Abstract
The purpose of this research is to provide a complete method for measuring the performance of green supply chain management (GSCM) in the steel manufacturing sector using a combined approach. This study is conducted on an integrated system based on four things: the design of the GSCM performance measurement model based on the Seven Sink Performance Model, weighing performance indicators using the analytical network process, the objective matrix method to measure performance assessment, and the traffic light system method to help identify critical indicators. According to the findings of the study, energy consumption is the most important factor that leads to GSCM application success in an Indonesian steel manufacturing company. The proportion of reusable materials is the smallest and most important performance metric that has to be improved. The suggested methodology may be used by steel company supply chain managers to assess and enhance GSCM performance. The suggested approach is verified by a case analysis at an Indonesian steel manufacturing company.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Maryam Masoumi K, Abdul-Rashid SH, Olugu EU, Ghazilla R, Ariffin R (2015) An integrated framework-for designing a strategic green supply chain with an application to the automotive industry. Int J Ind Eng 22(1):46
Kurien G, Qureshi M (2012) Performance measurement systems for green supply chains using modified balanced score card and analytical hierarchical process. Sci Res Essays 7(36):3149–3161. https://doi.org/10.5897/SRE11.1655
Salam MA. An empirical investigation of the determinants of adoption of green procurement for successful green supply chain management. In: Management of Innovation and Technology, 2008. ICMIT 2008. 4th IEEE International Conference on, 2008 (pp. 1038–1043): IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMIT.2008.4654511
Dai J, Cantor DE, Montabon FL (2015) How environmental management competitive pressure affects a focal firm’s environmental innovation activities: a green supply chain perspective. J Bus Logist 36(3):242–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12094
Srivastava SK (2007) Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review. Int J Manage Rev 9(1):53–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00202.x
Akkucuk U (2016) SCOR model and the green supply chain. Handb Res Waste Manage Tech Sustain. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9723-2.ch006
Rao P, Holt D (2005) Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance? Int J Oper Prod Manage 25(9):898–916. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510613956
Yu V, Ting H-I, Wu YCJ (2009) Assessing the greenness effort for European firms: a resource efficiency perspective. Manag Decis 47(7):1065–1079. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910978304
Shafique M, Rashid A, Bajwa I, Kazmi R, Khurshid M, Tahir W (2018) Effect of IoT capabilities and energy consumption behavior on green supply chain integration. Appl Sci 8(12):2481
Kirchoff JF, Tate WL, Mollenkopf DA (2016) The impact of strategic organizational orientations on green supply chain management and firm performance. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manage 46(3):269–292. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-03-2015-0055
de Oliveira UR, Espindola LS, da Silva IR, da Silva IN, Rocha HM (2018) A systematic literature review on green supply chain management: research implications and future perspectives. J Clean Prod 187:537–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.083
Gandhi S, Mangla SK, Kumar P, Kumar D (2016) A combined approach using AHP and DEMATEL for evaluating success factors in implementation of green supply chain management in Indian manufacturing industries. Int J Logist Res Appl 19(6):537–561
Tseng M-L, Islam MS, Karia N, Fauzi FA, Afrin S (2019) A literature review on green supply chain management: trends and future challenges. Resour Conserv Recycl 141:145–162
Tangen S (2004) Performance measurement: from philosophy to practice. Int J Product Perform Manage 53(8):726–737. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400410569134
Perotti S, Zorzini M, Cagno E, Micheli GJ (2012) Green supply chain practices and company performance: the case of 3PLs in Italy. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manage 42(7):640–672. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031211258138
Tseng M-L, Tan K, Chiu AS (2016) Identifying the competitive determinants of firms’ green supply chain capabilities under uncertainty. Clean Technol Environ Policy 18(5):1247–1262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-1064-0
Chen YJ, Wu YJ, Wu T (2015) Moderating effect of environmental supply chain collaboration: evidence from Taiwan. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manage 45(9/10):959–978. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-08-2014-0183
Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Lai K-H (2008) Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation. Int J Prod Econ 111(2):261–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.029
Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Lai K-H (2008) Green supply chain management implications for “closing the loop.” Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 44(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2006.06.003
Facanha C, Horvath A (2005) Environmental assessment of logistics outsourcing. J Manage Eng 21(1):27–37. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2005)21:1(27)
Hervani AA, Helms MM, Sarkis J (2005) Performance measurement for green supply chain management. Benchmark Int J 12(4):330–353. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770510609015
Lin R-J (2013) Using fuzzy DEMATEL to evaluate the green supply chain management practices. J Clean Prod 40:32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.06.010
Bhattacharya A, Mohapatra P, Kumar V, Dey PK, Brady M, Tiwari MK et al (2014) Green supply chain performance measurement using fuzzy ANP-based balanced scorecard: a collaborative decision-making approach. Prod Plann Control 25(8):698–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2013.798088
Sheu J-B, Chou Y-H, Hu C-C (2005) An integrated logistics operational model for green-supply chain management. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transp Rev 41(4):287–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2004.07.001
Neely A, Gregory M, Platts K (2005) Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. Int J Oper Prod Manage 25(12):1228–1263. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510633639
Neely A, Marr B, Roos G, Pike S, Gupta O (2003) Towards the third generation of performance measurement. Controlling 15(3–4):129–136. https://doi.org/10.15358/0935-0381-2003-3-4-129
Rolstadås A (1998) Enterprise performance measurement. Int J Oper Prod Manage 18(9/10):989–999. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579810225577
De Toni A, Tonchia S (2001) Performance measurement systems-models, characteristics and measures. Int J Oper Prod Manage 21(1/2):46–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570110358459
Mulebeke JA, Zheng L The analytic network process: evaluation and selection of PDP software. In ISAHP 2005 Honolulu Hawaii, July 8–10 2005
Dervitsiotis KN (1995) The objectives matrix as a facilitating framework for quality assessment and improvement in education. Total Qual Manage 6(5):563–570
Balkan D (2011) Enterprise productivity measurement in services by OMAX (Objective Matrix) method and an application with Turkish emergency service. In: Reser Conference, Productivity of Services Next Gen–Beyond Output/Input. Hamburg. Citeseer, pp 1–13
Hargrave BT (2002) A traffic light decision system for marine finfish aquaculture siting. Ocean Coast Manage 45(4):215–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-5691(02)00056-X
Kusi-Sarpong S, Sarkis J, Wang X (2016) Assessing green supply chain practices in the Ghanaian mining industry: a framework and evaluation. Int J Prod Econ 181:325–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.04.002
SCC (2010) Supply chain operations reference (SCOR) model version 10.0. The Supply Chain Council, Inc. SCOR. The Supply Chain Reference (binder)
Kazancoglu Y, Kazancoglu I, Sagnak M (2018) Fuzzy DEMATEL-based green supply chain management performance: application in cement industry. Ind Manage Data Syst 118(2):412–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-03-2017-0121
Monov V (2012) Energy consumption and efficiency in industrial processes. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics, vol 12, pp a9–a12
Van LH, Yu VF, Dat LQ, Dung CC, Chou S-Y, Loc NV (2018) New integrated quality function deployment approach based on interval neutrosophic set for green supplier evaluation and selection. Sustainability 10(3):838. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030838
Acknowledgements
This research is partially supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China (Taiwan) under Grant MOST 108-2221-E-011-051-MY3, and the Center for Cyber-Physical System Innovation from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
VFY and AB contributed to conceptualization; AB contributed to methodology, formal analysis, writing—original draft preparation, and software; VFY, AB, CLY, YJW, and RE contributed to validation and writing—review and editing; AB and RE contributed to investigation and data curation; VFY contributed to resources, project administration, and funding acquisition; and VFY, CLY, and YJW contributed to supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
The contributing editor for this article was Sharif Jahanshahi.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, V.F., Bahauddin, A., Yang, CL. et al. A Combined Approach for Green Supply Chain Management Performance Measurement in a Steel Manufacturing Company: An Indonesian Case. J. Sustain. Metall. 8, 1140–1153 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-022-00559-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-022-00559-z