Skip to main content
Log in

LES validation of lock-exchange density currents interacting with an emergent bluff obstacle

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We address the capability of large eddy simulation (LES) to predict the physics of density currents interacting with bluff obstacles. Most density currents of interest in engineering and geophysical applications interact with obstacles or topographic features. Validating LES solutions in these contexts is crucial to establish it as a trusted tool. We thus propose a validation effort based on simple geometries that nonetheless pose challenges common to more complex systems, including boundary layer separation and convective instabilities. We focus on lock-exchange gravity currents in the slumping phase interacting with an emergent vertical circular cylinder. Our main investment was in ensuring that the comparison of experimental data and numerical results include, at least, the velocity and the density fields , and derived quantities (e.g., second order moments). Measurements of both density and velocity fields were performed in the side and plan views for cylinder Reynolds numbers, \(Re_d\), in the range 1300 to 3475. It was found that the LES accurately predicts the temporal evolution of the current front position. The computed front velocity exhibits a maximum relative error less than 8%. A good agreement between the LES and the experimental size and shape of the current head, and billows was found. The overall features upstream the cylinder, including a reflected wave, adverse pressure gradient and backflow, and downstream the cylinder, including the backflow, wake and the formation of a new head are well reproduced by LES. The agreement between the LES and the experimental time-space evolution of current spanwise- and depth-averaged density contours and the instantaneous velocity fields are not affected by \(Re_d\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adduce C, Sciortino G, Proietti S (2012) Gravity currents produced by lock exchanges: experiments and simulations with a two-layer shallow-water model with entrainment. J Hydraul Eng 138:111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bardoel SL, Horna Muñoz DV, Grachev AA, Krishnamurthy R, Chamorro LP, Fernando HJS (2021) Fog formation related to gravity currents interacting with coastal topography. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 181(2–3):499–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-021-00638-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhaganagar K (2017) Role of head of turbulent 3-d density currents in mixing during slumping regime. Phys Fluids 29:020703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhaganagar K, Pillalamarri NR (2017) Lock-exchange release density currents over three-dimensional regular roughness elements. J Fluid Mech 832:793–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bombardelli FA, Cantero MI, Garcia MH, Buscaglia GC (2009) Numerical aspects of the simulation of discontinuous saline underflows: the lock-exchange problem. J Hydraul Res 47:777–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boussinesq J (1903) Theorie analytique de la chaleur, vol 2. Gauthier-Villars, Paris

  7. Brito M, Sanches P, Ferreira RML, Covas DIC (2017) Experimental study of the transient flow in a coiled pipe using PIV. J Hydraul Eng 143:04016087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cantero MI, Lee JR, Balachandar S, Garcia MH (2007) On the front velocity of gravity currents. J Fluid Mech 586:1–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cenedese C, Nokes R, Hyatt J (2016) Lock-exchange gravity currents over rough bottoms. Environ Fluid Mech 18:59–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cenedese C, Nokes R, Hyatt J (2018) Lock-exchange gravity currents over rough bottoms. Environ Fluid Mech 18:59–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Constantinescu G (2013) LES of lock-exchange compositional gravity currents: a brief review of some recent results. Environ Fluid Mech 14:295–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Daviero GJ, Roberts PJW, Maile K (2001) Refractive index matching in large-scale stratified experiments. Exp Fluids 31:119–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ermanyuk EV, Gavrilov NV (2005) Interaction of an internal gravity current with a submerged circular cylinder. J Appl Mech Tech Phys 46:216–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ermanyuk EV, Gavrilov NV (2005) Interaction of internal gravity current with an obstacle on the channel bottom. J Appl Mech Tech Phys 46:489–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Farias R (2020) Caracterização experimental da interacção de correntes de densidade com um cilindro. Master’s thesis MSc. Thesis, NOVA School of Science and Technology—FCT NOVA

  16. Ferreira RM (2011) Turbulent flow hydrodynamics and sediment transport: laboratory research with lda and piv. In: Experimental methods in hydraulic research. Springer, pp 67–111

  17. Fragoso AT, Patterson MD, Wettlaufer JS (2013) Mixing in gravity currents. J Fluid Mech 734

  18. Gonzalez-Juez E, Meiburg E, Constantinescu G (2009) Gravity currents impinging on bottom-mounted square cylinders: flow fields and associated forces. J Fluid Mech 631:65–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gonzalez-Juez E, Meiburg E, Constantinescu G (2009) The interaction of a gravity current with a circular cylinder mounted above a wall: Effect of the gap size. J Fluids Struct 25:629–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gonzalez-Juez E, Meiburg E, Tokyay T, Constantinescuand G (2010) Gravity current flow past a circular cylinder: forces, wall shear stresses and implications for scour. J Fluid Mech 649:69–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hacker J, Linden P, Dalziel S (1996) Mixing in lock-release gravity currents. Dyn Atmos Oceans 24:183–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Huppert HE, Simpson JE (1980) The slumping of gravity currents. J Fluid Mech 99:785–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Issa R (1986) Solution of the implicitly discretised fluid flow equations by operator-splitting 62:40–65

  24. Lollo GD (2021) Gravity currents interacting with an emergent obstacle. Master’s thesis MSc. Thesis, Università Roma Tre

  25. Mahdinia M, Firoozabadi B, Farshchi M, Varnamkhasti AG, Afshin H (2012) Large eddy simulation of lock-exchange flow in a curved channel. J Hydraul Eng 138:57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mariono BM, Thomas LP, Linden PF (2005) The front condition for gravity currents. J Fluid Mech 536:49–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Meiburg E, Radhakrishnan S, Nasr-Azadani M (2015) Modeling gravity and turbidity currents: computational approaches and challenges. Appl Mech Rev 67

  28. Ooi SK, Constantinescu G, Weber L (2007) A numerical study of intrusive compositional gravity currents. Phys Fluids 19:076602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ottolenghi L, Adduce C, Inghilesi R, Armenio V, Roman F (2016) Entrainment and mixing in unsteady gravity currents. J Hydraul Res 54:541–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ozan AY, Constantinescu G, Hogg AJ (2015) Lock-exchange gravity currents propagating in a channel containing an array of obstacles. J Fluid Mech 765:544–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pelmard J, Norris S, Friedrich H (2018) LES grid resolution requirements for the modelling of gravity currents. Comput Fluids 174:256–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pereira FS, Eça L, Vaz G, Girimaji SS (2021) Toward predictive RANS and SRS computations of turbulent external flows of practical interest 28:3953–4029

  33. Ramos JP (2021) Experimental characterization of liquid-liquid stratified flow interacting with vertical emergent cylinders. Master’s thesis MSc. Thesis, NOVA School of Science and Technology—FCT NOVA

  34. Ricardo AM, Koll K, Franca MJ, Schleiss AJ, Ferreira RM (2014) The terms of turbulent kinetic energy budget within random arrays of emergent cylinders. Water Resour Res 50:4131–4148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rocca ML, Adduce C, Sciortino G, Pinzon AB (2008) Experimental and numerical simulation of three-dimensional gravity currents on smooth and rough bottom. Phys Fluids 20:106603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sher D, Woods AW (2015) Gravity currents: entrainment, stratification and self-similarity. J Fluid Mech 784:130–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Simpson JE (1997) Gravity currents in the environment and the laboratory. Cambridge University Press

  38. Smagorinsky J (1963) General circulation experiments with the primitive equations i. The basic experiment. Mon Weather Rev 91:99–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Solis GN (2018) Gravity currents propagating over and within a porous bed. Master’s thesis MSc. Thesis, Università Roma Tre

  40. Tokyay T, Constantinescu G, Gonzalez-Juez E, Meiburg E (2011) Gravity currents propagating over periodic arrays of blunt obstacles: effect of the obstacle size. J Fluids Struct 27:798–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tokyay T, Constantinescu G, Meiburg E (2012) Tail structure and bed friction velocity distribution of gravity currents propagating over an array of obstacles. J Fluid Mech 694:252–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. van Leer B (1979) Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. v. a second-order sequel to godunov’s method 32:101–136

  43. van Sommeren DDJA, Caulfield CP, Woods AW (2012) Turbulent buoyant convection from a maintained source of buoyancy in a narrow vertical tank. J Fluid Mech 701:278–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhou J, Cenedese C, Williams T, Ball M, Venayagamoorthy SK, Nokes RI (2017) On the propagation of gravity currents over and through a submerged array of circular cylinders. J Fluid Mech 831:394–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by national funds through Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) project PTDC/CTA-OHR/30561/2017 (WinTherface).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Brito.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brito, M., Ferreira, R.M.L., Sousa, A. et al. LES validation of lock-exchange density currents interacting with an emergent bluff obstacle. Environ Fluid Mech 22, 1055–1079 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-022-09878-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-022-09878-x

Keywords

Navigation