Elsevier

Land Use Policy

Volume 120, September 2022, 106232
Land Use Policy

Beyond controversy, putting a livestock footprint on the map of the Senegal River delta

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106232Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The Delta area is experiencing strong pressure on natural and land resources.

  • Historically land use planning has been entangled in sectoral logic and constraints.

  • Livestock farming and mobility are still a reality in the Delta area.

  • Aside from technical solutions and promises, structural organizational changes are required.

Abstract

The Senegalese delta, like many other agricultural territories in the Global South, is experiencing changes in agricultural trajectory. These changes are related to the promotion of competitive and performance-based forms of agriculture. In a context of tense relations between farmers and herders, the quest for equitable access to land, which is a guarantee of peace, stability, and balanced economic and social development, is being called into question by the arrival of capital investors and new actors that are highly supported by the State. This situation raises questions about two important issues: (i) the challenge of the sustainable management of natural resources, especially land; and (ii) the socio-political stakes related to the fact that land is a sensitive resource, both politically and socially. The situation is exacerbated by the fact that dominant discourses are being built around representation of unused and available lands. The aim of this article is to address this controversy by questioning land-use planning processes and tools and underlining the reality depicted. We demonstrate that discourses around land availability are built upon sectoral visions that tend to overshadow the realities of land use. Indeed, livestock farming and particularly its mobile form (i.e., pastoralism) is rendered invisible by not being considered in the majority of land-use and agricultural policies. Through a participatory survey of campsites, we show that gathering basic information on livestock farming should not to be reduced to technical issues. Beyond that, we acknowledge that these land-use issues are rooted in sector-based and neoliberal visions of development. We conclude by discussing the importance of effective decentralization in financial and technical means and the development of systemic proficiency that goes beyond normative sectoral views to acknowledge and act on territorial development.

Introduction

Hunger and other forms of malnutrition continue to be society’s great challenge (Godfray et al., 2010), while the increasing climate variability jeopardizes global food systems and agricultural development, notably in the most vulnerable areas such as Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) (Thornton et al., 2011).

Certain policy efforts seek to eradicate food insecurity by 2030 (FAO et al., 2015). In order to align these goals with the looming prospect of feeding 9.7 billion people by 2050, transformative changes in the agricultural sector seem indispensable (Cole et al., 2018). Notwithstanding fervent and continuous support in favor of agricultural intensification, a large corpus of literature has underlined certain limits in terms of ethics, diminishing returns, and increasing externalities (Matson and Vitousek, 2006). Land conversion is seen as a complementary pathway, promoting the dedication of even greater amounts of arable lands for agricultural purposes (Cole et al., 2018). This paradigm follows the rationale that investing in land considered underutilized will compensate for production shortfalls (Byerlee et al., 2013). In practice, land investments in the agricultural sector are increasingly targeting SSA (Interdonato et al., 2020), portrayed a decade ago as underutilizing land. “Of the 183 million hectares (ha) of cultivated land in SSA, 95% is rain-fed and less than 5% benefits from some type of Agricultural Water Management (AWM)—by far the lowest irrigation development rate of any region in the world” (World Bank, 2013:30).

Along with underutilized land, marginal lands are also targeted to expand production schemes. Considered as uncultivated, these lands may harbor other types of value but are nevertheless seen as “suitable for commercial agriculture” (Exner et al., 2015:652). In the last decade, researchers have shown the costs associated with converting land from other uses to agricultural. For instance, Smith (2013) showed that out of the 3 billion ha suitable for crop production at the global scale, one-half was cultivated. Converting the other half, covered by forested areas, would entail high environmental and operating costs. Others have shown concerns regarding increasingly scarce land (Lambin et al., 2013), and the multiple and often conflicting demands for land that engender that scarcity (Smith et al., 2010). This apparent scientific consensus is challenged by studies identifying potential for land conversion at regional levels, often under the term of Potentially Available Cropland. Studies by Anon (2003) highlighted that land conversion will still be on the agenda in Sub-Saharan Africa until 2030, when it is expected to contribute 27 % of the region’s crop production. In 2011, the World Bank reported that 445 million hectares of potentially available uncultivated lands (globally), almost half of which is located in SSA, could benefit from agricultural investment (Deininger and Byerlee, 2011).

This rationalization is generally combined with the promotion of land investments led by agro-industries with the assumption that they will better address the challenge of reducing yield gaps (Deininger and Byerlee, 2011). Additionally, the emphasis on business in agriculture is justified by its contribution to alleviating global food insecurity and poverty (World Bank, 2019), and the expected trickle-down benefits to localized food security (Stiglitz, 2015). These narratives have taken root in rural areas of developing countries, propelled by government and Foreign Donor Funded Projects, where economic development and food security agendas are intertwined and bound by neoliberal ideologies (Mediavilla and Garcia-Arias, 2019). In line with Rostow’s stages of development (1990), narratives are built upon indicators of productive efficiency with horizons of modernity and economic growth (Weis, 2010). This dominant conceptualization of agricultural productivity for development has fostered the global emulation of industrial capitalist agriculture (Ross, 2013), manifesting in the rise of large-scale land acquisitions (Johansson et al., 2016, Nolte and Chamberlain, 2016) and the worldwide proliferation of land grabbing (Zoomers et al., 2016, Edelman et al., 2018).

In this international context of pressure on agrarian land and the commodification of agricultural space, the Senegalese government has undertaken policy and institutional reforms that sustain a vision of rural development directed towards highly productive sectors and the promotion of private agricultural initiatives (Bourgoin et al., 2019). The meta-analysis on agribusiness investments proposed by Bourgoin et al. (2019) showed hotspots for land investments, and in particular the delta of the Senegal River valley (commonly called “delta” throughout the article). Here, “modern forms of agriculture” (Ancey and Monas, 2005) are propelled by government-led projects. One example is the Project for Inclusive and Sustainable Agribusiness Development (PDIDAS), which has been operating since 2014 with a 43 billion XOF loan from the World Bank. The project’s rationale was justified by the fact that land is available for private investors to further develop horticultural production (PDIDAS, 2015, Mbaye Diop et al., 2017). This vision of modernity seems to be in contradiction with historical depictions of the area, portrayed as rich in pastoral activities (Michel and Sall, 1984, Tourrand, 1993a, Tourrand, 1993b, Corniaux et al., 1998). In practice, the discourses on land availability have met resistance within civil society, fostering the federation of a network of NGOs against the dynamics of land grabbing under a common umbrella organization called CRAFS (Faye et al., 2011, Kanoute et al., 2011, GRAIN, 2012, Bagnoli et al., 2015, Fall and Ngaido, 2016). At another scale, the Delta experienced several, more quantifiable local uprisings that opposed land acquisitions by agribusiness projects in the 2010 s (d'Aquino et al., 2017).

The aim of this article is to address the controversy around unused and available lands by questioning land-use planning processes and tools. How inclusive are these tools and which reality do they depict? Current representations of land use seem inconsistent. Either pastoral activities, often portrayed as anachronistic (Magrin et al., 2011), have naturally declined in number and been replaced by what the government defines as “modern forms of agriculture” (Ancey and Monas, 2005), or, as we hypothesize, discourses on land availability have obscured the existence of practices that do not fit the values of a certain vision of agricultural development. Our specific intention here is to compare the representation of agricultural practices by current information systems with the reality of actual practices found in the field. We use simple but efficient methods to expose practices that have a limited spatial footprint in a data scarce environment. We also discuss current and future risks related to overlooking these practices.

Section snippets

The Delta, an agricultural hotspot

Since 2014, the current Government of Senegal has been conducting a development program, the Plan Sénégal Emergent (PSE), which is based on various key sectors of the economy, mainly commercial agriculture and the agri-food sector. The government also intends to modernize family farming through the implementation of microprojects aimed at enhancing the value of existing farms by intensifying production and diversifying sources of agricultural income through additional high value-added

Building a cartographic diagnosis

Using geographic information systems and cartographic tools, we mapped the current extent of official knowledge on land use. The cartographic diagnosis of the study area, was built during a scientific and technical partnership, funded by AFD in 2017–2018, and involving SAED, the University of Gaston Berger, CIRAD, and ISRA. In this context, partners pooled geospatial information which included a geo-database from SAED that referenced all hydro-agricultural developments. The database included

Historical representations of livestock footprint

The Senegal River delta was originally a region devoted almost exclusively to extensive pastoral livestock farming. In the dry season, livestock farmers exploited the paths left by the receding waters of the Senegal River, and during the winter, the dune pastures of the non-floodable lands in a river valley (called Dieri) provided quality grass cover (Corniaux et al., 1998). Depending on the amplitude of the season’s last rains, herders could begin a long transhumance at the end of the dry

Acknowledging current trajectories at a territorial scale

For more than 50 years, the Senegal River delta and Guiers Lake areas have seen constant growth in hydro-agricultural developments. Propelled by the incentives of various mechanisms facilitating investments, around 25,500 ha of land have been irrigated between 2000 and 2015, almost 11,000 ha of which were developed by foreign agro-industries (Bourgoin et al., 2016). In 2019, eleven agro-industries were operating farms that averaged 600 ha. One of these agribusiness, present since early 1970,

Conclusion

In recent years, pastoral mobility has become emblematic of resilience in the Sahel, as evidenced by the Nouakchott and N'Djamena Declarations issued in 2013, affirming the contribution of pastoralism to the Saharo-Sahelian areas. In practice, information related to pastoral activities at the municipal level is still lacking and development projects supporting sustainable development through land-use planning have not aimed at overcoming this issue and have difficulty freeing themselves from

Declaration of Competing Interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This project received multiple support: from Acting for Life and DFID thought the extension of the BRACED project in Senegal; from AFD through their support of the scientific program of SAED-UGB, that associated ISRA and CIRAD; from ISRA BAME that contributed to technical and financial means to conduct the surveys; from the Land Matrix Initiative and the Senegal Land Governance Observatory to access Large-Scale Land Allocation-related data in Senegal.

References (95)

  • Bagnoli, L., Benegiamo, M., Cirillo, D., Franchi Sénégal, G., 2015. Comment on accapare la terre. La saga...
  • R. Behnke et al.

    Replacing Pastoralism with Irrigated Agriculture in the Awash Valley, North-Eastern Ethiopia: Counting the Costs. Future of Pastoralism. Addis Ababa, Future Agricultures Consortium at the Institute of Development Studies

    (2011)
  • Bélières, J.-F., P.-M. Bosc, G. Faure, S. Fournier and B. Losch (2002). What Future for West Africa’s Family Farms in a...
  • M. Benegiamo

    Extractivism, exclusion and conflictsin Senegal’s agro-industrial transformation

    Rev. Afr. Polit. Econ.

    (2020)
  • T. Benjaminsen et al.

    Why do pastoralists in Mali join jihadist groups? A political ecological explanation

    J. Peasant Stud.

    (2018)
  • T.A. Benjaminsen et al.

    Does Climate Change Drive Land-use Conflicts in the Sahel?

    J. Peace Res.

    (2012)
  • Bonnet-Dupeyron, F., 1950. Déplacements saisonniers des éléveurs au Sénégal et en Basse et Moyenne Mauritanie Paris,...
  • J. Bourgoin et al.

    The agricultural development model for the Senegal river delta

  • J. Bourgoin et al.
    (2018)
  • J. Bourgoin et al.

    Improving Transparency and Reliability of Tenure Information for Improved Land Governance in Senegal

    Land

    (2019)
  • R. Briday

    Le discours de la promesse chez les promoteurs de l’ingénierie climatique

    Socio

    (2019)
  • L. Brottem et al.

    Pastoralism and Conflict in the Sudano-Sahel: A Review of the Literature

    (2020)
  • F.F.K. Byamugisha

    Securing Africa’s Land for Shared Prosperity. A Program to Scale Up Reforms and Investments. AFD

    (2013)
  • D. Byerlee et al.

    Growing Africa. Unlocking the Potential of Agribusiness

    (2013)
  • M.B. Cole et al.

    The science of food security

    Sci. Food

    (2018)
  • C. Corniaux et al.

    Caractérisation des systèmes d’élevage dans le delta du fleuve Sénégal: typologie des élevages et cartographies des mouvements des troupeaux "

    (1998)
  • Corniaux, C., 2005. Gestion technique et gestion sociale de la production laitière: les champs du possible pour une...
  • P. d’Aquino et al.

    Du savoir local au pouvoir central: un processus participatif sur la réforme foncière au Sénégal

    Nat. Sci. Sociétés

    (2017)
  • d'Aquino P., Seck S.M., Cissokho A. 2000. In : Legoupil Jean-Claude (ed.), Dancette Claude (ed.), Maïga Ilias Mossi...
  • d’Aquino P., Seck S.M., Camara S. 2001. In : Tonneau Jean-Philippe (ed.), Teyssier André (ed.). Aménagement du...
  • Darre, J.-P. (1996). L’invention des pratiques dans l’agriculture. Vulgarisation et production locale de connaissance....
  • K. Deininger et al.

    Rising Global Interest in Farmland: Can It Yield Sustainable and Equitable Benefits?

    (2011)
  • Diop D., Bourgoin J., Dia D. (2016). Accès et usage de l’information foncière. Cas des Plans d’Occupation et...
  • M. Edelman et al.

    Global Land Grabbing and Political Reactions ‘from Below’

    (2018)
  • J. Erk

    Iron houses in the tropical heat: decentralization reforms in Africa and their consequences

    Reg. Fed. Stud.

    (2015)
  • Fall, M. and M. Ngaido (2016). Investissements fonciers, redevabilité et cadre légal: Leçons du Sénégal. Londres, IIED:...
  • FAO, IFAD, and WFP (2015). The state of food Insecurity in the world 2015. Meeting the 2015 international hunger...
  • Faye, I.M., A. Benkahla, O. Touré, S.M. Seck, C.O. Ba (2011). Les acquisitions de terres à grande échelle au Sénégal:...
  • Faye M., Fofana M.B., Bélières J.F. (1995). Présentation de la banque de données de la SAED pour le suivi des...
  • Faye, V.M., C. Mbow, A. Thiam (2016). Évolution de l’occupation et de l’utilisation du sol entre 1973 et 2010 das la...
  • P. Gautreau

    Information environnementale et pouvoir. Une géographie politique (Habilitation à diriger des recherches)

    (2018)
  • P. Girard

    L’insertion socio-économique des jeunes ruraux comme révélateur du changement structurel en Afrique subsaharienne: la trajectoire rurale revisitée. Economies et finances

    (2020)
  • H. Godfray et al.

    Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people

    Science

    (2010)
  • GRAIN (2012). Accaparement des terres et souveraineté alimentaire en Afrique de l’Ouest et du Centre. A contre...
  • Hervouët, J-P. 1971. Les éleveurs riziculteurs du moyen delta du Sénégal : les Peuls et l'aménagement. Doctoral...
  • D. Hodgson

    Rethinking Pastoralism in Africa: Gender, Culture and the Myth of the Patriarchal Pastoralist

    (2000)
  • M. Horowitz

    Dams, cows, and vulnerable people: anthropological contributions of sustainable development

    Pak. Dev. Rev.

    (1995)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Present address: Maison de la Télédétection, 500 rue Jean François Breton, 34090, Montpellier, France

    View full text