Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A neglected pioneer of psychology: Otto Selz’s contribution to the psychology of thinking and the dispute with Gestalt psychologists in Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung

  • Review
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 17 October 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

In the early decades of the twentieth century, Psychologische Forschung was primarily an outlet for researchers from the school of Gestalt psychology. Otto Selz, whose views were closer to those adopted in the cognitive/information-processing revolution in psychology that began in the 1950s, never published in Psychologische Forschung. However, his work was the subject of a negative evaluation in the journal in a book review by Wilhelm Benary, which was followed by critical assessments published elsewhere by Selz and Karl Bühler of a chapter of Kurt Koffka’s. A lengthy rebuttal from Koffka then appeared in Psychologische Forschung. In the present paper, we describe Selz’s system and Benary’s assessment of it. We then explain the relevant aspects of Koffka’s book chapter (in: Dessoir M (ed) Die Philosophie in ihren Einzelgebieten. Ullstein, Berlin, 1925) and the strong critiques of it by Bühler and Selz in 1926, followed by details of Koffka’s (Psychol Forsch 9:163–183, 1927) response. This part of the history of psychology is of significance to contemporary psychology on several levels. We have embedded this episode against the historical backdrop of Selz’s life and tragic end.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

No new data are reported in this review article. The articles, chapters, and books cited in the text are available online and in libraries.

Change history

References

  • Ach, N. (1910). Über den Willensakt und das Temperament. Quelle & Meyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ach, N. (1935). Analyse des Willens. In E. Abderhalden (Ed.), Handbuch der biologischen Arbeitsmethoden. Urban and Schwarzenberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, H. (2001). Selz in Amsterdam. Der Denkpsychologe Otto Selz (1881–1943) im niederländischen Exil. Psychologie Und Geschichte, 9, 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benary, W. (1923). Referat Otto Selz: Über die Gesetze des geordneten Denkverlaufs. II. Psychologische Forschung, 3, 417–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bühler, K. (1926). Die “neue” Psychologie Koffkas [The ‘new’ psychology of Koffka]. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 99, 145–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camu, T., Hommel, B., Brunel, L., & Brouillet, T. (2018). From anticipation to integration: The role of integrated action-effects in building sensorimotor contingencies. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25(3), 1059–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, W. B. (1852). On the influence of suggestion in modifying and directing muscular movement, independently of volition. Proceedings of the Royal Institute, 1, 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, W. B. (1853). Principles of human physiology with their chief applications to psychology, pathology, therapeutics, hygiène, andfForensic medicine. Blanchard and Lea.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Groot, A. D. (1946). Het denken van den schaker. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandse Uitgevers Maatschappij. English translation: Thought and choice in chess. (reprinted Den Haag: Mouton, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • de Spinoza, B. (1922). Ethics (Transl. Meijer, W.). S.L. van Looy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devonis, D. C. (2012). Koffka, Kurt. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the history of psychological theories (pp. 607–608). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, D. (1996). The logic of failure: Recognizing and avoiding error in complex situations. Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncker, K., & Lees, L. S. (1945). On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs, 58(5), i.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eder, A. B., & Dignath, D. (2021). Associations do not energize behavior: on the forgotten legacy of Kurt Lewin. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01631-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, J. I., Beeman, M., & Kounios, J. (2013). Insight. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 779–794). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, N. H. (2007). The laws of emotion. Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, N. H., & de Groot, A. D. (Eds.). (1981a). Otto Selz: His contribution to psychology. Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, N. H., & de Groot, A. D. (1981b). Preface. In N. H. Frijda & A. D. de Groot (Eds.), Otto Selz: His contribution to psychology (pp. vii–xi). Mouton.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grafton, S. T., & Hamilton, A. F. (2007). Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain. Human Movement Science, 26, 590–616.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Graziano, M. S. (2019). Attributing awareness to others: The attention schema theory and its relationship to behavioural prediction. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 26(3–4), 17–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenspon, E. B., Pfordresher, P. Q., & Halpern, A. R. (2020). The role of long-term memory in mental transformations of pitch. Auditory Perception and Cognition, 3(1–2), 76–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harleß, E. (1861). Der Apparat des Willens. Zeitschr. Philosophie Philosophische Kritik, 38, 50–73. Transl. Pfister, R., Janczyk, M. 2012. Psychological Research, 76, 561–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbart, J. F. (1825). Psychologie als Wissenschaft neugegründet auf Erfahrung, Metaphysik undMathematik. Erster, synthetischer Teil [Psychology as a Science Newly based on Experience, Metaphysics and Mathematics]. August Wilhelm Unzer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobhouse, L. T. (1915). Mind in evolution. MacMillan & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, Z., Muradoglu, M., & Cimpian, A. (2019). Explanation as a cognitive process. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(3), 187–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, G. (1951). Thinking: An introduction to its experimental psychology. Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology, in two volumes. Henry Holt & Co.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, J.-P. (2003). Teil IV. Bibliographie Wilhelm Benary. Psychology Science, 45(IV), 75–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinsorge, T., & Heuer, H. (1999). Hierarchical switching in a multi-dimensional task space. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 62, 300–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koffka, K. (1925). Psychologie. In M. Dessoir (Ed.), Die Philosophie in ihren Einzelgebieten (pp. 497–603). Ullstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koffka, K. (1927). Bemerkungen zur Denk-Psychologie. Psychologische Forschung, 9, 163–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, W. (1920). Die physischen Gestalten in Ruhe und im stationären Zustand: Eine naturphilosophische Untersuchung. Vieweg.

  • Kuusela, H., & Paul, P. (2000). A comparison of concurrent and retrospective verbal protocol analysis. American Journal of Psychology, 113(3), 387–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1922a). Das Problem der Willensmessung und das Grundgesetz der Assoziation I. Psychologische Forschung, 1(1), 191–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1922b). Das Problem der Willensmessung und das Grundgesetz der Assoziation II. Psychologische Forschung, 2(1), 65–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1926). Vorsatz, Wille und Bedürfnis. Psychologische Forschung, 7, 330–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotze, R. H. (1852). Medicinische Psychologie oder Physiologie der Seele. Weidmann’sche Buchhandlung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G. (2007). A history of modem experimental psychology: From James and Wundt to cognitive science. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, J. M., & Mandler, G. (Eds.). (1964). Thinking: From association to Gestalt. Wiley/Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marbe, K. (1901). Experimentell-psychologische. Untersuchungen über das Urteil—Eine Einleitung in die Logik. Leipzig.

  • Mayer, A., & Orth, J. (1901). Zur qualitativen Untersuchung der Association. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie Und Physiologie Der Sinnesorgane, 26, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, W. (1928). Emotion and feeling distinguished. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Feelings and emotions: The Wittenberg Symposium (pp. 200–205). Clark University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metraux, A., & Herrmann, Th. (Eds.). (1991). Otto Selz: Wahrnehmungsaufbau und Denkprozeß (Ausgewählte Schriften). Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Empirical explorations with the logic theory machine. In E. A. Feigenbaum & J. Feldman (Eds.), Computers and thought (pp. 109–122). McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. (1963). Chess playing programs and the problems of complexity. In E. A. Feigenbaum & J. Feldman (Eds.), Computers and thought (pp. 39–70). McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving (vol 104, no. 9). Prentice-hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, D. (1858). The human mind in its relations with the brain and nervous system. J. Churchill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I. (2005). Timing the brain: Mental chronometry as a tool in neuroscience. PLoS Biology, 3(2), e51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reinert, G. (1981). In memoriam Otto Selz: Spoken upon the occasion of the posthumous award of the Wilhelm Wundt Plakette in 1971. In N. Frijda & A. D. De Groot (Eds.), Otto Selz: His contribution to psychology (pp. 13–19). Mouton.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ribot, T. (1894). The diseases of the will (Transl. Snell, M.M.). Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2014). Neurocognitive mechanisms of perception–action coordination: A review and theoretical integration. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 46, 3–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robering, K. (2020). Otto Selz’s phenomenology of natural space. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 19(1), 97–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheerer, E. (1988). Fifty volumes of Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung: The history and present status of the journal. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 50, 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, 70–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seebohm, H.-B. (1981). The psychologist Otto Selz: His life and destiny. In N. H. Frijda & A. D. de Groot (Eds.), Otto Selz: His contribution to psychology (pp. 1–12). Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selz, O. (1910). Die experimentelle Untersuchung des Willensaktes. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 57, 241–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selz, O. (1912). Experimentelle Untersuchungen über den Verlauf determinierter intellektueller Prozesse. Bericht über den V. Kongress für experimentelle Psychologie (pp. 229–234). Leipzig: Barth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selz, O. (1913). In E. Teil (Ed.), Über die Gesetze des geordneten Denkverlaufs. Eine experimentelle Untersuchung. Spemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selz, O. (1919). Uber den Anteil der individuellen Eigenschaften der Flugzeugführer und Beobachter an Flügunfallen. Zeitschrift Für Angewandte Psychologie, 15, 254–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selz, O. (1922). Über die Gesetze des geordneten Denkverlaufs, Zweiter Teil: Zur Psychologie des produktiven Denkens und des Irrtums. Eine experimentelle Untersuchung. Bonn, Cohen.

  • Selz, O. (1924). Die Gesetze der produktiven und reproduktiven Geistestätigkeit. Kurzgefasste Darstellung. Bonn, Cohen.

  • Selz, O. (1926). Zur Psychologie der Gegenwart. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 99, 160–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selz, O. (1941). Die phänomenalen Grundlagen des Zahlbegriffes. Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Psychologie, 9, 147–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1981). Otto Selz and information-processing psychology. In N. Frijda & A. D. De Groot (Eds.), Otto Selz: His contribution to psychology (pp. 147–163). Mouton.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ter Hark, M. (2010). The psychology of thinking before the cognitive revolution: Otto Selz on problems, schemas, and creativity. History of Psychology, 13(1), 2–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2018). Insight. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Strien, P. J. (1997). Otto Selz über Kreativitat. Psychologie Und Geschichte, 7, 339–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Strien, P. J., & Faas, E. (2005). How Otto Selz became a forerunner of the cognitive revolution. In T. C. Dalton & R. B. Evans (Eds.), The life cycle of psychological ideas (pp. 175–201). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M., & von der Heydt, R. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure–ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172–1217.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. W. (2018). Insight, problem solving, and creativity: An integration of findings. In F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Ed.), Insight (pp. 779–794). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettersten, J. (2019). The Würzburg School today: The three—now four—world theory and new psychological research. Theory & Psychology, 29(3), 396–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, J. M., Ehbauer, N. N., & Mallot, H. A. (2009). Planning paths to multiple targets: Memory involvement and planning heuristics in spatial problem solving. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 73(5), 644–658.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, G., Hoβ, M., & Prinz, W. (1998). Instructions for motor learning: Differential effects of internal versus external focus of attention. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 169–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, A., & Proctor, R. W. (2018). The role of task space in action control: Evidence from research on instructions. In K. D. Federmeier (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 69; pp. 325–364). Academic Press

Download references

Funding

This study was not funded by a grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA

    Robert W. Proctor

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Postbox 15916, 1001 NK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    K. Richard Ridderinkhof

Authors
  1. Robert W. Proctor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Richard Ridderinkhof
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert W. Proctor.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Robert Proctor declares that he has no conflict of interest. Richard Ridderinkhof declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Proctor, R.W., Ridderinkhof, K.R. A neglected pioneer of psychology: Otto Selz’s contribution to the psychology of thinking and the dispute with Gestalt psychologists in Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung. Psychological Research 86, 2352–2364 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01707-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01707-6

Search

Navigation