidence. World Neurosurg 101:633–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.124
Kim YJ, Lee JW, Park KW et al (2009) Pulmonary cement embolism after percutaneous vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: incidence, characteristics, and risk factors. Radiology 251:250–259. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2511080854
Hassani SF, Cormier E, Shotar E et al (2018) Intracardiac cement embolism during percutaneous vertebroplasty: incidence, risk factors and clinical management. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5647-0
Weininger G, Elefteriades JA (2021) Intracardiac cement embolism. N Engl J Med 385:e49. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMicm2032931
Bernards C, Chapman J, Mirza S (2004) Lethality of embolized norian bone cement varies with the time between mixing and embolization. Proc 50th Annu Meet Orthop Res Soc 254
Krebs J, Aebli N, Goss BG et al (2007) Cardiovascular changes after pulmonary embolism from injecting calcium phosphate cement. J Biomed Mater Res - Part B Appl Biomater 82:526–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30758
Qin Y, Ye J, Wang P et al (2016) Evaluation of the biphasic calcium composite (BCC), a novel bone cement, in a minipig model of pulmonary embolism. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 27:317–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2015.1128240
Jin YJ, Yoon SH, Park K-W et al (2011) The volumetric analysis of cement in vertebroplasty. Spine 36:E761–E772. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181fc914e
Bae H, Hatten HP, Linovitz R et al (2012) A prospective randomized FDA-IDE trial comparing cortoss with PMMA for vertebroplasty: a comparative effectiveness research study with 24-month follow-up. Spine 37:544–550. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ba50b
Hines CB (2018) Understanding bone cement implantation syndrome. AANA J 86:433–441
Vervloet M, Thijs L, Hack C (1998) Derangements of coagulation and fibrinolysis in critically III patients with sepsis and septic shock. Semin Thromb Hemost 24:33–44. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-995821
Lavaud S, Canivet E, Wuillai A et al (2003) Optimal anticoagulation strategy in haemodialysis with heparin-coated polyacrylonitrile membrane. Nephrol Dial Transpl 18:2097–2104. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfg272
Aebli N, Krebs J, Davis G et al (2002) Fat embolism and acute hypotension during vertebroplasty: an experimental study in sheep. Spine 27:460–466
Krebs J, Ferguson SJ, Hoerstrup SP et al (2008) Influence of bone marrow fat embolism on coagulation activation in an ovine. J Bone Joint Surg 90:349–356. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.00058
Grimm KA, Lamont LA, Tranquilli WJ et al (2015) Veterinary anesthesia and analgesia, the fith edition of Lumb and Jones. Wiley, Hoboken
Kaneko JJ, Harvey JW, Bruss ML (2008) Clinical biochemistry of domestic animals. Academic Press
Duncan J, Prasse K (1986) Vertinary laboratory medicine, 2nd edn. Iowa State University Press
Smith B, Van Metre D, Pusterla N (2019) Large animal internal medicine, 6th edn. Mosby, United States
Krugsheld KR, Scholtens E, Mulder GJ (1980) Serum concentration of inorganic sulfate in mammals: species differences and circadian rhythm. Comp Biochem Physiol Part A Physiol 67:683–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9629(80)90261-3
Funding
This work was funded by AgNovos Healthcare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Study preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by CC, AR, DK, DG, and UM. The first draft of the manuscript was written by CC and JDS. The manuscript was critically revised by SZ, LMB, RSH, and CEA. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
John D. Stroncek and Ronald S. Hill are employed by AgNovos Healthcare. Lorin Benneker and Christoph Albers have received honoraria from AgNovos Healthcare. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Constant, C., Stroncek, J.D., Zeiter, S. et al. Venous injection of a triphasic calcium-based implant in a sheep model of pulmonary embolism demonstrates minimal acute systemic effects. Eur Spine J 31, 2812–2821 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07303-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07303-x