Abstract
This article explores the sociopragmatic functions of address terms in social interactions at the University of Calabar Senior Staff Club. It takes into perspective the metalinguistic categories of address terms, their motivations, and the cultural and sociolinguistic parameters that determine their choice among Club members. The study is rooted in social identity theory and community of practice (CoP) analytical framework as are theorized in contemporary sociolinguistic literature. The study identifies nicknames, titles, acronyms, formulaic appellations, clipped personal names and extended personal names as the primary types of address terms in the Club, and articulates that the use of address terms is a social construction of identity that enacts intimacy, fosters collective belonging, and enhances solidarity. Conversely, address terms can also reinforce social division and inequality given the hierarchical structure of the Club which does not license reciprocal use of some address terms. The study concludes that address terms are a site of highly creative use of language which is reflexively framed through humour, clipping, lengthening, language play and other linguistic devices. Generally, address terms provide mechanisms for members to bond socially and adapt flexibly to the socio-academic environment of the Club.
10 Acknowledgments
I am grateful to two anonymous reviewers of this article. They contributed ideas and perspectives which considerably improved the thesis of this article. I wish to thank Dr Idom Inyabri, Patrick Nkang, Tony Ekpe and other members of the University of Calabar Senior Staff Club who participated in this study. I appreciate Prof. Fleming Luke (University of Montreal, Canada) for sharing his ideas and reading an earlier draft of this paper. His suggestions were most insightful, and which this article benefitted immensely. All errors that remain are mine.
References
Afful, J. 2006. “Address terms among university students in Ghana: A case study”. Language and Intercultural Communication 6. 76–91.Search in Google Scholar
Afful, J. 2010. “Address forms among university students in Ghana: A case of gendered identities?” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 31. 443–456.Search in Google Scholar
Afful, J. and I. Mwinlaaru. 2012. “When ‘sir’ and ‘madam’ are not: Address terms and reference terms students use for faculty in a Ghanaian university”. Sociolinguistic Studies 6. 491–517.Search in Google Scholar
Alford, R. 1988. Naming and identity: A cross-cultural study of personal naming practices. New Haven: HRAF Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bisilki, K.A. 2017. “A sociolinguistic analysis of kinship terms in Likpakpaln (Konkomba)”. Ghana Journal of Linguistics 6. 33–58.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, P. and S. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, R. and A. Gilman. 1960. “The pronoun of power and solidarity”. In: Sebeok, T. (ed.), Style in language. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. 252–276.Search in Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. 1999. “Why be normal?’: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls”. Language in Society 28. 203–223.Search in Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. and K. Hall. 2005. “Identity in interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach”. Discourse Studies 7. 585–614.Search in Google Scholar
Buckingham, D. 2008. “Introducing Identity”. In: Buckingham, D. (ed.), Youth, identity and digital media. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–24.Search in Google Scholar
Burgoon, J. and N. Dunbar. 2006. “Nonverbal expressions of dominance and power in human relationships”. In: Manusov, V. and M. Patterson (eds.), The Sage handbook of nonverbal communication. Thousand Oaks: Sage. 279–297.Search in Google Scholar
Constitution of the University of Calabar Senior Staff Club. 2012. Calabar: University of Calabar Press.Search in Google Scholar
Crozier, W.R. 2002. “Donkeys and dragons: Recollection of school teachers’ nicknames”. Educational Review 28. 133–142.Search in Google Scholar
De Klerk, V. and B. Bosch. 1996. “Nicknames as sex-role stereotypes”. Sex Roles 35. 525–541.Search in Google Scholar
De Klerk, V. and B. Bosch. 1999. “Nicknames as evidence of verbal playfulness”. Multilingua 18. 1–16.Search in Google Scholar
Dickey, E. 1997. “Forms of address and terms of reference”. Journal of Linguistics 33. 255–274.Search in Google Scholar
DiLisle, H.H. 1993. “Forms of address in academic settings. A contrastive analysis”. Teaching German 26. 22–26.Search in Google Scholar
Eckert, P and S. McConnell-Ginet. 1992. “Communities of practice: Where language, gender and power all live”. In: Hall, K., M. Bucholtz and B. Moonwomon (eds.), Locating power: proceedings of the second Berkeley women and language conference. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group. 89–99.Search in Google Scholar
Fajardo, J.A. and F.R. Gonzalez. 2018. “Motivations and morphological variations in clipped personal names: A cross-linguistic approach”. Lingua 206. 25–48.Search in Google Scholar
Formentelli, M. 2009. “Address strategies in British academic setting”. Pragmatics 9. 179–196.Search in Google Scholar
Formentelli, M. 2018. “Strategies of address in English Lingua Franca (EFL) academic interactions”. Linguistics and Literature Studies 6. 298–306.Search in Google Scholar
Formentelli, M. and J. Hajek. 2016. “Address practices in academic interactions in pluricentric languages: Australian English, American and British English”. Pragmatics 26. 631–652.Search in Google Scholar
Hameit-Sievers, A. 1998. “Igbo traditional rulers: Chieftaincy and state in Southeastern Nigeria”. Afrika Spectrum 33. 57–99.Search in Google Scholar
Hao, S., S. Zhang and F. Zhu. 2008. “A comparative study of Chinese and American Address terms”. Journal of Praxis in Multicultural Education 3. 6–22.Search in Google Scholar
Harris, H., V. McCready and D. Herr. 1999. “Address forms and their implications in communication sciences and disorder university programs”. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorder 26. 82–93.Search in Google Scholar
Harris, S.A.J. 2008. “Social identity: Linguistic construction in relation to multiple groups”. Nanzan Junior College Journal 36. 243–267.Search in Google Scholar
Hogg, M. and D. Abrams. 1988. Social identification: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Hwang, S. (1991). “Terms of address in Korean and American cultures”. Intercultural Communication Studies 1. 117–134.Search in Google Scholar
Hymes, D. 1975. “Breakthrough into performance”. In: Ben-Amos, D. and K. Goldstein (eds.), Folklore, performance and communication. The Hague: Mouton. 11–74.Search in Google Scholar
Imbua, D. 2008. “The offshore British community and Old Calabar merchants 1659–1700”. Abibisem: Journal of African Culture and Civilization 1. 34–50.Search in Google Scholar
Ishikawa, A., T. Nagata, A. Nagao and H. Lizuka. 1981. “Address terms in modern Japanese: A sociolinguistic analysis”. Sophia Linguistica 8. 129–141.Search in Google Scholar
Jenkin, R. 2004. Social identity. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Kennedy, R. 2015. “Nicknames”. In: Taylor, J. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the word. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 650–672.Search in Google Scholar
Keshavarz, M. 2001. “The role of social context, intimacy and distance in the choice of forms of Address”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 148. 5–18.Search in Google Scholar
Kubayi, S.J. 2013. Address forms in Xitsonga: A sociopragmatic perspective. (PhD dissertation, University of South Africa.)Search in Google Scholar
Lave, J. and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Leech, G.N. 1999. “The distribution and functions of vocatives in American and British English conversations”. In: Hasselgard, H. and S. Oksefjell (eds.), Studies in honour of Stig Johansson. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 107–118.Search in Google Scholar
Lytra, A. 2003. “Nicknames and teasing: A case study of a linguistically and culturally mixed peer group”. In: Androutsopoulos, J.K. and A. Georgeakopoulos (eds.), Discourse construction of youth identities. Amsterdams: Benjamins. 47–73.Search in Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. 1972. “Phatic communion”. In: Laver, J. and S. Hutchinson, S. (eds.), Communication in face-to-face interaction. Harmondsworth: Penguin. 126–152.Search in Google Scholar
Mallison, C. and B. Childs. 2005. “Community of practice in sociolinguistic description: African American women language in Appalachia”. University of Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 10. 1–14.Search in Google Scholar
Mashiri, P. 1999. “Terms of address in Shona: A sociolinguistic approach”. Zambezia 26. 93–110.Search in Google Scholar
Maybin, J. and J. Swann. 2007. “Everyday creativity in language: Textuality, contextuality and critique”. Applied Linguistics 28. 497–517.Search in Google Scholar
Mensah, E. 2015. “Personal names in language contact situations: A case of Cross River State, South-eastern Nigeria”. Acta Academica 47. 102–138.Search in Google Scholar
Mensah, E. 2016. “Female nicknames in Nigeria: The case of Calabar Metropolis”. Language Matters 47. 184–202.Search in Google Scholar
Mensah, E. 2017. “Proverbial nicknames among rural youth in Nigeria”. Anthropological Linguistics 59. 414–439.Search in Google Scholar
Mensah, E. 2020. “Name this child: Religious identity and ideology in Tiv personal names”. Names: Journal of Onomastics 68. 1–15.Search in Google Scholar
Mensah, E. and S. Mekamgoum. 2017. “The communicative significance of Ngemba personal names”. African Identities 15. 398–413.Search in Google Scholar
Mensah, E. and K. Rowan. 2019. “African anthroponyms: Sociolinguistic currents and anthropological reflections”. Sociolinguistic Studies 13. 157–170.Search in Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, M. 2006. Introducing sociolinguistics. Oxford: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, M. 1996. “Dealing with gender identity as a sociolinguistic variable”. In: Bergvall, V., J. Bing and A. Freed (eds.), Language and gender research: Rethinking theory and practice. London: Longman. 225–252.Search in Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, M. 1994. “Updating gender as a sociolinguistic variable”. University of Pennsylvania Working Paper in Linguistics 1. 1–16.Search in Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, M. and N. Niedzielski. 1994. “Resistance to creolization: An interpersonal and group account”. Language and Communication 14. 313–330.Search in Google Scholar
Ng, S.H. and F. Deng. 2017. Language and power. Oxford research encyclopaedia of Communication. <https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-436> Retrieved July 3, 2019.Search in Google Scholar
Norrby, C. and C. Wide. 2015. Address practices as social action: European perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian.Search in Google Scholar
Norton, B. 1997. “Language, identity and the owner of English”. TESOL Quarterly 31. 409–429.Search in Google Scholar
Oyetade, S. 1995. “A sociolinguistic analysis of address forms in Yoruba”. Language in Society 24. 515–535.Search in Google Scholar
Payne, K.T. 1991. “Open statement to professions on behalf of the clinical instructors in speech-language pathology and audiology”. In: Goldsmith, S.C and S.T. Karr (eds.), In search of self. Rockville: American-Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 29–31.Search in Google Scholar
Pinto-Abecasis, N. 2011. “Towards the inclusion of nicknames in the genre of folklore: A case of the former Jewish community of Tetuan, Morocco”. Folklore 122. 135–154.Search in Google Scholar
Pyrko, I., V. Dorfier and E. Colin. 2016. “Thinking together: What makes communities of practice work?” Human Relations 70. 389–409.Search in Google Scholar
Starks, D. and K. Taylor-Leech. 2011. “Research project on nicknames and adolescent identities”. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics 17. 87–97.Search in Google Scholar
Stets, J. and P. Burke. 2000. “Identity theory and social identity theory”. Social Psychology Quarterly 63(3). 224–237.Search in Google Scholar
Wenger, E. 1998. Community of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Zawawi, B. 2006. “Linguistic creativity from a cognitive perspective”. South African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 24(2). 235–254.Search in Google Scholar
Ziv, A. 1984. Personality and sense of humour. New York: Springer.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
