Reviewed Publication:
Gerhard Preyer (ed.). 2018. Beyond semantics and pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press. 321 pp. ISBN: 978-0-19-879149-2.
About the author
Qiao Huang, PhD, is a Research Assistant Professor in the College of Foreign Languages and Cultures at Sichuan University in China. His main research interest is in pragmatics and philosophy of language. He has published several papers in “Intercultural Pragmatics”, “Forum for Linguistic Studies”, and “Contemporary Linguistics”.
References
Bach, Kent. 1994. Conversational impliciture. Mind and Language 9(2). 124–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1994.tb00220.x.Search in Google Scholar
Bezuidenhout, Anne. 2017. Contextualism and semantic minimalism. In Yan Huang (ed.), The oxford handbook of pragmatics, 21–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bloom, Paul. 2000. How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3577.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Cappelen, Herman & Ernie Lepore. 2005. Insensitive semantics: A defense of semantic minimalism and speech act pluralism. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470755792Search in Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2016. Linguistic conventions and the role of pragmatics. Mind and Language 31(5). 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12122.Search in Google Scholar
Huang, Qiao. 2020. From pragmatics to dialogue. Intercultural Pragmatics 17(4). 497–503. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2020-4005.Search in Google Scholar
Jaszczolt, Kasia M. 2005. Default semantics: Foundations of a compositional theory of acts of communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199261987.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan. 2017. From pragmatics to dialogue. In Edda Weigand (ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and dialogue, 78–92. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315750583-6Search in Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan. 2019. Impoverished pragmatics? The semantics-pragmatics interface from an intercultural perspective. Intercultural Pragmatics 16(5). 489–515. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2019-0026.Search in Google Scholar
Lepore, Ernie & Adam Sennet. 2014. Presupposition and context sensitivity. Mind and Language 29(5). 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12068.Search in Google Scholar
Lepore, Ernie & Matthew Stone. 2015. Imagination and convention: Distinguishing grammar and inference in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198717188.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1976. Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 457–489. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar
Millikan, Ruth Garrett. 1998. Language conventions made simple. Journal of Philosophy 95(4). 161–180. https://doi.org/10.2307/2564683.Search in Google Scholar
Murray, Sarah E. & William B. Starr. 2018. Force and conversational states. In Daniel Fogal, Daniel Harris & Matthew Moss (eds.), New work on speech acts, 202–236. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198738831.003.0009Search in Google Scholar
Schoubye, Anders & Andreas Stokke. 2016. What is said? Nous 50. 759–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12133.Search in Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Stojnić, Una, Matthew Stone & Ernie Lepore. 2013. Deixis (even without pointing). Philosophical Perspectives 27(1). 502–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12033.Search in Google Scholar
Szabó, Zoltán G. 2006. Sensitivity training. Mind and Language 21(1). 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00304.x.Search in Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda & Istvan Kecskes (eds.). 2018. From pragmatics to dialogue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ds.31Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston