Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Median nerve somatosensory evoked potential alarm related to head and neck positioning for carotid surgery

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Head positioning in carotid surgery represents an often overlooked but sensitive period in the surgical plan. A 53-year-old male presented a significant decrement in median nerve somatosensory evoked potential (mSEP) following head and neck positioning for carotid pseudoaneurysm repair before skin incision.

Neurophysiological monitoring was performed with mSEP and electroencephalography early during the patient’s preparation and surgery. Within five minutes after rotation and extension of the head to properly expose the surgical field, the contralateral m-SEP significantly decreased in both cortical (N20/P25) and subcortical (P14/N18) components. Partial neck correction led to m-SEP improvement, allowing to proceed with the carotid repair. We discuss possible underlying pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for these changes and highlight the relevance of an early start on monitoring to avoid neurological deficits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Cole TS, Mezher AW, Catapano JS, et al. Nationwide Trends in Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in the Post-CREST Era. Stroke. 2020;51(2):579–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Writing Group M, Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133(4):e38–60.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet, 1998. 351(9113): p. 1379–87.

  4. Abbott AL, Paraskevas KI, Kakkos SK, et al. Systematic Review of Guidelines for the Management of Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis. Stroke. 2015;46(11):3288–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(20):1415–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. C., et al., Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(7):445–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Abdelhamid MF, Wall ML, Vohra RK. Carotid artery pseudoaneurysm after carotid endarterectomy: case series and a review of the literature. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2009;43(6):571–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gautier PE, Baele PL, Guerit JM, et al. Changes in somatosensory evoked responses during carotid endarterectomy related to head position. Anesth Analg. 1991;73(5):649–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guerit JM, et al. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in carotid surgery. I. Relationships between qualitative SEP alterations and intraoperative events. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;104(6):459–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alcantara SD, Wuamett JC, Lantis JC 2. Outcomes of combined somatosensory evoked potential, motor evoked potential, and electroencephalography monitoring during carotid endarterectomy. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;28(3):665–72. nd, et al.

  11. Nwachuku EL, Balzer JR, Yabes JG, et al. Diagnostic value of somatosensory evoked potential changes during carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(1):73–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thiagarajan K, Cheng HL, Huang JE, et al. Is Two Really Better Than One? Examining the Superiority of Dual Modality Neurophysiological Monitoring During Carotid Endarterectomy: A Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2015;84(6):1941-9 e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Thirumala PD, Thiagarajan K, Gedela S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of EEG changes during carotid endarterectomy in predicting perioperative strokes. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;25:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Journée H-L, Polak HE, De Kleuver M. Conditioning stimulation techniques for enhancement of transcranially elicited evoked motor responses. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;37(6):423–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Allison T, McCarthy G, Wood CC, et al. Human cortical potentials evoked by stimulation of the median nerve. I. Cytoarchitectonic areas generating short-latency activity. J Neurophysiol. 1989;62(3):694–710.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tatu L, Moulin T, Vuillier F, et al. Arterial territories of the human brain. Front Neurol Neurosci. 2012;30:99–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kranenburg HAR, Tyer R, Schmitt M, et al. Effects of Head and Neck Positions on Blood Flow in the Vertebral, Internal Carotid, and Intracranial Arteries: A Systematic Review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019;49(10):688–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Papaharilaou Y, Aristokleous N, Seimenis I, et al. Effect of head posture on the healthy human carotid bifurcation hemodynamics. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2013;51(1–2):207–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuhn JE, Lebus GF, Bible JE. Thoracic Outlet Syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23:222–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nguyen. Soo Hoo. Evaluation and management of Arterial Thoracic Outlet Syndrome. Thorac Surg Clin. 2021;31:45–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mauguière F, Desmedt JE, Courjon J. Neural generators of N18 and P14 far-field somatosensory evoked potentials studied in patients with lesion of thalamus or thalamo-cortical radiations. Electroencephalogr clin neurophysiol. 1983;56(4):283–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Urasaki E, et al. Origin of the scalp far-field N18 of SSEPs in response to median nerve stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990;77:39–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Urasaki E, et al. Amplitude abnormalities in the scalp far-field N18 of SSEPs to median nerve stimulation in patients with midbrain-pontine lesion. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992;84:232–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Urasaki E, Uematsu S, Lesser RP. Short latency somatosensory evoked potentials around the human upper brain-stem. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993;88:92–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Burger KM, Tuhrim S, Naidich TP, Brainstem vascular stroke anatomy. Neuroimaging Clin N Am, 2005. 15(2): p. 297–324, x.

  26. Schmahmann JD. Vascular syndromes of the thalamus. Stroke. 2003;34(9):2264–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rossiti S, Volkmann R. Changes of blood flow velocity indicating mechanical compression of the vertebral arteries during rotation of the head in the normal human measured with transcranial Doppler sonography. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1995;53(1):26–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sakaguchi M, Kitagawa K, Hougaku H, et al. Mechanical compression of the extracranial vertebral artery during neck rotation. Neurology. 2003;61(6):845–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hoksbergen AW, Legemate DA, Ubbink DT, et al. Collateral variations in circle of willis in atherosclerotic population assessed by means of transcranial color-coded duplex ultrasonography. Stroke. 2000;31(7):1656–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhu G, Yuan Q, Yang J, et al. The role of the circle of Willis in internal carotid artery stenosis and anatomical variations: a computational study based on a patient-specific three-dimensional model. Biomed Eng Online. 2015;14:107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Szelenyi A, Bueno de Camargo A, Flamm E, et al. Neurophysiological criteria for intraoperative prediction of pure motor hemiplegia during aneurysm surgery. Case report. J Neurosurg. 2003;99(3):575–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mount Sinai Roosevelt, Mount Sinai West Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

    Alba Díaz-Baamonde, Roberto Peláez-Cruz, Maria J. Téllez, John Lantis & Sedat Ulkatan

Authors
  1. Alba Díaz-Baamonde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roberto Peláez-Cruz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maria J. Téllez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. John Lantis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sedat Ulkatan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alba Díaz-Baamonde.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Díaz-Baamonde, A., Peláez-Cruz, R., Téllez, M.J. et al. Median nerve somatosensory evoked potential alarm related to head and neck positioning for carotid surgery. J Clin Monit Comput 37, 699–704 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-022-00904-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-022-00904-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation