Skip to main content
Log in

On myths about albumin and misconceptions that cause confusion: authors’ reply to “What’s wrong with the ten myths about albumin: three layers for an indisputable dispute”

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Chaïbi KGS, Dreyfuss D, Woodcock TE (2022) What’s wrong with the ten myths about albumin: three layers for an indisputable dispute. Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06795-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Joannidis M, Wiedermann CJ, Ostermann M (2022) Ten myths about albumin. Intensive Care Med 48(5):602–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. The SAFE Study Investigators (2004) A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. NEJM 350:2247–2256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hahn RG, Dull RO, Zdolsek J (2020) The extended starling principle needs clinical validation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 64(7):884–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zdolsek M, Hahn RG, Zdolsek JH (2018) Recruitment of extravascular fluid by hyperoncotic albumin. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 62(9):1255–1260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gunnström M, Zdolsek JH, Hahn RG (2022) Plasma volume expansion and fluid kinetics of 20% albumin during general anesthesia and surgery lasting for more than 5 hours. Anesth Analg 134(6):1270–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Joannidis.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

MJ has received speaker’s fees from CLS Behring. CJW has received fees for speaking and consulting from CSL Behring, and fees for speaking from Biotest. MO reports no conflict of interests.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 22 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joannidis, M., Wiedermann, C.J. & Ostermann, M. On myths about albumin and misconceptions that cause confusion: authors’ reply to “What’s wrong with the ten myths about albumin: three layers for an indisputable dispute”. Intensive Care Med 48, 1255–1257 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06791-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06791-1

Navigation