TO THE EDITOR:
Several predictive scores have been described for patients with myelofibrosis (MF): these include IPSS [1], DIPPS [2], MYSEC [3], MIPSS [4] and GIPSS [5]. All of these have in common the identification of clinical, and biological risk factors for evolution of the disease and death. When these prognostic scores are applied to patients undergoing a hemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), the outcome reflects the progression of the disease: patients with an early disease, always do better than patients with more advanced disease, and/or a higher risk score [6, 7].
The question is the following: can we identify a prognostic score, specifically designed for patients undergoing an allogeneic HSCT. A recent study has identified transplant and molecular characteristics predictive of transplant outcome, and is referred to as the MTSS or molecular and transplant scoring system. These include: age over 57, Karnovsky score < 90%, platelet counts < 150 × 10^9/L, leukocyte count > 25 × 10^9/L, an HLA mismatched donor, ASXL1 mutation, and non-CARL/MP genotype, to be independent predictors of outcome [8], The Authors incorporate these factors in 4 level MTSS, low (0–2), intermediate (3–4), high (5) and very high (>5). The OS at 5 years for these groups was 90% (low), 77% (intermediate), 50% (high) and 34% (very high). However, there is no mention of relapse in this study, and thus one wonders why introduce molecular prognostication.
In our own series of patients, we asked the question whether the same prognostic value could be achieved with less information as compared to the MTSS. We have previously reported that spleen size, (maximum spleen longitudinal size recorded on ultrasound pretransplant—with a cut off of 22 cm), and transfusion burden (with a cut off of 20 red blood cell transfusions) were predictive of outcome after HSCT [9]. A recent study in patients with myelofibrosis grafted from haploidentical donor, has confirmed a negative impact of a large spleen (>22 cm) on relapse, but not on survival [10], and splenectomy may be beneficial in patients with a very large spleen [11]. The role of transfusion burden has not been evaluated to our knowledge.
We therefore analyzed 157 patients with myelofibrosis undergoing an allogeneic HSCT at a median interval of 925 days from diagnosis (116–8865). The clinical characteristics were as follows: 110 and 47 patients were aged < =/>60 years; 71 were prepared with a conditioning regimen including fludarabine and one alkylating agent (1 alk) (busulfan, melphalan or thiotepa) [12], and 86 patients received a regimen with two alkylating agents (thiotepa busulfan and fludarabine) (TBF) [12].
Fifty two patients exhibited a maximum spleen size before HSCT of ≤ 22 cm and had received 0–20 red blood cell transfusion pre HSCT (TS = 0), whereas 105 patients had a large spleen (>22 cm) and/or a heavy transfusion burden (>20 transfusions) (TS = 1). Spleen size was recorded as maximum size, also if the patient was splenectomized pre-transplant. Patients were also stratified according to the dynamic international prognostic scoring system (DIPSS) as int1-int2 (n = 87) or high risk (n = 70). Finally 60 patients were grafted from HLA identical sibling and 97 from matched unrelated or mismatched related donors. We looked at three outcomes: disease free survival (DFS) the event being death or relapse; transplant related mortality (TRM) the event being death without relapse; and relapse, the event being relapse of myelofibrosis.The multivariate Cox analysis included TS, age >60 years, DIPSS score, conditioning regimen and donor type.
The 5 year DFS was 51% vs 42% (p = 0.09) for patients aged < =60/> years, it was 60% vs 36% (p = 0.002) for patients prepared or not with TBF, and 59% vs 34% (p = 0.002) for patients with int1-int2 or high DIPSS. When looking at TS the 5 year DFS was 74% vs 36% (p = 0.0001) for patients with low or high TS (Fig. 1). The 5 years DFS for patients grafted from identical or alternative donors was 53% vs 46% (p = 0.3).
In multivariate Cox analysis (Table 1) patients age predicted only TRM (HR 1.8, p = 0.02); the conditioning regimen had a strong impact on relapse (HR 0.1, p < 0.00001) and therefore DFS (HR 0.3, p < 0.0001); TS had a significant impact on all three outcomes: DFS (HR 2.0, p = 0.008); TRM (HR 2.1, p = 0.03); Relapse (HR 2.2, p = 0.04). DIPSS predicted DFS, whereas donor type was the least predictive variable (Table 1).
Causes of death in patients with a high TS as compared with patient with a low TS were as follows: infectious deaths were 13% vs 5%, multiorgan toxicity 11% vs 4%, graft failure 4% vs 2%, GvHD 3% vs 4%, other transplant related 5% vs 6%, and relapse 25% vs 8%. When looking at patients over 60 years of age, prepared with two alkylating agents (TBF) (n = 33), the 5 years DFS was 79% for low TS vs 26% for a high TS (p = 0.007). Therefore, it seems possible to achieve excellent DFS also in older patients, given that they come to transplant without a heavy transfusion burden or a spleen that occupies the whole left abdomen. The problem remains for the older patients, over 60 years, with a high TS, in whom the TRM reaches 50%: one may have to reduce the intensity of the conditioning regimen in such patients.
As shown in the multivariate Cox analysis, TS predicts both transplant related death and relapse, possibly because spleen size and transfusion burden are surrogates for advanced disease and/or time from diagnosis, and at the same time, have implications for transplant events: a large spleen can delay hematologic recovery and increase infectious complications and a high transfusion burden generates sensitization to HLA antigens, and may increase the risk of graft failure.
The drawback of the study is of course its retrospective nature, but on the other side the number of patients involved is relatively large.
In conclusion we confirm that maximum spleen size and pre-HSCT transfusion burden are strong predictors of outcome for patients with myelofibrosis, and predict both transplant related toxicity as well as relapse of the original disease. Patients with a high TS may be eligible for programs of reduced toxicity conditioning regimens.
Data availability
The data of the analysis on which this report is based, is available on request.
References
Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Pereira A, Passamonti F, Reilly JT, Morra E, et al. New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Blood. 2009;13:2895–901.
Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, Morra E, Rumi E, Pereira A, et al. A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWGMRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment). Blood. 2010;9:1703–8.
Passamonti F, Giorgino T, Mora B, Guglielmelli P, Rumi E, Maffioli M, et al. A clinical-molecular prognostic model to predict survival in patients with post polycythemia vera and post essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2017;31:2726–31.
Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, Gangat N, Ketterling RP, Pardanani A, et al. MIPSS70 + version 2.0: mutation and karyotype‐enhanced international prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1769–70.
Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Nicolosi M, Mannelli F, Mudireddy M, Bartalucci N, et al. GIPSS: genetically inspired prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2018;7:1631–42.
Gagelmann N, Eikema DJ, de Wreede LC, Koster L, Wolschke C, Arnold R, et al. Comparison of dynamic international prognostic scoring system and MYelofibrosis SECondary to PV and ET prognostic model for prediction of outcome in polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2019;6:e204–8.
Tefferi A, Partain DK, Palmer JM, Slack JL, Roy V, Hogan WJ, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant overcomes the adverse survival effect of very high risk and unfavorable karyotype in myelofibrosis. Am J Hematol. 2018;5:649–54.
Hernández-Boluda JC, Pereira A, Alvarez-Larran A, Martín AA, Benzaquen A, Aguirre, et al. Predicting survival after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: performance of the Myelofibrosis Transplant Scoring System (MTSS) and development of a new prognostic model. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020;26:2237–44.
Bacigalupo A, Soraru M, Dominietto A, Pozzi S, Geroldi S, Van Lint MT, et al. Allogeneic hemopoietic SCT for patients with primary myelofibrosis: a predictive transplant score based on transfusion requirement, spleen size and donor type. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2010;3:458–63.
Kunte S, Rybicki L, Viswabandya A, Tamari R, Bashey A, Keyzner A, et al. Allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation with haploidentical donor and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide in patients with myelofibrosis: a multicenter study. Leukemia. 2022;36:856–64.
Robin M, Zine M, Chevret S, Meignin V, Munoz-Bongrand N, Moatti H, et al. The impact of splenectomy in myelofibrosis patients before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl 2017;23:958–64.
Chiusolo P, Bregante S, Giammarco S, Lamparelli T, Casarino L, Dominietto A, et al. Full donor chimerism after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells transplant for myelofibrosis: the role of the conditioning regimen. Am J Hematol. 2021;96:234–40.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded partly by Associazione Italiana Ricerca contro il Cancro (AIRC), grant to AB- Milano Italy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
FS and AB analyzed data and wrote the manuscript. FS, SG, AMR, CDG, SB, FG, RV, EG, SS, LL, II, FA, EM, and EA treated patients. All co-authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sora, F., Giammarco, S., Raiola, A.M. et al. Predicting the outcome for patients with myelofibrosis undergoing an allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplant. Blood Cancer J. 12, 111 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-022-00701-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-022-00701-w