Abstract
To balance the risks and benefits of fish consumption, selenium, fatty acids (DHA + EPA), and mercury in fishery products were determined. Analyzed products were canned tuna, frozen tuna (Thunnus albacares), smoked striped marlin (Tetrapturus audax), fresh Pacific sierra (Scomberomorus sierra), fresh dolphinfish (Coryphaena hippurus), fresh tilapia (Gerres cinereus), and fresh bullseye puffer (Sphoeroides annulatus). Mercury (μg g−1 wet weight) ranged from 0.01 (dolphinfish) to 0.23 (bullseye puffer); Se ranged from 0.12 to 0.25. EPA + DHA ranged from 1.16 to 10.72 mg g−1. Intake of EPA + DHA was comparable or above the recommended daily intake; Hg intake was below the reference dose but Se intake was below than recommended values for the different population groups. Considering the HBVSe, fishery products had positive values; i.e., they are healthy food items. According to the interaction of Hg and Se and the rate of fishery product consumption, the risk for consumers is below one percent.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams DH (2004) Total mercury levels in tunas from offshore waters of the Florida Atlantic coast. Mar Pollut Bull 49(7–8):659–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.06.005
AHANC (2009) Diet and lifestyle recommendations revision 2006: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Nutrition Committee. Circulation 114:82–96. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.176158
Axelrad DA, Bellinger DC, Ryan LM, Woodruff TJ (2007) Dose-response relationship of prenatal mercury exposure and IQ: an integrative analysis of epidemiologic data. Environ Health Perspect 115:609–615. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9303
Bergés-Tiznado ME, Márquez-Farías JF, Osuna-Martínez CC, Torres-Rojas YE, Galván-Magaña F, Páez-Osuna F (2019) Patterns of mercury and selenium in tissues and stomach contents of the dolphinfish Coryphaena hippurus from the SE Gulf of California, Mexico: concentrations, biomagnification and dietary intake. Mar Pollut Bull 138:84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.11.023
Bodin N, Lesperance D, Albert R, Hollanda S, Michaud P, Degroote M, Churlaud C, Bustamante P (2017) Trace elements in oceanic pelagic communities in the western Indian Ocean. Chemosphere 174:354–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.099
Burger J, Gochfeld M (2012) Selenium and mercury molar ratios in saltwater fish from New Jersey: individual and species variability complicate use in human health fish consumption advisories. Environ Res 114:12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2012.02.004
Burger J, Jeitner C, Gochfeld M (2011) Locational differences in mercury and selenium levels in 19 species of saltwater fish from New Jersey. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A 74:63–874. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2011.570231
Cai Y, Rooker JR, Gill GA, Turner JP (2007) Bioaccumulation of mercury in pelagic fishes from the northern Gulf of Mexico. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 64(3):458–469. https://doi.org/10.1139/f07-017
Calon F, Cole G (2007) Neuroprotective action of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids against neurodegenerative diseases: evidence from animal studies. Prostaglandins Leuko Essent Fat Acids 77(5–6):287–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plefa.2007.10.019
Cantoral A, Batis C, Basu N (2018) National estimation of seafood consumption in Mexico: implications for exposure to methylmercury and polyunsaturated fatty acids. Chemosphere 174:289–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.109
Cardoso C, Bandarra N, Lourenço H, Afonso C, Nunes E (2010) Methylmercury risks and EPA + DHA benefits associated with seafood consumption in Europe. Risk Anal 30:827–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01409.x
Chasteen TG (2000) Hydride generation atomic absorption spectroscopy. Sam Houston State University, Huntsville
Cheng H, Hu Y (2012) Understanding the paradox of mercury pollution in China: high concentrations in environmental matrix yet low levels in fish on the market. Environ Sci Tech 46:4695–4696. https://doi.org/10.1021/es3013744
Clarkson TW (2002) The three modern faces of mercury. Environ Health Perspect 110:11–23. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.02110s111
Cohen JT, Bellinger DC, Shaywitz BA (2005) A quantitative analysis of prenatal methyl mercury exposure and cognitive development. Am J Prev Med 29(4):353–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.06.007
CONAPESCA (2018) Anuario estadístico de acuacultura y pesca. Comisión Nacional de Acuacultura y Pesca. Impreso en México. Available from: https://nube.conapesca.gob.mx/sites/cona/dgppe/2018/ANUARIO_2018.pdf
Diaz-Alarcon JP, Navarro-Alarcon M, Lopez-Garcia de la Serrana H, Lopez-Martinez MC (1994) Determination of selenium levels in vegetables and fruits by hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry. J Agric Food Chem 42(12):2848–2851. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00048a036
Domingo JL, Bocio A, Falcó G, Llobet JM (2007) Benefits and risks of fish consumption Part I. A quantitative analysis of the intake of omega-3 fatty acids and chemical contaminants. Toxicology 230:219–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2006.11.054
Dong Z, Jim RC, Hatley EL, Backus AS, Shine JP, Spengler JD, Schaider LA (2015) A longitudinal study of mercury exposure associated with consumption of freshwater fish from a reservoir in rural south central USA. Environ Res 136:155–162
Downs SG, Macloed CL, Lester JN (1998) Mercury in precipitation and its relation to bioaccumulation in fish: a literature review. J Water Air Soil Pollut 108:149–187. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005023916816
EFSA (2012) Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and docosapentaenoic acid (DPA). Eur Food Saf Auth EFSA J 10:2815. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2815
Esteban M, Schindler BK, Jiménez-Guerrero JA, Koch HG, Angerer J, Rivas TC, Rosado M, Gómez S, Casteleyn L, Kolossa-Gehring M et al (2015) Mercury analysis in hair: comparability and quality assessment within the transnational COPHES/DEMOCOPHES project. Environ Res 141:24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2014.11.014
Fang GC, Nam DH, Basu N (2011) Mercury and selenium content of Taiwanese seafood. Food Add Contam Part B 4(3):212–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/19393210.2011.605526
FAO. 2018. El estado mundial de la pesca y la acuicultura 2018. Cumplir los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible. Roma. Licencia: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Available from: https://www.fao.org/documents/card/es/c/I9540ES/
FAO/WHO (2011) Report of the joint FAO/WHO expert consultation on the risk and benefits of fish consumption. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, p 50
FDA (1997) Food and drug administration. Federal register 62(108):6. 62 FR 30751
Folch J, Lees M, Stanley GH (1957) A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 226:497–509
Freije A, Awadh M (2009) Total and methylmercury intake associated with fish consumption in Bahrain. Water Environ J 23(2):155–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-6593.2008.00129.x
García-Hernández J, Ortega-Vélez MI, Contreras Paniagua AD, Aguilera-Márquez D, Leyva-García G, Torre J (2018) Mercury concentrations in seafood and the associated risk in women with high fish consumption from coastal villages of Sonora, Mexico. Food Chem Toxicol 120:367–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2018.07.029
García-Hernández J, Ortega MI, Contreras-Paniagua AD et al (2013) Community-based monitoring of pollutants in the Gulf of California. Final Technical Report. For: North American Partnership for Environmental Community Action (NAPECA). p 56
Ginsberg GL, Toal BF (2009) Quantitative approach for incorporating methylmercury risks and omega-3 fatty acid benefits in developing species-specific fish consumption advice. Environ Health Perspect 117:267–275. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.11368
Gochfeld M, Burger J, Jeitner C, Donio M, Pittfield T (2012) Seasonal, locational and size variations in mercury and selenium levels in striped bass (Morone saxatilis) from New Jersey. Environ Res 112:8–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2011.12.007
Goldhaber SB (2003) Trace element risk assessment: essentiality vs. toxicity. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 38:232–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-2300(02)00020-X
Grgec AS, Kljaković-Gašpić Z, Orct T, Tičina V, Sekovanić A, Jurasović J, Piasek M (2020) Mercury and selenium in fish from the eastern part of the Adriatic Sea: a risk-benefit assessment in vulnerable population groups. Chemosphere 261:127742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127742
Harada Y (1968) Congenital (or fetal) Minamata disease. Minamata Dis: 93–108
Hollman EL, Newman MC (2012) Expanding perceptions of subsistence fish consumption: evidence of high commercial fish consumption and dietary mercury exposure in an urban coastal community. Sci Total Environ 416:111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.10.003
Institute of Medicine (2000) Dietary reference intakes for vitamin C, vitamin E, selenium and carotenoids. The National Academic Press, Washington
Janz DM (2011) 7-selenium. In: Chris M, Wood APF, Colin JB (eds) Fish physiology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 327–374
Jeevanaraj P, Hashim Z, Elias SM, Aris AZ (2016) Mercury accumulation in marine fish most favoured by Malaysian women, the predictors and the potential health risk. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:23714–23729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7402-x
Kaneko JJ, Ralston NV (2007) Selenium and mercury in pelagic fish in the central north Pacific near Hawaii. Biol Trace Elem Res 119:242–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-007-8004-8
Karjalainen AK, Hallokainen A, Hirvonen T, Kiviranta H, Knip M, Kronberg-Kippila C, Leino O, Sinkko H, Tuomisto JT, Veijola R et al (2013) Estimated intake levels for Finnish children of methylmercury from fish. Food Chem Toxicol 54:70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2012.02.074
Khan MAK, Wang F (2009) Mercury-selenium compounds and their toxicological significance: toward a molecular understanding of the mercury-selenium antagonism. Environ Toxicol Chem 28:1567–1577. https://doi.org/10.1897/08-375.1
Kris-Etherton PM, Harris WS, Appel LJ (2002) Fish consumption, fish oil, omega-3 fatty acids, and cardiovascular disease. For the Nutrition Committee AHA scientific statement. Circulation 106:2747–2757. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000038493.65177.94
Lederman SA, Jones RL, Caldwell KL, Rauh V, Sheets SE, Tang D, Viswanathan S, Becker M, Stein JL, Wang RY et al (2008) Relation between cord blood mercury levels and early child development in a World Trade Center cohort. Environ Health Perspect 116:1085–1091. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10831
McDowell MA, Dillon CF, Osterloh J, Bolger PM, Pellizzari E, Fernando R, Montes de Oca R, Schober SE, Sinks T, Jones RL et al (2004) Hair mercury levels in US children and women of childbearing age: reference range data from NHANES 1999–2000. Environ Health Perspect 112:1165–1171. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7046
MESL (1997) Standard operating procedures. International Atomic Energy Agency, Monaco
Mozaffarian D, Rimm EB (2006) Fish intake, contaminants, and human health: evaluating the risks and the benefits. JAMA 296(15):1885–1899. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.15.1885
Murillo E, Rao KS, Durant AA (2014) The lipid content and fatty acid composition of four eastern central Pacific native fish species. J Food Compos Anal 33:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2013.08.007
NAS (2000) Toxicological effects of methylmercury. National Academy Press, Washington, p 368
Norma Official Mexicana (2009) NOM-242-SSA1–2009, Productos y servicios. Productos de la pesca frescos, refrigerados, congelados y procesados. Especificaciones sanitarias y métodos de prueba. Available from: https://www.dof.gob.mx/normasOficiales/3980/salud/salud.htm
Oken E, Wright RO, Kleinman KP, Bellinger D, Amarasiriwardena CJ, Hu H, Rich-Edwards JW, Gillman MW (2005) Maternal fish consumption, hair mercury and infant cognition in a US cohort. Environ Health Perspect 113:1376–1380. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8041
Oken E, Radesky JS, Wright RO, Bellinger DC, Amarasiriwardena CJ, Kleinman KP, Hu H, Gillman MW (2008) Maternal fish intake during pregnancy, blood mercury levels, and child cognition at age 3 years in a US cohort. Am J Epidem 167:1171–1181. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn034
Oken E, Rifas-Shiman SL, Amarasiriwardena C, Jayawardene I, Bellinger DC, Hibbeln JR, Gillman MW (2016) Maternal prenatal fish consumption and cognition in mid childhood: mercury, fatty acids, and selenium. Neurotoxicol Teratol 57:71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ntt.2016.07.001
Ordiano-Flores A, Rosíles-Martínez R, Galván-Magaña F (2012) Biomagnification of mercury and its antagonistic interaction with selenium in yellowfin tuna Thunnus albacares in the trophic web of Baja California Sur, Mexico. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 86:182–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.09.014
Ortega MI, Quizán T, Morales GG et al (1999) Cálculo de ingestión dietaria y coeficientes de adecuación a partir de registro de 24 horas y frecuencia de consumo de alimentos [Food consumption and diet adequation analysis: 24 hour-recall and food frequency questionnaires]. Ser Eval Consumo Aliment 1:1–48
Parizek J, Ostadalova I (1967) The protective effect of small amounts of selenite in sublimate intoxication. Experientia 23:142–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02135970
Penglase S, Hamre K, Ellingsen S (2014) Selenium and mercury have a synergistic negative effect on fish reproduction. Aquat Toxicol 149:16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2014.01.020
Polak-Juszczak L (2015) Selenium and mercury molar ratios in commercial fish from the Baltic Sea: additional risk assessment criterion for mercury exposure. Food Control 50:881–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.10.046
PROFECO (2019) Revista del consumidor. Num 505. p 38. Available from: https://www.gob.mx/profeco/documentos/revista-del-consumidor-2019?state=published
Ralston NVC (2008) Selenium health benefit values as seafood safety criteria. Eco Health 5:442–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-008-0202-0
Ralston NVC, Raymond LJ (2010) Dietary selenium’s protective effects against methylmercury toxicity. J Toxicol 278:112–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2010.06.004
Ralston CR, Blackwell JL III, Ralston NVC (2006) Effects of dietary selenium and mercury on house crickets (Acheta domesticus L.): implications of environmental co-exposures. Environ Bioind 1:98–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/15555270600605436
Ralston NVC, Ralston CR, Raymond LJ (2016) Selenium health benefit values: updated criteria for mercury risk assessments. Biol Trace Elem Res 171:262–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-015-0516-z
Raymond LJ, Ralston NVC (2009) Selenium´s importance in regulation issues regarding mercury. Fuel Process Technol 90:1333–1338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.07.012
Ruelas-Inzunza J, Meza-López G, Páez-Osuna F (2008) Mercury in fish that are of dietary importance from the coasts of Sinaloa (SE Gulf of California). J Food Compos Anal 21:211–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2007.11.004
Ruelas-Inzunza J, Patiño-Mejía C, Soto-Jiménez M, Barba-Quintero G, Spanopoulos-Hernández M (2011) Total mercury in canned yellowfin tuna Thunnus albacares marketed in northwest Mexico. Food Chem Toxicol 49(12):3070–3073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2011.07.030
Ruelas-Inzunza J, Šlejkovec Z, Mazej D, Fajon V, Horvat M, Ramos-Osuna M (2018) Bioaccumulation of As, Hg, and Se in tunas Thunnus albacares and Katsuwonus pelamis from the Eastern Pacific: tissue distribution and As speciation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(20):19499–19509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2166-0
Sellanes AG, Mársico ET, Santos NN, Sao Clemente SC, Oliveira GA, Monteiro AB (2002) Mercury in marine fish. Acta Sci Vet 30:107–112
Sheehan MC, Burke TA, Navas-Acien A, Breysse PN, McGready J, Fox MA (2014) Global methylmercury exposure from seafood consumption and risk of developmental neurotoxicity: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ 92:254-269F. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.12.116152
Sidhu KS (2003) Health benefits and potential risks related to consumption of fish or fish oil. Reg Toxicol Pharmacol 38:336–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2003.07.002
Sobhanardakani S (2017) Tuna fish and common kilka: health risk assessment of metal pollution through consumption of canned fish in Iran. J Consum Prot Food Saf 12(2):157–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00003-017-1107-z
Uauy R, Hoffman DR, Mena P, Llanos A, Birch EE (2003) Term infant studies of DHA and ARA supplementation on neurodevelopment: results of randomized controlled trials. J Pediatr 143(4):17–25. https://doi.org/10.1067/S0022-3476(03)00398-6
US EPA (2000) Guidance for Assessing chemical contaminant data for user in fish advisories, vol 2. Risk assessment and fish consumption limits third edition. United States Environmental Protection Agency. EPA 823-B-00–008
US EPA (2001) Risk assessment guidance for superfund: volume III-Part A, Process for conducting probabilistic risk assessment. Chapter 3 using probabilistic analysis in human health assessment. United States Environmental Protection Agency. EPA 540-R-02-002 OSWER 9285.7-45 PB2002 963302
Valent F, Mariuz M, Bin M, Little DA, Mazej D, Tognin V, Tratnik J, McAfee AJ, Mulhern MS, Parpinel M et al (2013) Associations of prenatal mercury exposure from maternal fish consumption and polyunsaturated fatty acids with child neurodevelopment: a prospective cohort study in Italy. J Epidemiol 23(5):360–370. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20120168
Vega-Sánchez B, Ortega-García S, Ruelas-Inzunza J, Frías-Espericueta MG, Escobar-Sánchez O, Jara-Marini ME (2020) Selenium and mercury in dolphinfish (Coryphaena hippurus) from the Gulf of California: inter-annual variations and selenium health benefit value. Environ Sci Pollu Res 27(2):2311–2318
Vinchira JE, Muñoz-Ramírez AP (2010) Selenio: nutriente objetivo para mejorar la composición nutricional del pescado cultivado. Rev Fac Med Vet Zootec 57(1):59–75
Visentainer JV, D’Addio-Noffs M, De Oliveira-Carvalho P, De Almeida VV, De Oliveira CC, De Souza NE (2007) Lipid content and fatty acid composition of marine fish species from the southeast coast of Brazil. J Am Oil Chem Soc 84:543–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-007-1070-4
WHO (1987) Selenium. A report of the international programme on chemical safety. Environmental health criteria number 58 (Geneva). World Health Organization
Yang D-Y, Chen Y-W, Gunn JM, Belzile N (2008) Selenium and mercury in organisms: interactions and mechanisms. Environ Rev 16:71–92. https://doi.org/10.1139/A08-001
Yavin E, Glozman S, Green P (2001) Docosahexaenoic acid sources for the developing brain during intrauterine life. Nutr Health 15:219–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/026010600101500411
Young G, Conquer J (2005) Omega-3 fatty acids and neuropsychiatric disorders. Rep Nutr Dev 45:1–28. https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2005001
Zamora-Arellano N, Ruelas-Inzunza J, García-Hernández J, Ilizaliturri-Hernández CA, Betancourt-Lozano M (2017) Linking fish consumption patterns and health risk assessment of mercury exposure in a coastal community of NW Mexico. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 23(6):1505–1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2017.1329622
Zamora-Arellano NY, Betancourt-Lozano M, Ilizaliturri-Hernández C, García-Hernández J, Jara-Marini M, Chávez-Sánchez C, Ruelas-Inzunza J (2018) Mercury levels and risk implications through fish consumption in Sinaloa coasts (Gulf of California, Northwest Mexico). Risk Anal 38(12):2646–2658. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13185
Zhang H, Feng X, Chan HM, Larssen T (2014) New insights into traditional health risk assessments of mercury exposure: implications of selenium. Environ Sci Technol 48:1206–1212. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4051082
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge laboratory support by Migdalia Sarahy Navidad and Gabriela Aguilar Zárate.
Funding
This work was supported by the Ministry of Public Education of Mexico under grant number 7596.20-P.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zamora-Arellano, N.Y., Betancourt-Lozano, M., Ruelas-Inzunza, J. et al. Risk and Benefit Analysis of Fish Consumption in NW Mexico: Mercury, Selenium, and Fatty Acids. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 83, 36–46 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-022-00939-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-022-00939-2