Constraints on the two-dimensional pseudospin-12 Mott insulator description of Sr2IrO4

B. Zwartsenberg, R. P. Day, E. Razzoli, M. Michiardi, M. X. Na, G. Zhang, J. D. Denlinger, I. Vobornik, C. Bigi, B. J. Kim, I. S. Elfimov, E. Pavarini, and A. Damascelli
Phys. Rev. B 105, 245130 – Published 22 June 2022

Abstract

Sr2IrO4 has often been described via a simple, one-band pseudospin-12 model subject to electron-electron interactions on a square lattice, fostering analogies with cuprate superconductors believed to be well described by a similar model. In this work we argue—based on a detailed study of the low-energy electronic structure by circularly polarized spin and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy combined with dynamical mean-field theory calculations—that a pseudospin-12 model fails to capture the full complexity of the system. We show instead that a realistic multiband Hubbard Hamiltonian, accounting for the full correlated t2g manifold, provides a detailed description of the interplay between spin-orbital entanglement and electron-electron interactions and yields quantitative agreement with experiments. Our analysis establishes that the j3/2 states make up a substantial percentage of the low-energy spectral weight, i.e., approximately 74% as determined from the integration of the j-resolved spectral function in the 0 to 1.64eV energy range. The results in our work are of relevance not only to Ir-based materials but also more generally to multiorbital materials with closely spaced energy scales.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 29 January 2022
  • Revised 10 April 2022
  • Accepted 19 May 2022

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.245130

©2022 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

B. Zwartsenberg1,2, R. P. Day1,2, E. Razzoli1,2, M. Michiardi1,2,3, M. X. Na1,2, G. Zhang4, J. D. Denlinger5, I. Vobornik6, C. Bigi7, B. J. Kim8,9,10, I. S. Elfimov1,2, E. Pavarini11,12,*, and A. Damascelli1,2,†

  • 1Quantum Matter Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada BC V6T 1Z4
  • 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada BC V6T 1Z1
  • 3Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids, Nöthnitzer Straße 40, 01187 Dresden, Germany
  • 4Key Laboratory of Materials Physics, Institute of Solid State Physics, HFIPS, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, People's Republic of China
  • 5Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 6Istituto Officina dei Materiali (IOM)-CNR, Laboratorio TASC, in Area Science Park, S.S.14, Km 163.5, I-34149 Trieste, Italy
  • 7Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit di Milano, Via Celoria 16, I-20133 Milano, Italy
  • 8Department of Physics, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 790-784, South Korea
  • 9Center for Artificial Low Dimensional Electronic Systems, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), 77 Cheongam-Ro, Pohang 790-784, Republic of Korea
  • 10Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research, Heisenbergstraße 1, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
  • 11Institute for Advanced Simulation, Forschungszentrum Jülich, D-52425 Jülich, Germany
  • 12JARA High-Performance Computing, Forschungszentrum Jülich, D-52425 Jülich, Germany

  • *e.pavarini@fz-juelich.de
  • damascelli@physics.ubc.ca

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 105, Iss. 24 — 15 June 2022

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×