Abstract
With the surge of global health threats, “health security” constitutes a large proportion of international security. Drawing on proximization theory, the study aims to reveal how proximization serves to legitimize health emergency measures based on a case study of U.S. policies on travel restrictions amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The study annotated and counted the lexico-grammatical items identified as proximization triggers in terms of space, time, and axiology based on the data from a corpus of approximately 60,237 tokens. An attempt is then made for a critical cognitive analysis of health security discourse, indicating that proximization facilitates the legitimization of travel restrictions through the construction of threats, both synchronically and diachronically. Furthermore, the results suggest that the proximization approach is suited to the analysis of health security discourse. Notably, this study may shed new light on research into state politics, crisis management, and international security.
About the authors
Ke Li is professor at Shandong University. He earned his Ph.D. in rhetorical studies from Shanghai International Studies University. He was a visiting scholar at University of Colorado Denver from Feb. 2015 to Feb. 2016. His research interests are in rhetoric, cognitive linguistics, and basic linguistic theories of English and Chinese.
Xiaonan Gong is a master student at Shanghai International Studies University. Her research interests are in cognitive linguistics and critical discourse analysis.
References
Amaya, Ana B., Vincent Rollet & Stephen Kingah. 2015. What’s in a word? The framing of health at the regional level: ASEAN, EU, SADC and UNASUR. Global Social Policy 15(3). 229–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018115599816.Search in Google Scholar
Balzacq, Thierry. 2005. The three faces of securitization: Political agency, audience and context. European Journal of International Relations 11(2). 171–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066105052960.Search in Google Scholar
Barker, Kezia. 2012. Infectious insecurities: H1N1 and the politics of emerging infectious disease. Health & Place 18(4). 695–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.01.004.Search in Google Scholar
Berrocal, Martina. 2019. Constructing threat through quotes and historical analogies in the Czech and the US “Ukraine Discourse”. Journal of Language and Politics 18(6). 870–892. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18002.ber.Search in Google Scholar
Boyd, Michael S. 2013. Reframing the American dream: Conceptual metaphor and personal pronouns in the 2008 US presidential debates. In Piotr Cap & Urszula Okulska (eds.), Analyzing genres in political communication, 297–319. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.50.12boySearch in Google Scholar
Burns, Jacob, Ani Movsisyan, Jan M. Stratil, Michaela Coenen, Karl Mf Emmert-Fees, Karin Geffert, Sabine Hoffmann, Olaf Horstick, Michael Laxy, Lisa M. Pfadenhauer, Peter von Philipsborn, Kerstin Sell, Stephan Voss & Eva Rehfuess. 2020. Travel-related control measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid review. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 10. CD013717. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd013717.Search in Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver & Jaap de Wilde. 1997. Security: A new framework for analysis. Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.10.1515/9781685853808Search in Google Scholar
Cap, Piotr. 2006. Legitimization in political discourse: A cross-disciplinary perspective on the modern US war rhetoric. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Search in Google Scholar
Cap, Piotr. 2008. Towards the proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 40(1). 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.002.Search in Google Scholar
Cap, Piotr. 2010. Axiological aspects of proximization. Journal of Pragmatics 42(2). 392–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.06.008.Search in Google Scholar
Cap, Piotr. 2013. Proximization: The pragmatics of symbolic distance crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.232Search in Google Scholar
Cap, Piotr. 2015. Crossing symbolic distances in political discourse space: Evaluative rhetoric within the framework of proximization. Critical Discourse Studies 12(3). 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1013481.Search in Google Scholar
Cap, Piotr. 2017. The language of fear: Communicating threat in public discourse. London: Springer Nature.10.1057/978-1-137-59731-1Search in Google Scholar
Cap, Piotr. 2018. From “cultural unbelonging” to “terrorist risk”: Communicating threat in the Polish anti-immigration discourse. Critical Discourse Studies 15(3). 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1405050.Search in Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. London: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/9780230000612Search in Google Scholar
Chen, Lijuan, Danyang Zhang, Yingfei He & Guoliang Zhang. 2020. Transcultural political communication from the perspective of proximization theory: A comparative analysis on the corpuses of the Sino–US trade war. Discourse & Communication 14(4). 341–361.10.1177/1750481320910519Search in Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203561218Search in Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2005. Discourse space theory: Geometry, brain and shifting viewpoints. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3. 78–116. https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.3.06chi.Search in Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2014. Language, space and mind: The conceptual geometry of linguistic meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511845703Search in Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul & Christina Schäffner. 2002. Introduction: Themes and principles in the analysis of political discourse. In Paul Chilton & Christina Schäffner (eds.), Politics as text and talk: Analytic approaches to political discourse, 1–44. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.4.03chiSearch in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Edward S. Herman. 1988. Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon Books.Search in Google Scholar
Davies, Sara E., Adam Kamradt-Scott & Simon Rushton. 2015. Disease diplomacy: International norms and global health security. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dunmire, Patricia L. 2011. Projecting the future through political discourse: The case of the Bush doctrine. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.41Search in Google Scholar
Filardo-Llamas, Laura. 2010. Discourse worlds in Northern Ireland: The legitimization of the 1998 agreement. In Katy Hayward & Catherine O’ Donnell (eds.), Political discourse and conflict resolution: Debating peace in Northern Ireland, 62–76. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Filardo-Llamas, Laura, Christopher Hart & Bertie Kaal. 2015. Introduction for the special issue on space, time and evaluation in ideological discourse. Critical Discourse Studies 12(3). 235–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1013480.Search in Google Scholar
Hameiri, Shahar. 2014. Avian influenza, “viral sovereignty”, and the politics of health security in Indonesia. Pacific Review 27(3). 333–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2014.909523.Search in Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science: New perspectives on immigration discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230299009Search in Google Scholar
Holmberg, Martin & Britta Lundgren. 2018. Framing post-pandemic preparedness: Comparing eight European plans. Global Public Health 13(1). 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2016.1149202.Search in Google Scholar
Horner, Jed, James G. Wood & Angela Kelly. 2013. Public health in/as “national security”: Tuberculosis and the contemporary regime of border control in Australia. Critical Public Health 23(4). 418–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2013.824068.Search in Google Scholar
Kamradt-Scott, Adam & Colin McInnes. 2012. The securitisation of pandemic influenza: Framing, security and public policy. Global Public Health 7. 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2012.725752.Search in Google Scholar
Kopytowska, Monika (ed.). 2017. Contemporary discourses of hate and radicalism across space and genres, 93. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/bct.93Search in Google Scholar
Kopytowska, Monika. 2020. Proximization, prosumption and salience in digital discourse: On the interface of social media communicative dynamics and the spread of populist ideologies. Critical Discourse Studies 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1842774.Search in Google Scholar
Kopytowska, Monika & Łukasz Grabowski. 2017. European security under threat: Mediating the crisis and constructing the Other. National identity and Europe in times of crisis. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.10.1108/978-1-78714-513-920171005Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 2004. Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. Hartford: Chelsea Green Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Liu, Ming. 2015. Scapegoat or manipulated victim? Metaphorical representations of the Sino-US currency dispute in Chinese and American financial news. Text & Talk 35(3). 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2015-0008.Search in Google Scholar
Maclean, Sandra J. 2008. Microbes, mad cows and militaries: Exploring the links between health and security. Security Dialogue 39(5). 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010608096149.Search in Google Scholar
McInnes, Colin & Anne Roemer-Mahler. 2017. From security to risk: Reframing global health threats. International Affairs 93(6). 1313–1337. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix187.Search in Google Scholar
Meadows, Bryan. 2007. Distancing and showing solidarity via metaphor and metomymy in political discourse: A critical study of an American statements on Iraq during the years 2004-2005. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines 1(2). 1–17.Search in Google Scholar
Mirhosseini, Seyyed-Abdolhamid. 2017. Discursive double-legitimation of (avoiding) another war in Obama’s 2013 address on Syria. Journal of Language and Politics 16(2). 706–730. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.16016.mir.Search in Google Scholar
Rushton, Simon B. 2011. Global health security: Security for whom? Security from what? Political Studies 59(4). 779–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00919.x.Search in Google Scholar
Stephenson, Niamh, Mark Davis, Paul Flowers, Casimir MacGregor & Emily Waller. 2014. Mobilising “vulnerability” in the public health response to pandemic influenza. Social Science & Medicine 102. 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.031.Search in Google Scholar
Stockwell, Peter. 2002. Towards a critical cognitive linguistics? In Ina Biermann & Annette Combrinck (eds.), Poetics, linguistics and history: Discourse of war and conflict, 510–528. Potchefstroom: Potchefstroom University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2005. War rhetoric of a little ally: Political implicatures and Aznar’s legitimatization of the war in Iraq. Journal of Language and Politics 4(1). 65–91. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.1.04dij.Search in Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Wæver, Ole. 1995. Securitization and desecuritization. In Ronnie D. Lipschutz (ed.), On security, 38–69. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Wenham, Clare. 2019. The Oversecuritization of global health: Changing the terms of debate. International Affairs 95(5). 1093–1110. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz170.Search in Google Scholar
Wenham, Clare & Deborah B. L. Farias. 2019. Securitizing Zika: The case of Brazil. Security Dialogue 50(5). 398–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010619856458.Search in Google Scholar
Williams, Michael C. 2003. Words, images, enemies: Securitization and international politics. International Studies Quarterly 47. 511–531. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0020-8833.2003.00277.x.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
