Correction to: Precision Agriculture https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-021-09850-7
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. Figures and Tables were not in sequential order and not placed nearby the citations in the originally published version.
The correct placement has been mentioned in this correction.
Table 2—should be placed under the heading “Comparison to ‘historical maximum yield’ approach” in Methods section.
Table3 and Figure 1—should be placed under the heading “Model validation” in Results section.
Figure 2 and Table 4—should be placed under the heading “Variable importance and model parameters” in Results section.
Figure 3 and Figure 4 should be placed under the heading “Yield gaps and potential yield across entire study area and study period” in Results section.
Figures 5–7 should be placed under the heading “Assessing yield potential/gaps through time for a case study field” in Results section.
Figure 8 and Table 5 should be placed under the heading “Comparison to maximum yield approach” in Results section.
The original article has also been corrected.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Filippi, P., Whelan, B.M., Vervoort, R.W. et al. Correction to: Identifying crop yield gaps with site- and season-specific data-driven models of yield potential. Precision Agric 23, 602 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-021-09867-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-021-09867-y