Insights into the mechanisms of aqueous Cd(II) reduction and adsorption by nanoscale zerovalent iron under different atmosphere conditions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129766Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Cd(II) reduction to Cd(0) by NZVI core was demonstrated by XPS Cd MNN Auger lines.

  • Oxygen induced compositional evolution of NZVI and change the Cd(II) adsorption model.

  • Cd(II) leaching during post air-intrusion came from Cd(0) and adsorbed Cd(II).

  • Bicarbonate, nitrate and phosphate reduced Cd(II) leaching during post air-intrusion.

Abstract

Nanoscale zero-valent iron (NZVI) can effectively remove and recover Cd(II) from aqueous solutions. However, the oxygen effects on Cd(II) removal by NZVI have been overlooked and not well studied. In this research, the Cd MNN auger lines obtained by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) revealed that Cd(II) adsorbed on the NZVI surface could be reduced to Cd(0) by the Fe(0) core under anaerobic conditions. With coexisting oxygen, the Cd(II) removal efficiency declined significantly, and Cd(II) reduction was inhibited by the thickened surface γ-FeOOH layer. Furthermore, the post-oxygen intrusion corroded the generated Cd(0) and led to the dramatic leaching of Cd(II) ions. According to the density functional theory (DFT) simulation, the adsorbed Cd(II) was preferably coordinated via a monodentate model on the surface of Fe3O4 and γ-FeOOH, which are the dominant surface species of NZVI under anaerobic and aerobic conditions, respectively. Thus, γ-FeOOH with doubly coordinated hydroxyl groups provided fewer adsorption sites than Fe3O4 for Cd(II) ions. Overall, the atmospheric conditions of subsurface remediation and wastewater treatment should be considered when applying NZVI for Cd(II) removal. Favorable atmospheric conditions would improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of NZVI-based technologies for the practical remediation of Cd(II) pollution.

Introduction

Cadmium ion (Cd(II)), identified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (Zhu and Costa, 2020), is a typical heavy metal pollutant found in groundwater and industrial wastewater with a Cd(II) concentration up to 300 mg/L (Kubier et al., 2019, Shrestha et al., 2021, Sribudda et al., 2015). Recently, nanoscale zero-valent iron (NZVI) techniques have attracted increasing attention for wastewater treatment and subsurface and sediment remediation for Cd(II) removal (Li et al., 2014, Liu et al., 2022a, Liu et al., 2022b, Tasharrofi et al., 2020, Wu et al., 2018, Xue et al., 2018, Yang et al., 2020, Zhao et al., 2021). Due to its large surface area (>10 m2/g) and high reduction capacity (EFe2+Fe0Θ(298 K)=-0.440 V) (Phenrat and Lowry, 2019), NZVI is versatile in removing various aqueous contaminants on the particle surface via reduction, adsorption, or precipitation (Li et al., 2021, Mu et al., 2017, Zou et al., 2016). For practical applications, NZVI can remove Cd(II) either from groundwater by a subsurface permeable reactive region (Tasharrofi et al., 2020) or from industrial wastewater using a two-stage tank (Li et al., 2014, Zhang et al., 2014). However, the performance of Cd(II) removal by NZVI might be influenced by the dissolved oxygen (DO) (Calderon and Fullana, 2015), which is dependent on the subsurface depth and the NZVI dose. However, how DO influences Cd(II) removal by NZVI is not well understood.

The atmospheric conditions might influence the interaction between Cd(II) ions and NZVI particles. Some studies reported that Cd(II) might be reduced to Cd(0) by NZVI even under aerobic conditions (Zhu et al., 2019), as Cd(0) has a standard redox potential (ECd2+Cd0Θ(298 K)=-0.403 V) lower than that of Fe(0). However, as DO can oxidize Cd(0) to Cd(II) and the EΘ values of Cd(0) and Fe(0) are similar, most studies have stated that NZVIs remove Cd(II) only via adsorption, precipitation, and surface complex formation (Huang et al., 2016, Li et al., 2018b, Ling et al., 2018, Lv et al., 2018, Park et al., 2019). Therefore, direct evidence is needed to investigate the mechanisms of Cd(II) removal by NZVI under different atmospheric conditions and reveal the roles of DO in the removal process.

In addition, NZVI suffers from aqueous corrosion due to its high reactivity. Fe(0) is readily oxidized to Fe(II) or Fe(III) by H+ ions and DO, forming secondary Fe minerals, such as wustite, magnetite, and lepidocrocite (Bae et al., 2018). The corrosion evolution depended on the atmospheric conditions, NZVI concentration, corrosion time, and patterns in the aqueous phase (Bae et al., 2018), which may also influence the Cd(II) adsorption and leaching process. Specifically, Cd(II) could be effectively removed by NZVI under aerobic conditions within 5 h (Calderon and Fullana, 2015). When the aging time was extended to more than 50 h, the removed Cd(II) leached by 65% (Calderon and Fullana, 2015). In comparison, modifying the NZVI surface by sulfidation inhibited the aqueous corrosion of NZVI particles, so Cd(II) could be stably adsorbed by sulfidated NZVI for 30 d (Guo et al., 2021, Stevenson et al., 2017). In addition, the crystalline and surface structure of Fe minerals might also influence the complex models of Cd(II) and relative adsorption capacity (Hao et al., 2022). However, as the oxygen intrusion was uncontrolled and the Fe species were not quantified, the relationships between the oxygen-induced corrosion, the compositional evolution of Fe minerals, and the Cd(II) leaching could not be confirmed.

Therefore, a systematic study was conducted to explore the mechanisms of Cd(II) removal by NZVI, including reduction and adsorption, and the influential mechanisms of oxygen on the removal process. Bare NZVIs without any modification were used in this study, to provide basic understanding of the NZVI-Cd(II) interactions. Cd speciation, metal ion leaching, and compositional evolution during Cd(II) removal were investigated with different NZVI particle sizes, oxygen intrusion amounts and patterns, aqueous backgrounds, and reaction duration. In addition, the amounts of Fe(II) and Fe(III) ions were quantified, and the species of secondary Fe minerals were identified with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES). The reduction of Cd(II) to Cd(0) by NZVI was first demonstrated with direct evidence. Furthermore, the adsorption models of Cd(II) on the surface of NZVI with different secondary minerals were first investigated with density functional theory (DFT) calculations, which also influenced the Cd(II) removal performance. The underlying mechanisms demonstrated in this study can guide the applications of NZVI-based materials, where the particle surface of NZVI was exposed to the aqueous phase for Cd(II) removal.

Section snippets

Materials

The chemicals used in this study are shown in the SI section (Text S1). NZVI was synthesized via aqueous reduction of FeCl3 by NaBH4 (Text S2) (Hu and Li, 2018). Ultrapure water, ethanol solutions with a volume ratio of ethanol to water at 1:4 and 1:1 were used as the synthesis media to adjust the particle size of NZVI. Details for the synthesis media were presented in Text S2.

Characterization of NZVIs

The morphology of the NZVI particles was examined by a scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi S-4800 FEG) and

Effects of the NZVI size on anaerobic Cd(II) removal, Fe(II) release and related kinetics

The Cd(II) removal performance under anaerobic conditions depended on the NZVI particle size. As shown in the SEM and TEM images (Figs. 1a-1c), the synthesized NZVIs are chain-like particles, with the diameter decreasing with increasing ethanol concentration in the synthesis medium. The three NZVI products with diameters of approximately 20, 50 and 100 nm were denoted NZVI20, NZVI50 and NZVI100, respectively. The decreasing size provided a higher specific area, so more iron oxides formed, and

Conclusions

As the redox potentials of the Fe2+Fe0 and Cd2+Cd0 pairs are similar, the mechanisms of Cd(II) removal by NZVI are not yet clear. This study revealed that Cd(II) reduction under anaerobic conditions was significant and contributed 49.9% of the total Cd(II) removal with NZVI50. The produced Cd(0) was completely covered by the adsorbed Cd(II), so many reports ignored the occurrence of Cd(II) reduction. The reduction could occur with the Fe0 core typically having an Fe0/Fe ratio above 40% (Fig. 3

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Yi-bo Hu: Investigation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Funding acquisition. Ting Du: Investigation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing - original draft. Lihang Ma, Xuening Feng, Yujie Xie, Xiaoyao Fan: Investigation. Ming-Lai Fu, Baoling Yuan, Xiao-yan Li: Supervision, Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Yi-bo Hu reports financial support was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China. Xiao-yan Li reports financial support was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China. Yi-bo Hu reports financial support was provided by Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China. Xiao-yan Li reports financial support was provided by Research

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers 52000083, 51978369], the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China [grant number 2020J01060], Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Government [grant numbers 17210219, T21–711/16R], the special fund from Key Laboratory of Drinking Water Science and Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences [grant number 19K02KLDWST], the Fundamental Research

References (48)

  • Z. Li et al.

    Zeolite-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron: New findings on simultaneous adsorption of Cd(II), Pb(II), and As(III) in aqueous solution and soil

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2018)
  • L. Liang et al.

    The removal of Cd by sulfidated nanoscale zero-valent iron: The structural, chemical bonding evolution and the reaction kinetics

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2020)
  • J. Liu et al.

    Synergistic adsorption of Cd(II) with sulfate/phosphate on ferrihydrite: An in situ ATR-FTIR/2D-COS study

    Chem. Geol.

    (2018)
  • M. Liu et al.

    Nano zero-valent iron-induced changes in soil iron species and soil bacterial communities contribute to the fate of Cd

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2022)
  • D. Lv et al.

    Design and characterization of sulfide-modified nanoscale zerovalent iron for cadmium(II) removal from aqueous solutions

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2018)
  • S. Majumder et al.

    CdO nanonecklace: effect of air annealing on performance of photo electrochemical cell

    J. Alloy. Compd.

    (2019)
  • M.H. Park et al.

    Removal of aqueous-phase Pb(II), Cd(II), As(III), and As(V) by nanoscale zero-valent iron supported on exhausted coffee grounds

    Waste Manag.

    (2019)
  • M. Qin et al.

    Role of exposed facets and surface OH groups in the Fenton-like reactivity of lepidocrocite catalyst

    Chemosphere

    (2019)
  • R. Shrestha et al.

    Technological trends in heavy metals removal from industrial wastewater: A review

    J. Environ. Chem. Eng.

    (2021)
  • D. Sribudda et al.

    Separation of Cd(II) from industrial wastewater via HFSLM: equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic investigation

    J. Ind. Eng. Chem.

    (2015)
  • Y. Su et al.

    Simultaneous removal of cadmium and nitrate in aqueous media by nanoscale zerovalent iron (nZVI) and Au doped nZVI particles

    Water Res.

    (2014)
  • Q. Sun et al.

    Formation of Cd precipitates on γ-Al2O3: Implications for Cd sequestration in the environment

    Environ. Int.

    (2019)
  • S. Tasharrofi et al.

    Adsorption of cadmium using modified zeolite-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron composites as a reactive material for PRBs

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2020)
  • W. Xue et al.

    Nanoscale zero-valent iron coated with rhamnolipid as an effective stabilizer for immobilization of Cd and Pb in river sediments

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2018)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text