Abstract
A demand-driven pressure swing adsorption biogas upgrading application is modelled using monolayer and multilayered (bilayer) beds, to gain insight on the impact of the adsorbent pellet size on the overall performance of such processes. Pellet radii in the range of 0.1–2.4 mm were studied, for fixed cycle settings and column dimensions. Varying the pellet size influences the sorption kinetics and flow resistance, resulting in the existence of an optimum pellet size for monolayered beds. For fixed cycle settings, small pellets may yield higher purities at low total productivities, yet show a more rapid decrease in product purity with increasing productivities due to the higher pressure drop. Furthermore, 18 configurations with beds containing a layer of larger pellets and a second layer of smaller pellets (bilayer) were investigated. Bilayered beds with 0.3 mm, 0.6 and 2.4 mm radius pellets were combined, with the first layer taking up 25, 50 or 75% of the bed. With respect to upward flow in the adsorption step, beds with the smallest pellet size in the top layer (LS beds) can offer higher product purity than beds with the smallest pellet in the bottom layer (SL beds).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alpay, E., Kenney, C.N., Scott, D.M.: Adsorbent particle size effects in the separation of air by rapid pressure swing adsorption. Chem. Eng. Sci. 49(18), 3059–3075 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(94)E0120-F
Shigaki, N., et al.: Reduction of electric power consumption in CO2-PSA with zeolite 13X adsorbent. Energies 11(4), 1–21 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/en11040900
Shirley, A.I., LaCava, A.I.: PSA performance of densely packed adsorbent beds. AIChE J. 41(6), 1389–1394 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690410605
Nikolic, D., Kikkinides, E.S., Georgiadis, M.C.: Optimization of multibed pressure swing adsorption processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48(11), 5388–5398 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie801357a
Ackley, M.W.: US 6790260 B2 enhanced rate PSA process. (2004)
Chlendi, M., Tondeur, D.: Dynamic behaviour of layered columns in pressure swing adsorption. Gas Sep. Purif. 9(4), 231–242 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-4214(95)00005-V
Ahn, H., Lee, C.H.: Adsorption dynamics of water in layered bed for air-drying TSA process. AIChE J. 49(6), 1601–1609 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690490623
Baksh, M.S.A., Ackley, M.W.: US 6 340 382 B1. (2002)
Cavenati, S., Grande, C.A., Rodrigues, A.E.: Separation of CH4/CO2/N2 mixtures by layered pressure swing adsorption for upgrade of natural gas. Chem. Eng. Sci. 61(12), 3893–3906 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2006.01.023
Golden, T.C., Weist, E.L.: US 6,814,787 B2. (2004)
Park, J.H., Kim, J.N., Cho, S.H.: Performance analysis of four-bed H2 PSA process using layered beds. AIChE J. 46(4), 790–802 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690460413
Rege, S.U., et al.: Air-prepurification by pressure swing adsorption using single/layered beds. Chem. Eng. Sci. 56(8), 2745–2759 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00531-5
Wilson, S.J., Webley, P.A.: Cyclic steady-state axial temperature profiles in multilayer, bulk gas PSA—the case of oxygen VSA. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41(11), 2753–2765 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0108090
Grande, C.A., Rodrigues, A.E.: Layered vacuum pressure-swing adsorption for biogas upgrading. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46(23), 7844–7848 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie070942d
Nastaj, J., Ambrozek, B.: Analysis of gas dehydration in TSA system with multi-layered bed of solid adsorbents. Chem. Eng. Process. 96, 44–53 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2015.08.001
Ribeiro, A.M., et al.: A parametric study of layered bed PSA for hydrogen purification. Chem. Eng. Sci. 63(21), 5258–5273 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2008.07.017
Sheikh Alivand, M., Farhadi, F.: Multi-objective optimization of a multi-layer PTSA for LNG production. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 49, 435–446 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2017.11.029
Xiao, J., et al.: Machine learning–based optimization for hydrogen purification performance of layered bed pressure swing adsorption. Int. J. Energy Res. 44(6), 4475–4492 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/er.5225
Mathews, A.P.: Effect of adsorbent particle layering on performance of conventional and tapered fixed-bed adsorbers. J. Environ. Eng. 131(11), 1488–1494 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(2005)131
Baksh, M., Simo, M.: WO 2012/096812 A1. (2012)
Miller, G.Q.: EP 0 435 156 A2 Vapor phase adsorption process using sequential adsorption zones containing different particle size adsorbents. (1990)
De Witte, N., Denayer, J.F.M., Van Assche, T.R.C.: Effect of adsorption duration and purge flowrate on pressure swing adsorption performance. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 60(37), 13684–13691 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c02291
Santos, M.P.S., Grande, C.A., Rodrigues, A.E.: Pressure swing adsorption for biogas upgrading. Effect of recycling streams in pressure swing adsorption design. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50(2), 974–985 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie100757u
Ergun, S.: Fluid through packed columns. Chem. Eng. Prog. 48, 89–94 (1952)
Li, G., et al.: Capture of CO2 from high humidity flue gas by vacuum swing adsorption with zeolite 13X. Adsorption 14(2–3), 415–422 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-007-9100-y
Rajagopalan, A.K., Avila, A.M., Rajendran, A.: Do adsorbent screening metrics predict process performance? A process optimisation based study for post-combustion capture of CO2. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 46, 76–85 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.12.033
Allen, K.G., von Backström, T.W., Kröger, D.G.: Packed bed pressure drop dependence on particle shape, size distribution, packing arrangement and roughness. Powder Technol. 246, 590–600 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2013.06.022
Moran, A., Patel, M., Talu, O.: Axial dispersion effects with small diameter adsorbent particles. Adsorption 24(3), 333–344 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-018-9944-3
Moran, A., Talu, O.: Role of pressure drop on rapid pressure swing adsorption performance. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 56(19), 5715–5723 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b00577
Guo, J., Shah, D.B., Talu, O.: Determination of effective diffusivities in commercial single pellets: effect of water loading. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46(2), 600–607 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie060747j
Silva, J.A.C., Schumann, K., Rodrigues, A.E.: Sorption and kinetics of CO2 and CH4 in binderless beads of 13X zeolite. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 158, 219–228 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.03.042
Kamiuto, K., Goubaru, A., Ermalina: Diffusion coefficients of carbon dioxide within type 13X zeolite particles. Chem. Eng. Commun. 193(5), 628–638 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/00986440500193970
Hu, X., et al.: Diffusion mechanism of CO2 in 13X zeolite beads. Adsorption 20(1), 121–135 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-013-9554-z
Hossain, M.I., et al.: Mass transfer mechanisms and rates of CO2 and N2 in 13X zeolite from volumetric frequency response. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58(47), 21679–21690 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b04756
Krishna, R., Van Baten, J.M.: Highlighting the anti-synergy between adsorption and diffusion in cation-exchanged faujasite zeolites. ACS Omega (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c00427
Shen, D., Bülow, M.: Sorption Kinetic and Porosimetric Evaluation of Novel BOC PPU TSA Sorbents: NaLSX Zeolite. (1998). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31422.43845
Webley, P.A., et al.: A new multi-bed vacuum swing adsorption cycle for CO2 capture from flue gas streams. Energy Procedia 114, 2467–2480 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1398
Haghpanah, R., et al.: Multiobjective optimization of a four-step adsorption process for postcombustion CO2 capture via finite volume simulation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52(11), 4249–4265 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie302658y
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Joeri F.M. Denayer is an editorial board member of Adsorption journal.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zapata Ballesteros, A., De Witte, N., Denayer, J.F.M. et al. Effect of pellet size on PSA performance: monolayer and multilayer bed case study for biogas upgrading. Adsorption 28, 197–208 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-022-00365-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-022-00365-9