Abstract
We study on the recent research work of two flavor magnetized PNJL model incorporating finite chemical potential in the thermal mass and in the interaction potential of Lagrangian density. The equation of state (EOS) and its corresponding thermodynamic properties after introducing the finite chemical potential in the thermal mass and potential are shown in the results. The results show that the EOS and thermodynamic relations are found to be similar pattern and enhanced results from the earlier results of EOS and thermodynamic relations of zero chemical potential. It indicates that there is effect of finite chemical potential in the outputs of EOS and the thermodynamic relations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
D. P. Menezes, M. B. Pinto, S. S. Avancini, and C. Providência, “Quark matter under strong magnetic fields in the \({\text{SU}}(3)\) Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model,” Phys. Rev. C 80, 065805 (2009).
G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrődi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, A. Schäfer, and K. K. Szabó, “The QCD phase diagram for external magnetic fields,” J. High Energy Phys. 2, 44 (2012) .
K. Fukushima, M. Ruggieri, and R. Gatto, “Chiral magnetic effect in the Polyakov–Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model,” Phys Rev D 81, 114031 (2010).
S. Rößner, T. Hell, C. Ratti, and W. Weise, “The chiral and deconfinement crossover transitions: PNJL model beyond mean field,” Nucl. Phys. A 814, 118–143 (2008).
P. Costa, C. A. de Sousa, M. C. Ruivo, and Yu. L. Kalinovsky, “The QCD critical end point in the SU(3) Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model,” Phys. Lett. B 647, 431–435 (2007).
A. Dahiya and S. S. Singh, “Equation of state of PNJL model under the influence of thermal mass and magnetic field,” Pramana J. Phys. 94, 121 (2020).
A. N. Tawfik, A. M. Diab, and M. T. Hussein, “Quark-hadron phase structure thermodynamics and magnetization of QCD matter,” J. Phys. G 45, 055008 (2018).
S. Lawley, W. Bentz, and A. W. Thomas, “Nucleons, nuclear matter and quark matter: A unified NJL approach,” J. Phys. G 32, 667 (2006).
K. Fukushima, “Chiral effective model with the Polyakov loop,” Phys. Lett. B 591, 277 (2004).
S. S. Singh and Y. Kumar, “Dilepton production in thermal dependent baryonic quark gluon plasma,” Can. J. Phys. 92, 31 (2014).
S. P. Klevansky, “The Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model of quantum chromodynamics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 649 (1992).
P. Wang, A. W. Thomas, and A. G. Williams, “Phase transition from hadronic matter to quark matter,” Phys. Rev. C 75, 045202 (2007).
M. Fukugita and A. Ukawa, “Deconfining and chiral transitions of finite-temperature quantum chromodynamics in the presence of dynamical quark loops,” Phys. Rev. Lett. B 57, 503 (1986).
S. K. Ghosh, T. K. Mukherjee, M. G. Mustafa, and R. Ray, “Susceptibilities and speed of sound from the Polyakov–Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model,” Phys. Rev. D 73, 114007 (2006).
K. Kashiwa, H. Kouno, M. Matsuzaki, and M. Yahiro, “Critical endpoint in the Polyakov-loop extended NJL model,” Phys. Lett. B 662, 26 (2008).
C. Ratti, S. Roessner, and W. Weise, “Quark number susceptibilities: Lattice QCD versus PNJL model,” Phys. Lett. B 649, 57 (2007).
G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrődi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and A. Schäfer, “QCD quark condensate in external magnetic fields,” Phys. Rev. D 86, 071502 (2012).
Y. Hatta and T. Ikeda, “Universality, the QCD critical and tricritical point, and the quark number susceptibility,” Phys. Rev. D 67, 014028 (2003).
M. Ferreira, P. Costa, D. P. Menezes, C. Providencia, and N. N. Scoccola, “Deconfinement and chiral restoration within the SU(3) Polyakov–Nambu–Jona-Lasinio and entangled Polyakov–Nambu–Jona-Lasinio models in an external magnetic field,” Phys.Rev. D 89, 016002 (2014).
D. H. Rischke, D. T. Son, and M. A. Stephanov, “Asymptotic deconfinement in high-density QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett. B 87, 062001 (2001).
D. Blaschke, S. Fredriksson, H. Grigorian, A. M. Oztas, and F. Sandin, “Phase diagram of three-flavor quark matter under compact star constraints,” Phys. Rev. D 72, 065020 (2005).
C. Nonaka and M. Asakawa, “Hydrodynamical evolution near the QCD critical end point,” Phys. Rev. C 71, 044904 (2005).
P. de Forcrand and O. Philipsen, “The QCD phase diagram for three degenerate flavors and small baryon density,” Nucl. Phys. B 673, 170 (2003).
S. Ejiri, T. Hatsuda, N. Ishii, Y. Maezawa, N. Ukita, S. Aoki, and K. Kanaya, “Equation of state for two-flavor QCD with an improved Wilson quark action at non-zero chemical potential,” arXiv:hep-lat/0609075.
J. O. Andersen, W. R. Naylor, and A. Tranberg, “Phase diagram of QCD in a magnetic field,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 025001 (2016).
M. Buballa, “NJL-model analysis of dense quark matter,” Phys. Rep. 407, 205 (2005).
Y. Aoki, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and K. K. Szabo, “The QCD equation of state with dynamical quarks,” J. High Energy Phys. 0601, 089 (2006).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank R. Ramanathan for his suggestions in fulfilling the manuscript’s writing and for his useful discussions in preparing the manuscript. The author, Anju thanks the University and CSIR, Delhi for providing financial supports in terms of Senior Research Fellowship (SRF) for this work successful.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anju Dahiya, Gupta, K.K. & Singh, S.S. Equation of State of Magnetized PNJL Model in Finite Chemical Potential. Phys. Part. Nuclei 53, 354–360 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779622020101
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779622020101