Skip to main content
Log in

Development of the Primary Standard for IAEA TRS-457 at OAP, Thailand

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
MAPAN Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research reports the procedure in establishing the diagnostic beam qualities following IAEA TRS-457 for calibration in the field of diagnostic dose rate meters in the Office of Atoms for Peace (OAP), Thailand. Both methods, the IAEA TRS-457 and a novel method that was proposed in previous research, were adapted to achieve the RQR beam qualities at the laboratory. In this paper, the achievement of diagnostic beams is presented under the criteria within the technical protocol agreement. The correction factors of the primary standard and their uncertainties are reported. The calibration coefficients with uncertainties of the transfer chamber, A6 exradin, are proposed. These coefficients are compared with the calibration coefficients which were given by PTB that are shown acceptability. The uncertainty in the OAP calibration coefficients is estimated to be 1.20% at k = 2 for RQR and 1.21% at k = 2 for RQA. The laboratory is now able to provide calibration services and to be a national standard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 61674:2012 Medical Electrical Equipment - Dosimeters with Ionization Chambers And/or Semiconductor Detectors as Used in X-Ray Diagnostic Imaging. 2012.

  2. Internationale Atomenergie Organisation, Dosimetry in diagnostic radiology: an international code of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  3. C.-H. Chu, W.-P. Kuan, T. Kurosawa, U.-T. Lin, I.-J. Chen and W.-L. Chen, Development of improved free-air ionisation chamber as absolute dosimetry standard for low-energy X rays in INER. Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 138 (2010) 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncp184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Yu, J. Wu, Z. Liao and Z. Zhou, Experimental measurement and monte Carlo simulation the correction factor for the medium-energy x-ray free-air ionization chamber. J. Korean Phys. Soc., 73 (2018) 1466–1472. https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.73.1466.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. “Report 90,” J ICRU, vol. 14, no. 1, p. NP-NP, Nov. 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jicru/ndw043.

  6. D. Yaşar, E. Kapdan, H. Erez, T. Zengin, and E. Kam, Generation of Diagnostic X-Ray Radiation Qualities in the Ssdl X-Ray System According to Iec 61267 Standard, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.30931/JETAS.297617.

  7. K.L. Lee, D. Butler and T. Bailey, Establishing IAEA TRS-457 diagnostic X-ray beam qualities at the Australian primary standard dosimetry laboratory. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med, 40 (2017) 881–893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-017-0604-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. P. Rindhatayathon, K. Koonkana and V. Pungkun, Development of the primary standard for low-energy and W/Mo mammography X-rays at OAP, Thailand. Metrologia, 58 (2021) 055009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/ac08e3.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. M.R. Ay, M. Shahriari, S. Sarkar, M. Adib and H. Zaidi, Monte carlo simulation of X-ray spectra in diagnostic radiology and mammography using MCNP4C. Phys Med Biol, 49 (2004) 4897–4917. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/49/21/004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. K. Nigapruke, P. Puwanich, N. Phaisangittisakul and W. Youngdee, A comparison of mammographic X-ray spectra: simulation with EGSnrc and experiment with CdTe detector. J Radiat Res, 50 (2009) 507–512. https://doi.org/10.1269/jrr.09026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients | NIST. https://www.nist.gov/pml/X-ray-mass-attenuation-coefficients (accessed Feb. 02, 2022).

  12. D. Burns et al., Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K2 of the air-kerma standards of the ENEA-INMRI, Italy and the BIPM in low-energy X-rays,” Metrologia, vol. 48, pp. 1–10, Apr. 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/48/1A/06010.

  13. D. T. Burns, A. Nohtomi, N. Saito, T. Kurosawa, and N. Takata, “Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K2 of the air-kerma standards of the NMIJ and the BIPM in low-energy X-rays,” Metrologia, vol. 45, no. 1A, p. 06015, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/45/1A/06015.

  14. D.T. Burns, C. Kessler and P.J. Allisy, Re-evaluation of the BIPM international standards for air kerma in X-rays. Metrologia, 46 (2009) L21. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/46/5/N01.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. J.E. Lye, D.J. Butler and D.V. Webb, Monte Carlo correction factors for the ARPANSA kilovoltage free-air chambers and the effect of moving the limiting aperture. Metrologia, 47 (2009) 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/47/1/002.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. P. Rindhatayathon, K. Koonkana, and V. Pungkun, The determination of correction factors for free-air ionization chamber calculation using monte carlo method, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 1719, no. 1, p. 012043, Jan. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1719/1/012043.

  17. BIMP, BIPM - Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM), 1995.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the upgrading primary standard project of the Office of Atoms for Peace, Thailand.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Rindhatayathon.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rindhatayathon, P., Koonkana, K., Rungseesumran, T. et al. Development of the Primary Standard for IAEA TRS-457 at OAP, Thailand. MAPAN 37, 641–652 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-022-00584-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-022-00584-z

Keywords

Navigation