Evaluation of parameters controlling calcium recovery and CO2 uptake from desalination reject brine: An optimization approach

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133405Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A multistage process for extracting minerals from desalination reject brine while concurrently capturing CO2 was evaluated.

  • CO2 uptake and calcium recovery were optimized using Response Surface Methodology.

  • The optimum conditions for NaOH, CO2 flowrate and salinity for the process were found to be 5 g/L, 2 L/min and 75 g/L, respectively.

  • 100% removal of Ca2+ ions from the brine and a CO2 uptake of 5.4 g/L could be achieved under optimum conditions.

Abstract

A multistage process scheme for extracting valuable minerals from desalination reject brine while simultaneously sequestering CO2 has been proposed. As a part of the proposed scheme, simultaneous removal of calcium ions and CO2 uptake of a magnesium free reject brine was investigated in an inert particle spouted bed reactor (IPSBR) by reacting CO2 with reject brine in presence of NaOH. Response surface methodology was applied to optimize the effect of NaOH dosage, gas flowrate and salinity on the reaction with the target of maximizing calcium removal and CO2 uptake. A second order regression model was generated for both target responses. The predicted responses for both targets were in good agreement with the obtained experimental response. Based on a multivariate optimization, the optimum conditions for NaOH, flowrate and salinity for simultaneous calcium removal and CO2 uptake were found to be 5 g/L, 2 L/min and 75 g/L, respectively. Under these conditions, 100% removal of Ca2+ ions from the brine could be achieved with a CO2 uptake of 5.4 g/L. Moreover, the solid products obtained under the optimum conditions were characterized confirming the formation of high purity calcium carbonates. Based on optimized conditions, the proposed multistage process scheme promises to produce highly pure Mg(OH)2 and CaCO3, while sequestering 5400 tons of CO2 for every million tons of brine treated. The scheme can be further improved by incorporating an electrolysis unit to produce HCl along with NaOH that can be recirculated to eliminate the need for any external addition of NaOH, thus, creating a sustainable process for reject brine management and CO2 sequestration.

Introduction

Rapid growth of population coupled with industrial developments is gradually leading to the depletion and contamination of the already scarce fresh water sources. It was reported that around 20% of the world's pollution is suffering from water scarcity and this number is expected to be doubled by the year 2030 (Abdelkareem et al., 2018). Moreover, by the year 2050, the global demands for water is projected to increase by 55% compared to the demands of the year 2000 (Rao et al., 2018). Consequently, finding alternate sources of fresh water to ensure the social and economic growth has become the top priority for the governments worldwide (Elwakeel, 2020; Mekonnen and Hoekstra, 2016). Since 97% of the world's water body is saline, desalination has naturally emerged as the most sustainable means of water supply (Manju and Sagar, 2017). In a typical desalination process, water from a saline source (seawater) is utilized to produce fresh water for municipal and industrial uses (Aziz and Hanafiah, 2021). Currently, there are over 15 thousand desalination plants in operation in over 177 countries around the world (Ghaffour et al., 2013; Jones et al., 2019). These plants account for a water production capacity of almost 100 million cubic meters per day and almost half of it is being produced from the countries located in the Middle East and Africa (Elsaid et al., 2020).

The potential of desalination technology as a long-term solution to meet the global water demand is undeniable, however, there are several economic and environmental implications associated with their use (Darre and Toor, 2018; Jones et al., 2019). A high salinity effluent commonly known as brine is produced as a by-product of the desalination processes and around 90% of the produced brine is discharged back into the ocean (Crowe et al., 2016). In addition to its high salinity (Total Dissolved Solids >70 g/L), it also comprises of various pretreatment chemicals that are used in different stages of the treatment process which lead to the contamination of the adjacent water bodies (Ihsanullah et al., 2021; Mavukkandy et al., 2019). Studies have also shown that the reject brine tends to have higher density compared to its seawater source, thus, contaminants present with the brine are easily transported and deposited to the ocean floor which can eventually harm the benthic communities (Missimer and Maliva, 2018; Rodman et al., 2018). Although, the estimates for the volume of reject brine being disposed globally appears to vary between studies, a recent study have reported the volume to be around 44 million cubic meters per day (Aziz and Hanafiah, 2021). Consequently, implementation of improved brine management strategies to negate the harmful impacts of the large volume of disposed reject brine is necessary to protect the environment. Moreover, the desalination processes are known to be energy-intensive and mostly powered by the fossil fuel sources, which are notorious for their CO2 emissions that eventually contributes to global warming and exacerbate water scarcity. Hence, the CO2 emissions generated from fossil fuel powered desalination plants has become another major concern. Currently, it is estimated that around 76 million tons per year of CO2 is being emitted from all operational desalination plants. As the demand for clean water continous to grow, this number is expected reach around 218 million tons per year by the end of 2040 (Shahzad et al., 2017). Therefore, modification of current desalination facilities is paramount to address the concerns related to brine disposal and CO2 emissions to protect the environment and also to ensure sustainable water supply for current and future generations.

Recently, CO2 mineralization using reject brine has garnered a lot of interest from the scientific community as a solution for brine management (Mustafa et al., 2020). Reject brine is rich in calcium and magnesium ions which can be converted into their carbonate form via reaction with CO2 by adjusting the pH. Moreover, this approach is considered to be economically feasible as it promises the production of various marketable CO2-based products while simultaneously ensuring the treatment of reject brine and reduction of carbon footprint in the long term. The Solvay process is one such process that has been applied to sequester CO2 and reduce the salinity of the brine to produce different products. The process involves the reaction of carbon dioxide with sodium chloride present in the aqueous solutions in presence of a catalyst that raises the pH of the process. Ammonia is traditionally used as a catalyst for this process and it results in the formation ammonium chloride and sodium bicarbonate prepitates. However, the presence of ammonia is a major concern of the process because of its environmental and health hazards. Furthermore, the Solvay process suffers from a low CO2 capture and salt reduction efficiency that needs to be improved to increase the feasability of the process. This motivated the researchers to replace the ammonia with other alkaline components. El-Naas et al. applied calcium oxide as a promoter in a modified Solvay process and achieved a significant improvement in CO2 capture efficiency (El-Naas et al., 2017). Mourad et al. adopted a similar approach in their work using potassium hydroxide as promotor. The authors not only observed a significant improvement in CO2 capture efficiency, but also observed a significant reduction in sodium, calcium and magnesium ions (El-Naas et al., 2017; Mourad et al., 2021, 2022). Since amines can significantly improve the pH of a solution, a few studies have suggested their use for combined sequestration of CO2 and removal ions from reject brine (Dindi et al., 2015; Kang et al., 2020). Although, the amine based processes can improve the CO2 capture efficiency and produce of high quality carbonates, their recovery from aqueous brine can be very challenging and may require additional steps.

This work is a continuation of a previous study focusing on the production of magnesium and calcium free feed to a membraneless electrolyzer unit (Mahmud et al., 2022). The electrolyzer will be used to produce acid and base products. Since reject brine contains considerable amounts of magnesium and calcium ions, removing these ions is essential for the long-time durability of the electrodes. In the previous study, a multistage process for step wise removal of magnesium and calcium ions was proposed in accordance to the scheme shown in Fig. 1. The first step of this scheme, involved the precipitation of magnesium ions into magnesium hydroxide via addition of NaOH. The optimum conditions for maximizing magnesium removal in this step was investigated and an overall Mg2+ removal of 98.8% was achieved with the production of high purity magnesium hydroxide (Mahmud et al., 2022). The brine effluent obtained after this step was almost free of magnesium but it did not have any significant reduction in Ca2+ ions. As illustrated in the proposed scheme, the calcium ions present within the effluent can be recovered in the subsequent steps to produce high purity calcium carbonates. Although, the direct reaction of the obtained effluent with CO2 resulted in some removal of calcium ions, it was observed that additional NaOH dose was required for the complete removal of calcium ions. In this work, the reaction of Mg-free brine effluent with CO2 and NaOH is investigated using an inert particle spouted bed reactor (IPSBR). Response surface methodology was adopted to determine the optimum conditions for complete removal of calcium ions and maximizing CO2 uptake by varying the NaOH dose, CO2 flowrate and brine salinity. Furthermore, the effect of the three process variables on the two target responses are also investigated and solid products obtained under optimum conditions are characterized using various techniques. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, optimization of such an integrated process is not available in the open literature, therefore, the results presented in this work can provide significant insights in the field of simultaneous treatment of reject brine and CO2 sequestration.

Section snippets

Thermodynamics and reaction mechanism

The reactions between carbon dioxide and sodium hydroxide in reject brine can be explained as follows. Firstly, sodium hydroxide being highly alkaline will be dissociated into the Na+ and OH ions. Once introduced into the reactor, the carbon dioxide gas will get physically absorbed in brine solution and then react with the hydroxyl ions to generate carbonate and bicarbonate ions according to the reaction equations (1), (2).CO2 + OH ↔ HCO3HCO3 + OH ↔ H2O + CO3

These two reactions are

Optimization using response surface methodology

The response surface optimization of the process parameters was conducted at high and low levels based on Table 2 with the target of maximizing calcium removal and CO2 uptake. CCD was then employed to design a set of 20 experiments by varying the process parameters within the levels as listed in Table 3. The table also lists the response obtained for calcium removal as well as the CO2 uptake from the experiments conducted under the designed conditions along with their predicted response. In

Conclusions

A sustainable scheme for reject brine management and CO2 sequestration has been proposed. As a part of the of the scheme, simultaneous removal of calcium ions and CO2 uptake of magnesium free reject brine was investigated in an inert particle spouted bed reactor (IPSBR) by reacting CO2 with reject brine in presence of NaOH. Response surface methodology was applied to optimize the effect of NaOH dosage, gas flowrate and Salinity on the reaction with the target of maximizing calcium removal and CO

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Nafis Mahmud: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. Mohamed H. Ibrahim: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. Daniela V. Fraga Alvarez: Data curation, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. Daniel V. Esposito: Conceptualization, Writing – review &

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: The authors declare the following competing financial interest(s): Daniel Esposito is a co-founder and advisor of sHYp, BV PBC.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation) through Grant # NPRP 12S-0215-190090. The authors also acknowledge the co-funding provided by Qatar Shell Research Technology Center (QSRTC). The findings achieved herein are solely the responsibility of the authors. The authors would like to thank Dr. Ahmed Khodary (Qatar Shell) for his valuable feedback. SEM imaging was carried out at the Central Laboratories unit (CLU), Qatar

References (50)

  • M. Herrero-Gonzalez et al.

    Highly concentrated HCl and NaOH from brines using electrodialysis with bipolar membranes

    Separ. Purif. Technol.

    (2020)
  • M.H. Ibrahim et al.

    Enhanced CO2 capture through reaction with steel-making dust in high salinity water

    Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control

    (2019)
  • I. Ihsanullah et al.

    Desalination and environment: a critical analysis of impacts, mitigation strategies, and greener desalination technologies

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2021)
  • E. Jones et al.

    The state of desalination and brine production: a global outlook

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2019)
  • D. Kang et al.

    Accelerated chemical conversion of metal cations dissolved in seawater-based reject brine solution for desalination and CO2 utilization

    Desalination

    (2020)
  • N. Mahmud et al.

    Magnesium recovery from desalination reject brine as pretreatment for membraneless electrolysis

    Desalination

    (2022)
  • S. Manju et al.

    Renewable energy integrated desalination: a sustainable solution to overcome future fresh-water scarcity in India

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2017)
  • M.O. Mavukkandy et al.

    Brine management in desalination industry: from waste to resources generation

    Desalination

    (2019)
  • T.M. Missimer et al.

    Environmental issues in seawater reverse osmosis desalination: intakes and outfalls

    Desalination

    (2018)
  • A.F. Mohammad et al.

    Optimization of magnesium recovery from reject brine for reuse in desalination post-treatment

    J. Water Proc. Eng.

    (2019)
  • A.A.H.I. Mourad et al.

    CO2 capture and ions removal through reaction with potassium hydroxide in desalination reject brine: statistical optimization

    Chem. Eng. Proc. Proc. Intensificat.

    (2022)
  • J. Mustafa et al.

    Simultaneous treatment of reject brine and capture of carbon dioxide: a comprehensive review

    Desalination

    (2020)
  • M.A. Rahman et al.

    Structure, crystallization and mineral composition of sclerites in the alcyonarian coral

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (2008)
  • D. Ramachandran et al.

    Studies of carbonation process in nanoparticles modified fly ash concrete

    Construct. Build. Mater.

    (2020)
  • P. Rao et al.

    Energy considerations associated with increased adoption of seawater desalination in the United States

    Desalination

    (2018)
  • Cited by (7)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text