Abstract
A novel method for controlling the output DC link voltage of a single-phase power factor correction (PFC) converter without using a DC voltage sensor for electric vehicle (EV) charging is proposed in this paper. The conventional boost PFC converter normally uses three expensive sensors, i.e., at the input voltage, the input current, and the output voltage. These sensors are used to regulate the power quality and maintain system stability. To reduce the cost and hardware complexity in the power converter, a DC voltage sensorless control using an estimator is proposed. This method utilizes the available input voltage and current signals to predict the output DC link voltage. This predicted output voltage contains an average DC component superimposed with a small ripple content at double the line frequency (2f). The proposed control method tracks the reference sinewave signal to maintain a high-power factor. The converter also exhibits very stable behavior under transient load variations. Simulated and experimental validation results obtained with a 1 kW prototype PFC converter are included.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Yilmaz, M., Krein, P.T.: Review of battery charger topologies, charging power levels, and infrastructure for plug-in electric and hybrid vehicles. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 28, 2151–2169 (2013)
Morrow, K., Darner, D., Francfort, J.: U.S. Department of energy vehicle technologies program—advanced vehicle testing activity—plug-in hybrid electric vehicle charging infrastructure review. (2008) https://doi.org/10.2172/946853.
Gautam, D., Musavi, F., Edington, M., Eberle, W., Dunford, W.G.: An automotive on-board 3.3 kW battery charger for PHEV application, in 2011 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/VPPC.2011.6043192.
Part 3.2: Limits—limits for harmonic current emissions, international standard, edition. 1, IEC 61000-3-2, 1998–2004.
Koo K.-W., Kim, D.-H., Woo, D.G., Lee, B.-K.: Topology comparison for 6.6 kW on board charger: performance, efficiency, and selection guideline, in 2012 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, IEEE, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/VPPC.2012.6422583
Praneeth, A.V.J.S., Williamson, S.S.: A review of front-end AC-DC topologies in universal battery charger for electric transportation, in 2018 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC), IEEE, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITEC.2018.8450186
Chen, H.-C., Lin, C.-C., Liao, J.-Y.: Modified single-loop current sensor less control for single-phase boost-type SMR with distorted input voltage. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 26, 1322–1328 (2011)
Noguchi, T., Tomiki, H., Kondo, S., Takahashi, I.: Direct power control of PWM converter without power source voltage sensors, in IAS’96. Conference Record of the 1996 IEEE Industry Applications Conference Thirty-First IAS Annual Meeting (IEEE). https://doi.org/10.1109/IAS.1996.560196.
Qi, W., Li, S., Tan, S.C., Hui, S.Y.: Design considerations for voltage sensor less control of a PFC single-phase rectifier without electrolytic capacitors. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 67, 1878–1889 (2020)
González-Castaño, C., Restrepo, C., Sanz, F., Chub, A., Giral, R.: DC voltage sensor less predictive control of a high-efficiency PFC single-phase rectifier based on the versatile buck-boost converter. Sensors 21, 5107 (2021)
Chen, H.-C.: Single-loop current sensor less control for single-phase boost-type SMR. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 24, 163–171 (2009)
Pahlevaninezhad, M., Das, P., Moschopoulos, G., Jain, P.: Sensor less control of a boost PFC AC/DC converter with a very fast transient response, in 2013 Twenty-Eighth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), IEEE. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/APEC.2013.6520233.
Yip, S.C., Qiu, D.Y., Chung, H.S., Hui, S.Y.R.: A novel voltage sensor less control technique for a bidirectional ac/dc converter. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 18(6), 1346–1355 (2003)
Ohnishi, T., Hojo, M.: DC voltage sensorless single-phase PFC converter. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 19, 404–410 (2004)
Chen, H.-C.: Duty phase control for single-phase boost-type SMR. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 23(4), 1927–1934 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2008.924627
Nguyen, C.-L., Lee, H.-H., Chun, T.-W.: A simple grid-voltage-sensorless control scheme for PFC boost converters. J. Power Electron. 14, 712–721 (2014)
López, F., López-Martín, V.M., Azcondo, F.J., Corradini, L., Pigazo, A.: Current sensor less power factor correction with predictive controllers. IEEE J. Emerg. Select. Top. Power Electron. 7, 891–900 (2019)
Wang, J., Maruta, H., Matsunaga, M., Kurokawa, F.: A novel predictive digital controlled sensor less PFC converter under the boundary conduction mode. J. Power Electron. 17, 1–10 (2017)
Zhang, X., et al.: Sensorless control for DC–DC boost converter via generalized parameter estimation-based observer. Appl. Sci. 11, 7761 (2021)
Lee, D.-C., Lim, D.-S.: AC voltage and current sensorless control of three-phase PWM rectifiers. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 17, 883–890 (2002)
Bhowmik, S., van Zyl, A., Spee, R., Enslin, J.H.R.: Sensorless current control for active rectifiers. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 33, 765–773 (1997)
Chen, H.-C., Lin, C.-C., Liao, J.-Y.: Modified single-loop current sensorless control for single-phase boost-type SMR With distorted input voltage. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 26, 1322–1328 (2011)
Ohnishi, T., Fujii, K.: Line voltage sensorless three phase PWM converter by tracking control of operating frequency, in Proceedings of Power Conversion Conference—PCC’97 (IEEE). https://doi.org/10.1109/PCCON.1997.645620.
Noguchi, T., Tomiki, H., Kondo, S., Takahashi, I.: Direct power control of PWM converter without power-source voltage sensors. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 34, 473–479 (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anand, N.V., Praneeth, A.V.J.S., Yalla, N. et al. Simplified DC voltage sensorless control of single-phase PFC converters in EV chargers. J. Power Electron. 22, 1956–1965 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43236-022-00494-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43236-022-00494-y