Skip to main content
Log in

Extraction of Copper from Liquid Effluents by Cementation in Agitated Vessels Equipped with Expanded Aluminum Cylindrical Sheets

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The presence of high levels of heavy metals in wastewaters is known to pose a serious threat to the environment. Because of their numerous industrial, domestic, agricultural, medical, and technical applications, they are widely distributed in the environment, raising worries about their possible effects on human health and the environment. In this work, a cylindrical-expanded aluminum sheet placed in an agitated vessel was used to recover copper ions from synthetic wastewater. The influence of initial Cu2+ ion concentration, rotating speed, solution pH, aluminum mesh number, temperature, and the presence of different types of surfactants on the kinetics of the Cu+2 ions cementation was investigated. The current study found that the rate of copper cementation rises with increasing rotational speed, starting copper ion concentration, temperature, and the mesh number of the expanded aluminum cylindrical sheet, but the pH has no influence within range examined. Surfactants reduce the rate of cementation by a percentage ranging from 9.38 to 75.19 for cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTMAB) and 19.27 to 78.53 for sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) depending on mesh number and rpm. The mass transfer data of the present study have been correlated for by a dimensionless equation from which the rate of cementation can be estimated at various conditions within the range of the applicability of the equation.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A:

Surface area of the expanded aluminum cylinder, cm2

Ao :

Arrhenius equation frequency factor, cm/s

Q:

Solution volume, cm3

Co :

Initial concentration of copper ions, mol/cm3

C:

Concentration of copper ions at any time, mol/cm3

d:

Diameter of the expanded aluminum cylinder, cm

de :

Screen’s hydraulic diameter, cm

dw :

Screen’s wire diameter, cm

di :

Impeller diameter, cm

D:

Diffusivity of copper ions, cm2/s

eo :

Standard electrode potential, Volt

Eo :

Standard potential of the cementation overall reaction, Volt

E:

Activation Energy, kcal/mol

F:

Faraday’s constant, 96,500 Coulumbs/mol

k:

Mass transfer coefficient, cm/s

K:

Volumetric mass transfer coefficient at the expanded aluminum cylinder, cm3/s

\(\overline{K }\) :

Equilibrium constant, cm3/mol

Ko :

Volumetric mass transfer coefficient in the presence of the surfactants, cm3/s

Ks :

Volumetric mass transfer coefficient at the solid aluminum sheet, cm3/s

R:

Universal gas constant, kcal/(mol K)

t:

Reaction time, s

T:

Absolute temperature, K

Z:

Number of electrons involved in the cementation reaction

\(\alpha \) :

Inhibition efficiency

\(\Delta {G}_{o}\) :

Standard free energy, J/mol

\(\varnothing \) :

Porosity

\(\varepsilon \) :

Enhancement ratio

\(\mu \) :

Solution viscosity, Poise

\(\omega \) :

Impeller rotational speed, rpm

\(\rho \) :

Solution density, g/cm3

Re:

Impeller Reynolds number \(\left(\frac{\rho N {d}_{i}^{2}}{ \mu }\right)\)

Sc:

Schmidt number \(\left(\frac{\mu }{\rho D}\right)\)

Sh:

Sherwood number \(\left(\frac{K}{D d}\right)\)

References

  1. Bhatti MS, Kapoor D, Kalia RK, Reddy AS, Thukral AK (2011) RSM and ANN modeling for electrocoagulation of copper from simulated wastewater: multi objective optimization using genetic algorithm approach. Desalination 274(1):74–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rengaraj S, Kim Y, Joo CK, Yi J (2004) Removal of copper from aqueous solution by aminated and protonated mesoporous aluminas: kinetics and equilibrium. J Colloid Interface Sci 273(1):14–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu B, Zhang Y, Shukla A, Shukla SS, Dorris KL (2000) The removal of heavy metal from aqueous solutions by sawdust adsorption-removal of copper. J Hazard Mater 80(1):33–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ibrahim BS, Abdel-Aziz MH, El-Ashtoukhy E-SZ, Zewail TM, Zatout AA, Sedahmed GH (2021) Cementation of copper on zinc in agitated vessels equipped with perforated baffles as turbulence promoters. Min Metall Exploration 38(2):1203–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zaabar A, Aitout R, Amoura D, Maizia R, Makhloufi L, Saidani B (2019) Effect of nettle plant extract on the overconsumption diminution of zinc as sacrificial metal during cementation of copper. Miner Eng 142:105933

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shishkin A, Mironovs V, Vu H, Novak P, Baronins J, Polyakov A, Ozolins J (2018) Cavitation-dispersion method for copper cementation from wastewater by iron powder. Metals 8(11):920

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Granata G, Tsendorj U, Liu W, Tokoro C (2019) Direct recovery of copper nanoparticles from leach pad drainage by surfactant-assisted cementation with iron powder. Colloids Surf A 580:123719

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Demirkıran N, Özdemir GDT, Dardağan M (2020) Application of response surface method to copper cementation by metallic aluminum particles. Ch&ChT 14(4):590–596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Abdel-Aziz MH, El-Ashtoukhy E-SZ, Bassyouni M (2016) Recovery of copper from effluents by cementation on aluminum in a multirotating cylinder-agitated vessel. Metall and Mater Trans B 47(1):657–665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Annamalai V, Hiskey JB, Murr LE (1978) The effects of kinetic variables on the structure of copper deposits cemented on pure aluminum discs: a scanning electron microscopic study. Hydrometallurgy 3(2):163–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mackinnon DJ, Ingraham TR (1970) Kinetics of Cu (II) cementation on a pure aluminum disc in acidic sulphate solutions. Can Metall Q 9(3):443–448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Djokić SS (1996) Cementation of copper on aluminum in alkaline solutions. J Electrochem Soc 143(4):1300–1305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dib A, Makhloufi L (2004) Cementation treatment of copper in wastewater: mass transfer in a fixed bed of iron spheres. Chem Eng Process 43(10):1265–1273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gros F, Baup S, Aurousseau M (2008) Intensified recovery of copper in solution: cementation onto iron in fixed or fluidized bed under electromagnetic field. Chem Eng Process 47(3):295–302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gros F, Baup S, Aurousseau M (2011) Copper cementation on zinc and iron mixtures: Part 2: fluidized bed configuration. Hydrometallurgy 106(1):119–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mubarak AA, El-Shazly AH, Konsowa AH (2004) Recovery of copper from industrial waste solution by cementation on reciprocating horizontal perforated zinc disc. Desalination 167:127–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. El-Shazly AH, Mubarak AA, Farag HA, Fadl AG (2014) Improving the rate of Cu+2 recovery from industrial wastewater using a vertical array of reciprocating perforated zinc discs. Alex Eng J 54(1):71–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nosier SA, Sallam SA (2000) Removal of lead ions from wastewater by cementation on a gas-sparged zinc cylinder. Sep Purif Technol 18(2):93–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hsu YJ, Kim MJ, Tran T (1999) Electrochemical study on copper cementation from cyanide liquors using zinc. Electrochim Acta 44(10):1617–1625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nosier SA (2003) Removal of cadmium ions from industrial wastewater by cementation. Chem Biochem Eng Q 17(3):219–224

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Konsowa AH (2010) Intensification of the rate of heavy metal removal from wastewater by cementation in a jet reactor. Desalination 254(1):29–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nassef E, El-Taweel YA (2015) Removal of copper from wastewater by cementation from simulated leach liquors. J Chem Eng Process Technol 6(1):1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Alemany C, Aurousseau M, Lapicque F, Ozil P (2002) Cementation and corrosion at a RDE: changes in flow and transfer phenomena induced by surface roughness. J Appl Electrochem 32(11):1269–1278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Abdel-Aziz EG, El-Naggar MA, Nosier SA, Mubarak AA, Abdel-Aziz MH, Sedahmed GH (2020) Recovery of copper from industrial waste solutions by cementation using a rotating fixed bed of stacked steel screens. Min Metall Exploration 37:453–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. El-Ashtoukhy E-SZ, Abdel-Aziz MH (2013) Removal of copper from aqueous solutions by cementation in a bubble column reactor fitted with horizontal screens. Int J Miner Process 121:65–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Grau JM, Bisang JM (2005) Mass transfer studies at rotating cylinder electrodes of expanded metal. J Appl Electrochem 35:285–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Power GP, Ritchie IM (1975) Modern aspects of electrochemistry. In: Bockris JOM (ed) Conway, BE. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Selley NJ (1977) Experimental approach to electrochemistry. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kolmachikhina EB, Sviridov AV, Naumov KD (2020) Investigation into the influence of sodium lignosulfonate, anionic surfactants, and their mixtures on the copper cementation rate by zinc. Russ J Non-Ferrous Met 61:488–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Karavasteva M (1996) The effect of certain surfactants on the cementation of copper by suspended zinc particles. Hydrometallurgy 43:379–385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. McCabe WL, Smith JC, Harriott P (2005) Unit operations of chemical engineering. Mc-Graw Hill Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vogel AI (1961) A textbook of quantitative inorganic analysis including elementary instrumental analysis. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  33. Goronja JM, Janošević-Ležaić A, Dimitrijević BM, Malenović A, Stanisavljev D, Pejić N (2016) Determination of critical micelle concentration of cetyltrimethyl-ammonium bromide: different procedures for analysis of experimental data. Hemijska Ind 70:485–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rahman A, Brown CW (1983) Effect of pH on the critical micelle concentration of sodium dodecyl sulphate. J Appl Polym Sci 28:1331–1334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Findlay A, Kitchner J (1965) Practical physical chemistry. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lobo VMM (1993) Mutual diffusion coefficient in aqueous electrolyte solutions (technical report). Pure Appl Chem 65(12):2613–2640

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Walsh FC (1993) A first course in electrochemical engineering. The electrochemical consultancy. Hants UK

  38. Fahidy Z (1985) Principle of electrochemical reactor analysis. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hung YP, Mohamed N, Darus H (2005) Recovery of copper from strong chloride-based solution. J Appl Sci 5(8):1328–1333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Welty JR, Wicks CE, Rorer G, Wilson RE (2007) Fundamentals of momentum, heat, and mass transfer. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lee EC, Lawson F, Han KN (1978) Effect of precipitant surface roughness on cementation kinetics. Hydrometallurgy 3(1):7–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Ekmekyapar A, Tanaydin M, Demirkiran N (2012) Investigation of copper cementation kinetics by rotating aluminum disc from the leach solutions containing copper ions. Physicochem Problems Min Process 48(2):355–367

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Demirkiran N, Kuenkuel A (2011) Recovering of copper with metallic aluminum. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 21(12):2778–2782

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Tanaka M, Yamashita I, Chisaka F (1990) Flow and heat transfer characteristics of the Stirling engine regenerator in an oscillating flow. JSME Int J Ser 33(2):283–289

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Shehata AS, Elshazly AH, Zaatout AA, Sedahmed GH (2011) Mass transfer behaviour of a new liquid-liquid rotating screen disc extractor. Bul Chem Commun 43(3):427–438

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Nagamalleswara Rao K, Koteswara Reddy G, Murali Mohan V, RajendraPrasad P, Sujatha V (2011) Studies on ionic mass transfer with coaxially placed twisted tape as turbulent promoter in circular conduits. J Eng Res Stud 2(1):49–61

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wu Y, Hua C, Li W, Li Q, Gao H, Liu H (2009) Intensification of micromixing efficiency in a ceramic membrane reactor with turbulence promoter. J Membr Sci 328(1):219–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Gaber MM, Fouad YO, Farag HA, Sedahmed GH (2015) Intensification of the rate of diffusion controlled electrolytic oxidation of FeSO4 by turbulence promoters in a stirred tank reactor in relation to wastewater treatment. Chem Eng Res Des 97(May):100–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Fogler HS (2006) Elements of chemical reaction engineering. Prentice-Hall, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  50. Alberty RA (1960) The foundations of chemical kinetics (Ed: Benson, S. W.). Mc-Graw Hill Inc., New York

  51. Dönmez B, Sevim F, Sarac H (1999) A kinetic study of the cementation of copper from sulphate solutions onto a rotating aluminum disc. Hydrometallurgy 53(2):145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sedahmed GH, Ahmed AM (1989) Effect of surface-active agents on the rate of solid-liquid mass transfer with gas generation at the interface. Chem Eng J 42(1):17–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Karavasteva M (1996) The effect of certain surfactants on the cementation of copper by suspended zinc particles. Hydrometallurgy 43(1):379–385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Zarraa MA (1996) Effect of surface-active substances on the rate of production of copper powder from copper sulphate solutions by cementation on zinc rods in gas sparged reactors. Hydrometallurgy 41(2–3):231–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Drweesh MA (2004) Effect of surfactants on the removal of copper from waste water by cementation. Alex Eng J 43(6):917–925

    Google Scholar 

  56. Poulson B (1999) Complexities in predicting erosion-corrosion. Wear 233:497–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. H. Abdel-Aziz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

The contributing editor for this article was Adam Clayton Powell.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El-Naggar, M.A., Hassan, D.M., Zewail, T.M. et al. Extraction of Copper from Liquid Effluents by Cementation in Agitated Vessels Equipped with Expanded Aluminum Cylindrical Sheets. J. Sustain. Metall. 8, 1318–1329 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-022-00573-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-022-00573-1

Keywords

Navigation