Skip to main content
Log in

Radiological impact assessment and dose distribution pattern in gorgan bay, Northern Iran

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the specific activity of radionuclides was measured using a high purity germanium detector (HPGe) and the distribution pattern of radiological parameters and hazard indicators was plotted using Surfer and GIS software. Sediment samples were collected from the Gaz River in the mountains of Golestan province, and the central and southern part of Gorgan Bay. In the samples, the average values of specific activity of 226Ra, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs are 17.61, 35.91, 398.65 and 4.01 Bqkg− 1, respectively. The highest concentration of 40K is in the sediments of the outlet of the Gaz River, which may be due to the use of potassium fertilizers for agricultural activities in this area. The concentration of 137Cs activity in the Bay sediment is higher than other sediments, also due to the high mobility and lightness of 137Cs, higher concentration of this radionuclide is in the quiet parts in the middle of the bay. In Gorgan Bay, the maximum of radiological parameters is in the estuary of Gaz River and in line with the water flow, the maximum level of these parameters tends to northwest. Mean radiological indices such as Raeq, Dose, AEDout, ELCRout and AGDE estimated as 99.67 Bqkg− 1, 45.82 nGy/h, 0.056 mSvy− 1, 0.197 × 10− 3 and 329.72 µSvy− 1, respectively which they were all within the allowable range and not threaten the health of residents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, UNSCEAR (2008) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation, report of the general assembly annex B

  2. International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP (2012) Compendium of dose coefficient based onICRP Publication119, 41(1)

  3. Ali YF, Cucinotta FA, Ning-Ang L, Zhou G (2020) Cancer Risk of Low Dose Ionizing Radiation. Front Phys 8:234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.00234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wrenn ME, Durbin PW, Howard B, Lipsztein J, Rundo J, Still ET, Willis DI (1985) Metabolism of ingested U and Ra. Health Phys 48:601–633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sankaranarayanan K (1999) Ionizing radiation and genetic risks: X. The potential “disease phenotypes” of radiation-induced genetic damage in humans: perspectives from human molecular biology and radiation genetics. Mutat Res 429:45–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0027-5107(99)00100-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller KM, Kuiper JL, Helfer IK (1990) 137Cs fallout depth distributions in forest versus field sites: Implications for external gamma dose rates. J Environ Radioact 12(1):23–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0265-931X(90)90034-S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Frissel MJ, Pennders R (1983) Models for the accumulation and migration of 90Sr, 137 Cs, 239,240Pu and 241Am in the upper layer of soils. In: Coughtrey PJ (ed) Ecological aspects of radionuclide release. Blackwell, Oxford, pp: 63–72. ISBN 0632011858

  8. He Q, Walling DE (1997) The distribution of fallout 137Cs and 210Pb in undisturbed and cultivated soils. Appl Radiat Isot 48:667–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-8043(96)00302-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ritchie JC, Mchenry JR (1990) Application of radioactive fallout cesium-137 for measuring soil erosion and sediment accumulation rates and patterns. J Environ Qual 19:215–233. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1990.00472425001900020006x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Davidson W, Spezanno P, Hilton J (1993) Remobilization of caesium from freshwater sediments. J Environ Radioact 19:109–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/0265-931X(93)90072-F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, UNSCEAR (1993) Ionizing radiation: Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. New York

  12. AbdelHalim MAK, El-Taher A (2014) Elemental analysis of limestone by using instrumental neutron activation analysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 299:1949–1953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-014-2925-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Suresh G, Ramasamy V, Meenakshisundaram V, Venkatachalapathy R, Ponnusamy V (2011) A relationship between the natural radioactivity and mineralogical composition of the Ponnaiyar river sediments, India. J Environ Radioact 102:370–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.02.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pourimani R, Mortazavi Shahroodi SM (2021) Analysis of environmental radioactivity of soil and water at the source of Qarasu river along Drazno in Gorgan region of Iran. Paper presented at the Third National Conference on Biotechnology Innovation and Technology, Iranian Chemistry, Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/1146739/

  15. Pourimani R, Asadpour F (2016) Determination of Specific Activities of Radionuclides in Soil and Their Transfer Factor from Soil to Bean and Calculation of Cancer Risk for Bean Consumption in Iran. J Arak Uni Med Sci 19(107):9–18

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pourimani R, Davoodmaghami T, Mohebian M (2020) Determination of radiological map of radionuclides distribution in soils ‎around of Shazand oil power plant. Iran J Radiation Saf Meas 8(4):63–72. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=548120

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pourimani R, Fardad R, Mirzaei M (2019) Assessment of Environmental Radioactivity in Sediments, Water and Reed Samples at the Inlet of Wastewater Treatment plant of Arak to international Meyghan Wetland. J Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.22034/JEST.2019.41198.4522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shahrokhi A, Adelikhah M, Chalupnik S, Kovacs T (2021) Multivariate statistical approach on distribution of natural and anthropogenic radionuclides and associated radiation indices along the north-western coastline of Aegean Sea, Greece. Mar Pollut Bull 163:112009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fahmi NM, El-Khatib A, Abd El-Salam YM, Shalaby MH, El-Gally MM, Naim MA (2010) Study of the environmental impacts of the natural radioactivity presents in beach sand and Lake Sediment samples Idku, Behara, Egypt. Paper presented at the Tenth Radiation Physics and Protection Conference, Nasr City–Cairo, Egypt, November 391–402

  20. Abdi MR, Kamali M, Vaezifar S (2008) Distribution of radioactive pollution of 238U, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs in northwestern coasts of Persian Gulf, Iran. Mar Pollut Bull 56(4):751–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.12.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Abdi MR, Hassanzadeh S, Kamali M, Raji HR (2009) 238U, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs activity concentrations along the southern coast of the Caspian Sea, Iran. Mar Pollut Bull 58(5):658–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.01.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fallah M, Jahangiri S, Janadeleh H, Kameli MA (2019) Distribution and risk assessment of radionuclides in river sediments along the Arvand River, Iran. Microchem J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2019.02.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Surfer (2020) version 19.1.189 (64-bit), http://www.goldensoftware.com

  24. GIS10.3- Geographic information system, version 10.3 (2014) https://www.esri.com

  25. MofidiKhajeh AM, KaramiKhanyeki A, Khaje M, Parsaie L, GhoreyshiRad HR (2008) Investigation of the characteristics of the coasts of Golestan province in order to identify the erosive devices in the coasts. Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Institute, Tehran, p 58. (In Persian)https://civilica.com/doc/1070516/

    Google Scholar 

  26. Parsaie L, MofidiKhajeh AM (2009) Gorgan Gulf Watershed Management, Challenges, Prospects. Paper presented at the Fifth National Conference on Watershed Management Science and Engineering of Iran. (In Persian) https://civilica.com/doc/86966

  27. Sufi T, Hassanzati A, Mohammadgholipour M, Sa A, Mohammadnazemi A (2006) hydrological study on Gorgan Bay. Iran Fisheries Science Research Institute. https://civilica.com/doc/1091120 (In Persian)

  28. International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA (2003) Collection and Preparation of bottom sediment sample for analysis of radionuclides and trace element. IAEA-TECDOC-1360 IAEA

  29. Pourimani R, Mortazavi Shahroodi SM (2018) Radiological Assessment of the Artificial and Natural Radionuclide Concentrations of Wheat and Barley Samples in Karbala, Iraq. Iran J Med Phys 15(2):126–131. https://doi.org/10.22038/ijmp.2017.24190.1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Paiva JDS, Farias EE, Franca EJD (2015) Assessment of the equilibrium of Th-228 and Ra-228 by gamma-ray spectrometry in mangrove soils

  31. Shahrokhi A, Kovacs T (2021) Radiological survey on radon entry path in an underground mine and implementation of an optimized mitigation system. Environ Sci Eur 33:66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-021-00507-w

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pourimani R, Anoosheh F (2015) A Study on Transfer Factors of Environmental Radionuclides: Radionuclide Transfer from Soil to Different Varieties of Rice in Gorgan, Iran. Iran J Med Phys 12(3):189–199. https://doi.org/10.22038/IJMP.2015.6220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pourimani R, Rahimi S (2016) Radiological Assessment of the Artificial and Natural Radionuclide Concentrations of Some Species of Wild Fungi and Nourished Mushrooms. Iran J Med Phys 13(4):269–275. https://doi.org/10.22038/ijmp.2017.8293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD (1979) Exposure to radiation from the natural radioactivity in building materials. Report by a Group of Experts, Nuclear Energy Agency, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  35. European Commission EC (1999) Radiation Protection, 112- radiological protection principles concerning the natural radioactivity of building materials. Directorate-General Environment, Nuclear Safety and Civil Protection

  36. Beretka J, Mathew PJ (1985) Natural Radioactivity of Australian Building Materials, Industrial Wastes and By-products. Health Phys 48(1):87–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-198501000-00007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation, UNSCEAR (2000) Report on theeffects of atomic radiation submitted to the general congress by United Nations scientific committee, Vol. II, 12–15

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was done with the financial support of the Research Council of Arak University, so the authors are grateful to them.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reza Pourimani.

Ethics declarations

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohsen, S., Shahroudi, M. & Pourimani, R. Radiological impact assessment and dose distribution pattern in gorgan bay, Northern Iran. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 331, 3449–3459 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08296-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08296-z

Keywords

Navigation