Elsevier

Water Research

Volume 221, 1 August 2022, 118747
Water Research

Accurate identification of radicals by in-situ electron paramagnetic resonance in ultraviolet-based homogenous advanced oxidation processes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118747Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A systematic EPR method to accurately identify radicals in UV-AOPs was presented.

  • EPR method on identification of SO4· without the interference of ·OH was proposed.

  • Alkoxy and alkyl radicals produced in UV/peracetic acid system were identified.

  • Iodine-related radicals and hydrated electron in UV/IO4 system were identified.

  • Key characteristics on various DMPO-radical adducts in EPR spectrum were summarized.

Abstract

Accurate identification of radicals in advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) is important to study the mechanisms on radical production and subsequent oxidation-reduction reaction. The commonly applied radical quenching experiments cannot provide direct evidences on generation and evolution of radicals in AOPs, while electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) is a cutting-edge technology to identify radicals based on spectral characteristics. However, the complexity of EPR spectrum brings uncertainty and inconsistency to radical identification and mechanism clarification. This work presented a comprehensive study on identification of radicals by in-situ EPR analysis in four typical UV-based homogenous AOPs, including UV/H2O2, UV/peroxodisulfate (and peroxymonosulfate), UV/peracetic acid and UV/IO4 systems. Radical formation mechanism was also clarified based on EPR results. A reliable EPR method using organic solvents was proposed to identify alkoxy and alkyl radicals (CH3C(=O)OO·, CH3C(=O)O· and ·CH3) in UV/PAA system. Two activation pathways for radical production were proposed in UV/IO4 system, in which the produced IO3·, IO4·, ·OH and hydrated electron were precisely detected. It is interesting that addition of specific organic solvents can effectively identify oxygen-center and carbon-center radicals. A key parameter in EPR spectrum for 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) spin adduct, AH, is ranked as: ·CH3 (23 G) >·OH (15 G) >IO3· (12.9 G) >O2· (11 G) ≥·OOH (9–11 G) ≥IO4· (9–10 G) ≥SO4· (9–10 G) >CH3C(=O)OO· (8.5 G) > CH3C(=O)O· (7.5 G). This study will give a systematic method on identification of radicals in AOPs, and shed light on the insightful understanding of radical production mechanism.

Introduction

Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have drawn intensive attention in water treatment area for organic pollutants degradation and pathogenic microorganisms’ inactivation (Miklos et al., 2018; Sun et al., 2016). Generally, AOPs involve production of radicals with high oxidization ability for degradation/transformation of pollutants (Ike et al., 2019; Ma et al., 2021). Particularly, ultraviolet (UV)-based AOPs, such as UV/H2O2, UV/peroxodisulfate (PDS, S2O82−), UV/peroxomonosulfate (PMS, HSO5), UV/peracetic acid (PAA, CH3C(=O)OOH), UV/IO4, UV/HClO, UV/NH2Cl, etc. are most widely applied technologies due to efficient and rapid production of radicals (Ao et al., 2021; Lee et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2021). The energy input of UV can directly break the specific bonds (such as peroxy bond in H2O2, PAA, PDS and PMS), and the reaction rate constant between radicals and pollutants is extremely high (∼109 M−1 s−1), which is almost controlled by diffusion (Zhang et al., 2019b).

UV/H2O2 system is a classical UV-based AOP, in which hydroxyl radical (·OH), superoxide radical (O2·), and hydroperoxyl radical (·OOH) with strong oxidation capacity are produced (Sobańska et al., 2017). ·OH (E0 = 1.9–2.7 V vs. NHE), the most common reactive oxidation species (ROS), is a strong electrophilic radical and can attack organics through radical addition-elimination, electron transfer and hydrogen abstraction (Xu et al., 2017). O2· (E0 = 0.94 V vs. SHE) has less reactivity due to its anionic form, which tends to attack organics through single electron transfer (Krumova and Cosa, 2016). However, the protonation radical (HOO·, E0 = 1.06 V vs. SHE) has higher reaction activity and can undergo hydrogen abstraction and radical addition reactions (Iuga et al., 2012; Marino et al., 2014). UV/PDS and UV/PMS systems are typical sulfate radical (SO4·)-based AOPs, and SO4· (E0 = 2.6–3.1 V vs. NHE) has become a popular alternative of ·OH in recent years, due to its stronger oxidation ability and higher selectivity in broad pH ranges (Chen et al., 2021). UV/PAA system has drawn increasing interests in water treatment area because of the high efficiency, various radicals’ production, and low toxic by-products production (da Silva et al., 2020; Shah et al., 2015). Besides ·OH, electrophilic radicals including acetoxy radical (CH3C(=O)O·) and acetylperoxyl radical (CH3C(=O)OO·) also can be generated in this system (Ao et al., 2021). CH3C(=O)OO· is considered to be the most concentrated active species in PAA system (∼10−10 M) (Wu et al., 2020), which has a longer life and tends to attack aromatic rings with high electron density (Wu et al., 2020). CH3C(=O)O· is relatively unstable and would further undergo single molecule decay to form nucleophilic ·CH3 (Ao et al., 2021; Kim et al., 2020). In UV/IO4 system, iodine-related radicals including iodate radical (IO3·) and periodate radical (IO4·) can be produced, accompanied by ·OH (Zhang et al., 2021). IO3· and IO4· are also active oxygen-center radicals containing halogen, which are electrophilic and can selectively react with organic substrates (Tian et al., 2017).

In AOPs systems, clarification of the production-evolution mechanism, reaction activity and selectivity of radicals are important to clearly understand the subsequent reactions with target pollutants (Yang et al., 2020). Therefore, identification of radicals is a prerequisite procedure. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) is a cutting-edge technology to directly determine radicals by means of spectrum characteristics recognition (Gerson and Huber, 2003). Trapping agent, such as 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) and 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy (TEMPO), is used to convert short-lived radical into stable/metastable radical addition product, and then the radical-adduct is identified based on the hyperfine splitting from N and H nuclei on characteristic spectrum, due to the difference of polarity and electronegativity of radical groups (Brustolon and Giamello, 2009; Davies, 2016). However, there are still inconsistency in the recognition of EPR spectrum in previous studies, which causes a misleading to accurately identify the signals of radicals: (1) incorrect information recognizing on basic parameters of EPR spectrum, such as unit and plotting; (2) incorrect applied determination conditions, such as selected solvent, solution pH and trapping agent; (3) incorrect identification of radicals’ spectra due to interference by impurities signals; (4) insufficient description of radicals’ spectra with only peak shape, number or intensity ratio. Therefore, establishment of accurate measurement and identification method for radicals by using EPR is very important.

The objective of this work was to provide a comprehensive study to identify radicals in typical UV-based AOPs through in-situ EPR method, and meanwhile, clearly illustrate the possible erroneous zone in EPR test for specific AOP system. DMPO was used as a trapping agent to capture radicals in conventional and emerging UV-based AOPs, including UV/H2O2, UV/PDS (and PMS), UV/PAA, and UV/IO4. EPR experiments and EasySpin simulation in MATLAB software were used to describe the characteristics of radicals’ spectra. Moreover, the mechanisms of radicals’ formation and evolution in the UV-AOPs were also proposed. This study can provide an overall and deep insights into identification of radicals in UV-based and even universal AOP systems through EPR.

Section snippets

Radicals production in various UV-based AOPs

Chemicals used in this study are presented in Text S1 of Supplementary Data (SD). In this study, an in-situ and integrated reaction and detection instrument was established on an EMXplus-6/1 EPR spectrometer (Bruker, Germany) (Fig. 1), and the schematic diagram of this in-situ EPR experimental set-up was also presented in Fig. S1. The radicals were generated in a quartz standard sampling tube under UV light irradiation. A 254 nm low-pressure mercury lamp (CEL-LPH120-254, Beijing Zhongjiao

Radical signals recognition in EPR spectrum

As a radical trapping agent, DMPO can capture short-lived radicals and convert them to stable DMPO radical addition products (Spulber and Schlick, 2010). The radical (labeled as R·) prefers to attack the C=N bond of DMPO molecule (structure shown in Fig. S3) and add on α-C, and then the free electron will transfer to N–O group to form DMPO adduct radical (DMPO-R·) (Villamena et al., 2005).

The spectral signal of DMPO-R· detected by EPR is isotropic and has an average g factor around

Conclusion

This study presented an overall summary on identification of radicals by EPR in typical UV-based homogenous AOP systems, and carefully discussed the challenges in this area. The obtained findings can provide a reference for identification of radicals in such UV-AOPs, and even in other AOPs with similar radicals’ production. The primary and important findings are:

  • (1)

    In UV/H2O2 system, ·OOH and O2· are also produced and the roles cannot be ignored. Accurate identification of these two radicals can

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial supports from National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2021YFA1202500), National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 21906001 and 51721006), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2021M690208 and 2021M700213), and the Beijing Nova Program (Z191100001119054).

References (67)

  • I.A. Ike et al.

    Oxidation byproducts from the degradation of dissolved organic matter by advanced oxidation processes - a critical review

    Water Res.

    (2019)
  • A. Keszler et al.

    Comparative investigation of superoxide trapping by cyclic nitrone spin traps: the use of singular value decomposition and multiple linear regression analysis

    Free Radical Bio. Med.

    (2003)
  • L.-D. Liu et al.

    Catalytic activities of dissolved and Sch-immobilized Mo in H2O2 decomposition: implications for phenol oxidation under acidic conditions

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2016)
  • D. Ma et al.

    Critical review of advanced oxidation processes in organic wastewater treatment

    Chemosphere

    (2021)
  • D.B. Miklos et al.

    Evaluation of advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment - a critical review

    Water Res.

    (2018)
  • Z. Sun et al.

    Impact of humic acid on the photoreductive degradation of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) by UV/Iodide process

    Water Res.

    (2017)
  • F.-X. Tian et al.

    Phototransformation of iodate by UV irradiation: kinetics and iodinated trihalomethane formation during subsequent chlor(am)ination

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2017)
  • J. Wang et al.

    Activation of persulfate (PS) and peroxymonosulfate (PMS) and application for the degradation of emerging contaminants

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2018)
  • L. Wang et al.

    A fluorescent turn-on probe for detection of HSO4 ion based on hydrolysis of BODIPY-derived Schiff base with chromogenic and fluorogenic dual signals

    Sens. Actuators B

    (2016)
  • M.T. Westwood et al.

    Metal-, photocatalyst-, and light-free direct C–H acylation and carbamoylation of heterocycles

    Org. Lett.

    (2019)
  • W. Wu et al.

    Degradation of organic compounds by peracetic acid activated with Co3O4: a novel advanced oxidation process and organic radical contribution

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2020)
  • Z. Xu et al.

    Decomplexation of Cu(II)-EDTA by UV/persulfate and UV/H2O2: efficiency and mechanism

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2017)
  • Y. Yang et al.

    Recent advances in application of graphitic carbon nitride-based catalysts for degrading organic contaminants in water through advanced oxidation processes beyond photocatalysis: a critical review

    Water Res.

    (2020)
  • K. Yu et al.

    Mechanism and efficiency of contaminant reduction by hydrated electron in the sulfite/iodide/UV process

    Water Res.

    (2018)
  • F. Yuan et al.

    Degradation of selected pharmaceuticals in aqueous solution with UV and UV/H2O2

    Water Res.

    (2009)
  • X. Zhang et al.

    Efficiency and mechanism of 2,4-dichlorophenol degradation by the UV/IO4 process

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2021)
  • Y. Zhang et al.

    Comparison of amoxicillin photodegradation in the UV/H2O2 and UV/persulfate systems: reaction kinetics, degradation pathways, and antibacterial activity

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2019)
  • Z. Zhang et al.

    Pilot-scale evaluation of oxidant speciation, 1,4-dioxane degradation and disinfection byproduct formation during UV/hydrogen peroxide, UV/free chlorine and UV/chloramines advanced oxidation process treatment for potable reuse

    Water Res.

    (2019)
  • J. Zhou et al.

    Activate hydrogen peroxide for efficient tetracycline degradation via a facile assembled carbon-based composite: synergism of powdered activated carbon and ferroferric oxide nanocatalyst

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2020)
  • Y. Akdogan et al.

    The solvation of nitroxide radicals in ionic liquids studied by high-field EPR spectroscopy

    Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.

    (2010)
  • S. Boukhedoua et al.

    Comparative study on photooxidation of methyl orange using various UV/oxidant systems

    Int. J. Chem. React. Eng.

    (2021)
  • M. Brustolon et al.

    Electron Paramagnetic Resonance: a Practitioners Toolkit

    (2009)
  • G.R. Buettner

    On the reaction of superoxide with DMPO/*OOH

    Free Radic. Res. Commun.

    (1990)
  • Cited by (195)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text