Abstract
Solving subtraction and addition problems is accompanied by spontaneous leftward and rightward gaze shifts, respectively. These shifts have been related to attentional processes involved in mental arithmetic, but whether these processes induce overt attentional shifts mediated by the activation of the motor programs underlying lateral eye movements or covert shifts only is still unknown. Here, we used the abducted eye paradigm to selectively disrupt activation of the oculomotor system and prevent oculomotor preparation, which affects overt but not covert attentional shifts. Participants had to mentally solve addition and subtraction problems while fixating a screen positioned either in front of them or laterally to their left or right such that they were physically unable to programme and execute saccades further into their temporal field while they still could do so in their nasal field. In comparison to the frontal condition, rightward eye abduction impaired additions (with carrying), and leftward eye abduction impaired subtractions (with borrowing) showing that at least some arithmetic problems rely on processes dedicated to overt attentional shifts. We propose that when solving arithmetic problems requires procedures such as carrying and borrowing, oculomotor mechanisms operating on a mental space transiently built in working memory are recruited to represent one numerical magnitude in relation to another (e.g. the first operand and the result).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andres, M., Geers, L., Marnette, S., Coyette, F., Bonato, M., Priftis, K., & Masson, N. (2019). Increased cognitive load reveals unilateral neglect and altitudinal extinction in chronic stroke. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 25(6), 644–653. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617719000249
Andres, M., Salvaggio, S., Lefèvre, N., Pesenti, M., & Masson, N. (2020). Semantic associations between arithmetic and space: Evidence from temporal order judgements. Memory & Cognition, 48(3), 361–369. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00975-9
Ball, K., Pearson, D. G., & Smith, D. T. (2013). Oculomotor involvement in spatial working memory is task-specific. Cognition, 129(2), 439–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.006
Blini, E., Pitteri, M., & Zorzi, M. (2019). Spatial grounding of symbolic arithmetic: An investigation with optokinetic stimulation. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 83(1), 64–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1053-0
Born, S., Mottet, I., & Kerzel, D. (2014). Presaccadic perceptual facilitation effects depend on saccade execution: Evidence from the stop-signal paradigm. Journal of Vision, 14(3), 7–7. https://doi.org/10.1167/14.3.7
Brandt, S. A., & Stark, L. W. (1997). Spontaneous eye movements during visual imagery reflect the content of the visual scene. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1997.9.1.27
Campbell, J. I., & Xue, Q. (2001). Cognitive arithmetic across cultures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(2), 299. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.299
Casarotti, M., Michielin, M., Zorzi, M., & Umiltà, C. (2007). Temporal order judgment reveals how number magnitude affects visuospatial attention. Cognition, 102, 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.09.001
Casteau, S., & Smith, D. T. (2020). Covert attention beyond the range of eye-movements: Evidence for a dissociation between exogenous and endogenous orienting. Cortex, 122, 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.11.007
Colling, L. J., Szűcs, D., De Marco, D., Cipora, K., Ulrich, R., Nuerk, H. C., & McShane, B. B. (2020). Registered replication report on Fischer, Castel, Dodd, and Pratt (2003). Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920903079
Craighero, L., Nascimben, M., & Fadiga, L. (2004). Eye position affects orienting of visuospatial attention. Current Biology, 14(4), 331–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.01.054
Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44(1–2), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90049-N
Díaz-Barriga Yáñez, A., Couderc, A., Longo, L., Merchie, A., Chesnokova, H., Langlois, E., Thevenot, C., & Prado, J. (2020). Learning to run the number line: The development of attentional shifts during single-digit arithmetic. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14464
Dormal, V., Schuller, A. M., Nihoul, J., Pesenti, M., & Andres, M. (2014). Causal role of spatial attention in arithmetic problem solving: Evidence from left unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia, 60, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.007
Ferreira, F., Apel, J., & Henderson, J. M. (2008). Taking a new look at looking at nothing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 405–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.007
Fischer, M. H., Castel, A. D., Dodd, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6(6), 555–556. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1066
Gabay, S., Henik, A., & Gradstein, L. (2010). Ocular motor ability and covert attention in patients with Duane retraction syndrome. Neuropsychologia, 48(10), 3102–3109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.06.022
Galarraga, D. B., Pratt, J., & Cochrane, B. A. (2021). Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211039479.
Galfano, G., Rusconi, E., & Umiltà, C. (2006). Number magnitude orients attention, but not against one’s will. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(5), 869–874. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194011
Gevers, W., Verguts, T., Reynvoet, B., Caessens, B., & Fias, W. (2006). Numbers and space: A computational model of the SNARC effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.32
Glaser, M., & Knops, A. (2020). When adding is right: Temporal order judgements reveal spatial attention shifts during two-digit mental arithmetic. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(7), 1115–1132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820902917
Guitton, D., & Volle, M. (1987). Gaze control in humans: Eye-head coordination during orienting movements to targets within and beyond the oculomotor range. Journal of Neurophysiology, 58(3), 427–459. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1987.58.3.427
Hanning, N. M., Szinte, M., & Deubel, H. (2019). Visual attention is not limited to the oculomotor range. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(19), 9665–9670. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1813465116
Hartmann, M., Mast, F. W., & Fischer, M. H. (2015). Spatial biases during mental arithmetic: Evidence from eye movements on a blank screen. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00012
Hartmann, M., Mast, F. W., & Fischer, M. H. (2016). Counting is a spatial process: Evidence from eye movements. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 80(3), 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0722-5
Hunt, A. R., & Kingstone, A. (2003). Covert and overt voluntary attention: Linked or independent? Cognitive Brain Research, 18(1), 102–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.08.006
Johansson, R., Holsanova, J., Dewhurst, R., & Holmqvist, K. (2012). Eye movements during scene recollection have a functional role, but they are not reinstatements of those produced during encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(5), 1289. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026585
Johansson, R., Holsanova, J., & Holmqvist, K. (2006). Pictures and spoken descriptions elicit similar eye movements during mental imagery, both in light and in complete darkness. Cognitive Science, 30(6), 1053–1079. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_86
Johansson, R., & Johansson, M. (2014). Look here, eye movements play a functional role in memory retrieval. Psychological Science, 25(1), 236–242.
Klein, R.M., & Pontefract, A. (1994). Does oculomotor readiness mediate cognitive control of visual attention? Revisited! In C. Umiltà, & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing. The MIT Press: Cambridge. pp. 333–350.
Klein, E., Huber, S., Nuerk, H. C., & Moeller, K. (2014). Operational momentum affects eye fixation behaviour. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(8), 1614–1625. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.902976
Klein, R. M. (1980). Does oculomotor readiness mediate cognitive control of visual attention? Atten. Perform., 8, 259–276.
Knops, A., Thirion, B., Hubbard, E. M., Michel, V., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Recruitment of an area involved in eye movements during mental arithmetic. Science, 324, 1583–1585. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1171599
Kong, J., Wang, Y., Shang, H., Wang, Y., Yang, X., & Zhuang, D. (1999). Brain potentials during mental arithmetic-effects of problem difficulty on event-related brain potentials. Neuroscience Letters, 260(3), 169–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00974-4
Laeng, B., & Teodorescu, D. S. (2002). Eye scanpaths during visual imagery reenact those of perception of the same visual scene. Cognitive Science, 26(2), 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2602_3
LeFevre, J. A., DeStefano, D., Penner-Wilger, M., & Daley, K. E. (2006). Selection of procedures in mental subtraction. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/revue Canadienne De Psychologie Expérimentale, 60(3), 209.
Liu, D., Cai, D., Verguts, T., & Chen, Q. (2017). The time course of spatial attention shifts in elementary arithmetic. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 921. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01037-3
Loetscher, T., Bockisch, C. J., & Brugger, P. (2008). Looking for the answer: The mind’s eye in number space. Neuroscience, 151(3), 725–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.07.068
Masson, N., & Pesenti, M. (2014). Attentional bias induced by solving simple and complex addition and subtraction problems. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1514–1526. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.903985
Masson, N., & Pesenti, M. (2016). Interference of lateralized distractors on arithmetic problem solving: A functional role for attention shifts in mental calculation. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 80, 640–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0668-7
Masson, N., Pesenti, M., & Dormal, V. (2017). Impact of optokinetic stimulation on mental arithmetic. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 81(4), 840–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0784-z
Masson, N., Letesson, C., & Pesenti, M. (2018a). Time course of overt attentional shifts in mental arithmetic: Evidence from gaze metrics. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(4), 1009–1019. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1318931
Masson, N., Pesenti, M., Coyette, F., Andres, M., & Dormal, V. (2018b). Shifts of spatial attention underlie numerical comparison and mental arithmetic: Evidence from a patient with right unilateral neglect. Neuropsychology, 31(7), 822–833. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000361
Masson, N., Andres, M., Alsamour, M., Bollen, Z., & Pesenti, M. (2020a). Spatial biases in mental arithmetic are independent of reading/writing habits: Evidence from French and Arabic speakers. Cognition, 200, 104262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104262
Masson, N., Andres, M., Pereira, S. C., Pesenti, M., & Vannuscorps, G. (2020b). Exogenous covert shift of attention without the ability to plan eye movements. Current Biology, 30(18), R1032–R1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.07.074
Masson, N., Andres, M., Carneiro Pereira, S., Vandenberghe, A., Pesenti, M., & Vannuscorps, G. (2021). Shifting attention in visuospatial short-term memory does not require oculomotor planning: Insight from congenital gaze paralysis. Neuropsychologia, 161, 107998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107998
Mathieu, R., Epinat-Duclos, J., Sigovan, M., Breton, A., Cheylus, A., Fayol, M., Thevenot, C., & Prado, J. (2017). What’s behind a “+” sign? Perceiving an arithmetic operator recruits brain circuits for spatial orienting. Cerebral Cortex, 28(5), 1673–1684. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhx064
Mathieu, R., Gourjon, A., Couderc, A., Thevenot, C., & Prado, J. (2016). Running the number line: Rapid shifts of attention in single-digit arithmetic. Cognition, 146, 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.002
Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7
Myachykov, A., Ellis, R., Cangelosi, A., & Fischer, M. H. (2016). Ocular drift along the mental number line. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 80(3), 379–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0731-4
Pearson, D. G., Ball, K., & Smith, D. T. (2014). Oculomotor preparation as a rehearsal mechanism in spatial working memory. Cognition, 132(3), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.05.006
Pinhas, M., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). Mental movements without magnitude? A study of spatial biases in symbolic arithmetic. Cognition, 109(3), 408–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.09.003
Pinhas, M., Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2014). Heed the signs: Operation signs have spatial associations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(8), 1527–1540. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.892516
Proctor, R. W., & Cho, Y. S. (2006). Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 416. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.416
Ranzini, M., Lisi, M., Blini, E., Pitteri, M., Treccani, B., Priftis, K., & Zorzi, M. (2015). Larger, smaller, odd or even? Task-specific effects of optokinetic stimulation on the mental number space. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(4), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2014.941847
Ranzini, M., Lisi, M., & Zorzi, M. (2016). Voluntary eye movements direct attention on the mental number space. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 80(3), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0741-2
Rapcsak, S. Z., Cimino, C. R., & Heilman, K. M. (1988). Altitudinal neglect. Neurology, 38(2), 277–277. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.38.2.277
Ristic, J., Wright, A., & Kingstone, A. (2006). The number line effect reflects top-down control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(5), 862–868. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194010
Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., & Umiltá, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia, 25(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(87)90041-8
Salvaggio, S., Masson, N., & Andres, M. (2019). Eye position reflects the spatial coding of numbers during magnitude comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(10), 1910. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000681
Salvaggio, S., Andres, M., Zénon, A., & Masson, N. (2022a). Pupil size variations reveal covert shifts of attention induced by numbers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02094-0
Salvaggio, S., Masson, N., Zénon, A., & Andres, M. (2022b). The predictive role of eye movements in mental arithmetic. Experimental Brain Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06329-3
Schuller, A. M., Hoffmann, D., Goffaux, V., & Schiltz, C. (2015). Shifts of spatial attention cued by irrelevant numbers: Electrophysiological evidence from a target discrimination task. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(4), 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2014.946419
Schwarz, W., & Keus, I. M. (2004). Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(4), 651–664. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194909
Shelton, P. A., Bowers, D., & Heilman, K. M. (1990). Peripersonal and vertical neglect. Brain, 113(1), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/113.1.191
Smith, D. T., & Archibald, N. (2018). Spatial working memory in progressive supranuclear palsy. Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.07.004
Smith, D. T., Ball, K., Ellison, A., & Schenk, T. (2010). Deficits of reflexive attention induced by abduction of the eye. Neuropsychologia, 48(5), 1269–1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.12.028
Smith, D. T., Rorden, C., & Jackson, S. R. (2004). Exogenous orienting of attention depends upon the ability to execute eye movements. Current Biology, 14(9), 792–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.04.035
Smith, D. T., Schenk, T., & Rorden, C. (2012). Saccade preparation is required for exogenous attention but not endogenous attention or IOR. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(6), 1438. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027794
Stelmach, L. B., Campsall, J. M., & Herdman, C. M. (1997). Attentional and ocular movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(3), 823–844. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.23.3.823
Stoianov, I., Kramer, P., Umilta, C., & Zorzi, M. (2008). Visuospatial priming of the mental number line. Cognition, 106(2), 770–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.013
van Ede, F., Chekroud, S. R., & Nobre, A. C. (2019). Human gaze tracks attentional focusing in memorized visual space. Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 462–470. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0549-y
Vuilleumier, P., Ortigue, S., & Brugger, P. (2004). The number space and neglect. Cortex, 40(2), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70134-5
Wiemers, M., Bekkering, H., & Lindemann, O. (2014). Spatial interferences in mental arithmetic: Evidence from the motion–arithmetic compatibility effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(8), 1557–1570. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.889180
Zorzi, M., Bonato, M., Treccani, B., Scalambrin, G., Marenzi, R., & Priftis, K. (2012). Neglect impairs explicit processing of the mental number line. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 125. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00125
Acknowledgements
M.P. is a senior research associate at the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FRS-FNRS, Belgium). N.M. is supported by grant PDR-T.0047.18 from the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FRS-FNRS, Belgium) to M.P and grant FNR-INTER/FNRS/17/1178524 from the National Research Fund of Luxembourg (FNR, Luxembourg). We thank Delphine Lafontaine for her help in material preparation and data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
NM: Conceptualization; Methodology; Investigation; Formal analysis; Data Curation; Writing—Original Draft; Writing—Review & Editing; Visualization; Project administration. MP: Conceptualization; Writing—Original Draft; Writing—Review & Editing; Visualization; Supervision; Project administration; Funding acquisition.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Masson, N., Pesenti, M. A functional role for oculomotor preparation in mental arithmetic evidenced by the abducted eye paradigm. Psychological Research 87, 919–928 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01696-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01696-6