Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What’s wrong with the ten myths about albumin: three layers for an indisputable dispute

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. Joannidis M, Wiedermann CJ, Ostermann M (2022) Ten myths about albumin. Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06655-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Emanuel EJ, Grady CC, Crouch RA et al (2008) The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  3. Angell M (2000) Is academic medicine for sale? N Engl J Med 342:1516–1518. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200005183422009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Efficacy and tolerance of hyperoncotic albumin administration in septic shock patients: the earss study | Cochrane Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/central/CN-01035404/full. Accessed 16 Apr 2022

  5. Mayerhöfer T, Wiedermann CJ, Joannidis M (2021) Einsatz von albumin. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 116:655–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-021-00875-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Didier Dreyfuss and Thomas Edward Woodcock contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, AP-HP, Hôpital Avicenne, 125 rue de Stalingrad, 93000, Bobigny, France

    Khalil Chaïbi & Stephane Gaudry

  2. French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM), UMR_S1155, CORAKID, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, 75020, Paris, France

    Khalil Chaïbi, Stephane Gaudry & Didier Dreyfuss

  3. Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Colombes, France

    Didier Dreyfuss

  4. Université de Paris, Paris, France

    Didier Dreyfuss

  5. FluidPhysiology.Org, Stockbridge, Hampshire, UK

    Thomas Edward Woodcock

Authors
  1. Khalil Chaïbi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephane Gaudry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Didier Dreyfuss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Thomas Edward Woodcock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Edward Woodcock.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 57 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chaïbi, K., Gaudry, S., Dreyfuss, D. et al. What’s wrong with the ten myths about albumin: three layers for an indisputable dispute. Intensive Care Med 48, 1253–1254 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06795-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06795-x

Search

Navigation