Skip to main content
Log in

Why and when is implicit racial bias linked to abusive supervision? The impact of manager racial microaggressions and individualized consideration

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We explore whether abusive supervision may occur more in mixed-race supervisor-subordinate dyads. Specifically, our model tests whether, in mixed-race dyads, a manager’s implicit racial bias may be associated with racial microaggressions, and, subsequently, subordinates’ perceptions of the degree to which that manager is an abusive supervisor. Social identity theory supports the why of these predictions. We also test when it may be possible for some managers to overcome their racial biases—by engaging in behaviors reflective of viewing their subordinates as individuals, rather than members of another race, via individuation theory. In this vein, we investigate a way in which race-based mistreatment and abusive supervision may be mitigated. We tested our predictions in 137 manager-employee dyads in two chemical manufacturing firms in South Africa. We found a positive relationship between manager implicit racial bias and abusive supervision, and that this relationship is lessened by individualized consideration–a moderator of the mediated effect of manager racial microaggressions on bias and abuse. Thus, our hypotheses were supported. We conclude with implications for victimized employees, and possible strategies to combat race-based aggression for organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Available

Notes

  1. In line with the terminology used in the South African Employment Equity Act, Act 55 of 1998, the term “colored” is used in this paper as a general depiction of people of mixed European (“white”) and African (“black”) or Asian descent (Adams et al., 2012).

  2. Copyright © 1995 by Bernard Bass & Bruce J. Avolio. All rights reserved in all media. Published by Mind Garden, Inc. www.mindgarden.com.

References

Download references

Funding

This study was supported in part by the National Research Foundation of South Africa, Grant Number 110835.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carin Bergh.

Ethics declarations

This study was done as partial fulfilment of the first author's Ph.D. in Industrial and Organizational Psychology at the University of Pretoria, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent to publish

The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the research.

Conflict of interest/Competing interests

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (SAV 210 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bergh, C., Hoobler, J.M. Why and when is implicit racial bias linked to abusive supervision? The impact of manager racial microaggressions and individualized consideration. Curr Psychol 42, 22036–22049 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03292-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03292-8

Keywords

Navigation