Abstract
In this paper we offer a longitudinal Conversation Analysis of talk lasting 18 months between a father and son, which reveals changes in the child’s level of Interactional Competence (IC). We propose an index of developing IC based upon Sacks’ distinction between “invited” and “volunteered” stories. While stories have a “socialization function” we suggest stories may be tracked in terms of IC also. What has been called “today narrative” routines (“What did you do at school today”, etc.), initiated by the father, predominate in a series of conversations. The analysis reveals how the child is encouraged to take extended turns through the father’s questions and comments, which are developed into a storytelling sequence. We observe that the child’s responses to the initial inquiries become more elaborate over time. Furthermore, there is a gradual resistance to the invited story format because it inhibits how the child organizes his stories. Volunteered stories obtain a more personal ‘voice’. The paper showcases the nexus between socialization and interactional competence.
Funding source: Universidade de Macau
Award Identifier / Grant number: SRG2018-00135-FAH
Award Identifier / Grant number: MYRG2020-00068-FAH
About the authors
Younhee Kim received her PhD in Second Language Acquisition from University of Hawai’i at Mānoa and is currently an assistant professor at the University of Macau. Her research interests include Second Language Acquisition/Learning, Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, interaction with and among children, and Teacher Education. She has published various book chapters and articles in journals such as Applied Linguistics, East Asian Pragmatics, Journal of Pragmatics, and Journal of Teacher Education.
Andrew P. Carlin received his PhD in Sociology from the University of Stirling and lectures at Ulster University. His research interests include the Social Organization of Scholarly Communication, Disciplinarity and Interdisciplinarity, Disciplinary contexts for Teaching, Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, Sociology of Information, and conceptual analysis. He is co-editor of the book series Directions in Ethnomethodology & Conversation Analysis (Routledge) and co-editor of the International Handbook of Ethnomethodology (in press, Routledge).
Acknowledgment
We thank three anonymous reviewers and Srikant Sarangi for their engagement with our paper, and the families who agreed to participate in our project.
-
Research funding: This study was funded by the University of Macau via grants SRG2018-00135-FAH and MYRG2020-00068-FAH.
. terminal contour: falling
, continuative contour: slight rise
: within talk, colons indicate prolongation
[ ] overlapping talk
= latching
(.) micropause (less than 0.2 s)
(2.0) length of pause in approximate seconds
> < words within angle brackets are delivered faster than surrounding talk
ye- truncated word
school emphasis on part of word
hhh audible breath
ye(hh)s within-speech aspiration, laughter
(yes) uncertain hearing, transcriber’s best guess
((sniff)) describing paralinguistic features of talk
⁞ within line numbering, colons indicate turns have been omitted
References
Bateman, Amanda. 2015. Conversation analysis and early childhood education. Farnham: Ashgate.10.4324/9781315574158Search in Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1993. “You gotta know how to tell a story”: Telling, tales, and tellers in American and Israeli narrative events at dinner. Language in Society 22(3). 361–402. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500017280.Search in Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1997. Dinner talk: Cultural patterns of sociability and socialization in family discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana & Catherine E. Snow. 2002. Talking to adults. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.10.4324/9781410604149Search in Google Scholar
Carlin, Andrew P. & Younhee Kim. 2021. Longitudinal conversation analysis of parent-child interaction: Small data and interdisciplinary work in linguistics and sociology. In SAGE Research Methods Cases Part 1. London: Sage.10.4135/9781529757248Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.21236/AD0616323Search in Google Scholar
Cook-Gumperz, Jenny. 1986. Caught in a web of words: Some considerations on language socialization and language acquisition. In Jenny Cook-Gumperz, William A. Corsaro & Jürgen Streeck (eds.), Children’s worlds and children’s language, 37–64. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110864212.37Search in Google Scholar
Coulter, Jeff. 1983. Rethinking cognitive theory. London: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-06706-0Search in Google Scholar
Cuff, Edward C. & David W. Francis. 1978. Some features of ‘invited stories’ about marriage breakdown. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 18. 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1978.18.111.Search in Google Scholar
Evaldsson, Ann-Carita & Olga Abreu Fernandes. 2019. Embodied performances and footings in a young child’s spontaneous participation in bilingual (Russian-Swedish) storytelling. Research on Children and Social Interaction 3(1–2). 36–64. https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.37297.Search in Google Scholar
Filipi, Anna. 2019. Snapshots of tellings in interactions between adults and children aged two, three and three and a half in an Australian context. Research on Children and Social Interaction 3(1–2). 119–143. https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.37285.Search in Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 2002. Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold & Harvey Sacks. 2017. On formal studies of practical actions. In Harold Garfinkel (ed.), Ethnomethodological studies of work, 157–189. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Garrett, Paul B. 2005. What a language is good for: Language socialization, language shift, and the persistence of code-specific genres in St Lucia. Language in Society 34(3). 327–361. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404505050128.Search in Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness & Asta Cekaite. 2018. Embodied family choreography. Abingdon: Routledge.10.4324/9781315207773Search in Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.Search in Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1972. On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & Janet Holmes (eds.), Sociolinguistics, 269–293. London: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1990. List-construction as a task and resource. In George Psathas (ed.), Interaction competence, 63–92. Washington, DC: University Press of America.Search in Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. A note on laughter in ‘male’-‘female’ interaction. Discourse Studies 6(1). 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445604039445.Search in Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail & John R. E. Lee. 1992. The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a ‘troubles-telling’ and a ‘service encounter’. In Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work, 521–548. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1016/0378-2166(81)90026-6Search in Google Scholar
Keel, Sara. 2016. Socialization: Parent – child interaction in everyday life. Abingdon: Routledge.10.4324/9781315609706Search in Google Scholar
Kidwell, Mardi. 2013. Interaction among children. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 511–532. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9781118325001.ch25Search in Google Scholar
Kim, Younhee. 2018. Private speech and mutual engagement in preschoolers’ playtime interaction: Talk and embodiment. Sociolinguistics Journal of Korea 26(2). 119–165. https://doi.org/10.14353/sjk.2018.26.2.05.Search in Google Scholar
Kim, Younhee & Andrew P. Carlin. 2021. “How was your day?”: Development of Interactional Competence located in today narrative sequences. Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19043.kim.Search in Google Scholar
Kim, Younhee & Andrew P. Carlin. 2022. Story appreciation in conversations-for-learning: Stories and gestalt-contextures. In Anna Filipi, Binh Thanh Ta & Maryanne Theobald (eds.), Storytelling practices in home and educational contexts. Singapore: Springer.10.1007/978-981-16-9955-9_11Search in Google Scholar
Kim, Younhee & Yvonne Tse Crepaldi. 2021. Co-constructed storytelling as a site for socialization in parent-child interaction: A case from a Malay-English bilingual family in Singapore. Journal of Pragmatics 172. 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.11.019.Search in Google Scholar
Lee, Yo-An. 2006. Towards respecification of communicative competence: Condition of L2 instruction or its objective? Applied Linguistics 27(3). 349–376. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml011.Search in Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene H. 1992. Assisted storytelling: Deploying shared knowledge as a practical matter. Qualitative Sociology 15(3). 247–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00990328.Search in Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael. 2002. From naturally occurring data to naturally organized ordinary activities: Comment on Speer. Discourse Studies 4(4). 531–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456020040040801.Search in Google Scholar
Mackay, Robert W. 1974. Conceptions of children and models of socialization. In Roy Turner (ed.) Ethnomethodology: Selected readings, 180–193. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar
Mehan, Hugh. 1980. The competent student. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 11(3). 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1980.11.3.05x1865s.Search in Google Scholar
Miller, Peggy J., Michele Koven & Shumin Lin. 2011. Language socialization and narrative. In Alessandro Duranti, Elinor Ochs & Bambi B. Schieffelin (eds.), The handbook of language socialization, 190–208. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444342901.ch8Search in Google Scholar
Nguyen, Hanh. 2012. Social interaction and competence development: Learning the structural organization of a communicative practice. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction 1. 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.05.006.Search in Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1991. Socialization through language and interaction: A theoretical introduction. Issues in Applied Linguistics 2(2). 143–147. https://doi.org/10.5070/l422005140.Search in Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor & Bambi Schieffelin. 2017. Language socialization: An historical overview. In Patricia A. Duff & Stephen May (eds.), Language socialization (Encyclopedia of language and education). Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-02255-0_1Search in Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor & Carolyn Taylor. 1992. Family narrative as political activity. Discourse & Society 3(3). 301–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003003003.Search in Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, Carolyn Taylor & Ruth Smith. 1992. Story-telling as a theory-building activity. Discourse Processes 15(1). 37–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544801.Search in Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, Ruth Smith & Carolyn Taylor. 1989. Detective stories at dinnertime: Problem-solving through co-narration. Cultural Dynamics 2. 238–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/092137408900200206.Search in Google Scholar
Pekarek-Doehler, Simona. 2019. On the nature and the development of L2 interactional competence: State of the art and implications for praxis. In M. Rafael Salaberry & Silvia Kunitz (eds.), Teaching and testing L2 interactional competence: Bridging theory and practice, 25–59. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315177021-2Search in Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1980. Telling my side: “Limited access” as a fishing device. Sociological Inquiry 50(3–4). 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682x.1980.tb00020.x.Search in Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1974. An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In Richard Bauman & Joel Scherzer (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking, 337–353. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611810.022Search in Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1987. On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In Graham Button & John R. E. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organisation, 54–69. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.4324/9781003060994-2Search in Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey & Emanuel A. Schegloff. 1979. Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In George Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 15–21. New York: Irvington Publishers.10.1017/CBO9780511486746.003Search in Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1979. The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Syntax and semantics 12: Discourse and syntax, 261–286. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368897_012Search in Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology 102(1). 161–216. https://doi.org/10.1086/230911.Search in Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2002. On ‘opening sequencing’: A frame statement. In James E. Katz & Mark Aakhus (eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance, 321–385. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511489471.025Search in Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Harvey Sacks. 1973. Opening up closings. Semiotica 8(4). 289–327. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289.Search in Google Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi & Elinor Ochs (eds.). 1986. Language socialization across cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620898Search in Google Scholar
Siromaa, Maarit. 2012. Resonance in conversational second stories: A dialogic resource for stance taking. Text & Talk 32(4). 525–545. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2012-0025.Search in Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya & Asifa Majid. 2007. Questioning children: Interactional evidence of implicit bias in medical interviews. Social Psychology Quarterly 70(4). 424–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250707000410.Search in Google Scholar
Takagi, Tomoyo. 2019. Referring to past actions in caregiver-child interaction in Japanese. Research on Children and Social Interaction 3(1–2). 92–118. https://doi.org/10.1558/rcsi.37384.Search in Google Scholar
Theobald, Maryanne & Susan Danby. 2017. Co-producing cultural knowledge: Children telling tales in the school playground. In Amanda Bateman & Amelia Church (eds.), Children’s knowledge-in-interaction: Studies in conversation analysis, 111–125. Singapore: Springer.10.1007/978-981-10-1703-2_7Search in Google Scholar
Tolmie, Peter & Mark Rouncefield. 2013. Reading for pleasure: Bedtime stories. In Peter Tolmie & Mark Rouncefield (eds.), Ethnomethodology at play, 53–71. Farnham: Ashgate.10.4324/9781315580579-8Search in Google Scholar
Watson, David R. 1990. Some features of the elicitation of confessions in murder interrogations. In George Psathas (ed.), Interaction competence, 263–295. New York: Irvington.Search in Google Scholar
Young, Richard F. 2011. Interactional competence in language learning, teaching, and testing. In Eli Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, 426–443. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203836507.ch26Search in Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Don H. & Melvin Pollner. 1971. The everyday world as phenomenon. In Jack D. Douglas (ed.), Understanding everyday life, 80–103. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.10.4324/9781351327329-4Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston