Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Types of domestic violence in Pakistan: Elaborating on Johnson’s typology

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose

The present study applies Johnson’s (2008) typology of intimate partner violence (IPV) to female survivors in Karachi, Pakistan.

Method

Face-to-face structured interviews of a purposive sample of 80 ever-married survivors of IPV, followed by a cluster analysis of husbands’ controlling behaviors to identify types of IPV, followed by quantitative exploration of differences among the types.

Results

The first type identified by a Ward’s method cluster analysis is situational couple violence (SCV), comprising 29 respondents whose husbands exhibited low levels of control for all items. The second type is intimate terrorism (IT), comprising 15 respondents experiencing high levels of control on most items. The third type, unique to this study, is labeled as familial intimate terrorism (FIT) and consists of 36 respondents whose husbands were not quite as controlling as IT, not particularly jealous or sexually cruel, but more likely than IT to use control tactics that were based in the joint family system.

Conclusions

The Johnson control typology does, indeed, apply to intimate partner violence in Pakistan, with the important addition of a third type of male violence, rooted in the joint family system that is prevalent in many countries around the world. In future research, it would be important to include a sample of non-violent couples for comparison, especially important in cultures in which the joint family system authorizes considerable “normal” control over women. Although we have assumed that the newly-identified type (familial intimate terrorism) involves men (and sometimes their families) abusing the norms of this system, further exploration of this issue is necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 17 June 2022

    The original version of this paper was updated due to the footnotes under Table 3 and under Table 5 are repeated 5 times, and one under Table 1 is repeated twice.

References

  • Ali, P. A., Dhingra, K., & McGarry, J. (2016, Nov - Dec). A literature review of intimate partner violence and its classifications. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 31, 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, P. A., Naylor, P. B., Croot, E., & O’Cathain, A. (2015, Jul). Intimate partner violence in Pakistan: A systematic review. Trauma Violence & Abuse, 16(3), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014526065

  • Ali, T. S., & Bustamante-Gavino, I. (2007). Prevalence of and reasons for domestic violence among women from low socioeconomic communities of Karachi. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 13(6), 1417–1426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amir-Ud-Din, R. (2019). Domestic violence -- the way out [https://www.thenews.com.pk/tns/detail/568734-domestic-violence-way].The News on Sunday

  • Ansara, D. L., & Hindin, M. J. (2010). Exploring gender differences in the patterns of intimate partner violence in Canada: A latent class approach. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 64, 849–854

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhasin, K. (2004). What Is Patriarchy? Gender Basics. Kali/Women Unlimited

  • Briere, J., & Runtz, M. (1989). The trauma symptom checklist (TSC-33): Early data on a new scale. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4, 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626089004002002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cater, Å. K., & Sjögren, J. (2016). Children exposed to intimate partner violence describe their experiences: A typology-based qualitative analysis. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 33, 473–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-016-0443-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (Eds.). (1998). Rethinking Violence Against Women. Sage

  • Frye, V., Manganello, J., Campbell, J. C., Walton-Moss, B., & Wilt, S. (2006, October). The distribution of and factors associated with intimate terrorism and situational couple violence among a population-based sample of urban women in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21(10), 1286–1313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260506291658

  • Graham-Kevan, N., & Archer, J. (2003, November). Intimate terrorism and common couple violence: A test of Johnson’s predictions in four British samples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(11), 1247–1270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260503256656

  • Hadi, A. (2017). May-August). Patriarchy and gender-based violence in Pakistan. European Journal of Social Sciences, 4(4), 289–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardesty, J. L., Crossman, K. A., Haselschwerdt, M. L., Raffaelli, M., Ogolsky, B. G., & Johnson, M. P. (2015, August). Toward a standard approach to operationalizing coercive control and classifying violence types. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(4), 833–843. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12201

  • Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Meehan, J. C. (2004, Dec). Typologies of men who are maritally violent: Scientific and clinical implications. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(12), 1369–1389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260504269693

  • Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Meehan, J. C., Herron, K., Rehman, U., & Stuart, G. L. (2000). December). Testing the Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994) batterer typology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(6), 1000–1019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (2013). State of Human Rights in 2012

  • Hussain, H., Hussain, S., Zahra, S., & Hussain, T. (2020). May-June). Prevalence and risk factors of domestic violence and its impacts on women’s mental health in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36(4), 627–631. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.4.1530

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Images (2019). March 7, 2019). The Aurat March challenges misogyny in our homes, workplaces and society, say organisers ahead of Women’s Day Retrieved March 11, 2022 from https://images.dawn.com/news/1181993

  • Jackman, M. R. (1994). The Velvet Glove: Paternalism and Conflict in Gender, Class, and Race Relations. University of California Press

  • Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M. (1998). When Men Batter Women: New Insights into Ending Abusive Relationships. Simon & Schuster

  • Johnson, M. P. (2008). A Typology of Domestic Violence: Intimate Terrorism, Violent Resistance, and Situational Couple Violence. Northeastern University Press. http://www.upne.com/1-55553-693-X.html

  • Johnson, M. P., Leone, J. M., & Xu, Y. (2014, February). Intimate terrorism and situational couple violence in general surveys: Ex-spouses required. Violence Against Women, 20(2), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801214521324

  • Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender & Society, 2(3), 274–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A. J., Ali, T. S., & Khuwaja, A. K. (2009). Domestic violence among Pakistani women: an insight into literature. ISRA Medical Journal, 1(2), 54–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Nawaz, B. (2014). Understanding Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Through Control Tactics: A Sociological Study of Women’s Experiences From Pakistan. [dissertation, University Of Karachi]

  • Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education Groups for Men Who Batter: The Duluth Model. Springer

  • Shaheed, F. (1991). The cultural articulation of patriarchy. In F. Zafar (Ed.), Finding Our Way (pp. 135–158). ASR

  • Spanier, G. B. (1976, February). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/350547

  • Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (Eds.). (1990). Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptations to Violence in 8,145 Families. Transaction Press

  • Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996, May). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) - Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251396017003001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, R. M. (1999). The validation of the Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory. Violence and Victims, 14(1), 25–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Truman, J. L., & Morgan, R. E. (2014). Nonfatal Domestic Violence, 2003–2012. U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (NCJ 24469)

  • Weiss, A. M. (2014). Interpreting Islam, modernity, and women’s rights in Pakistan. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137389008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winstok, Z. (2013). Partner Violence: A New Paradigm For Understanding Conflict Escalation. Springer

  • World Health Organization (2017). Violence against women: Key facts. Retrieved September 18 from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women

  • Zia, A. S. (2019). Faith and Feminism in Pakistan: Religious Agency or Secular Autonomy?. Sussex Academic Press

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael P. Johnson.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nawaz, B., Johnson, M.P. Types of domestic violence in Pakistan: Elaborating on Johnson’s typology. J Fam Viol 39, 133–141 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00420-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00420-7

Keywords

Navigation