Solving generalized fractional problem on a funnel-shaped domain depicting viscoelastic fluid in porous medium

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2022.108335Get rights and content

Abstract

In this paper, a series of generalized-formed equations describing the fluid flow, combined with the heat and mass transfer of viscoelastic fluid under the impacts of Dufour and Soret effects are presented. The constitutive relation of viscoelastic fluid, modified Fick’s model and Fourier’s law are all considered as fractional types. Assume that the ultrafiltration process happens in a funnel, and this particular convex domain renders the problem real and more difficult. The highlight of this work is to deal with a series of complex and coupled controlling equations on a funnel-shaped domain. A finite volume method with unstructured grid mesh is adopted, and presented in details. The verified numerical results show that the algorithm is effective, and the numerical method has a good accuracy even with a coarse mesh.

Introduction

Filtration of viscoelastic fluid is widely observed in industrial applications, such as in food processing and so on, and the permeability behavior of viscoelastic fluid has roused the attentions of many scholars. Sajid et al. [1] studied hybrid convection of viscoelastic fluid fully developed between two parallel vertical permeable plates. Naganthran et al. [2] investigated the stability of viscoelastic fluid flowing around the stagnation point on a permeable shrinkage plane. Aziz et al. [3] investigated the unsteady flow of a third-order fluid permeating a panel in a porous medium. For viscoelastic fluids which possess non-local and non-instantaneous dynamic characteristics, the fractional derivative can better characterize the fluid behaviors. However, due to the definition of fractional model, it brings great resource consumption in calculation than in the cases with integer-order models. As widely used numerical methods, finite element method, spectral element method, and meshless method have their own advantages and can solve problems from different engineering applications as well as some analytical methods [4], [5]. In this paper, we provide effective numerical schemes to solve the generalized fractional differential equation depicting the viscoelastic fluid in the porous medium. By using the finite volume method with unstructured meshes [6], difficulties in the calculation caused by the trapezoidal domain, the mutually coupled heat and mass transfer equations, and convection terms in the momentum equation are resolved tactically. The present method can be extended to similar problems on any convex domain and a good accuracy can be obtained even with a coarse mesh.

Assume an incompressible viscoelastic fluid flows through a conical filter containing porous media with an initial velocity and in the gravitational field (Fig. 1). Consider the cross section of this filter, i.e., a two-dimensional problem. Buoyancy and infiltration due to porous media are taken into account. Assume the x-axis lies along the center line of the cone, and the y-axis is perpendicular to it. For viscoelastic fluid, where the shear stress at a certain point is affected by the velocity gradient both nearby and far-away, the fractional derivative model is used to characterize the fluid behavior better compared with the integer derivative model [7], [8]: τxy=μ̃ααuyα,where μ̃α and α0<α<1 are the generalized dynamic viscosity and space-fractional derivative, respectively. The Riemann–Liouville fractional derivative is used [9]: αuyα=1Γ(1α)y0y(yξ)αu(x,ξ,t)dξ,where Γ() denotes the Gamma function.

Furthermore, with the impact of thermal inhomogeneity combined with mass inhomogeneity, the density gradient generated in the saturated media leads to the buoyancy drive while the flow, heat and mass transfer are mutually coupled [10]. Thus, the modified Fourier’s law [11] and a similar fractional Fick’s model [12] are adopted as: Jq=λ̃γγTyγρD̃γKTCsγCyγ,Jm=ρD̃γγCyγρD̃γKTTmγTyγ,where λ̃γ and Cs are the generalized thermal conductivity and the concentration susceptibility. KT represents the thermal diffusion ratio, while Tm and D̃γ are the mean temperature and the generalized diffusion coefficient, respectively. Fractional derivatives of the Riemann–Liouville type are also used in Eq.(3). The value of γ ranges from 0 to 1.

By using the fractional constitutive relations of Eqs. (1), (3), the governing equations can be obtained. To further non-dimensionalize the governing equations, we adopt the following dimensionless variables: x=xL, y=yL, u=uu, v=vv, T=TTTwT, C=CCCwC, t=tuL, where characteristic length is denoted as L. Thus, the dimensionless governing equations become (the ‘*’ in the dimensionless variables is omitted in the followings): ux+vy=0, ut+uux+vuy=1Reyαuyα+ArT+ArNrCɛReDau+f(x,y,t), Tt+uTx+vTy=1Pry(γTyγ)+Dfy(γCyγ)+g(x,y,t), Ct+uCx+vCy=1Re1Scy(γCyγ)+Sry(γTyγ)+h(x,y,t),where, Re=ρLαuμ̃α, Sc=μ̃αρD̃γ, Df=D̃γKT(CwC)CsCpLγu(TwT), Sr=D̃γKT(TwT)TmLγu(CwC), Ar=gβTL(TwT)u2, Da=k0L1+α, Nr=βC(CwC)βT(TwT), Pr=λ̃γρCpLγu. Re, Sc, Df, Sr and Pr are generalized Reynolds number, Schmidt number, Dufour number, Soret number, and Prandtl number, respectively. Ar, Nr and Da represent the Archimedes number, the buoyancy ratio number, and the Darcy number. It should be noted that Eqs. (4)–(7) are generalized forms: f(x,y,t), g(x,y,t) and h(x,y,t) are all source terms. Since the pressure can be controlled artificially in actual working conditions [7], a pressure term may be incorporated into f(x,y,t).

Section snippets

Numerical technique

In the present research, control volume method is adopted to solve Eqs. (4)–(7). Firstly, the two-dimensional domain is divided into a number of triangles. A specific control volume is constructed as illustrated in Fig. 2. The pink area in Fig. 2 is referred as the control volume, while the whole contour is called the control domain. The area of an arbitrary control volume is denoted as Vi(i=1,2,,Np); Np is the total number of nodes; Pi(i=0,1,2,,m,m=6 in Fig. 2) is the node; Qi(i=1,2,,m) is

Discussions on the numerical results of an example

In this section, we verify the feasibility of the numerical algorithm, proposing a numerical experiment by comparing its exact results with numerical ones. Also, the effects of mesh densities on the results are compared, proving the adopted algorithm is stable. The computed region is treated as revealed in Fig. 1. Eqs. (4)–(7) are solved with parameters: Re=2, Sc=4, Df=0.1, Sr=0.1, Ar=1.5, Nr=1, ɛ=0.5, Da=1, Pr=8. The source terms in Eqs. (4)–(7) are supposed as: f(x,y,t)=x(1x)(x+4y2)t+12x(1x

Conclusion

The equations in a generalized form describing the viscoelastic fluid in a complex porous funnel are solved in this paper. The mesh influences and the accuracy of results with different fractional coefficients (0.95α0.98,0.93γ0.95) are analyzed. The results of a typical numerical example show that the precision of the technique is acceptable, from both a local and a global point of views. This finite volume method with unstructured mesh has an applicability and validity to calculate similar

Acknowledgments

The work is supported by the CSC . The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to the referees and editors for their very helpful comments and suggestions, which greatly improved the quality of this paper.

References (16)

  • SajidM. et al.

    Fully developed mixed convection flow of a viscoelastic fluid between permeable parallel vertical plates

    Comput. Math. Appl.

    (2010)
  • NaganthranK. et al.

    Stability analysis of impinging oblique stagnation-point flow over a permeable shrinking surface in a viscoelastic fluid

    Int. J. Mech. Sci.

    (2017)
  • AzizA. et al.

    MHD flow of a third grade fluid in a porous half space with plate suction or injection: an analytical approach

    Appl. Math. Comput.

    (2012)
  • AsifN. et al.

    Analytical solution of a maxwell fluid with slip effects in view of the Caputo–Fabrizio derivative

    Eur. Phys. J. Plus

    (2018)
  • AlsharifA. et al.

    Electroosmotic flow of generalized fractional second grade fluid with fractional Cattaneo model through a vertical annulus

    Chinese J. Phys.

    (2022)
  • ZhangT. et al.

    The finite difference/finite volume method for solving the fractional diffusion equation

    J. Comput. Phys.

    (2018)
  • QiH. et al.

    Unsteady flow of viscoelastic fluid with fractional Maxwell model in a channel

    Mech. Res. Commun.

    (2007)
  • PanM. et al.

    Lie group analysis and similarity solution for fractional Blasius flow

    Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul.

    (2016)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
View full text