Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton January 29, 2021

Lexically specific accumulation in memory of word and segment speech rates

  • Esther L. Brown EMAIL logo , William D. Raymond , Earl Kjar Brown ORCID logo and Richard J. File-Muriel

Abstract

Variability abounds in speech. According to usage-based accounts, lexical representations reflect phonetic variants of words resulting from contextual conditioning. Because faster speech contexts promote durational shortening of words and segments, words that occur more often in fast speech may be more reduced than words commonly used in slow speech, independent of the target’s contextual speech rate. To test this, linear mixed-effects models including a word form’s ratio of conditioning by fast speech contexts (FRCRATE) are used to predict the duration of Spanish /s/ and words containing /s/ in a corpus of spoken Spanish. Results show that words’ cumulative exposure to relatively fast speech affects phonetic realizations independent of factors operative in the production contexts. Thus, word and segment rates reflect cumulative (lexicalized) effects of words’ experience in fast speech contexts. The results suggest that lexically specific cumulative measures should be incorporated into models of linguistic variation and change.


Corresponding author: Esther L. Brown, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for suggestions given to us by anonymous reviewers which helped lead to considerable improvements of this work.

References

Aguilar, Lourdes. 1999. Hiatus and diphthong: Acoustic cues and speech situation differences. Speech Communication 28(1). 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-6393(99)00003-5.Search in Google Scholar

Aguilar, Lourdes & María Machuca. 1995. Pragmatic factors affecting the phonetic properties of diphthongs. In Fourth European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, 18–21. Madrid, Spain: EUROSPEECH.10.21437/Eurospeech.1995-351Search in Google Scholar

Arnon, Inbal & Uriel Cohen Priva. 2013. More than words: The effect of multi-word frequency and constituency on phonetic duration. Language and Speech 56(3). 349–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830913484891.Search in Google Scholar

Aylett, Matthew & Alice Turk. 2004. The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: A functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech 47(1). 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309040470010201.Search in Google Scholar

Baayen, Harald & Richard Sproat. 1996. Estimating lexical priors for low-frequency morphologically ambiguous forms. Computational Linguistics 22(2). 155–166.Search in Google Scholar

Baese-Berk, Melissa M., Laura C. Dilley, Molly J. Henry, Louis Vinke & Elina Banzina. 2019. Not just a function of function words: Distal speech rate influences perception of prosodically weak syllables. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 81(2). 571–589. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1626-4.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Rachel & Ann Bradlow. 2009. Variability in word duration as a function of probability, speech style, and prosody. Language and Speech 52(4). 391–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830909336575.Search in Google Scholar

Bayley, Robert, Kristen Greer & Cory Holland. 2017. Lexical frequency and morphosyntactic variation. Spanish in Context 14(3). 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.14.3.04bay.Search in Google Scholar

Bell, Alan, Jason M. Brenier, Michelle Gregory, Cynthia Girand & Daniel Jurafsky. 2009. Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English. Journal of Memory and Language 60(1). 92–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.06.003.Search in Google Scholar

Bell, Alan, Michelle Gregory, Jason M Brenier, Daniel Jurafsky, Ayako Ikeno & Cynthia Girand. 2002. Which predictability measures affect content word duration. In PMLA. Proc. ISCA Workshop on pronunciation modeling and lexicon adaptation for spoken language, Estes Park, CO, 1–5.Search in Google Scholar

Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2019. Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.0. 52) [Windows].Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Earl K. 2009. A usage-based account of syllable-and word-final /s/ reduction in four dialects of Spanish. Munich: Lincom Europa.10.1515/shll-2009-1047Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Earl K. & Matthew Alba. 2017. The role of contextual frequency in the articulation of initial /f/ in Modern Spanish: The same effect as in the reduction of Latin /f/? Language Variation and Change 29(1). 57. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394517000059.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Earl K. & Esther L. Brown. 2012. Syllable-final and syllable-initial /s/ reduction in Cali, Colombia: One variable or two? In File-Muriel Richard & Rafael Orozco (eds.), Linguistic studies in Colombian varieties of Spanish, 89–106. Madrid: Iberoamericana.10.31819/9783954870196-006Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Earl K., Michael Gradoville & Richard File-Muriel. 2014. The variable effect of form and lemma frequencies on phonetic variation: Evidence from/s/realization in two varieties of Colombian Spanish. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 10(2). 213–241. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2013-0025.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Esther L. 2004. The reduction of syllable-initial/s/in the Spanish of New Mexico and southern Colorado: A usage-based approach. The University of New Mexico dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Esther L. 2005. New Mexican Spanish: Insight into the variable reduction of “la ehe inihial” (/s-/). Hispania 88. 813–824. https://doi.org/10.2307/20063211.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Esther L. 2015. The role of discourse context frequency in phonological variation: A usage-based approach to bilingual speech production. International Journal of Bilingualism 19(4). 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913516042.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Esther L. & Rena Torres Cacoullos. 2003. Spanish [s]: A different story from beginning (initial) to end (final). In Rafael Navarro, Luis López & Richard Cameron (eds.), A Romance perspective on language knowledge and use: Selected papers from the 31st Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, 21–38. Chicago: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.238.05broSearch in Google Scholar

Brown, Esther L. & William D. Raymond. 2012. How discourse context shapes the lexicon: Explaining the distribution of Spanish f-/h-words. Diachronica 29(2). 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.29.2.02bro.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Esther & William D. Raymond. 2014. Contextual frequency effects in Spanish phonology. Paper presented at the Georgetown University Round Table. Washington, DC: Georgetown University.Search in Google Scholar

Brysbaert, Marc & Kevin Diependaele. 2013. Dealing with zero word frequencies: A review of the existing rules of thumb and a suggestion for an evidence-based choice. Behavior Research Methods 45(2). 422–430. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0270-5.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 1999. Usage-based phonology. In Kathleen Wheatley, Michael Darnell, Michael Noonan, Frederick J. Newmeyer & Edith A. Moravcsik (eds.), Functionalism and formalism in linguistics: Volume I: General papers, 211–242. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511612886Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2002. Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14(3). 261–290. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394502143018.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, usage, and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511750526Search in Google Scholar

Cedergren, Henrietta J. 1978. En torno a la variación de la s final de sílaba en Panamá: Análisis cuantitativo. In Lopez Morales Humbero (ed.), Corrientes actuales en la dialectología del Caribe hispánico, 37–49. Puerto Rico: Editorial Universitaria.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen Priva, Uriel. 2015. Informativity affects consonant duration and deletion rates. Laboratory Phonology 6(2). 243–278. https://doi.org/10.1515/lp-2015-0008.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen Priva, Uriel, Emily Gleason. 2018. The role of fast speech in sound change. In Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Madison, WI, 1512–1517. http://mindmodeling.org/cogsci2018/papers/0293/index.html.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen Priva, Uriel & T. Florian Jaeger. 2018. The interdependence of frequency, predictability, and informativity in the segmental domain. Linguistics Vanguard 4(S2). https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2017-0028.Search in Google Scholar

Cotton, Eleanor & John Sharp. 2001. Spanish in the Americas. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Divjak, Dagmar. 2017. The role of lexical frequency in the acceptability of syntactic variants: Evidence from that-clauses in Polish. Cognitive Science 41(2). 354–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12335.Search in Google Scholar

Erker, Daniel. 2010. A subsegmental approach to coda /s/ weakening in Dominican Spanish. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 203. 9–26.10.1515/ijsl.2010.019Search in Google Scholar

Espinosa, Aurelio. 1909. Studies in New Mexican Spanish: Part I: Phonology (No. 53). Albuquerque, N.M.: University of New Mexico Press.Search in Google Scholar

File-Muriel, Richard J. 2009. The role of lexical frequency in the weakening of syllable-final lexical /s/ in the Spanish of Barranquilla, Colombia. Hispania 92. 348–360.Search in Google Scholar

File-Muriel, Richard J. 2010. Lexical frequency as a scalar variable in explaining variation. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics 55. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008413100001353.Search in Google Scholar

File-Muriel, Richard J. 2012. A laboratory approach to s-lenition in the Spanish of Barranquilla, Colombia. In Richard File-Muriel & Rafael Orozco (eds.), Linguistic studies in Colombian varieties of Spanish, 127–140. Madrid: Iberoamericana.10.31819/9783954870196-008Search in Google Scholar

File-Muriel, Richard J. & Earl K. Brown. 2011. The gradient nature of s-lenition in Caleño Spanish. Language Variation and Change 23(2). 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394511000056.Search in Google Scholar

Flórez, Luis. 1951. La pronunciación del español en Bogotá, vol. 8. Bogotá, Colombia: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Search in Google Scholar

Forrest, Jon. 2017. The dynamic interaction between lexical and contextual frequency: A case study of (ING). Language Variation and Change 29(2). 129–156. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394517000072.Search in Google Scholar

Fosler-Lussier, Eric & Nelson Morgan. 1999. Effects of speaking rate and word frequency on pronunciations in conversational speech. Speech Communications 29. 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-6393(99)00035-7.Search in Google Scholar

Foulkes, Paul & Jennifer Hay. 2015. The emergence of sociophonetic structure. In Brian MacWhinney & William O’Grady (eds.), 292. The handbook of language emergence. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118346136.ch13Search in Google Scholar

Fowler, Carol & Jonathan Housum. 1987. Talkers’ signaling of “new” and “old” words in speech and listeners’ perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language 26(5). 489–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596x(87)90136-7.Search in Google Scholar

Gahl, Susanne. 2008. Time and thyme are not homophones: The effect of lemma frequency on word durations in spontaneous speech. Language 84(3). 474–496.10.1353/lan.0.0035Search in Google Scholar

Gahl, Susanne. 2012. Why so short? Competing explanations for variation. In Proceedings of the 29th West Coast Conference on formal linguistics, vol. 29, 1–10. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2012. Introduction. In Stefan Th. Gries & Dagmar Divjak (eds.), Frequency effects in language learning and processing, 1–6. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110274059.1Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2013. Statistics for linguistics with R: A practical introduction. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110307474Search in Google Scholar

Guitart, Jorge M. 1976. Markedness and a Cuban dialect of Spanish. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Guy, Gregory. 1980. Variation in the group and the individual: The case of final stop deletion. In W. Labov (ed.), Locating language in time and space, 1–36. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer. 2018. Sociophonetics: The role of words, the role of context, and the role of words in context. Topics in Cognitive Science 10(4). 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12326.Search in Google Scholar

Henriksen, Nicholas & Sarah Harper. 2016. Investigating lenition patterns in south-central Peninsular Spanish /sp st sk/ clusters. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1159/000441729.Search in Google Scholar

Hualde, José Ignacio & Pilar Prieto. 2014. Lenition of intervocalic alveolar fricatives in Catalan and Spanish. Phonetica 71(2). 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1159/000368197.Search in Google Scholar

Hundley, James E. 1987. Functional constraints on plural marker deletion in Peruvian Spanish. Hispania 70(4). 891–894. https://doi.org/10.2307/342562.Search in Google Scholar

Jaeger, T. Florian & Esteban Buz. 2018. Signal reduction and linguistic encoding. In Eva Fernández & Helen Smith Cairns (eds.), Blackwell handbooks in linguistics. The handbook of psycholinguistics, 38–81. Hoboken, NJ: Jon Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Jurafsky, Daniel, Alan Bell, Michelle Gregory, & William D. Raymond. 2001. The effect of language model probability on pronunciation reduction. Paper presented at the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2001, Salt Lake City, UT.Search in Google Scholar

Kemmer, Suzanne & Michael Barlow. 2000. Introduction: A usage-based conception of language. In Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Usage-based models of language, vii–1. Stanford: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Lipski, John. 1984. On the weakening of /s/ in Latin American Spanish. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik. 31–43.Search in Google Scholar

Lipski, John. 1985. /s/ in Central American Spanish. Hispania 68. 143–149. https://doi.org/10.2307/341630.Search in Google Scholar

Lipski, John. 1986. Instability and reduction of /s/ in the Spanish of Honduras. Revista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos. 27–47.Search in Google Scholar

Lison, Pierre & Jörg Tiedemann. 2016. OpenSubtitles2016: Extracting Large Parallel Corpora from Movie and TV Subtitles. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2016). Retrieved from: http://opus.nlpl.eu/OpenSubtitles-v2018.php.Search in Google Scholar

Lohmann, Arne. 2018. Time and thyme are not homophones: A closer look at Gahl’s work on the lemma-frequency effect, including a reanalysis. Language 94(2). e180–e190. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2018.0032.Search in Google Scholar

Lohmann, Arne & Erin Conwell. 2020. Phonetic effects of grammatical category: How category-specific prosodic phrasing and lexical frequency impact the duration of nouns and verbs. Journal of Phonetics 78. 100939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2019.100939.Search in Google Scholar

Lopez, Scott & Alma Leticia. 1983. A sociolinguistic analysis of/s/ variation in Honduran Spanish. University of Minnesota dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Méndez Dosuna, Julian. 1985. La duración de S en los grupos SP, ST, SK: A propósito del orden regular de difusión en algunos cambios fonéticos. In José L. Melena (ed.), Symbolae Ludovico Mitxelena Septuagenario Oblatae, 647–655. Vitoria: Universidad del Pais Vasco.Search in Google Scholar

Nadeu, lMarianna. 2014. Stress-and speech rate-induced vowel quality variation in Catalan and Spanish. Journal of Phonetics 46. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.05.003.Search in Google Scholar

Parrell, Benjamin. 2012. The role of gestural phasing in Western Andalusian Spanish aspiration. Journal of Phonetics 40(1). 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.08.004.Search in Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2001. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition, and contrast. Typological Studies in Language 45. 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.08pie.Search in Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2006. The statistical basis of an unnatural alternation. Laboratory Phonology 8. 81–107.10.1515/9783110197211.1.81Search in Google Scholar

Pisoni, David. 1997. Some thoughts on ‘normalization’ in speech perception. In Keith Johnson & J. W. Mullenix (eds.), Talker variability in speech processing, 9–32. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Plag, Ingo, Sonia Ben Hedia, Arne Lohmann & Julia Zimmermann. 2019. An S is an ‘S, or is it? Plural and genitive plural are not homophonous. In Körtvélyessy Livia & Pavel Stekauer (eds.), Complex words, 260–292. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108780643.015Search in Google Scholar

Plug, Leendert. 2010. Pragmatic constraints in usage-based phonology, with reference to some Dutch phrases. Journal of Pragmatics 42. 2014–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.001.Search in Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana. 1980. The notion of the plural in Puerto Rican Spanish: Competing constraints on (s) deletion. Locating Language in Time and Space 1. 55–67.Search in Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana. 1984. Variable concord and sentential plural marking in Puerto Rican Spanish. Hispanic Review 52(2). 205–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/473375.Search in Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana & Sali Tagliamonte. 1989. There’s no tense like the present: Verbal-s inflection in early Black English. Language Variation and Change 1(1). 47–84. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394500000119.Search in Google Scholar

R Development Core Team. 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.Search in Google Scholar

Ranson, Diana L. 1993. The interaction of linguistic and contextual number markers in Andalusian Spanish. Hispania 76. 919–930. https://doi.org/10.2307/343932.Search in Google Scholar

Raymond, William D., Esther L. Brown & Alice Healy. 2016. Cumulative context effects and variant lexical representations: Word use and English final t/d deletion. Language Variation and Change 28(2). 175–202.10.1017/S0954394516000041Search in Google Scholar

Raymond, William D. & Esther L. Brown. 2012. Are effects of word frequency effects of context of use? An analysis of initial fricative reduction in Spanish. In Stefan Th. Gries & Dagmar Divjak (eds.), Frequency effects in language learning and processing, 35–52. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110274059.35Search in Google Scholar

Raymond, William D., Robin Dautricourt & Elizabeth Hume. 2006. Word-internal /t, d/ deletion in spontaneous speech: Modeling the effects of extra-linguistic, lexical, and phonological factors. Language Variation and Change 18(1). 55. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394506060042.Search in Google Scholar

Resnick, Melvin. 1975. Phonological variants and dialect identification in Latin American Spanish. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Ruch, Hanna. 2013. Investigating a gradual metathesis: Phonetic and lexical factors on/s/-aspiration in Andalusian Spanish. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 19(2). 19.Search in Google Scholar

Ruíz Sánchez, Carmen. 2005. Restricciones funcionales en la elisión del marcador de plural en el español de Caracas. Boletín de Lingüística 17. 89–105.Search in Google Scholar

Ryant, Neville & Mark Liberman. 2016. Large-scale analysis of Spanish/s/-lenition using audiobooks. In Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 22ICA, vol. 28, No. 1, p. 060005. Acoustical Society of America.10.1121/2.0000500Search in Google Scholar

Samper Padilla, JoséAntonio. 2003. La variación fonológica: los estudios hispánicos sobre -/s/ implosiva. Available at: http://cvc.cervantes.es/obref/congresos/valladolid/ponencias/unidad_diversidad_del_espanol/1_la_norma_hispanica/samper_j.htm.Search in Google Scholar

Sánchez, Rosaura. 1982. Our linguistic and social context. In Jon Amastae & Elías Lucía Olivares (eds.), Spanish in the United States: Sociolinguistic aspects, 9–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Scherre, Maria Marta Pereira. 2001. Phrase level parallelism effect on noun phrase number agreement. Language Variation and Change 13. 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394501131042.Search in Google Scholar

Scherre, María Marta Pereira & Anthony Naro. 1991. Marking in discourse: “Birds of a feather”. Language Variation and Change 3(1). 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394500000430.Search in Google Scholar

Scherre, María Marta Pereira & Anthony Naro. 1992. The serial effect on internal and external variables. Language Variation and Change 4(1). 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394500000636.Search in Google Scholar

Schwegler, Armin & Juergen Kempff. 2007. Fonética y fonología españolas, 3rd edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Seyfarth, Scott. 2014. Word informativity influences acoustic duration: Effects of contextual predictability on lexical representation. Cognition 133(1). 140–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.013.Search in Google Scholar

Sóskuthy, Martón & JenniferHay. 2017. Changing word usage predicts changing word durations in New Zealand English. Cognition 166. 298–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.032.Search in Google Scholar

Strycharczuk, Patrycja & Martin Kohlberger. 2016. Resyllabification reconsidered: On the durational properties of word-final/s/in Spanish. Laboratory Phonology 7. 24.10.5334/labphon.5Search in Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2012. Variationist sociolinguistics. Change, observation, interpretation. Malden, MA/Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Tamminga, Meredith. 2016. Persistence in phonological and morphological variation. Language Variation and Change 28(3). 335–356. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394516000119.Search in Google Scholar

Tanner, James, Sonderegger Morgan & Michael Wagner. 2017. Production planning and coronal stop deletion in spontaneous speech. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology 8(1). 15. https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.96.Search in Google Scholar

Terrell, Tracy. 1977. Constraints on the aspiration and deletion of final/s/in Cuban and Puerto Rican Spanish. Bilingual Review/La Revista Bilingüe 4(1/2). 35–51.Search in Google Scholar

Terrell, Tracy. 1979. Final /s/ in Cuban Spanish. Hispania 62(4). 599–612. https://doi.org/10.2307/340142.Search in Google Scholar

Torreira, Francisco & Mirjam Ernestus. 2012. Weakening of intervocalic/s/in the Nijmegen Corpus of Casual Spanish. Phonetica 69(3). 124–148. https://doi.org/10.1159/000343635.Search in Google Scholar

Travis, Catherine. 2005. Discourse markers in Colombian Spanish: A study in polysemy. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Vasilescu, Ioana, Nidia Hernandez, Bianca Vieru & Lori Lamel. 2018. Exploring temporal reduction in dialectal Spanish: A large-scale study of lenition of voiced stops and coda-s. Interspeech. 2728–2732.10.21437/Interspeech.2018-1256Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-03-23
Accepted: 2021-01-07
Published Online: 2021-01-29

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cllt-2020-0016/html
Scroll to top button